Navigating Unprecedented Economic Times: Historically, high fed funds rates have never been reached again, indicating a potential system breakdown. Central bank actions are causing significant market volatility, and clear communication is crucial during these uncertain times.
Key takeaway from the Q2 mastermind discussion on The Bitcoin Fundamentals podcast is the recognition that we are living through unprecedented economic times, and the actions of central banks, particularly the Federal Reserve, are causing significant volatility in financial markets. During the discussion, the panelists, including attorney and adjunct professor Joe Carlessari, entrepreneur and venture capitalist Jay Gold, medical doctor turned fund manager Jeff Ross, and others, touched on various topics, including the Luna stablecoin meltdown, the global bond market selloff, the equity selloff, and commodities blowing out. One intriguing observation made during the discussion was that historically, when the fed funds rate has hit a high, it has never gotten back up to that level, indicating that something may have broken in the system. The panelists also noted that the Fed's communication has become increasingly important as they navigate these uncharted waters, and the use of the term "softish landing" by both Powell and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's president suggests that they are aware of the potential for market disruption. Overall, the discussion underscored the importance of staying informed and remaining nimble in the face of rapidly changing economic conditions.
Inflation and Monetary Policy Impacting Markets: The panelists discussed the impact of inflation and monetary policy on various markets, with concerns about a potential financial crisis due to tightening measures.
The panelists believe that inflation is a significant concern and it's currently impacting various markets, including fixed income and mortgage rates. They also discussed the potential for a disruption in supply chains due to monetary tightening. Trey Lockerbie and Preston Pysh expressed their concerns about the imminence of a financial crisis, with Lockerbie suggesting that it's already happening and Pysh arguing that tightening could worsen the situation. Joe Carlasare, who previously held a bullish view on yields, acknowledged his mistake and agreed that the current state of the bond market is a disaster. The panelists also touched upon the topic of Bitcoin and the potential impact of its volatility on the markets, with Do Kwon's Luna project being mentioned as an example of the risks involved in the crypto space. Overall, the consensus among the panelists is that inflation and monetary policy are major factors driving market instability, and the potential for a financial crisis is a real concern.
The Luna stablecoin collapse exposes risks in DeFi and stablecoins: The Luna stablecoin collapse highlights the risks and interconnectedness of decentralized finance and stablecoins, and the need for regulation and oversight in the space.
The recent collapse of the Terra stablecoin, Luna, and its associated ecosystem has exposed the risks and interconnectedness of decentralized finance (DeFi) and stablecoins, which are currently a major focus of regulatory scrutiny. The Luna stablecoin, which was supposedly pegged to the dollar but not fully backed by Bitcoin or other reserves, saw its value plummet from $100 to a dollar, leading to a sell-off of Bitcoin and other assets in the space. The DeFi ecosystem, which includes many stablecoins and other projects, is heavily interconnected, and when one project fails, it can cause a chain reaction of losses for other projects and investors. Additionally, some stablecoins, like Luna, promised substantial yields and had venture capital backing, which could lead to regulatory action and potential legal consequences for those involved. The broader macroeconomic environment and the Federal Reserve's concerns about stablecoins as a threat to the dollar are also factors to consider. Overall, the Luna collapse serves as a reminder of the risks and potential consequences of investing in decentralized finance and stablecoins, and highlights the need for regulation and oversight in the space.
Market instability linked to broader issues in bonds and legacy markets: The ongoing market instability is interconnected with issues in bonds and legacy markets, which lack liquidity and could lead to continued sell-offs. Investors must keep a holistic view of markets to avoid focusing solely on crypto.
The current market instability, particularly in the crypto and DeFi space, is interconnected with broader issues in the bond market and legacy markets. The lack of liquidity in these markets could lead to a continuation of the sell-off, and any potential intervention by authorities could have varying effects depending on the asset class. The famous Luna tattoo incident serves as a reminder of the risks and potential consequences of being associated with high-profile projects in the crypto space. The ongoing crisis has all the hallmarks of a classic liquidity crisis, and until stability is achieved, markets are likely to continue selling off. It's important for investors to keep a holistic view of the markets and not focus solely on crypto and ignore what's happening in other markets.
