Podcast Summary
Medical Democide Documentary: A filmmaker releases a docuementary on medical democide, sharing stories of individuals seeking justice for loved ones' deaths due to medical negligence or experimental drug trials, emphasizing educational purpose only.
Ahmed Malik, a private civilian and filmmaker, is releasing a documentary titled "Playing God" about medical democide and the struggles of individuals seeking justice for their loved ones who have been victims of government policies. Malik emphasizes that his work is for educational purposes only and not meant to harass, intimidate, or cause distress. The documentary features interviews with individuals whose family members were killed or harmed due to medical negligence or experimental drug trials. Malik shares the long and challenging journey of Joan, a woman who has been fighting for justice for her daughter's death in 1978. He also expresses his confliction about taking legal action against the system due to the financial and emotional strain it can cause for individuals. Despite the challenges, Malik remains committed to giving a voice to those who have been silenced.
Playing God in Medical Profession, Politics: Believing one holds ultimate power and control can lead to ethical dilemmas and misapplications of authority in the medical profession and politics, particularly in matters of life and death.
The concept of "playing God" in various fields, including the medical profession, can lead to a complex power dynamic and ethical dilemmas. The speaker shared a personal story about a woman named Joan Bai, who dedicated her life to finding her daughter's body parts after a tragic incident. The speaker also mentioned the movie "Malice" and the character Doctor Hill, who proclaimed "I am God." This theme of individuals believing they hold ultimate power and control was further exemplified by the actions of politicians during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically in regards to euthanasia and DNRs. The controversy lies in the misapplication of DNRs to individuals who are not terminally ill or in significant pain. The speaker emphasized the importance of understanding the implications of such decisions and advocated for transparency and accountability in these matters.
Ageist and ableist decisions in end-of-life care: During the pandemic, some doctors made ageist and ableist decisions about Do Not Resuscitate orders without consulting patients or families, leading to discriminatory end-of-life care for elderly and disabled individuals.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been concerning reports of doctors making decisions about Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders without consulting the patients or their families. These decisions were allegedly based on ageist and ableist criteria, leading to elderly and disabled individuals being deemed "not worthy of life." This practice, which can be considered a form of eugenics, was particularly prevalent in care homes. The use of fragility scales to determine end-of-life care pathways further exacerbated this issue, as it led to healthy elderly people being labeled as needing end-of-life care. The speaker's personal experience with this issue involved her father, who had a stroke and was placed in a care home with a DNR order without her knowledge or consent. She was able to remove the order and bring him home, but many others were not so fortunate. This issue highlights the importance of ensuring that patients and their families are involved in decisions regarding their end-of-life care and that these decisions are not based on discriminatory criteria.
Power imbalance in healthcare: Clear communication, respect for patient autonomy, and empathy towards vulnerable individuals and their families are crucial in healthcare situations to prevent power imbalances and ensure every person's dignity and rights are respected.
In a healthcare situation, there can be a significant power imbalance between medical professionals and family members. In this story, paramedics made a decision based on incorrect information, leading to the untimely death of a man. Despite the family's concerns and the presence of a power of attorney, the professionals acted on their own judgment, leaving the family feeling powerless and traumatized. This incident highlights the importance of clear communication, respect for patient autonomy, and empathy towards vulnerable individuals and their families. It also raises questions about the need for better protocols and training to prevent such incidents and ensure that every person's dignity and rights are respected.
Elderly care crisis: The focus on individualism and smaller families has made it difficult for elderly members to receive personalized care, leading to an overreliance on institutions and tragic outcomes
Our society's focus on individualism and the loss of extended family units has led to a crisis in care for the elderly. As families become smaller and more dispersed, and as the cost of living increases, it has become increasingly difficult for families to provide the necessary care for their elderly members. This has resulted in an overreliance on institutions like nursing homes, where care may not be as personalized or compassionate as it could be. The isolation experienced by many elderly people in these institutions can lead to tragic outcomes, including neglect and even murder. It is essential that we as a society reconsider our priorities and find ways to support families in caring for their elderly members, whether through policy changes, community initiatives, or other means.
Depopulation concerns, organ harvesting: Concerns exist over depopulation agendas, organ harvesting, and euthanizing the elderly, driven by financial reasons. Lack of concrete evidence, but personal experiences and ethical concerns raise questions about informed consent and potential implications of medical procedures and policies.
There are concerns about depopulation agendas, including making people infertile and euthanizing the elderly, which some believe is driven by financial reasons. The discussion also touched upon organ harvesting, with the implementation of an opt-out organ donation system in May 2020 raising eyebrows. The organs are reportedly removed while the person is still alive but declared brain dead, a concept some question. It's important to note that while these allegations are serious, they lack concrete evidence. The speaker emphasized that the majority of healthcare professionals are good people, but the system can make them follow protocols without thinking individually. The speaker's personal experiences include observing healthcare workers competing to administer the most vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic, and now regretting their actions. The conversation underscores the importance of informed consent and considering the potential implications of medical procedures and policies.
