Podcast Summary
Manhattan DA Sues House Judiciary Committee to Block Interference in Trump Prosecution: Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg filed a lawsuit against Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee to prevent them from interfering with the local prosecution of Donald Trump, arguing that their subpoena of a former prosecutor violates federalism principles and could dismiss the case.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has filed a federal lawsuit against Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee, seeking to block them from interfering with the Manhattan district attorney's criminal prosecution of Donald Trump. The key issue is that the House Judiciary Committee has subpoenaed Mark Pomerantz, a former special assistant district attorney, to testify and produce documents. Bragg argues that this interference violates federalism principles and could ultimately dismiss the case if Pomerantz is not joined as a defendant. The lawsuit includes photographs of Trump's threatening posts towards Bragg and his wife. The injunction requests that a federal judge order Mark Pomerantz not to be required to give testimony before the judiciary committee, as it would interfere with the constitutional authority of local and state prosecutors and secret grand jury deliberation laws.
House Judiciary Committee Faces Lawsuit Over Interference with Trump Investigation: The Manhattan DA's Office is suing the House Judiciary Committee and Rep. Jim Jordan for attempting to interfere with a criminal investigation of former President Trump, seeking an injunction to prevent further interference and arguing that Congress lacks the power to supervise state criminal probes or demand confidential information.
Representative Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee are facing a federal lawsuit for attempting to interfere with the ongoing criminal investigation of former President Donald Trump by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office. The lawsuit, brought by District Attorney Alvin Bragg, seeks an injunction to prevent further interference, specifically regarding a subpoena sent to a former prosecutor for confidential documents and testimony. The lawsuit argues that Congress lacks the power to supervise state criminal prosecutions or demand confidential local prosecutorial information, as well as the power to punish the investigated. The subpoena is seen as an affront to state sovereignty and has no legitimate legislative purpose. The lawsuit does not seek monetary damages, but rather an order for Jordan and the committee to cease and desist from further interference.
Subpoena threatens state sovereignty and criminal proceedings: The subpoena to a former president poses challenges to state authority, grand jury secrecy, and ongoing criminal investigations. Meanwhile, intimidation and obstruction by a congressional committee undermine democratic processes. Use a countertop electric composter like Lomi for convenience and environmental benefits.
The subpoena issued to a former president threatens the sovereignty of states, the secrecy of grand jury proceedings, and the integrity of ongoing criminal prosecutions. The states hold primary authority for defining and enforcing criminal law, and federal intrusion into state criminal trials can hinder both the state's power to punish offenders and their efforts to uphold constitutional rights. Meanwhile, the use of intimidation, retaliation, and obstruction by a congressional committee against a defendant's criminal process undermines the democratic process and the rule of law. On a lighter note, another takeaway is the convenience and environmental benefits of using a countertop electric composter like Lomi. It simplifies the composting process, reduces the amount of garbage, and turns waste into nutrient-rich soil for gardening. By using Lomi, individuals can make a positive impact on the environment and make cleanup after dinner a breeze.
House Republicans Interfere with Manhattan DA's Trump Investigation: House Republicans subpoenaed a key prosecutor in Manhattan DA's Trump investigation, raising federalism and separation of power concerns, and potentially prejudicing Trump's right to a fair trial.
Former President Trump and his allies, including House Republicans, have been making inflammatory statements against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who is leading the investigation into Trump's business dealings. These statements have resulted in death threats and other harassment against Bragg. Instead of condemning these efforts, House Republicans are using their oversight powers to interfere with the state criminal justice process by subpoenaing a key prosecutor, Mark Pomerantz. This interference raises significant federalism and separation of power concerns, and the Supreme Court's decision in Mazars requires Congress to provide a legitimate purpose for its inquiry. However, Chairman Jordan and his allies have changed their story multiple times, and their true intent seems to be to undermine the rule of law and New York's police power. Subpoenaing a prosecutor to make extrajudicial statements during an ongoing criminal prosecution is unprecedented and could prejudice Trump's right to a fair trial. Members of Congress do not have the authority to invade New York's sovereign authority for their or Trump's political aims.
New York DA challenges unconstitutional subpoena from Republican Judiciary Committee: The New York DA, Alvin Bragg, is contesting a subpoena from the Republican Judiciary Committee, arguing it lacks a legislative purpose and threatens state sovereignty in an ongoing criminal investigation of former President Trump.
The district attorney of New York, Alvin Bragg, is challenging a subpoena issued by the Republican Judiciary Committee, arguing that it is unconstitutional and unenforceable. The subpoena, which seeks information related to the ongoing criminal investigation of former President Donald Trump, lacks a legitimate legislative purpose and would allow the committee to access confidential and privileged materials. Bragg asserts that Congress does not have the power to interfere with ongoing state criminal matters and that the subpoena represents a threat to federalism and the sovereign interests of the state of New York. The district attorney is seeking to have the subpoena enjoined and to protect the state's pursuit of criminal justice from unconstitutional congressional interference.
Manhattan DA Sues House Oversight Committee for Unlawful Subpoena: The Manhattan DA, Alvin Bragg, is suing the House Oversight Committee and its chairman, Jim Jordan, over an unlawful subpoena to a senior prosecutor in his office. The case could impact investigative powers of the executive and judicial branches.
The Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, is currently facing a lawsuit from former President Donald Trump and House Oversight Committee Chairman Jim Jordan. The lawsuit, filed by a private law firm representing Bragg, aims to stop the subpoena issued by Jordan's committee to Mark Pomerantz, a senior prosecutor in the Manhattan DA's office. The complaint alleges that the subpoena is unlawful and unconstitutional. Trump and Jordan have accused Bragg of political motivation and interference in their investigations. The filing includes numerous posts from Trump's social media account, which could potentially be used as exhibits in the case. The request includes a permanent and preliminary injunction to stop the subpoena's enforcement and other necessary relief. The case is significant as it highlights the ongoing tensions between the executive and judicial branches over investigative powers.
