Logo

    AMA | September 2024

    enSeptember 02, 2024
    What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
    Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
    Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
    Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
    Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
    Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?

    Podcast Summary

    • Appreciation for learningThe importance of learning for its own sake should not be overlooked in education, even in a data-limited universe, as it provides valuable insights and fosters intellectual curiosity.

      The romantic and important aspect of learning for its own sake should not be overlooked in education. While it's important to acknowledge the practical benefits of education, we should also celebrate the adventure of learning about the universe and sharing knowledge. Even in a data-impoverished universe where direct observations are no longer possible, historical records could still provide valuable insights. The scientific method would still apply, and scientists would try to fit the available data to a comprehensive story. Despite the limitations, they would still be able to infer certain details about the universe. Regarding sports, some people might feel that their enjoyment is diminished if determinism or eternalism are true, as the outcome might already be determined. However, this doesn't have to be the case, as the excitement can still come from the uncertainty and the epistemic competition between teams or individuals.

    • Universe, consciousness, realityThe determinism of the universe doesn't dampen enjoyment of uncertain events, consciousness might be a threshold phenomenon, dark matter is more intriguing than dark energy, and exploration and questioning are essential for knowledge.

      Our understanding of the universe, consciousness, and reality is still a work in progress. The speaker expressed that the determinism of the universe, or the idea that the future is already set, does not affect his enjoyment of uncertain events like sports or lotteries. He also shared his thoughts on consciousness, suggesting that it might be a threshold phenomenon, rather than a series of discrete levels. The speaker also touched on the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy, expressing that while dark matter is more dynamic and interesting due to its observable effects on the universe, the nature of dark energy remains simple but largely unknown. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of continued exploration and questioning in our pursuit of knowledge.

    • Physical mysteriesOur understanding of the physical world is incomplete, with mysteries in dark matter and quantum mechanics, and religion can inspire deep thinking about the human condition despite not being factually accurate.

      Our understanding of the physical world, whether it's dark matter or quantum mechanics, is still incomplete and full of mysteries. Dark matter could be just cold particles, but there's also room for more intricate theories. Similarly, in quantum mechanics, every state is in principle unmeasurable, and even gentle measurements can significantly alter the system. As for the role of religion in a modern worldview, some argue that it can inspire us to think deeply about the human condition and our place in the world, even if we don't agree with its claims as fact. Regarding the completeness of our physical theories, while we may not have discovered everything, the universe itself can be seen as a complete theory, with the possibility of an infinite number of fields or particles. These ideas challenge us to keep questioning and exploring the unknown.

    • Understanding complex scientific conceptsConsider multiple perspectives, be open to new ideas, and acknowledge limitations when dealing with complex scientific concepts like quantizing gravity or addressing existential risks.

      When it comes to understanding complex scientific concepts, such as quantizing gravity or addressing existential risks, there are no easy answers or definitive methods. Instead, it's important to consider multiple perspectives, be open to new ideas, and acknowledge the limitations of our current knowledge. For instance, in the quest to quantize gravity, various approaches like loop quantum gravity, string theory, and space from Hilbert space each have their merits and challenges. While some argue that new approaches might lead to a completely new type of force, others maintain that these are just different ways of understanding the same fundamental force of gravity. Similarly, when dealing with existential risks, it's crucial to consider not only the probability of each risk but also the potential consequences and the possibility of interventions. Ultimately, the best approach may involve a combination of perspectives and a willingness to adapt as new information emerges.

    • Choices and EvidenceLifestyle choices and beliefs should be guided by evidence. Scientific understanding, open-mindedness, and the role of biology in emotions are crucial, while astrology lacks scientific backing despite seeming relatable. Evidence is key in all areas of life.

      Different lifestyles and diets can impact our decisions and longevity. When discussing scientific concepts like virtual particles and Bayesian reasoning, it's clear that understanding and revising our beliefs with new evidence is crucial. Additionally, while AI can mimic human experiences, true emotions might rely on biological contexts, not just computational abilities. Astrology may seem relatable, but studies show no real connection between celestial events and personality traits, highlighting how we often perceive patterns where none exist. Overall, whether in diet, science, technology, or astrology, being open to evidence and understanding the systems involved is key to making informed choices.

