Logo

    Comment Letter on IPPS FY2023 Proposed Rule and NDC Reporting for NTAP Drugs

    enJuly 19, 2022
    What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
    Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
    Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
    Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
    Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
    Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?

    About this Episode

    Dear Readers:
    Below is the content from a letter we submitted to CMS regarding their proposal in the IPPS FY2023 Proposed Rule to discontinue ICD-10-PCS codes for identifying drugs eligible for NTAP and switch to requiring NDC numbers be reported on inpatient. We’ve made an alternate suggestion after talking with many of you, and also offered some important steps that should be taken to ensure the integrity of the data if CMS proceeds with this proposal.

     

    Please send us your feedback. We’ll do another analysis when the Final Rule is issued in August, prior to its implementation date of October 1, 2022.

     

    Our goal is simple; we’re taking complex information and making it practical. 

     

    Until our next edition, this is Maxie Friemel and Agatha Nolen providing you with tips for increasing your Pharmacy Revenue.

     

    ******************************************

    June 15, 2022

     

    Via Electronic Submission to: http://www.regulations.gov (CMS-1771-P)

     

    Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, Administrator

    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

    Department of Health and Human Services

    Attention: CMS–1771-P

    P.O. Box 8013

    Baltimore, MD 21244–1850

     

    Re: Comments on The Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems (IPPS) for

    Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment

    System and Proposed Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2023 Rate published in the

    May 10, 2022 Federal Register (CMS-1771-P)



    Dear Administrator Brooks-Lasure: 

     

    We are pharmacists and consultants to health systems and practitioners in the area of pharmacy revenue cycle and are commenting on the proposal to change the claim identifier for drugs qualifying for New Technology Add-on Payment (NTAP) from the current ICD-10-PCS Code to the National Drug Code (NDC) number. 

     

    This is found in section II.F.8.”Proposed Use of National Drug Codes (NDCs) To Identify Cases Involving Use of Therapeutic Agents Approved for New Technology Add-On Payment”- Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2022 / Proposed Rules/ page 28353. 




    Background:

    The National Drug Code (NDC) number is a 10-digit number coordinated by the FDA which is reported on health claims as an 11-digit number. In the hospital environment, the NDC is stored in the Pharmacy IT system and is used in the clinical care of the patient for drug interaction checking, diagnosis conflicts, as well as safety aspects such as matching patient and medication through barcode medication administration and accurate restocking of floor stock supplies.

    Drug profiles are created in the Pharmacy IT system that have NDC numbers that link to billing information such as a procedure code, revenue code and HCPCS code as the HCPCS code has been the standard for reporting drugs for payment under the OPPS system since 2000.

     

    We understand that the ICD-10-PCS coding system was not designed to provide detailed coding for each drug manufactured. With the increased speed of FDA approval and the escalating costs of drugs, it has become cumbersome to have ICD-10-PCS codes issued for each drug, even when limiting the codes to only those drugs eligible for NTAP payment.



     

    • Concerns in considering this proposal:

     

     

    Multiple ways to report drugs for payment based upon patient status and code sets

    Hospitals are faced with increasingly complex requirements to report drugs to secure reimbursement with variations based upon code sets and patient status.  

     

    For Inpatient claims we have two ways of reporting drugs for additional payment:

    • Hemophilia products are reported with HCPCS codes + billed units per date of service (DOS)
    • NTAP-eligible drugs reported with ICD-10-PCS codes with only a single code independent of number of doses or days administered

    For Outpatient claims we report all drugs similar to Hemophilia products on inpatient claims (i.e. HCPCS code + billed units per DOS) with two nuances:

    • Most oral drugs are not assigned HCPCS codes as they are typically self-administered drugs and not covered under Part B
    • HCPCS Code C9399 (Unclassified drug or biological) is used for new drugs and biologicals that are approved by the FDA on or after January 1, 2004 for which a specific HCPCS code has not been assigned but CMS requires that the drug name, dose, amount of waste and National Drug Code (NDC) number be manually added to the remarks section of the claim.