Market conditions and lack of liquidity: Predictions suggest that market stabilization may require more liquidity than during the 2020 crisis, with equity markets absorbing much of it, leading to wealth consolidation.
The speakers on this podcast discussed the current market conditions and the lack of liquidity, with some predicting that the amount of liquidity that will be required to stabilize the markets could surpass what was injected during the March 2020 liquidity crisis. They also mentioned how the liquidity is being absorbed by the equity market, leading to a consolidation of wealth in the hands of a few equity holders. Yahoo Finance was highlighted as a valuable tool for staying informed about market news and trends. Additionally, Raine Wilson's story of creating a successful business with AT&T's support was shared. Overall, the speakers emphasized the importance of staying informed and prepared in the current economic climate.
Lower-than-expected CPI data and signs of peaking inflation may lead to relief rally for risk-on assets: Unexpectedly low CPI and potential inflation peak could bring relief to risk-on assets, but economic data surprises and possible double-dip recession remain concerns
The recent CPI data coming in lower than expected, along with signs of peaking inflation and potential economic data surprises in the third quarter, could lead to a relief rally for risk-on assets, including Bitcoin. This is due to the Fed potentially having more wiggle room to ease up on their hawkish stance, as inflation may no longer be accelerating. However, this is not a guarantee of a full market recovery, as some experts believe we could still be in for a double-dip recession, with a potential pivot from the Fed and large-scale quantitative easing on the horizon for late 2023. It's important to note that this is a complex economic situation, and investors should stay informed and cautious as the market continues to evolve.
Volatility in the Market: Bear Market Rally and Future Declines: Despite a potential strong bear market rally, investors should be prepared for significant losses in the upcoming market downturn. Historical context suggests a pattern of deep sell-offs, strong rebounds, and deeper sell-offs.
The current market conditions are being described as one of the most volatile in history, particularly in the bond market. Trey Lockerbie emphasizes that the upcoming bear market rally, while it may fool some investors into thinking the bear market is over, will likely be a strong one that will ultimately lead to significant losses. Jack Neureuter mentions the possibility of Bitcoin reaching new all-time highs before collapsing again. Preston Pysh shares historical context, noting that the NASDAQ in 2008 experienced a similar pattern of a deep sell-off, a strong bounce, and then a deeper sell-off. The panelists disagree on the Federal Reserve's actions and their potential impact on the market. While some believe the Fed will continue to raise interest rates, others think the economy is already in a downturn and earnings reports in the coming months will reveal weak guidance and potential layoffs. Overall, the consensus is that the market is volatile and uncertain, and investors should be prepared for further declines.
Fed's rate hikes and potential market sell-off: Experts predict continued stock declines due to unchanged Fed policy and earnings downgrades, with uncertainty around future rate hikes leading to potential bear market rallies. Adjusted for inflation, the NASDAQ is already down from its 2020 high.
The panelists believe the Fed's recent rate hikes are not a change in policy, and stocks are not cheap, leading to concerns about a potential market sell-off. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq are expected to continue declining, with potential downgrades in earnings expectations leading to significant price drops. The Fed's language in their press conference suggests concern about the sell-off, but the question is whether they will keep hiking rates or ease up. Some believe the market will experience bear market rallies amid bad economic news, as investors hope for a potential pause in rate hikes. The NASDAQ is currently 23% higher than its pre-COVID top, but adjusting for inflation, it's actually down 13% from the previous high in 2020. The panelists' opinions vary, but they all agree that the end game is uncertain and that investors should be prepared for a range of outcomes.
Economic downturn and rising interest rates strain individuals and political pressures on the Federal Reserve: Individuals with dollar-denominated debt and heavy home equity reliance face financial strain due to economic downturn and rising interest rates. Political pressures on the Federal Reserve from midterm elections and uncertainty add complexity to the economic landscape, potentially impacting Bitcoin's value.