    • Computational emergence of complex behaviorComputational simulations show that complex behaviors can emerge from seemingly random systems, even without an energy source, providing insights into the possible relationship between entropy and life

      While computer simulations like the one discussed in the podcast may not directly address the connection between entropy and life using a full theory that considers entropy and dissipation, they do show that complex computational behaviors can emerge from seemingly random systems, even without an apparent energy source. This is similar to how life arises from the dissipation of the sun's energy in the real world. These simulations are not meant to be realistic models of biology or chemistry but rather an exploration of the origin of reproductive behavior from true random initial conditions. The idea that certain computational behaviors can be attractors in a dynamical system sense is an intriguing question that may provide insights into the relationship between entropy and life.

    • Computational models of lifeDiscussion centered around Blaizegara Yarkas' experiments revealing potential computation and replication from random initial conditions, with implications for the ubiquity of life in the universe. Open questions remain regarding emergence in various automata and programming languages.

      The recent discussion revolved around the emergence of computation and replication from random initial conditions in computational models, specifically in the context of Blaizegara Yarkas' experiments. Dennis and Adam shared their thoughts on this approach, comparing it to earlier works like Conway's Game of Life. They discussed the possibility of computation being an attractor in these models and its potential implications for the ubiquity of life in the universe. The conversation also touched upon the fragility and robustness of different computational models and the open questions regarding the emergence of computation from random initial conditions in various automata and programming languages. Daniel raised concerns about the potential teleological implications of this approach, but it was emphasized that it does not imply the existence of a creator or higher intelligence. Overall, the conversation highlighted the ongoing exploration and discovery in the field of computational models of life and the many open questions that still need to be addressed.

    • Elections and complex reactionsExploring complex voting systems, like range voting or score voting, could potentially increase voter turnout and allow moderate candidates to gain support, but may be more complex and subject to strategic voting, and do not equate to life as we understand it, like the Rauscher-oscillating reaction.

      The Rauscher-oscillating reaction, a complex-looking chemical reaction, does not constitute life as we understand it. Despite its intricate appearance, it lacks the essential aspects of life such as metabolism, reproduction, learning, and adaptation. In the realm of elections, a proposed system using range voting or score voting, where voters assign scores to candidates instead of choosing one, could potentially increase voter turnout and allow moderate candidates to gain support from a broader political spectrum. However, this system may be more complex and subject to strategic voting, which could lead to insincere scores. Overall, while these systems have their advantages and disadvantages, it is essential to continue exploring ways to improve our current electoral systems to better represent the diverse opinions within a population.

    • Reflections on Aging and ScienceAging brings reflections on life priorities and health, while individual traits influence scientific preferences and interpretations. Understanding these dynamics enriches our interactions with both personal and communal experiences.

      As we age, our perspectives shift significantly. Approaching milestones like 60 can bring about deeper reflections on life, health, and priorities. Physical changes remind us of our limitations, but they also encourage us to enjoy meaningful experiences like travel and family. Additionally, in scientific communities, personal traits can influence the preferences for different theories. This interplay of personality and scientific thought highlights that our unique backgrounds shape how we understand and approach complex concepts, blending both emotional and intellectual elements in decision-making.

    • Causality and emergent phenomenaCausality is a real phenomenon, even if not directly mentioned in fundamental laws of physics, and it interacts with emergent phenomena such as tables, chairs, and human beings.

      The existence of causality and emergent phenomena, such as tables, chairs, and even human beings, are not mutually exclusive concepts. Robert Ruxendrescu argues that causality is a real phenomenon, despite not being directly mentioned in the fundamental laws of physics. Masimo Tori clarified that the strong force plays a role in determining the magnetic moment of a muon due to the constant interactions between particles in quantum field theory. Tis Jansen expressed skepticism towards Penrose's Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, finding the connection between space emerging from entanglement and the theory itself unconvincing, as it relies on unphysical assumptions. Overall, the discussion touched upon various philosophical and scientific concepts, including the nature of reality, the role of causality, and the limitations of current scientific theories.

    • Theories explaining phenomenaSome theories, like the Conformal Cyclic Cosmos and sterile neutrinos, are unsatisfying due to lack of explanation for initial conditions and concrete evidence, while theories like the weak miracle and axions are more appealing due to their additional explanations and adjustability to fit the dark matter density. In politics, it's crucial to address potential threats to democracy.