     

    Hospital Pharmacy and Billing IT systems will need remediation with complex maintenance in order to accurately bill drugs based upon the type of drug, whether it is eligible for NTAP payment and the status of the patient. Changes in patient status will require programming to recalculate posted charges. Many hospitals currently do not bill some NTAP-eligible drugs due to the cumbersome process and low anticipated reimbursement. This can lead to inadvertent billing errors or omissions when a business decision is made that the anticipated payment will be less than the cost to remediate IT systems and maintain these complex billing rules. Inaccurate data could lead to erroneous future rate-setting by CMS when data is missing from claims.

     

    No national rules or standards on how to correctly code drugs using NDC numbers on 837I claims or that NDC numbers will be accepted by all payers on inpatient claims

     

    The 5010 HIPAA transaction standards define the NDC units of measure (F2, UN, GM, ML, ME), but do not define how they are to be applied in the hospital setting. There is no nationally recognized public or third-party database that authoritatively provides these instructions. State Medicaid programs have provided directions since requiring NDC numbers on outpatient claims beginning in 2006, but one eHR vendor has advised clients to use the “UN” unit of measure with a “unit” of “1” for all entries rather than using the most common four units of measure as directed by State Medicaid programs. In addition, vendors and providers also differ in the reporting of the actual NDC administered to the patient (usually captured with Bar-code Medication Administration (BCMA), or an NDC number that is retrieved from a database and “represents” what is administered to the patient matching only the generic identification but not the specific NDC number. Without specific guidance, current NDC reporting is often inaccurate resulting in increasing claim rejections for an invalid NDC number.

     

    Currently, some payers are requiring NDC numbers on outpatient claims, but rejecting the line if not reported with a HCPCS code. It is anticipated that this situation may occur similarly on inpatient claims with commercial payers.

     

    Future concerns with potential changes in FDA assignment of NDC numbers

    The FDA held public hearings in 2018 to receive input as the current structure of 10-digit NDC codes will run out of codes within 10-15 years. Although a path forward has not yet been announced, it is conceivable that a longer NDC number (e.g. 16 digits) may be required as early as 2028 requiring clinical and billing systems to be updated in all hospitals as well as updated 5010 requirements for standardized billing. CMS, MACs, and all payer systems will also require remediation to accommodate these changes. A summary of the public hearings is here:  https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/public-hearing-future-format-national-drug-code https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/are-you-prepared-for-a-major-industry-change-to-the-national-drug-code-ndc-number



     

    • Recommendations for CMS for this section of the Proposed Rule:

     

     

    1. Consider that NTAP-eligible drugs be billed on inpatient claims with the same instructions as currently used to report hemophilia products, i.e. with HCPCS codes and billing units by DOS. Having one way to bill drugs on inpatient and outpatient claims will reduce IT programming expense and reduce errors with increased standardization.
      1. Request that the CMS HCPCS Working Group assign HCPCS codes to items eligible for NTAP payments, even if they normally would not be assigned a HCPCS code (such as drugs with inpatient-only status, or an oral drug which is not usually covered under Part B). As HCPCS codes are assigned quarterly, this would eliminate the need for special notification if new NDC numbers are marketed after the implementation of the NTAP status and before the next rule-making cycle.

     

    1. If CMS adopts the proposed change to use NDC numbers to identify NTAP-eligible drugs on inpatient claims, we recommend that CMS should:
    1. Work with NUBC to provide further clarification on how these 5010 standard units of measure and billing quantities should be calculated and reported prior to utilizing the NDC number to drive payment. In effect, the unit of measure and billing quantity required with 5010 standards will be meaningless on inpatient or outpatient claims.
    2. Work with NUBC to require all payers to accept NDC numbers on inpatient claims to avoid payer-specific instructions which require complex and expensive IT programming.
    3. Provide additional details in rule-making which clarify whether the NDC reported on the claim must be from the package administered to the patient or whether it can be retrieved from a database and be “representative” of the drug administered to the patient, but not necessarily the exact NDC administered to the patient.
    4. Provide additional details in rule-making if multi-day therapies with NTAP-eligible drugs must be combined into a single line and reported only once at the start of therapy, or whether the NDC number can be reported on each DOS with the appropriate NDC unit of measure and NDC billed units and CMS will provide software logic to recognize the NDC and provide appropriate payment even if the NDC number is reported on multiple dates of service.
    5. Provide a notification process when a new NDC is marketed after final rule-making for the NTAP-eligible drug. This may be a result of improved packaging or when additional vial sizes are marketed.