The economic downturn and rising interest rates are causing significant financial strain for many individuals, particularly those with dollar-denominated debt and heavy reliance on home equity. At the same time, the uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve and potential midterm elections could add political pressure on the chair, Jay Powell. As for Bitcoin, its value could continue to drop, potentially reaching the 21,500 mark, but some experts believe it could present a massive buying opportunity. Ultimately, the economic landscape is complex and filled with various pressures, making it essential for individuals to stay informed and adapt accordingly.
Bitcoin's current state and market analysts' views: Some market analysts believe Bitcoin is cheap and will recover from dips, while others see potential challenges ahead due to inflation and political factors.
Bitcoin is currently considered cheap by some market analysts, despite recent market trends. Jurrien Timmer from Fidelity believes that the cryptocurrency is trading along its adoption line and would require significant market forces to push it lower. He also noted that Bitcoin has a history of quickly recovering from major dips, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, the Senate is expected to vote on a confirmation for a shared round either tonight or tomorrow. In terms of the broader market, some experts believe that the Biden administration's focus on inflation could lead to a delay in market recovery. Elliott Bisnow suggested that the Democrats may sacrifice market gains in order to bring down inflation and appeal to voters. However, others, such as Joe Carlasare, still believe that the market will eventually reach lower lows, but there may be a brief delay in the process. Additionally, there were several sponsor messages throughout the discussion, promoting various financial products and services, including a high yield cash account from public.com and a franchise opportunity from Iflex stretch studio. Overall, the conversation highlighted the ongoing debate around the current state of the market and the potential impact of various economic and political factors. While some remain bullish on Bitcoin and the market, others are more cautious and believe that there may be challenges ahead.
When everyone is bearish, there's nobody left to sell: The bearish market sentiment, liquidity concerns, and systemic risks could lead to a potential market reversal, as everyone may have already sold, leaving no one left to fuel further declines.
The current bearish sentiment in the market, fueled by widespread pessimism and liquidity concerns, could lead to a potential market reversal. According to Jack Mallers, when everyone is bearish, there's nobody left to sell, and the price may start creeping up despite skepticism. Jason Brett adds that the Fed's own financial stability report identifies liquidity issues in various markets as a systemic risk. Preston Pysh also points out that when liquidity starts drying up, it becomes mathematical, and the market becomes focused on covering counterparty risk, leading to a potential large correction in risky assets. Additionally, the ongoing situation in China and the mutated nature of COVID-19 add layers of uncertainty to the market. Overall, the consensus among the speakers is that the market may be due for a surprise turnaround, despite the current bearish sentiment.
Factors contributing to China's strict COVID-19 measures: Experts attribute China's strict COVID-19 measures to poor healthcare policies, centralized government control, potential political tensions, and possibly hidden agendas.
The ongoing situation in China, with strict lockdowns and unusual policies, can be attributed to a combination of factors including poor healthcare policies, centralized government control, and potential political tensions. However, some experts argue that there might be hidden agendas behind these actions, given China's history of controlling various aspects of society. Ross Gerber believes that China's strict lockdowns and policies are a result of misguided attempts to eradicate COVID-19, while others suggest that it could be related to resource constraints or geopolitical tensions. Ultimately, the situation in China is complex and multifaceted, with various theories circulating, but it's clear that something significant is happening.
Regulatory response to Luna highlights risks of DeFi and crypto: Ignorance and poor policies from leadership on COVID-19 aside, the Luna situation underscores the risks and uncertainties of DeFi and crypto, making stricter regulations a compelling argument. High-profile events like this can result in significant consumer losses, making intervention more likely.
The recent events surrounding the Luna stablecoin and the potential regulatory response highlight the risks and uncertainties associated with decentralized finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies. Jack Neureuter expressed concerns about the ignorance and poor policies from leadership regarding COVID-19, but the panelists agreed that the regulatory response to the Luna situation provides a powerful talking point for those advocating for stricter regulations in the crypto space. The potential for consumers to lose significant amounts of money, as seen in the Luna situation, can make it easier for regulators to justify intervention. Jack Mallers warned against building platforms based on staking tokens and yield farming, as these practices can leave investors vulnerable when the "run in the bank" occurs and there's no central authority to intervene. Preston Pysh questioned the sustainability of high yields in decentralized systems, and Jason Brett warned against giving up control of Bitcoin by staking it on exchanges. Overall, the panelists emphasized the importance of understanding the risks and limitations of decentralized finance and cryptocurrencies, and the potential for significant regulatory action in response to high-profile events.