      While there are various theories and candidates for explaining phenomena like dark matter and the arrow of time, some are more satisfying than others based on the amount of explanation they offer for related problems and the existence of related particles or phenomena. For instance, theories like the Conformal Cyclic Cosmos (CCC) and sterile neutrinos as answers to dark matter are possible but unsatisfying due to their lack of explanation for the initial conditions and the absence of concrete evidence, respectively. On the other hand, theories like the weak miracle or axions, which address other problems like the hierarchy problem and the strong CP problem, are more appealing as they provide additional explanations and can be adjusted to fit the dark matter density. Ultimately, the search for a comprehensive and satisfying explanation continues. In the political realm, the importance of highlighting potential threats to democracy, such as Project 2025, cannot be overstated, and the Democratic Party's focus on addressing these issues has been effective in raising awareness and mobilizing opposition.

    • Politics, PhysicsDespite complexities and uncertainties, progress is being made in politics and physics. Democratic efforts in politics and potential in biophysics and material science in physics hold promise for significant impact.

      While there are complexities and uncertainties in various domains such as politics and physics, progress is being made and answers to apparent mysteries are being discovered. Regarding politics, the discussion highlighted the challenges and complexities of the electoral process, but also acknowledged the Democratic Party's efforts in raising awareness about potential dangers. In physics, while the next breakthrough may not be in fundamental physics, areas like biophysics and material science hold great potential for significant impact on everyday life. Probabilities, whether subjective or objective, are important in understanding the world, but quantum mechanics does not directly impact them. The double slit experiment and the uncertainty principle are examples of known mysteries in quantum mechanics, but quantum mechanics itself provides clear answers. Quantum computers, as physical systems, do not function as reality selectors, but rather as systems that follow the Schrodinger equation and undergo decoherence upon measurement.

    • Uncertainty principle, ethics in AIThe uncertainty principle is a theorem in quantum mechanics, not an assumption or axiom. Ethical guidelines for AI are a topic of debate, with specific instructions and clear objectives being more effective than Asimov's three laws.

      The uncertainty principle, a fundamental theorem in quantum mechanics, is widely accepted despite initial concerns and debates. It's not an assumption or an axiom but a theorem derived from quantum theory. The Doomsday Argument, which suggests the human race might not last long, fails due to the lack of justification for assuming a uniform probability distribution of human existence. Consciousness may or may not require quantum mechanics for emergence, and the future applications of ethical guidelines for AI are a topic of ongoing debate. Asimov's three laws of robotics, while popular, are not a central focus in discussions about creating ethical AI. Instead, specific instructions and clear objectives are considered more effective. Regarding Magneto, expanding his electromagnetic powers could involve delving deeper into the properties of magnetic fields, such as topological quantum field theory or exploring the potential of creating stable magnetic monopoles.

    • Magneto's electromagnetic powersMagneto's power extends beyond magnet manipulation to control of electromagnetic fields, making him virtually omnipotent at human scale. Importance of proper coarse-graining to simplify complex systems while maintaining useful dynamics.

      Magneto's power in the X-Men universe goes beyond just manipulating magnets as many may initially assume. His ability to control electromagnetic fields makes him virtually omnipotent at the human scale, as everything in chemistry and biology is mediated by electromagnetic fields. Coarse-graining, a concept discussed in the podcast, is a way to simplify complex systems by throwing away unnecessary information. However, it's important to do it correctly to maintain useful dynamics and interactions between systems. The podcast interviews are not heavily scripted, but the host does have some talking points in mind to ensure important topics are covered. In the interview with Doris Katz, the conversation veered off topic, but the host could have let it wander more to allow for a more in-depth discussion. A question was posed about the late sci-fi author Werner Vinci, requesting an expansion on the host's previous comments about his work and potential plans for his Unfinished Zones of Thought series. Unfortunately, the host does not have extensive knowledge about Vinci's work beyond one book he has read.

    • Mathematics in Sci-FiSci-fi explores future tech changes, Globokar considers implications, e^(i*pi) = -1 involves deep concepts, dark matter doesn't create anti-gravitons, universe can be a closed system, Higgs field may decay, leading to vacuum decay.

