Logo
    Search

    460. The True Story of the Minimum-Wage Fight

    en-usApril 29, 2021

    Podcast Summary

    • The Push for a $15 Minimum Wage to Combat COVID-19 Poverty in the USDemocrats are advocating for a $15 minimum wage to combat rising poverty rates caused by COVID-19. However, Republicans argue it may harm businesses and lead to job losses. The current federal minimum wage has not been raised since 2009, causing a decline in worker dignity and security.

      The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in poverty rates in the United States, with an estimated 8 million Americans falling below the poverty line. Democrats are pushing for a higher minimum wage of $15 per hour to combat this issue. Support for this wage increase is strong among Democrats, but Republican politicians argue that it could harm businesses and result in job losses. The current federal minimum wage has not been raised since 2009, leading to a decline in worker dignity and security.

    • The Debate over Minimum Wage and Its Long-Term Effects in the USWhile a higher minimum wage can lead to job loss in the short term, it can also benefit workers in the long term with increased productivity and customer satisfaction. It's crucial for policymakers to consider the impact on real people and their lives.

      The debate over minimum wage in the US has been a long-standing issue, with arguments from both sides of the political spectrum. While it is true that a higher wage can lead to job loss in the short term, it can also lead to benefits in the long term such as increased productivity and customer satisfaction. Despite this, the federal minimum wage has not been indexed to inflation or the median wage, resulting in constant political battles over wage increases. However, some states have taken matters into their own hands and passed their own minimum wage laws. Despite varying opinions among economists, it is important for policymakers to consider the impact on real people and their lives.

    • The Debate Over Raising Minimum WageEconomists are divided over the impact of raising minimum wage on employment. Many argue that it could lead to job losses, while others are uncertain. More research is needed to find a solution to improve bottom wages.

      The debate on whether to raise minimum wage policy is still ongoing in the economics profession, and it is currently split. 45% of academic economists are still concerned that raising minimum wages would lead to lower employment, while a mere 33% are uncertain, and a few disagree completely. Moreover, there is substantial evidence in favor of the anti-minimum wage arguments that suggest that raising minimum wages leads to job losses, which makes economists reluctant to support it. Therefore, the solution to the problem of increasing earnings at the bottom wages is still up for debate and requires more research to find a better solution.

    • The Ineffectiveness of Raising the Minimum Wage for Poverty ReductionRaising the minimum wage may not directly benefit the poor, and alternative policies like the earned-income tax credit and direct cash transfers can be more effective in reducing poverty.

      Raising the minimum wage is not an effective way to reduce poverty as it is a blunt instrument that does not target the poor specifically. The law passed when raising the minimum wage says 'Thou shalt not pay low wages' not 'Thou shalt not be poor.' This means that the benefit from the higher wage will flow up the income distribution and not down. While higher minimum wages do pull some people into the workforce, the vast majority of people who don't work aren't holding out for a higher wage. Instead of raising the minimum wage, we could consider alternative policies such as expanding the earned-income tax credit or direct cash transfers to the poor.

    • The Potential Impact of a $15 Minimum Wage on Small Businesses and Low-Wage WorkersA $15 minimum wage could affect 50% of workers in some states and pose a challenge for small businesses. Some Democratic Senators see it as necessary for families, but the losses and cost of living disparities need to be considered.

      A $15-an-hour minimum wage would affect around 50% of workers in those states where the federal wage of $7.25 an hour is applicable, according to economist David Neumark. This poses a challenge for small businesses operating on small margins, who may struggle to adjust by raising prices or reducing employment. The losses from a $15 minimum wage could be substantial, and past estimates may be too optimistic. Some Democratic Senators, including Joe Manchin of West Virginia, have opposed a $15 minimum wage proposal due to differences in cost of living across states, but others see it as necessary to ensure families can achieve an adequate standard of living.

    • Economist Argues for Raising Minimum WageRaising the minimum wage can benefit millions of people and reduce poverty without causing significant job loss, according to economist Arin Dube's research. His analytical methods have been successfully used by the British government.

      The debate regarding the increase of minimum wage has led to many arguments from economists regarding its potential positive and negative effects. However, Arin Dube—an economist at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst—believes that numerous studies on the topic reveal that raising the minimum wage promotes income for 17 million people and lessens poverty while also not causing significant job loss. Dube believes that exploring a $15 minimum wage by 2025 is reasonable and is supported by his research, which indicates that the implementation of a minimum wage law does not lead to negative employment effects. Dube's analytic methods, which assess the overall impact of a wage increase, have been successfully used by the British government to determine the impact of minimum wage hikes in other economies. Overall, Dube's research and perspective provide valuable information for policymakers during discussions about increasing the minimum wage.

    • Who Pays for Minimum Wage Increase: Impact on Inflation and BusinessesRaising the minimum wage may cause businesses to increase some prices, but it will have minimal impact on inflation. Although large corporations support it, small businesses need assistance to adjust to the change.

      Raising the minimum wage brings up the issue of who pays for the increased wages. Studies show that businesses will pass on some of the costs to the customers, but overall, the impact on inflation will be minimal. While low-income people may be affected by the increase in prices, the wage gains are much larger. Large corporations like Amazon support the increase while smaller businesses are more resistant. However, small businesses, especially in the hospitality sector, may need assistance in the form of tax credits and a longer phase-in period.