Ethereum Staking: Risks, Uncertainties, and Potential Regulatory Responses: Ethereum's complex staking process with significant capital locked in raises concerns about transparency and potential similarities to a Ponzi scheme. Regulatory response, including SEC intervention and class action lawsuits, could impact the market. Bitcoin's underlying technology is emphasized as a differentiator from other 'clown coins'.
The Ethereum staking process, with over a trillion dollars staked and the inability to withdraw, presents a complex and confusing situation. The speaker expresses concerns about the lack of transparency and potential similarities to a Ponzi scheme. The SEC's slow and inefficient regulation and the potential for class action lawsuits against exchanges were discussed as possible solutions or consequences. The speaker also differentiated Bitcoin from Ethereum and other "clown coins," emphasizing the importance of understanding the engineering behind these new technologies. Ultimately, the uncertainty surrounding Ethereum's staking process and the potential regulatory response highlight the risks and challenges associated with investing in new technologies.
SEC's regulation of cryptos as securities could lead to selective enforcement and litigation: The SEC's stance on cryptos as securities may result in legal action against individual actors and exchanges, potentially setting a precedent for how decentralized protocols are regulated and impacting the definition of decentralization.
The SEC's regulation of cryptocurrencies and altcoins as securities could lead to selective enforcement and litigation against individual actors and entities, particularly exchanges. This could create legal liability for exchanges that aid and abet the sale of unregistered securities. The ongoing Ripple case, which is currently being reviewed in the 2nd circuit, could set a precedent for how the SEC approaches these cases and the potential use of the fair notice defense by crypto projects. The outcome of the Ripple case could also impact how the SEC approaches the regulation of decentralized protocols and the definition of decentralization. The SEC's approach to crypto regulation is expected to increase, but the capacity and resources of the SEC may limit their ability to regulate the entire market.
SEC's ruling on Bitcoin ETF: Settlement more likely: The SEC's primary concerns are market size, liquidity, and surveillance. A settlement with fines, penalties, and disgorgement is more likely than a definitive approval or denial due to overseas trading volume and leverage.
The SEC's ruling on the spot Bitcoin ETF is not the final word, and a settlement is more likely than a definitive approval or denial. The SEC's primary concerns are ensuring a market of sufficient size and liquidity in the United States with access for US regulators, and a universal shared surveillance agreement. However, the majority of Bitcoin trading volume and leverage is overseas, making it a regulatory black box. A settlement would likely include disgorgement, fines, and penalties, but would not result in anyone going to jail. The SEC's role is not to take liberty away or bankrupt entities, but to recover their lost funds. The settlement paid by BlockFi, which was $100 million, is an example of this. The SEC's stance may not change unless there is political pressure, a rule change, or a law mandating approval. The CME, which has a surveillance sharing agreement, is the primary source of Bitcoin liquidity in the domestic markets, and the SEC trusts this market.
Recognition of CME's reputation and lack of manipulation: Bitcoin's unique characteristics make it a superior form of money and an inevitable winner in the future, despite the challenges of understanding its complexities.
The approval of Bitcoin futures ETFs was not an attempt to manipulate Bitcoin's price, but rather a recognition of the CME's reputable status and the lack of internal manipulation in their market. Education is key in convincing others about the value of Bitcoin, and having meaningful conversations about its unique characteristics, such as decentralization, immutability, scarcity, and censorship resistance, can help build a strong case for its potential as a superior form of money. However, the complexities of understanding Bitcoin may require significant research and education for some, making it a challenging conversation to have. Ultimately, the belief is that Bitcoin's unique characteristics make it the best alternative to the current broken financial markets and an inevitable winner in the future.
Bitcoin as Digital Gold: Long-term Appreciation and Unbreakable Nature: Bitcoin's unbreakable nature and potential for long-term appreciation make it a valuable alternative to the historically depreciating US dollar. Follow panelists on Twitter for updates and consider Vailshire for investment opportunities.