MG163 protocol: The MG163 protocol, a harmful guideline during COVID-19, led to numerous deaths despite medical professionals' objections, highlighting the importance of individual judgment and accountability in healthcare and the potential dangers of over-reliance on centralized guidelines.
Good people are capable of following harmful guidelines without being aware of the consequences. The discussion highlights the case of a protocol, MG163, implemented during the COVID-19 crisis, which was deemed inhumane by medical professionals but still led to numerous deaths due to its implementation. The protocol, which involved the use of midazolam and morphine, was followed by medical staff due to its status as a government guideline. This incident underscores the importance of individual judgment and accountability in healthcare and the potential dangers of over-reliance on centralized guidelines. The conversation also touches upon the role of NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence) and its potential influence from government and big pharma. The discussion emphasizes the need for critical evaluation of guidelines and the potential unintended risks they may pose.
Healthcare responsibility: Individuals administering healthcare actions bear responsibility, not those issuing instructions; power dynamics and profit motives can negatively impact healthcare system
The responsibility for harm or death caused by following guidelines or orders, even in a healthcare setting, lies with the individual administering the action, not those issuing the instructions. The systemic issue lies in the asymmetrical power dynamic between healthcare professionals and the public, with the cult-like status of institutions like the NHS making it difficult for questions to be raised. This dynamic, combined with influences from big pharma and corporations, results in a healthcare system that is designed to keep people sick and profitable for those in power. The public's ignorance to these issues is often only broken when they personally experience harm or loss. It is crucial to advocate for a healthcare system where practitioners are free to practice as they see fit, allowing for accountability and justice when mistakes are made.
Healthcare ethics: Botched surgeries and lack of duty of candor from medical professionals raise concerns, while the push for assisted dying could lead to potential abuse and involuntary euthanasia. Transparency and ethical practices are crucial, and facing criticism daily can be exhausting.
There are significant issues in various sectors, including healthcare and ethics, which require critical thinking and integrity. The speaker shares her personal experience of a botched surgery and the lack of duty of candor from medical professionals. She also expresses concern over the push for assisted dying, believing it to be a slippery slope towards involuntary euthanasia and potential abuse. The speaker urges the importance of addressing these complex issues and promoting transparency and ethical practices. Additionally, she emphasizes the exhausting impact of facing criticism daily, especially on social media.
Natural Laws and Human Values: Individuals should question the morality and legality of laws that contradict natural laws and human values, such as taking a life without consent. Everyone has the inherent right to decide when their life ends, and it's crucial to stand up against laws that infringe upon this fundamental right.
Individuals should question the morality and legality of laws that go against natural laws and human values, such as taking a life without consent. The speaker expresses concern about the potential abuse of assisted dying laws and the potential for people to be pressured into ending their lives prematurely. They argue that everyone has the inherent right to decide when their life ends and that it's important to stand up against laws that go against this fundamental right. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of individual conscience and moral compass, encouraging people to question the motivations behind laws and to resist those that go against their moral principles. The discussion also touches on the potential for societal acceptance of euthanasia and the dangers of conformity and brainwashing.
Appreciating Elders: Valuing the stories and histories of older generations and showing compassion and connection is crucial for their wellbeing, rather than neglecting or focusing only on material possessions.
It's essential to appreciate the unique stories and histories of older generations, rather than dismissing them as "old" or only focusing on their material possessions. Many families neglect visiting their elderly parents or even attending their funerals, which can be deeply saddening for those involved. The current healthcare system often contributes to the sickness and confusion of older adults, leading to over-medication and a lack of vitality. It's crucial to remember the importance of duty, compassion, and connection with our elders, as they have lived rich and fascinating lives worth acknowledging. By focusing on whole foods and avoiding ultra-processed carbohydrates and sugars, older adults can improve their health and vitality, regardless of their dietary preferences.
Medical practices: Individuals should critically evaluate medical practices and question potentially harmful acts, while also considering individual autonomy and the possibility of reincarnation.
Individuals should question the status quo and be cautious of potentially harmful practices, such as assisted dying acts and the use of certain medical protocols. The conversation also highlighted the importance of critical thinking and individual autonomy, especially within the medical field. Additionally, the speakers encouraged people to enjoy life and consider the possibility of reincarnation. The use of the midazolam protocol in COVID-19 treatment was discussed as a concern, and listeners were encouraged to watch a forthcoming movie for more information. Overall, the conversation emphasized the importance of questioning authority, being kind, and living life to the fullest.