Logo
    Search

    Donald Trump’s January 6 indictment

    en-gbAugust 04, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • Historic indictment for Trump: Conspiring against the US during 2020 electionFormer President Trump indicted for defrauding, disenfranchising voters, and obstructing official proceeding during 2020 election. First time a US president has faced such charges post-office.

      Former President Donald Trump faces a historic and serious indictment for allegedly conspiring against the United States during the 2020 presidential election. The indictment, handed down by special counsel Jack Smith, includes charges of defrauding the United States, disenfranchising voters, and obstructing an official proceeding. This marks the first time Trump has been indicted for actions taken while in office. The indictment, detailed in 45 pages, alleges Trump's lies and efforts to overturn the election were crimes against the American people. The significance of this moment goes beyond the country and the American justice system, as it sets a precedent for holding a former president accountable for actions taken during their term. The indictment comes as Trump is the current frontrunner for the 2024 presidential election. The story unfolds on election night, when Trump's team started to realize he might have lost the election, leading to attempts to overturn the results.

    • Trump's post-election efforts to stay in powerTrump and allies sought illegal means to change election results based on false claims and conspiracy theories, but efforts were largely unsuccessful

      During the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump and his allies, including Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, believed they couldn't win through legal means, so they sought alternative ways for Trump to remain in power. They focused on allegations of election fraud and tried to lobby election officials in battleground states to change the outcome or conduct new recounts. Trump also attempted to pressure the Justice Department to investigate and announce fraud, despite having no evidence. The efforts were largely based on conspiracy theories and false claims, as acknowledged by the Trump campaign itself. The indictment refers to these actions as sham investigations.

    • Former President Trump's plan to overturn the 2020 election results through fake electoral certificatesTrump's team devised a complex plan to send fraudulent electoral certificates to Congress, aiming to confuse VP Pence and delay certification, but ultimately failed due to Pence's refusal to accept them.

      During the 2020 presidential election, former President Trump and his allies attempted to overturn the results through a complex plan involving fake electoral certificates. John Eastman, a conservative legal scholar, devised this scheme, known as the "fake elector's plot," which aimed to send fraudulent certificates to Congress to confuse Vice President Mike Pence during the certification process. The goal was to delay the certification beyond January 6th, 2021, creating a legal gray area and potentially allowing Trump to stay in office. However, Pence refused to accept these fake certificates and rejected the pressure from Trump to do so, ultimately thwarting the plan. Despite facing numerous obstacles, the Trump team's desperation to challenge the election results led them to pursue this elaborate but ultimately unsuccessful scheme.

    • Trump's Role in the Capitol RiotsFormer President Trump's persistent claims of election fraud and his failure to call off the Capitol riots have led to obstruction charges in the DC indictment. New details reveal Trump's suggestion to use the Insurrection Act and campaign's dismissive response.

      During the January 6, 2021 Capitol riots, former President Trump encouraged the crowd to believe that Vice President Pence had the power to overturn the election results, despite Pence's objections. Trump's persistent claims of election fraud and his failure to call off the attack once it had begun are central to the obstruction charges against him in the DC indictment. New details from the indictment include Jeff Clark's suggestion, three days before the riot, that the Insurrection Act could be used to suppress protests and riots. Trump's campaign dismissed the indictment as part of an ongoing attempt to interfere with the 2024 presidential election. However, the indictment provides a detailed account of Trump's actions and statements on January 6, 2021, which contributed to the violent events that day.

    • Trump repeatedly told lies about election fraud despite being informed of the truthProsecution emphasizes Trump's 'willful denial' of election results, arguing it led to Capitol attack and undermined electoral process

      That the prosecution in the Trump indictment is emphasizing that Trump was repeatedly informed that his claims of election fraud were false, yet he knowingly continued to disseminate them. This is significant because it forms the basis for the charge that Trump's actions led to the Capitol attack and undermined the electoral process. The prosecution argues that Trump was in "willful denial," despite being advised by numerous individuals, including family members and top advisors, that he had lost the election fair and square. This argument aims to refute any potential defense from Trump that he sincerely believed the election was stolen. Additionally, some charges against Trump do not hinge on his belief in the fraud but rather on his actions and their consequences. However, the trial could be complex as it involves the application of the First Amendment and the concept of "corrupt purpose" in relation to Trump's actions.

    • Will Trump be acquitted if one juror sympathizes with him?The outcome of Trump's trial depends on a unanimous jury, but if just one juror sympathizes with him, Trump could be acquitted. The trial includes six unindicted coconspirators, and if Trump is found guilty, he could face up to 35 years in prison.

      The outcome of Donald Trump's ongoing trial in Washington D.C. hinges on the decision of a unanimous jury. With the jury being predominantly Democratic, there's a possibility that Trump could be acquitted if just one juror sympathizes with him and believes in his claims of election fraud. The indictment includes six unindicted coconspirators, and the reason why they haven't been charged yet is unclear. Jack Smith, the special counsel, may be trying to expedite the trial before the election in 2024 to streamline the process and avoid complications with multiple defendants. If Trump is found guilty, he could face up to 5 years in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States, up to 20 years for conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding and obstruction of an official proceeding, and up to 10 years for conspiracy against rights. The judge assigned to the case, Tanya Tritican, has a reputation for handing down tough sentences, which could mean harsher penalties for Trump if found guilty.