Bitcoin, despite its volatility in the short term, is a valuable asset due to its unbreakable nature and the potential for long-term appreciation. The panelists compared it to digital gold, which is more convenient to store and transfer in large quantities than physical gold. They also emphasized the historical depreciation of the US dollar and the importance of not getting too caught up in short-term price movements. Jay Gould and Joe Carlasare encouraged listeners to follow them on Twitter for more information, and Jeff Vail mentioned Vailshire for those interested in investment opportunities. The panelists agreed that while the dollar may strengthen in the short term, it is historically guaranteed to depreciate over the long run, making Bitcoin an attractive alternative. They also emphasized the importance of looking at long-term price movements rather than getting distracted by short-term fluctuations.
Impact of earnings reports and monetary policy on equities: Panelists predict potential market volatility due to earnings reports and uncertainty around monetary policy. Jay Gould anticipates a decline in the S&P 500, while Jason Brett and Preston Pysh express skepticism and belief in the market rally, respectively. Joe Carlasare warns of potential changes in monetary policy based on employment and market conditions.
The panelists expressed uncertainty about the direction of equities in the next few months due to the impact of earnings reports and potential changes in monetary policy. Jay Gould predicted a potential decline in the S&P 500 by July or August due to weak earnings guidance and the possibility of layoffs. Jason Brett shared his skepticism about hitting all-time highs, while Preston Pysh expressed his belief that the market is in a rally and that he doesn't sell Bitcoin due to the uncertainty and potential tax implications. Joe Carlasare added that the Federal Reserve's dual mandate of full employment and inflation could lead to a change in monetary policy if there are signs of significant employment declines or a market crash. Overall, the panelists agreed that the coming months could bring significant volatility and uncertainty to the markets.
Recognize value and start buying when prices are at an extreme: Long-term investors should consider buying Bitcoin at current prices for potential gains, even with market uncertainty and volatility.
Despite the uncertainty and volatility in the market, particularly in the NASDAQ, long-term investors are advised to recognize value and start buying when prices are at an extreme valuation, rather than trying to time the bottom. The speakers emphasized that Bitcoin, currently priced sub-$30,000, is a good value for long-term investors, and even those with a shorter-term horizon of 2 years or more can benefit from buying at these prices. They also discussed how credit conditions and employment are leading indicators, and how the pain in the market may not be over yet, but the value of Bitcoin remains. It's important to remember that this is not individual investment advice, but a reminder to consider the long-term value of Bitcoin and to start buying rather than waiting for the perfect bottom.
Important reminder for listeners: Always consult a financial professional before making investment decisions and ensure proper permissions for syndication or rebroadcasting.
While "The Investor's Podcast" provides valuable financial information, it is essential to remember that the show is for entertainment purposes only. Before making any investment decisions, it is crucial to consult a financial professional. Additionally, the show is copyrighted by The Investor's Podcast Network, and written permissions must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting. This reminder is important to ensure that the information is shared responsibly and accurately. Listeners should approach the content with a critical mindset and always double-check any information with their financial advisors. It's always better to be safe than sorry when it comes to managing your hard-earned money.
BTC078: Bitcoin Mastermind Discussion w/ Joe Carlasare, Jay Gould, & Jeff Ross (Bitcoin Podcast)
Recent Episodes from We Study Billionaires - The Investor’s Podcast Network
TIP661: Betting Big on China & Lessons from Bear Markets w/ Richard Lawrence
BTC200: Base Fiat Money and Bitcoin w/ Matthew Mežinskis (Bitcoin Podcast)
TIP660: Mastermind Q3, 2024 w/ Stig Brodersen, Tobias Carlisle and Hari Ramachandra
TIP659: Hermès Stock Deep Dive w/ Shree Viswanathan
BTC199: Bitcoin's Collateral in Real Estate w/ Leon Wankum (Bitcoin Podcast)
TIP658: Peter Lynch’s Guide to Investing in Your Expertise w/ Kyle Grieve
TIP657: Morgan Housel's Lessons to Build Wealth w/ Clay Finck
BTC198: Institutions Adopting Bitcoin w/ Max Kei and Pascal Hugli (Bitcoin Podcast)
RWH049: Crushing The Market Over 50 Years w/ Jay Bowen
TIP656: Mastering Stock Selection with an Investment Checklist w/ Clay Finck
Related Episodes
Mervyn King Says the Bank of England Is Making a ‘Big Mistake’
Former Governor of the Bank of England Mervyn King says the central bank hasn’t been covering itself in glory of late, and that’s partly thanks to it falling victim to groupthink. The economics profession is jammed with brilliant people, he argues on this week’s episode of Merryn Talks Money, but unfortunately, they’ve all been taught the same thing: money has absolutely nothing to do with inflation.