     

    We appreciate CMS’ proposal to provide a streamlined mechanism for reporting certain drugs on inpatient claims as an alternative to ICD-10-PCS codes and appreciate the opportunity to comment on this proposal.

     

    Regards,



    Maxie Friemel, Pharm.D., CRCR.

    Visante, Senior Director, Pharmacy Revenue Cycle

    Agatha Nolen, Ph.D., D.Ph., FASHP, CRCR 

    Visante, Billing Consultant

    Recent Episodes from Pharmacy Revenue Cycle Podcast

    The Heavy Hitters for July Quarterly Updates

    The Heavy Hitters for July Quarterly Updates

    July 2023 is here and time to validate another round of quarterly updates from CMS. The JZ modifier, in addition to the JW modifier, is now required to effectively bill for drug waste (JW) and to attest when no drug was discarded (JZ) for all separately payable that are single-dose or single-use containers. Additionally, we have updated the Visante Quarterly Update Tool and the C9399 Tool to help organizations validate that their system is up to date with the recent changes.  

    Beat Inflation with a Part B Rebate

    Beat Inflation with a Part B Rebate

    As a part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, CMS is requiring manufacture rebates for certain Medicare Part B drugs in which the cost has exceeded inflation. Beneficiaries out of pocket costs will be reduced to 20% of the inflation-adjusted payment described in the Act.

    Don’t be “SAD”... An Alternative Way to Handle Self-Administered Drugs

    Don’t be “SAD”... An Alternative Way to Handle Self-Administered Drugs

    Self-administered drugs (SAD) have been a long-standing controversy when administered in a hospital outpatient setting from the perspectives of a patient, frontline healthcare workers, and billing. “Why does my Tylenol cost $10 per tablet, but the 1,000-count bottle I have at home was purchased for $3?” This question is often difficult to answer and may lead to unintended operational consequences.  

    Botulinum toxin PA – Are you exempt?

    Botulinum toxin PA – Are you exempt?

    The new year brings a new focus on resolutions including prior authorization processes. In July 2020, Medicare implemented a prior authorization process for select services including botulinum toxin. Its time to revisit workflow processes and, if not exempt, confirm with respective teams that a prior authorization is obtained prior to providing the service.

    Designer HCPCS Codes are in the Mainstream Spotlight

    Designer HCPCS Codes are in the Mainstream Spotlight

    The Pharmacy Revenue Cycle is starting out with a new fashion design for 2023 as there are 36 new brand-specific HCPCS codes. CMS has been reviewing its approach for assigning HCPCS Level II codes for drugs that have been approved under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act 505(b)(2) New Drug Application (NDA) or the Biologics License Application (BLA) after October 2003. These drugs are not rated therapeutically equivalent to the reference drug listed in the FDA’s Orange Book and therefore are considered single-source products according to section 1847A(c)(6) of the Social Security Act. Each single source product should be assigned a unique billing and payment code which now includes the brand name in the description to differentiate the HCPCS. Additionally, CMS removes brand names from the HCPCS description when the code is used for multiple source drugs.  

    In efforts to decrease the use of “not otherwise specified codes” and align with the definitions embedded within the Social Security Act for single and multisource products, CMS plans to continue their review of products that were approved under separate NDA or BLA pathways after October 2003 and are not considered therapeutically equivalent to a listed reference product in an existing code.  

     

    Shout Outs! 

     

    1. Pharmacy and revenue integrity teams should ensure their HCPCS codes have been updated to reflect the changes effective 1/1/2023 and be on the lookout for additional brand-specific HCPCS codes in quarterly updates. 
    2. Pharmacy and IT teams should evaluate their processes to ensure each NDC is matched to the correct HCPCS and that the NDC being administered to the patient is the NDC that is represented on the claim.  
    3. Don’t forget to check out our updated tools to help you manage your pharmacy revenue cycle!
     
