Podcast Summary
Corcoran's testimony: The defense aims to suppress former attorney Corcoran's testimony and memos, which could significantly weaken the government's case in the Mar-a-Lago investigation if successful.
The focus of Donald Trump's legal team in the Mar-a-Lago case is on suppressing the evidence and testimony of former attorney Evan Corcoran. Corcoran's memos and testimony, which were compelled by a prior judge, connect Trump to potential willful intent to hide and obstruct justice regarding the handling of classified documents. If Judge Aileen Cannon agrees with the defense and suppresses this evidence, the government's case could significantly weaken, leaving only grainy video footage as key evidence. The importance of Corcoran's testimony cannot be overstated, and if it is excluded from the trial, there may be little hope for the government's case in the Mar-a-Lago investigation.
Trump's Lawyer Obstruction: Trump's lawyer Evan Corcoran obstructed the investigation into the return of presidential records by delegating the review process to Trump, potentially allowing him to move documents and obstruct justice.
Evan Corcoran, one of Donald Trump's lawyers during the controversy over the retention of presidential records and top secret documents, played a pivotal role in the negotiations with the National Archive for their return. Despite the failure of these negotiations, Corcoran continued to represent Trump and delegated the process of reviewing the boxes to him, allowing Trump to potentially obstruct the investigation and move documents around in an elaborate shell game. Corcoran's actions, which included turning a blind eye to Trump's likely corruption, ultimately led to the indictment of himself and other lawyers involved in the case.
Mar-a-Lago search: Trump and team's handling of Mar-a-Lago search questioned, documents not reviewed properly, areas entered unauthorized, labeled as due diligence search
The handling of the search for classified documents at Mar-a-Lago by Donald Trump and his team was questionable at best. Trump had already sanitized the boxes before his lawyer, Evan Corcoran, arrived to review them. The room was staged, and Trump insisted on being present during the search. Trump's team did not want Corcoran to examine the documents alone and instead chose to be present. Trump reportedly spent only 20 minutes reviewing around 40 boxes and came out with fewer than 40 documents. Despite being instructed not to, Trump's team went into areas they were told not to enter, such as a locked office and cabinet. The documents were then labeled and signed off as the result of a due diligence search, even though the search was not conducted in accordance with proper procedures. The situation raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of the search for classified documents and the potential mishandling of government records.
NAD plus and aging: NAD plus levels decline significantly with age, leading to aging symptoms, but Qualia NAD Plus can help boost NAD plus levels up to 50% through precursors
NAD plus, a cofactor essential for cellular energy production and DNA maintenance, declines significantly with age, leading to aging symptoms. Qualia NAD Plus, a clinically tested and doctor-formulated supplement, can help boost NAD plus levels up to 50% by providing precursors that the body can convert into NAD plus. By staying at the forefront of aging research and incorporating Qualia NAD Plus into their routine, individuals can potentially regain vitality and support their cellular health. Evan Corcoran, a person mentioned in the discussion, is facing an indictment related to Donald Trump's instructions to manipulate documents.
False Claims, Thorough Searches: False claims and mishandling of documents can lead to incomplete searches and potential legal consequences, while thorough searches are crucial in ensuring the accuracy and completeness of information.
During the search for classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, an IT consultant named Evan Corcoran made a false claim about Hillary Clinton's email server and suggested deleting documents. However, the individuals he thought were cooperating with Trump, such as housekeepers and cooks, were already working with the Department of Justice. They knew that not all boxes had been properly searched and provided information leading to the issuance of a search warrant. Despite having his attorney-client privilege stripped away, Corcoran testified to the grand jury and turned over his notes and audio recordings. Trump, who didn't know the names of many executives in his own organization, was unaware of the cooperation of these individuals. This incident highlights the importance of thorough searches and the potential consequences of false claims and mishandling of documents.
Trump investigation: A federal judge ruled it's likely Trump committed a crime related to election interference and the removal of attorney-client privilege could hinder the prosecution's case against him.
A federal judge in Washington D.C. has ruled it is more likely than not that former President Donald Trump committed a crime related to the Eastman documents and potential efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. This decision came before Trump's recent indictment in New York for 34 felony counts. If a judge in this ongoing case suppresses the testimony of Trump's attorney, Evan Corcoran, and upholds the removal of attorney-client privilege, it could significantly hinder the prosecutor's ability to make their case against Trump for willful, corrupt intent. This is a significant development in the ongoing investigations into Trump's actions surrounding the 2020 election.
Trump's legal representation testimony: Evan Corcoran's testimony as Trump's lawyer in the Mar-a-Lago investigation could be crucial in determining Trump's intent. Prosecutors could have challenged its use, but didn't, and Trump's team argues they've waived the issue.
The testimony of Evan Corcoran, a lawyer who represented former President Donald Trump in the Mar-a-Lago investigation, could be crucial in determining whether prosecutors can prove Trump's willful intent in the case. The use of this testimony, along with other evidence and documents, is unusual but was done within constitutional safeguards. Prosecutors could have appealed the issue, but they didn't. Trump's team argues that the prosecution has waived the issue. Trump himself can still argue it in court. The judge, Judge Amit Mehta, has a history of involving parties who don't have a vested interest in the case. Other issues, such as the exclusion of Corcoran's notes and evidence, could also impact the case significantly. The outcome of these issues will be discussed in upcoming court filings by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Legal AF show: The Legal AF show on Midas Touch Network offers exclusive, in-depth analysis of legal and political issues, hosted by Michael Popok, available for free on YouTube, major audio podcast platforms, and the Midas Touch Network, with opportunities for viewer engagement through comments and Patreon.
The Midas Touch Network's Legal AF show, hosted by Michael Popok, provides exclusive and in-depth analysis of the top stories at the intersection of law and politics. The show airs every Wednesday and Saturday at 8 p.m. Eastern time and can be accessed for free on YouTube, major audio podcast platforms, and the Midas Touch Network. Viewers can engage with Michael directly by leaving comments or joining his Patreon community for additional content. The show offers a unique perspective that goes beyond headlines and is a valuable resource for those interested in legal and political issues. So, if you want to stay informed and get a deeper understanding of the day's most important legal concepts, tune in to Legal AF on the Midas Touch Network.