Believing that was a “big mistake,” King says it’s brought the UK economy to where it is: inflation at multi-decade highs and the BOE having its credibility questioned.
According to King, it’s likely that—despite all money supply indicators signaling the consumer price index will soon be falling fast—the BOE will keep raising rates and the UK will end up in a recession. The central bank will have made the misstep “in both directions over a period of three to four years.” He points out that whether rates go up or down a little over the next year won’t change the fact that they are likely to remain far above the historical lows to which people are accustomed. And that suggests all asset prices are going to have to come down relative to income.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
SUMMER SCHOOL 7: The Fed & Volcker's Socks
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy
Eric Leeper on *A Fiscal Accounting of COVID Inflation*
Eric Leeper is a professor of economics at the University of Virginia, a former advisor to central banks around the world, and a distinguished visiting scholar at the Mercatus Center. Eric is also a returning guest to the podcast, and he rejoins Macro Musings to talk about his work on the fiscal accounting of the COVID inflation surge. Specifically, David and Eric discuss fiscal dominance during the pandemic period, how the fiscal theory of the price level explains inflationary trends, the backward and forward-looking fiscal accounting exercises, and more.
Transcript for this week’s episode.
Eric’s Twitter: @EricMLeeper
Eric’s UVA profile
Eric’s Mercatus profile
David Beckworth’s Twitter: @DavidBeckworth
Follow us on Twitter: @Macro_Musings
Join the Macro Musings mailing list!
Check out our Macro Musings merch!
Related Links:
*A Fiscal Accounting of COVID Inflation* by Eric Leeper and Joe Anderson
*Fiscal Dominance—What It Is and How It Threatens Inflation Control* by Eric Leeper
*Three World Wars: Fiscal-Monetary Consequences* by George Hall and Thomas Sargent
*The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level With a Bubble* by Markus Brunnermeier, Sebastian Merkel, and Yuliy Sannikov
*George Hall on the History of the U.S. National Debt and Government Financing* by Macro Musings
Josh Hendrickson on Economic Growth, National Defense, and US Monetary Policy
Josh Hendrickson is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Mississippi and Chair of the Economics Department. Josh joins David on Macro Musings to discuss US monetary policy and US defense policy. Specifically, Josh and David discuss the coordination of fiscal and monetary policy and what Milton Friedman would think of it today, the Fed’s responsibility for modern inflation trends, state capacity and how it impacts economic growth, the role of national defense in the context of state capacity and economic growth, and much more.
Take the Macro Musings listener survey here.
Transcript for the episode can be found here.
Josh’s Twitter: @RebelEconProf
Josh’s Ole Miss profile: https://economics.olemiss.edu/joshua-hendrickson/
Related Links:
*Central Banks are Inflation Creators, Not Inflation Fighters* by Joshua R. Hendrickson
*Evolution, Uncertainty, and the Asymptotic Efficiency of Policy* by Brian C. Albrecht, Joshua R. Hendrickson, and Alexander William Salter
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3251917
*The Coronavirus and Lessons for Preparedness* by Josh Hendrickson
https://www.mercatus.org/publications/covid-19-crisis-response/coronavirus-and-lessons-preparedness
*Preventing Plunder, Military Technology, Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth* by Brian C. Albrecht, Joshua R. Hendrickson, and Alexander William Salter
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3025548
David’s blog: macromarketmusings.blogspot.com
David’s Twitter: @DavidBeckworth