     

    Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule- CY2023

    Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule- CY2023

    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provided the OPPS Final Rule for CY2023 in the Federal Register on November 23, 2022. Provisions in this rule will be effective for dates of service on or after January 1, 2023.

    Significant changes for drug reimbursement and coding occur in three areas: 340B-acquired drugs, non-opioid pain management reimbursement in Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASC) and Hospital Outpatient Departments (HOPD), and new requirements for reporting waste in HOPD.

    340B-acquired Drugs

    In light of the Supreme Court decision in American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 142 S. Ct. 1896 (2022), CMS is applying the default rate, generally average sales price (ASP) plus 6 percent, to 340B acquired drugs and biologicals and removing the increase to the conversion factor that was made in CY 2018 to implement the 340B policy in a budget neutral manner. These changes are reflected in posted ASP Pricing Files and Addendum B reimbursement rates.

    Non-opioid pain management

    CMS will provide separate payment for five drugs in the ASC setting (but not in the HOPD setting) as non-opioid pain management drugs that function as supplies (Exparel, Omidria, Dextenza, Xaracoll, and Posimir). Note that Zynrelef received pass-through payment status on April 1, 2022, and is therefore eligible for separate payment in both the ASC and HOPD setting in CY2023.

    Drug Waste Reporting in Hospital Outpatient Departments

    New reporting requirements for drugs where there is no discarded waste were detailed in the CY2023 Physician Fee Schedule Rule and summarized in a recent Visante newsletter and podcast.

    The following links and notes provide additional information on changes in drug reimbursement in HOPD for CY2023:

    1. Pass-through expirations CY 2022- 32 drugs will have pass-through payment end on December 31, 2022. Table 57 (page 198 pdf)
    2. Pass-through Drugs and biologicals that will receive one to four quarters of separate payment in CY 2023- 43 drugs will receive separate payment in one or more quarters in CY2023. Table 58 (pg 202 pdf)
    3. Pass-through Drugs and biologicals with pass-through payment status to expire after CY2023 (with pass-through payment end dates)- 49 drugs will continue with pass-through status throughout CY2023. Table 59 (pg 208 pdf)
    4. Packaging Threshold- CMS raises the per-day cost packaging threshold for separate payments from $130 to $135.
    5. Biosimilars- Visante has provided a recent newsletter that details payment increases for biosimilars.

    Hope this summary is helpful in evaluating your reimbursement for the coming year!

    SHOUT-OUT

    1. All pharmacy revenue cycle teams should review the OPPS CY 2023 Rule Final Rule and ensure systems are updated by January 1, 2023.

     

    Drug Waste is Packed with a Punch and a Refund

    Drug Waste is Packed with a Punch and a Refund

    Dive into the CY23 CMS Physician Fee Schedule rule as it relates to the new requirements for discarded drugs or drug waste. A JW and JZ modifier are required for all Part B separately payable single-dose or single-use packages. Additionally, manufacturers are required to pay a refund for discarded drugs that exceed 10% of the total charges. 

    Payment Increases for Biosimilars

    Payment Increases for Biosimilars

    Payment Increases for Biosimilars

    On April 16th, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was signed into law. Section 11403 requires a temporary increase in add-on payment for qualifying biosimilars from 6% to 8% for 5 years. This change was implemented on October 1, 2022, and CMS uploaded pricing files that already include the temporary price increase.

    Applicable 5-year period
    This increase began on October 1, 2022, for products for which payment was made by September 30, 2022. For other biosimilar products in which payment was made between October 1, 2022 - December 31, 2027, the 5-year period will begin on the first day of such a calendar quarter in which the payment was first made. For example, payments made between October 1, 2022 - December 31, 2022, the 5-year period will begin October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2027.
     
    Qualifying biosimilar
    A qualifying biosimilar product is defined as a biosimilar biological product with an ASP that is not more than the ASP of the reference product. Also, a biosimilar biological product ASP during a calendar quarter throughout the 5-year period is not more than the ASP of the reference product for such quarter.
     