    • The Debate on Raising the Minimum Wage: Balancing Workers' Rights and Business SustainabilityRaising the minimum wage can help workers earn more money, but it can also lead to business closures. The debate highlights the need for a balance between workers' rights and businesses' sustainability.

      Raising the minimum wage is a complex issue that can lead to business closures but also helps workers earn more money. Restaurant owners often argue that raising wages will force them to increase prices, which will drive away customers and lead to business failure. However, research shows that there is no clear consensus on whether raising the minimum wage leads to job losses. Despite this, economists like Betsey Stevenson argue that if a business cannot withstand slightly higher wages, it may not be adding much value to society and should not continue to exist. Overall, the debate on minimum wage highlights the need for balance between workers' rights and businesses' ability to sustain themselves.

    • The Seattle Minimum Wage Study and its Unique FindingsRaising the minimum wage can result in employers reducing work hours instead of laying off staff. Further analysis is necessary to fully understand the complex and varied effects of minimum wage increases.

      The minimum-wage literature is highly controversial, and researchers often disagree on the effects of raising the minimum wage. However, the Seattle Minimum Wage Study, led by economist Jacob Vigdor, had access to a unique set of data that allowed them to study the effects of raising the minimum wage more comprehensively. Specifically, they had access to hours data, which showed that employers may adjust to a higher minimum wage by reducing work hours rather than laying people off or reducing staff. This type of adjustment is not typically visible in most data sets, which only provide information on the total number of employees. The study's findings ultimately suggest that raising the minimum wage can have complex and varied effects on employment and should be analyzed more thoroughly.

    • The Impact of Minimum Wage Increase on Seattle's WorkersWhile experienced workers benefitted, some inexperienced workers found it hard to find employment due to employers wanting experienced personnel for a relatively high wage. It may not offset the reduction in hours and may lead to less income.

      When Seattle raised their minimum wage by 34% from $9.47 to $15, the synthetic control technique identified a decline in hours worked, primarily in businesses with less work. The experienced workers benefitted from the increase and earned 9% more than before, while inexperienced workers found it hard to find employment due to employers wanting experienced personnel for a relatively high wage. The reality is that for some workers, the increased wage may not offset the reduction in hours and may lead to less income. Thus, for delivering more money to families, it is a leaky bucket solution. Employers prefer hiring experienced workers, and they may have the track record and references that make them reliable, leading to an increased reliance on older employees.

    • The Unintended Consequences of Minimum Wage LawsWhile a higher minimum wage may foster more reliable workers, it could also limit employment opportunities and contribute to Black men's high unemployment rates. Anti-poverty measures beyond a minimum wage, such as childcare support and free community college, are also crucial. Regional comparisons are necessary to assess the impact.

      Minimum wage laws may have unintended consequences, including limiting employment opportunities for young people and contributing to the high rate of unemployment among Black men. While a higher minimum wage may lead to more reliable workers, it may also lead employers to treat all teenagers as a risk. Poverty exists on many dimensions and even a $15 minimum wage won't fix everything. Anti-poverty measures, such as money for childcare, paid leave, and free community college, can also play a crucial role. Vigdor's analysis of Seattle's minimum wage suggests that minimum wage laws may not be applicable in every context, and critics argue that evaluating the impact of minimum wage laws requires a comparison to similar regions.

    • Is the Fight for a Higher Minimum Wage Worth It?While a higher minimum wage can reduce poverty, it can also lead to automation and changes in job tasks. We need to evaluate how automation impacts job opportunities for workers.

      The actual impacts of the minimum wage are not necessarily worth all the sound and fury, as businesses adapt to higher labor costs. While a higher minimum wage can lift people out of poverty, the United States struggles to fully embrace the idea due to political implications. There is evidence that a higher minimum wage spurs automation, but it also changes the tasks that workers do. Overall, we should consider the impact of automation on the job market, and whether it truly creates more and better opportunities for human workers.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    It’s hard to know whether the benefits of hiring a celebrity are worth the risk. We dig into one gruesome story of an endorsement gone wrong, and find a surprising result.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • John Cawley, professor of economics at Cornell University.
      • Elizabeth (Zab) Johnson, executive director and senior fellow with the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Alvin Roth, professor of economics at Stanford University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 27, 2024

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    Broadway operates on a winner-take-most business model. A runaway hit like Stereophonic — which just won five Tony Awards — will create a few big winners. But even the stars of the show will have to go elsewhere to make real money. (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 20, 2024

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    The Berlin dance mecca Berghain is known for its eight-hour line and inscrutable door policy. PJ Vogt, host of the podcast Search Engine, joins us to crack the code. It has to do with Cold War rivalries, German tax law, and one very talented bouncer.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Lutz Leichsenring, executive board member of Clubcommission Berlin and co-founder of VibeLab.
      • PJ Vogt, reporter, writer, and host of the podcast Search Engine.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 17, 2024

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    Hit by Covid, runaway costs, and a zillion streams of competition, serious theater is in serious trouble. A new hit play called Stereophonic — the most Tony-nominated play in history — has something to say about that. We speak with the people who make it happen every night. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 13, 2024

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    Every December, a British man named Tom Whitwell publishes a list of 52 things he’s learned that year. These fascinating facts reveal the spectrum of human behavior, from fraud and hypocrisy to Whitwell’s steadfast belief in progress. Should we also believe?