      Science fiction serves an important role in exploring the possibilities of future technological and societal changes, and authors like Vinko Globokar excel in this area by deeply considering the implications of these changes. Regarding mathematics, the identity of e to the power of i pi equals -1 may seem trivial once understood, but the process of reaching that understanding involves significant non-trivial concepts. As for dark matter and the cosmological constant, virtual particles do not create anti-gravitons, and the universe can be a closed system with dark energy. Lastly, the Higgs field, which has a non-zero vacuum expectation value, could potentially decay into a lower energy state, leading to the possibility of vacuum decay.

    • Physics and ConsciousnessA true vacuum bubble can't escape a black hole and consciousness is likely a gradual spectrum of behavior. Understanding physics should begin with classical mechanics, which is more intuitive before delving into quantum mechanics.

      If a bubble of true vacuum forms inside a black hole, it wouldn't escape because the black hole's gravity traps everything within its event horizon. This means any potentially dangerous vacuum decay wouldn't affect the outside universe. Additionally, consciousness is seen as a spectrum, complicated by behaviors and interactions rather than having a clear transition point. Understanding fundamental consciousness and how intricate structures might lead to it remains uncertain. Lastly, while quantum mechanics underpins all physics, classical mechanics remains a more intuitive starting point for learning, pointing to an emergent understanding of physics from classical to quantum realms.

    • Phase transitions and emergence of complexityThe increase in complexity in the universe, such as the emergence of life and complex life, can be thought of as phase transitions and the use of information in more sophisticated ways.

      The realm of classical mechanics applies well to our everyday experience and serves as a solid foundation for understanding the world before introducing the more abstract concepts of quantum mechanics. Complexity in the universe is believed to have increased in significant ways, such as the emergence of life and complex life, which can be thought of as phase transitions and the use of information in more sophisticated ways. The matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe is still a mystery, and theories suggest that it could have arisen from various processes, such as baryogenesis or leptogenesis. The discussion also touched on the concept of Hawking radiation and the principle of equivalence, with differing perspectives on whether a freely falling observer would observe radiation or not. Overall, the conversation highlighted the ongoing exploration and debates in the fields of physics and cosmology.

    • Unruh radiation implications for computationThe concept of Unruh radiation, where a moving observer detects particles in empty space, could potentially grant us the ability to answer hard questions faster if the laws of physics allow for non-locality or changes in complexity classes.

      The concept of unruh radiation challenges our understanding of empty space and the relationship between observers in motion and the quantum vacuum. Unruh radiation is a phenomenon where a detector moving at constant acceleration in empty space detects particles, despite the quantum state of the universe remaining the same. This is due to the observer's perspective and the concept of horizons for accelerating observers. Regarding the implications for computation, if the laws of physics allow for non-locality or changes in complexity classes, it could potentially grant us the ability to answer hard questions faster. However, the specifics depend on the nature of the non-locality and the underlying physics.

    • Quantum mechanics and consciousnessThere is ongoing debate about the connection between quantum mechanics and consciousness, with no definitive proof or consensus on the issue.

      While the connection between quantum mechanics, consciousness, and the collapse of wave functions is a topic of ongoing debate, there is currently no definitive proof or consensus on the issue. Emmett Francis raised concerns about arguments suggesting non-locality from quantum gravity could help solve NP problems, and questioned the validity of arguments for consciousness requiring a non-physical aspect. The discussion also touched upon the potential of neural link implants as a future technology, and the general consensus that the Nobel Committee generally makes wise choices in the physics category, but could do more to recognize foundational work in quantum mechanics.

    • Science Discoveries vs Theoretical BrillianceUnexpected discoveries in science, like the cosmic microwave background by Penzias and Wilson, are valued more than theoretical brilliance and can lead to Nobel Prizes.

      Discoveries in science, no matter how unexpected, are valued more than theoretical brilliance. Penzias and Wilson, who discovered the cosmic microwave background, serve as an excellent example. They weren't specifically looking for it but found it nonetheless, and their discovery earned them a Nobel Prize. Similarly, while the speaker has made predictions in his research, he's unsure if they will lead to Nobel-worthy discoveries. He also clarified a common misconception about light and matter interaction, explaining that photons can indeed be pushed, despite a friend's assertion to the contrary. In cosmology, there are several unsolved problems, including the Hubble tension, the nature of dark matter, and the formation of supermassive black holes. While the speaker is optimistic about all being solved in his lifetime, he acknowledges that they are distinct issues with varying levels of urgency and complexity. Lastly, he discussed the idea of God's existence and cognitive stability, emphasizing that a well-defined theory is necessary to assign credence.