    Add on payment
    The temporary price increase applies an 8% of the reference product ASP to the ASP of the biosimilar. This applies to separately payable pass-through and non-pass-through status biosimilars in accordance with the OPPS.
     
    Shout Outs

    1. Pharmacy and Finance Teams - should review your biosimilar strategy and financial models. CMS 2022 Q4 pricing files were uploaded to reflect the 8% temporary price increase.

    Our goal is simple; we’re taking complex information and making it practical.
    Until our next edition, this is Maxie Friemel and Agatha Nolen providing you with tips for increasing your Pharmacy Revenue Cycle.

    Car T-cell Therapy: Coverage and Billing-Outpatient (Updated – October 1, 2022)

    Car T-cell Therapy: Coverage and Billing-Outpatient (Updated – October 1, 2022)

    Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an example of a rapidly emerging immunotherapy approach called adoptive cell transfer (ACT) where patients’ own immune cells are collected and used to treat their cancer.

    This newsletter details coverage and billing instructions when the products are used on an outpatient basis and has been updated to reflect HCPCS codes current as of October 1, 2022.

    The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates cellular therapy products, human gene therapy products, and certain devices related to cell and gene therapy. The FDA provides a list of approved cellular and gene therapies including six that are Car T-cell therapies:

    ABECMA (idecabtagene vicleucel)

    BREYANZI (lisocabtagene maraleucel)

    CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel)

    KYMRIAH (tisagenlecleucel)

    TECARTUS (brexucabtagene autoleucel)

    YESCARTA (axicabtagene ciloleucel)

    Coverage

    CMS finalized a National Coverage Determination (NCD 110.24) on Car T-cell therapies on 8/7/2019. The NCD detailed that for Medicare Fee-For-Service and Medicare Advantage, Medicare covers the autologous treatment for cancer with T-cells expressing at least one chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) when:

    • Administered at healthcare facilities enrolled in the FDA risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS)
    • Used for a medically accepted indication, i.e. for either an FDA-approved indication as detailed in the FDA-approved label for the product, or for other uses when the product has been FDA-approved and the use is supported in one or more CMS-approved compendia

    When the above requirements are not met, the CAR T-cell therapy is non-covered.

    In addition, the routine costs in clinical trials that use CAR T-cell therapy as an investigational agent are covered when they meet the requirements listed in NCD 310.1.

    Billing and Reimbursement

    HCPCS/CPT codes

    Billing for CAR T-cell therapy on outpatients includes HCPCS codes for the therapies as well as the administration. All CAR T-cell products should be billed with revenue code 891.

    Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) is reported with HCPCS code Q2042- Tisagenlecleucel, up to 600 million car-positive viable T cells, including leukapheresis and dose preparation procedures, per therapeutic dose.

    Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel) is reported with HCPCS code Q2041- Axicabtagene Ciloleucel, up to 200 Million Autologous Anti-CD19 CAR T Cells, including leukapheresis and dose preparation procedures, per infusion.

    Tecartus- (brexucabtagene autoleucel) is reported with HCPCS code Q2053- Brexucabtagene autoleucel, up to 200 million autologous anti-cd19 car positive viable t cells, includimg leukapheresis and dose preparation procedures, per therapeutic dose.

    Breyanzi- (lisocabtagene maraleucel) is reported with HCPCS code Q2054- Lisocabtagene maraleucel, up to 110 million autologous anti-cd19 car-positive viable t cells, including leukapheresis and dose preparation procedures, per therapeutic dose.

    Abecma (idecabtagene vicleucel) is reported with HCPCS code Q2055- Idecabtagene vicleucel, up to 460 million autologous b-cell maturation antigen (bcma) directed car-positive t cells, including leukapheresis and dose preparation procedures, per therapeutic dose.

    Carvykti (ciltacabtagene autoleucel) received FDA approval on 2/28/2022, and CMS has assigned a new HCPCS code effective October 1, 2022: code Q2056- Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, up to 100 million autologous b-cell maturation antigen (bcma) directed car-positive t cells, including leukapheresis and dose preparation procedures, per therapeutic dose.