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 06, 2024

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    An update of our 2020 series, in which we spoke with physicians, researchers, and addicts about the root causes of the crisis — and the tension between abstinence and harm reduction.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Gail D’Onofrio, professor and chair of emergency medicine at the Yale School of Medicine and chief of emergency services at Yale-New Haven Health.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Nicole O’Donnell, certified recovery specialist at the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy.
      • Jeanmarie Perrone, professor of emergency medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eileen Richardson, restaurant manager.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 03, 2024

    590. Can $55 Billion End the Opioid Epidemic?

    590. Can $55 Billion End the Opioid Epidemic?

    Thanks to legal settlements with drug makers and distributors, states have plenty of money to boost prevention and treatment. Will it work? (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Christine Minhee, founder of OpioidSettlementTracker.com.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 30, 2024

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    Most epidemics flare up, do their damage, and fade away. This one has been raging for almost 30 years. To find out why, it’s time to ask some uncomfortable questions. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • David Cutler, professor of economics at Harvard University.
      • Travis Donahoe, professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 23, 2024

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Presenting two stories from The Economics of Everyday Things: Why does it seem like every car is black, white, or gray these days? And: How self-storage took over America.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Tom Crockett, classic car enthusiast.
      • Zachary Dickens, executive vice president and chief investment officer of Extra Space Storage.
      • Mark Gutjahr, global head of design at BASF.
      • Kara Kolodziej, self-storage unit tenant.
      • Anne Mari DeCoster, self-storage consultant.
      • Nikkie Riedel, carline planning manager at Subaru of America.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 20, 2024

    588. Confessions of a Black Conservative

    588. Confessions of a Black Conservative

    The economist and social critic Glenn Loury has led a remarkably turbulent life, both professionally and personally. In a new memoir, he has chosen to reveal just about everything. Why?

     

    • SOURCE:
      • Glenn Loury, professor of economics at Brown University and host of The Glenn Show.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 16, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Ep. 984 - Models Of Doom

    Ep. 984 - Models Of Doom

    The White House releases models suggesting at least 100,000 Americans could die in the coronavirus pandemic; the Fed continues to pump dollars into the economy; and partisanship continues to rear its ugly head.


    Check out The Cold War: What We Saw, a new podcast written and presented by Bill Whittle at https://www.dailywire.com/coldwar. In Part 1 we peel back the layers of mystery cloaking the Terror state run by the Kremlin, and watch as America takes its first small steps onto the stage of world leadership.


    If you like The Ben Shapiro Show, become a member TODAY with promo code: SHAPIRO and enjoy the exclusive benefits for 10% off at https://www.dailywire.com/Shapiro

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the American Approach Is Failing

    Why the American Approach Is Failing

    So far, the United States has been losing the battle against the pandemic, with a patchwork of inconsistent measures across the country proving unequal to halting the spread of the virus. Today, we ask: What will it take to change the course of the crisis?

    Guest: Donald G. McNeil Jr., a science and health reporter for The New York Times. For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily.

    Background reading:

    #254 – Jay Bhattacharya: The Case Against Lockdowns

    #254 – Jay Bhattacharya: The Case Against Lockdowns
    Jay Bhattacharya is a professor of medicine at Stanford University and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration. Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors: - Athletic Greens: https://athleticgreens.com/lex and use code LEX to get 1 month of fish oil - InsideTracker: https://insidetracker.com/lex and use code Lex25 to get 25% off - Coinbase: https://coinbase.com/lex to get $5 in free Bitcoin - ROKA: https://roka.com/ and use code LEX to get 20% off your first order - Indeed: https://indeed.com/lex to get $75 credit EPISODE LINKS: Jay's Twitter: https://twitter.com/DrJBhattacharya Great Barrington Declaration: https://gbdeclaration.org/ PODCAST INFO: Podcast website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ YouTube Full Episodes: https://youtube.com/lexfridman YouTube Clips: https://youtube.com/lexclips SUPPORT & CONNECT: - Check out the sponsors above, it's the best way to support this podcast - Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lexfridman - Twitter: https://twitter.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lexfridman - Medium: https://medium.com/@lexfridman OUTLINE: Here's the timestamps for the episode. On some podcast players you should be able to click the timestamp to jump to that time. (00:00) - Introduction (10:18) - How deadly is Covid? (39:48) - Covid vs Influenza (45:42) - Francis Collins email to Fauci (1:06:19) - Francis Collins (1:13:48) - Vaccine safety and efficacy (1:20:46) - Vaccine hesitancy (1:37:21) - Great Barrington Declaration and lockdowns (1:53:39) - Focused Protection (2:15:31) - Fear (2:19:57) - Advice for young people (2:24:56) - Fear of death (2:26:53) - Meaning of life