    • Academic communication and persuasionBe honest and clear when asking team members to tackle challenging tasks in academic settings, and remember that utility and wealth may not follow a linear relationship

      Effective communication and persuasion in academic settings involve honesty and articulating clear reasons for challenging tasks. The speaker emphasized the importance of being open and transparent with team members when asking them to tackle difficult problems. They also discussed the non-linear relationship between utility and wealth or resources, suggesting it may follow a logarithmic function. The speaker also shared their belief that human cognitive abilities have a limit, but may still be able to decipher messages from advanced extraterrestrial civilizations. Lastly, they acknowledged the presence of crackpots in academic communities, who may send their research to a wide audience, and their personal preference for focusing on universal patterns across complex systems.

    • Physics concept developmentTheories and observations influence each other in the development of complex physics concepts, with some preceding and others inspired by them. The nature of reality may not be fully understood through poetic labels like 'force'.

      The understanding of complex concepts in physics, such as dark matter, inflation theory, complexity, and the role of forces, is an ongoing process with theories and observations influencing each other. While some theories may precede observations, others may be inspired by them. For instance, the theory of cosmic inflation came after the observation of the smoothness and isotropy of the universe, while the exclusion principle, though often considered a force, is better understood as a fundamental property of matter preventing compression. The development of complexity over cosmic time is more about adaptive systems, hierarchies, and information utilization than the boundary between chaos and order. The use of poetic analogies and labels like "force" can be helpful but should not be mistaken for the fundamental nature of reality.

    • Bordeaux desserts, cookingFollowing recipes can lead to delicious results in cooking, and Bordeaux's unique dessert, canalays, can be made with a steel pan instead of traditional copper molds and beeswax.

      Bordeaux's history as a major port contributed to the unique flavors in their traditional dessert, canalays, which include exotic ingredients like vanilla and rum. Cooking, for some, can be a rewarding and experimental process, but not everyone has the intuitive ability to create dishes spontaneously. Instead, following recipes can lead to delicious results. The process of cooking can bring joy and the use of gadgets can make it more enjoyable. Canalays, a traditional Bordeaux dessert, are notoriously hard to make with copper molds and beeswax, but a good steel pan works just as well. Regarding population numbers, the speaker expresses indifference, believing that the world population will continue to grow before eventually peaking. The concepts of life being computation and the universe being a computer are intriguing but lack clear definitions, leaving the speaker uncertain about their credence in these claims.

    • Energy definition, Computation and lifeOur understanding of energy and computation in relation to physics is complex and subject to ongoing exploration. While energy is conserved and life utilizes information processing, their definitions and significance depend on context. The definition of computation is also an open question.

      Our understanding of concepts in physics, such as energy and computation, can be complex and subject to ongoing exploration and refinement. Regarding energy, while it may be conserved in most cases, its definition and significance can depend on the specific context and theoretical framework. As for computation and life, the idea that life is a computation is plausible because living organisms utilize information processing in unique ways. However, the definition of computation is an open question. Regarding Feynman's statement about energy, it's not accurate to say we have no knowledge of what energy is, as we have definitions and theories that help us understand it. Lastly, the idea of faster-than-light travel raises complexities related to relativity and time travel, and any potential solution would require significant theoretical advancements.

    • Quantum MuriologyResearchers explore the complex relationship between quantum systems and their components, aiming to minimize entanglement and wave function spread to identify classical systems from a quantum perspective. Early universe could have emerged from a quantum mechanical mess, and multiple dark matter theories may coexist.

      The relationship between whole systems and their components, a concept known as muriology, is a complex issue in quantum mechanics. Researchers are trying to understand how to identify classical systems and their environments from a quantum perspective. The quantum muriology question is about going backwards from the whole system to identify its parts. The idea is to minimize entanglement and the spread of the wave function to make the system look relatively classical. The laws of physics may not have evolved as some suggest, but the early universe could have emerged from a quantum mechanical mess, with individual branches of the wave function emerging from this chaos. Dark matter theories do not exclude each other, and it's possible that there is a cocktail of different dark matter candidates. Google, like other commercial enterprises, is a valid place for high-level academic research, and Blaise Gratera's work in quantum mechanics and AI is a great example. Quantum mechanics does not change the laws of logic, but it introduces quantum logic, which is applied to different systems. Classical logic deals with bits of information, while quantum logic deals with qubits, which have more information due to their complex nature.

