Logo
    Search

    About this Episode

    Last year when a BBC journalist while interviewing Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev, asked him about the restrictions on free press in his country, he rebuked the reporter and said “You have no moral right to talk about free media when you do these things”, by these things he meant treatment of Julian Assange by the U.K government.

     It’s been over two years now, since the London Metropolitan Police entered into Ecuadorian Embassy in London and arrested Assange and ever since then he has been languishing in U.K’s high security Belmarsh Prison and many fear that this has taken a toll on his physical and mental health. It’s really sad to see that there hasn’t been a lot of mainstream media coverage of Assange and his current plight, but, hey what do you expect from media houses whose primary motive is to rake in big bucks. So, let’s talk about Assange and how he ended up where he is now.

     So, if you remember, back in 2010, Assange and Wikileaks along with some major media outlets published 100s and 1000s of documents exposing potential war crimes committed in Afghanistan and Iraq and subsequently in the same year they also published classified U.S embassies’ cables that further embarrassed the U.S government. At the time, many in the U.S government claimed that these leaks would endanger the lives of its operatives on the ground and in the field, however, so far, there hasn’t been any evidence to suggest that has indeed been the case.

     Let’s take a look back at how some of the most powerful governments in the world went after Assange to appease the most powerful country in the world, and many may find it amusing that the reason initially Assange was arrested in the United Kingdom was not actually for his role in embarrassing the U.S government. So, why was he arrested, you ask? O.K let me take you down the memory lane.

     In August 2010, the Swedish Prosecutor's Office issued an arrest warrant for Assange accusing him of sexual misconduct.

     In December 2010 Assange was arrested in London based on the arrest warrant issued by the Swedish authorities

     In May 2012 - The UK's Supreme Court ruled that Assange should be extradited to Sweden to face questioning over the allegations of sexual misconduct, however, many including Assange feared that these accusations by Swedish authorities were in fact at the behest of United States and if Assange were to be extradited to Sweden, then he would most certainly end up in the U.S facing trumped up espionage charges.  

     Therefore, in June 2012, Assange violating his bail conditions, went to Ecuadorian Embassy in London and sought asylum. Subsequently, in August 2012, Ecuador granted him asylum on the grounds that his human rights might be violated if he was extradited.

     In August 2015, Swedish authorities dropped their investigation into two allegations against Assange, one of sexual molestation and one of unlawful coercion, because they had run out of time to question him. But the more serious accusation of rape wasn’t dropped until May 2017.

     Between July 2018 and April 2019, many claim that under pressure from the U.S government the Ecuadorian government engaged in talks with the U.K government and finally in April 2019, The London Metropolitan Police entered the Ecuadorian embassy and arrested Assange for "failing to surrender to the court" over a warrant issued in 2012. In May 2019, Assange is sentenced to 50 weeks in jail for breaching his bail conditions from 2012.

     

    Recent Episodes from The Hyat Report

    AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM - A GENERIC DISCUSSION

    AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM - A GENERIC DISCUSSION

    I recently hosted a space where my guest speaker and I discussed Australian Immigration System, it was a generic discussion ranging from how Australian in the recent past treated refugees who attempted to seek asylum but had come by boats to how both parties Liberals and Labour despite promising reforms in Parent visas, did not deliver  substantive change in that aspect. 

    MUSLIM WOMEN SOFT TARGETS IN INDIA AND CASE OF VANIA SHAIKH

    MUSLIM WOMEN SOFT TARGETS IN INDIA AND CASE OF VANIA SHAIKH

    Hi Everyone, so Today, I wanna talk about Vania Shaikh, a female dental student, a Muslim in India who was allegedly sexually harassed by a Hindu man, according to some reports on social media, Vania in fact protested against this harassment, however, she was allegedly physically assaulted for protesting by her abuser. This then led to vania committing suicide at her university or college campus.

     

    Now, before we get into how the Indian authorities are responding or not responding to this case or how Indian media is covering or not covering this story, I just wanna call out that anytime Muslims are persecuted anywhere in the world, be it in the east or the west, the usual narrative that is pushed is “human rights” or “women’s rights” or “let’s save Muslim women from Muslim men”. We saw this when Afghanistan was invaded, we saw this when Iraq was invaded, we saw this when the occupation of both Afghanistan and Iraq  was justified.

     

    When it comes to India, Muslims have been facing persecution since Britain’s colonisation of the sub-continent, however, it became really intense pretty much since 1947, which is the year when India got its independence. Since 1947, Muslims in India have faced numerous massacres, pogroms and riots and in each of these scenarios Muslim women were specifically targeted by the perpetrators of violence. 

     

    In light of this, I’d like to argue that the reason Muslim women face these atrocities is because the oppressors who in my opinion are filled with Anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia, want to humiliate Muslim men and this is not just applicable to India, but if you notice, this theory of mine can be applied to western liberal societies as well, where Muslim women are consistently demonised or in some cases even criminalised for their clothing. I think it’s very clear that these Anti-Muslim Islamophobes know that us Muslim men are very protective of our women and therefore, these people target our women to get to us or humiliate us.

     

    So let’s go back to India, where not long ago we saw how Muslim girls in the southern Indian state of Karnataka were targeted for wearing Hijab, they were barred from attending school, those girls then went to Karnataka High Court, which delivered a judgement barring Hijab, then they went to Supreme Court of India, which then delivered a split judgement meaning Hijab remains banned in those colleges of Karnataka even today. We also saw how recently convicted rapists of Bilkis Bano, a victim of Gujrat riots were released based on good behaviour. I mean…how can convicted rapists be released on good behaviour grounds? Not just this, but there is also consistent rhetoric from Hindu saints in India where they are riling up Hindu men to go after or target Muslim women. 

     

    In all of this, Muslims of India remain hopeful in the sense they still rely on their law enforcement agencies to potentially take action against these perpetrators, they still on their justice system to do the right thing. But in my opinion both Indian law enforcement and the justice system has failed Muslims of India not just once but over and over and over again. This then makes me that this is a system’s failure, that this is a systematic failure which the Indian Muslim leadership to a large extent still refuses to acknowledge. 

     

    Now coming back to Vania Shaikh, I think this crime stems from the fact that Hindu men in India are emboldened to go after and target Muslim women, because they know that they enjoy the immunity from the system that released rapists of Bilkis Bano on good behavioural grounds. So I absolutely think it is the liberal, secular system that is responsible for Muslim women being targeted without any consequences and I do not think that it is only one political party that is responsible for this, I think the silence from most other ‘secular’ parties in India on th

    IT'S NAIVE TO THINK THAT "PERSECUTION OF MUSLIMS" IN INDIA STARTED IN 2014

    IT'S NAIVE TO THINK THAT "PERSECUTION OF MUSLIMS" IN INDIA STARTED IN 2014

    In this episode I talk about why it's a simplistic and a very naive argument to say that if the current government of India loses next elections then everything will be hunky dory for Muslims of India.

    In this episode, I list various events, where Muslims were the victims and these events took place under various regimes.