    The administration of any CAR T-cell therapy should be reported with CPT code 0540T- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy; CAR-T cell administration, autologous. This CPT code should be reported with revenue code 874 – Infusion of Modified Cells w/CPT 0540T.

    Some payers also require that the claim include a new value code 86 with the invoice/acquisition cost when revenue code 891 is present on an outpatient claim. 

    CMS provides instructions that providers may include all costs and charges and report them under revenue code 891, or they may separately report cell collection, storage and other preparatory activities. However, CMS does not reimburse these codes separately and they are reported for information only. Detailed examples on these two options for CAR T-cell billing for outpatients is available at CMS Transmittal #10454- (November 13, 2020).

    Revenue Codes

    CMS has also provided instructions for specific revenue codes to report all services associated with CAR T-cell therapy for inpatients and outpatients. The following Revenue Codes are used:

    0871 – Cell Collection w/Current Procedural Technology (CPT) code 0537T

    0872 – Specialized Biologic Processing and Storage – Prior to Transport w/CPT 0538T

    0873 – Storage and Processing after Receipt of Cells from Manufacturer w/CPT 0539T

    0874 – Infusion of Modified Cells w/CPT 0540T

    0891 – Special Processed Drugs – FDA Approved Cell Therapy w/HCPCS Q2041, Q2042, or C9399

    SHOUT-OUTS!

    1. Pharmacy and Revenue Integrity should determine if CAR T-cell therapy will be provided and ensure that appropriate chargemaster entries for the products are established with product specific HCPCS codes and the unique revenue code, 891.
    2. Pharmacy, Managed Care and Revenue Integrity should determine if any payers require the invoice cost to be added to claim with value code 86 and establish a process to ensure that the invoice cost is correctly added to the claim.
    3. Revenue Integrity and HIM Coders should receive instructions as to which products will be utilized and the medical record location where the administration will be recorded.
    4. Pharmacy should ensure that if the product is administered under a clinical trial, or received at no cost from the manufacturer, that it is clearly indicated in the medical record to ensure proper billing and coding.

    Our goal is simple; we’re taking complex information and making it practical. 

    Until our next edition, this is Maxie Friemel and Agatha Nolen providing you with tips for increasing your Pharmacy Revenue.

     

    Vacating the 340B Payment Reduction Policy

    Vacating the 340B Payment Reduction Policy

    On September 28, 2022, the US District Court issued a ruling that states the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is required to vacate the prospective portion of the 340B reimbursement rate outlined in the 2022 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Rule. In other words, payment rates must revert to the default of ASP + 6% rather than the reduced rate for select drugs of ASP - 22.5%. The decision was determined to not cause substantial disruption; thereby, requiring HHS to begin immediately. This was in response to American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 142 S. Ct. 1896 (2022), in which the Supreme Court ruled against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) stating they exceeded their statutory authority by varying its 2018 and 2019 OPPS reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals without first conducting a statutorily mandated survey of hospitals acquisition costs.

     

    CMS has issued a statement that they will be reprocessing claims contractors paid on or after September 28, 2022, using the default rate of ASP+6%. CMS is also uploading a revised OPPS drug file that will apply the default rate generally ASP+6% to the 340B drugs for the remainder of this year. Additionally, providers can contact their MAC to make a mass adjustment for claims paid prior to September 28, 2022. 

     

     

    Shout Outs!

     

    1. Revenue integrity teams should be aware that Medicare fee-for-service claims paid at the ASP - 22.5% will be reprocessed and paid at generally ASP+6%. This is effective for claims paid on or after September 28, 2022.
    2. Revenue integrity teams should contact their MAC to determine the process for making a mass adjustment to claims paid prior to September 28, 2022.
    3. Pharmacy and finance teams should review the impact to the price change and the associated impact to pharmacy budgets.
    4. Revenue cycle teams should be on the lookout for upcoming discussions and changes to the OPPS CY 2023.

     

    Our goal is simple; we’re taking complex information and making it practical. Until our next edition, this is Maxie Friemel and Agatha Nolen providing you with tips for increasing your Pharmacy Revenue.

     

     

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io