    • Quantum Logic vs Classical LogicQuantum logic and classical logic follow the same rules, but interpreting and manipulating quantum systems involves focusing on the wave function instead of yes-or-no entities.

      While the rules of logic apply to both quantum and classical systems, the way we interpret and manipulate these systems is different. The concept of quantum logic being different than classical logic can be misleading if we view quantum states as classical yes-or-no entities. Instead, we should focus on the actual system, which is the wave function, and find that our conventional rules of logic remain valid. Becoming a better teacher involves paying attention to what we're doing and caring about doing it better, seeking feedback, and continuously asking how we can improve. Philosophy, while asking profound questions, requires careful and serious investigation beyond casual bullsession. With technology advancing, it's crucial for philosophers to address pressing questions related to reality, evidence, and consciousness.

    • Philosophy and public discoursePhilosophy and public can have deep discussions about complex ethical issues, benefiting from each other's perspectives. Philosophers have a responsibility to communicate clearly and inclusively.

      Both the public and the philosophy profession have the capacity to engage in deep and meaningful discussions about complex ethical issues, as demonstrated in our conversation today. The public's curiosity and engagement with philosophical questions is a testament to the relevance and importance of philosophy in everyday life. Meanwhile, philosophers have a responsibility to communicate their ideas clearly and accessibly to a wider audience. While there are challenges to be addressed, such as ensuring that philosophical discussions are inclusive and representative, the potential benefits of these dialogues are significant. Ultimately, the goal should be to foster a culture of open-mindedness, respect, and intellectual curiosity, where individuals from all walks of life feel empowered to explore and engage with complex ethical questions. So, let us continue to challenge ourselves and each other to have meaningful conversations that can make a positive impact on our world.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    288 | Max Richter on the Meaning of Classical Music Today

    288 | Max Richter on the Meaning of Classical Music Today

    It wasn't that long ago, historically speaking, that you might put on your tuxedo or floor-length evening gown to go out and hear a live opera or symphony. But today's world is faster, more technologically connected, and casual. Is there still a place for classical music in the contemporary environment? Max Richter, whose new album In a Landscape releases soon, proves that there is. We talk about what goes into making modern classical music, how musical styles evolve, and why every note should count.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/09/09/288-max-richter-on-the-meaning-of-classical-music-today/

    Max Richter trained in composition and piano at Edinburgh University, at the Royal Academy of Music, and with Luciano Berio in Florence. He was a co-founder of the ensemble Piano Circus. His first solo album, "Memoryhouse," was released in 2002. He has since released numerous solo albums, as well as extensive work on soundtracks for film and television, ballet, opera, and collaborations with visual artists.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | September 2024

    AMA | September 2024

    Welcome to the September 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with AMA questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/09/02/ama-september-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    One common feature of complex systems is sensitive dependence on initial conditions: a small change in how systems begin evolving can lead to large differences in their later behavior. In the social sphere, this is a way of saying that history matters. But it can be hard to quantify how much certain specific historical events have affected contemporary conditions, because the number of variables is so large and their impacts are so interdependent. Political economist Jean-Paul Faguet and collaborators have examined one case where we can closely measure the impact today of events from centuries ago: how Colombian communities are still affected by 16th-century encomienda, a colonial forced-labor institution. We talk about this and other examples of the legacy of history.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/26/287-jean-paul-faguet-on-institutions-and-the-legacy-of-history/

    Jean-Paul Faguet received a Ph.D. in Political Economy and an M.Sc. in Economics from the London School of Economics, and an Master of Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. He is currently Professor of the Political Economy of Development at LSE. He serves as the Chair of the Decentralization Task Force for the Initiative for Policy Dialogue. Among his awards are the W.J.M. Mackenzie Prize for best political science book.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    Understanding how life began on Earth involves questions of chemistry, geology, planetary science, physics, and more. But the question of how random processes lead to organized, self-replicating, information-bearing systems is a more general one. That question can be addressed in an idealized world of computer code, initialized with random sequences and left to run. Starting with many such random systems, and allowing them to mutate and interact, will we end up with "lifelike," self-replicating programs? A new paper by Blaise Agüera y Arcas and collaborators suggests that the answer is yes. This raises interesting questions about whether computation is an attractor in the space of relevant dynamical processes, with implications for the origin and ubiquity of life.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/19/286-blaise-aguera-y-arcas-on-the-emergence-of-replication-and-computation/

    Blaise Agüera y Arcas received a B.A. in physics from Princeton University. He is currently a vice-president of engineering at Google, leader of the Cerebra team, and a member of the Paradigms of Intelligence team. He is the author of the books Ubi Sunt and Who Are We Now?, and the upcoming What Is Intelligence?


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    Being rational necessarily involves engagement with probability. Given two possible courses of action, it can be rational to prefer the one that could possibly result in a worse outcome, if there's also a substantial probability for an even better outcome. But one's attitude toward risk -- averse, tolerant, or even seeking -- also matters. Do we work to avoid the worse possible outcome, even if there is potential for enormous reward? Nate Silver has long thought about probability and prediction, from sports to politics to professional poker. In his his new book On The Edge: The Art of Risking Everything, Silver examines a set of traits characterizing people who welcome risks.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/12/285-nate-silver-on-prediction-risk-and-rationality/

    Nate Silver received a B.A. in economics from the University of Chicago. He worked as a baseball analyst, developing the PECOTA statistical system (Player Empirical Comparison and Optimization Test Algorithm). He later founded the FiveThirtyEight political polling analysis site. His first book, The Signal and the Noise, was awarded the Phi Beta Kappa Society Book Award in Science. He is the co-host (with Maria Konnikova) of the Risky Business podcast.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | August 2024

    AMA | August 2024

    Welcome to the August 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/05/ama-august-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/seanmcarroll

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    The human brain does a pretty amazing job of taking in a huge amount of data from multiple sensory modalities -- vision, hearing, smell, etc. -- and constructing a coherent picture of the world, constantly being updated in real time. (Although perhaps in discrete moments, rather than continuously, as we learn in this podcast...) We're a long way from completely understanding how that works, but amazing progress has been made in identifying specific parts of the brain with specific functions in this process. Today we talk to leading neuroscientist Doris Tsao about the specific workings of vision, from how we recognize faces to how we construct a model of the world around us.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/29/284-doris-tsao-on-how-the-brain-turns-vision-into-the-world/

    Doris Tsao received her Ph.D. in neurobiology from Harvard University. She is currently a professor of molecular and cell biology, and a member of the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, at the University of California, Berkeley. Among her awards are a MacArthur Fellowship, membership in the National Academy of Sciences, the Eppendorf and Science International Prize in Neurobiology, the National Institutes of Health Director’s Pioneer Award, the Golden Brain Award from the Minerva Foundation, the Perl-UNC Neuroscience Prize, and the Kavli Prize in Neuroscience.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    Change is scary. But sometimes it can all work out for the best. There's no guarantee of that, however, even when the change in question involves the introduction of a powerful new technology. Today's guest, Daron Acemoglu, is a political economist who has long thought about the relationship between economics and political institutions. In his most recent book (with Simon Johnson), Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity, he looks at how technological innovations affect the economic lives of ordinary people. We talk about how such effects are often for the worse, at least to start out, until better institutions are able to eventually spread the benefits more broadly.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/22/283-daron-acemoglu-on-technology-inequality-and-power/

    Daron Acemoglu received a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics. He is currently Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a fellow of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Econometric Society. Among his awards are the John Bates Clark Medal and the Nemmers Prize in Economics. In 2015, he was named the most cited economist of the past 10 years.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    The philosophy of mathematics would be so much easier if it weren't for infinity. The concept seems natural, but taking it seriously opens the door to counterintuitive results. As mathematician and philosopher Joel David Hamkins says in this conversation, when we say that the natural numbers are "0, 1, 2, 3, and so on," that "and so on" is hopelessly vague. We talk about different ways to think about the puzzles of infinity, how they might be resolved, and implications for mathematical realism.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/15/282-joel-david-hamkins-on-puzzles-of-reality-and-infinity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Joel David Hamkins received his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley. He is currently the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Logic at the University of Notre Dame. He is a pioneer of the idea of the set theory multiverse. He is the top-rated user by reputation score on MathOverflow. He is currently working on The Book of Infinity, to be published by MIT Press.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Welcome to the July 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/08/ama-july-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.