    • A president facing criminal trials presents unique challengesDespite potential jail time, a president can still be elected, requiring accommodations for court appearances and campaigning

      The legal situation surrounding Donald Trump's potential criminal trials and his presidential campaign is unprecedented and presents unique challenges. Trump could be facing significant jail time, which would impact his ability to campaign and fulfill the duties of the presidency if he is elected. The feasibility of how this would play out, including rescheduling debates and court appearances, has not been fully explored. Despite these challenges, it is possible for Trump to be elected president even if he is convicted of crimes. The American legal system requires defendants to appear in court, and failure to do so can result in contempt charges. Judges may make accommodations for Trump's schedule, but ultimately, he would need to adjust his campaigning around the court's timetable. This situation raises significant questions about the practicality of a president facing criminal charges while in office and the potential impact on the presidency and the political landscape.

    • Trump's Legal Troubles and Future Bid for OfficeDespite legal issues, Trump's popularity within GOP remains strong, and his potential re-election could impact ongoing cases. Challengers may face backlash for opposing Trump's stance on issues like abortion. America's political system shows vulnerability and resilience as it holds Trump accountable for attempts to manipulate the rule of law.

      Former President Donald Trump's legal troubles have not deterred him from running for office again, and he may use the power of the presidency to potentially influence the outcome of his cases if he is re-elected. Trump's indictments have not significantly impacted his popularity within the Republican Party, with some polls even showing an increase in support. However, any Republican challenger who does not align with Trump's stance on abortion of the law could face backlash from his base. The current situation underscores the vulnerability and resilience of America's political system, as Trump's attempts to manipulate the rule of law during his campaign and presidency led to the appointment of a special counsel and the indictment process. Despite the unprecedented nature of these events, the system is reasserting itself and demonstrating its ability to hold those in power accountable.

    • Journalist faces tough subject, March on Washington anniversary, Reverend Sharpton's fight, Shopify's business growth, All-new Lexus GXJournalist tackles challenging book subject, March on Washington marks 60th anniversary, Reverend Sharpton advocates for police reform, Shopify empowers business growth, All-new Lexus GX combines capability and luxury

      Hugo Lal, a journalist, recognizes a formidable adversary in his current book subject. Meanwhile, this month marks the 60th anniversary of the March on Washington, which led to the passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1964. Reverend Al Sharpton discusses his beliefs on the misuse of Martin Luther King's I Have A Dream speech by some on the right and his ongoing fight for police reform in a new Politics Weekly America episode. Additionally, Shopify is a versatile commerce platform that assists businesses in growing, from their initial online shop to their first physical store and beyond. The all-new Lexus GX is an exceptional vehicle that pushes its drivers out of their comfort zones with its capabilities while also spoiling them with intuitive technology and luxurious features.

    Recent Episodes from Today in Focus

    Rishi Sunak staggers on – but for how long?

    Rishi Sunak staggers on – but for how long?
    The prime minister is another MP down after Natalie Elphicke crossed the floor to join Labour. With the Conservatives trailing by 30 points after heavy local election losses, what options does Rishi Sunak now have? Guardian political correspondent Kiran Stacey tells Helen Pidd what these losses mean for the PM, and looks at what calculation Keir Starmer made in taking in a rightwing Tory. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

    The London Bridge ‘hero’ who could go to prison for 99 years

    The London Bridge ‘hero’ who could go to prison for 99 years
    In 2019, ex-offender Marc Conway helped hold down a knifeman who killed two people in a terror attack. But by doing so he risked being recalled to prison. Simon Hattenstone reports Marc Conway risked his life to stop the London Bridge terror attack. Why did he fear being sent to prison for it?. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

    Related Episodes

    Trump re-enters the battleground for the presidency: Politics Weekly America

    Trump re-enters the battleground for the presidency: Politics Weekly America
    Donald Trump has announced his third run for president, and not all Republicans are happy about it. Not only have there been a string of midterm losses by candidates he handpicked and supported – but in the background, federal and state authorities are investigating Trump’s personal, political and financial conduct. This week, Jonathan Freedland speaks to the political columnist Jonathan Martin of Politico and unpacks how the Republican party can finally break away from Trump’s legacy

    The man who sued Trump for incitement: Politics Weekly Extra

    The man who sued Trump for incitement: Politics Weekly Extra
    In the aftermath of the 6 January attack on the Capitol, Donald Trump was impeached and acquitted for a second time. Jonathan Freedland talks to Congressman Eric Swalwell who talks about what a special select committee is doing to hold those deemed responsible for inciting the mob accountable. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/politicspod

    How would a possible third indictment affect Trump’s 2024 run?

    How would a possible third indictment affect Trump’s 2024 run?
    On Tuesday, Donald Trump said he had received a letter suggesting he was about to be indicted by special counsel Jack Smith in connection with the criminal investigation into the Capitol riot on 6 January 2021. It would be his third criminal indictment. Jonathan Freedland asks Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, if the pile of indictments could grow too large even for Trump – and his voters. Plus: who is Glenn Youngkin, the governor of Virginia? If Republicans do decide Trump is too badly damaged, might they turn to him?

    Why are third party candidates a threat to Biden in 2024?

    Why are third party candidates a threat to Biden in 2024?
    This week, Joe Biden admitted that he probably would not be running for re-election if Donald Trump was not likely to be the Republican candidate. The thoughts of a rehashed presidential race in 2024 has many Americans dreading next year, and some are looking to third-party or independent candidates as potential alternatives. So why hasn’t an outsider been more successful in the past? Is running independently of the Democrat and Republican parties a legitimate offer to voters, or nothing more than an election spoiler? And if the answer is the latter, why should the president be the one to worry? This week, Jonathan Freedland speaks to Nitish Pahwa of Slate about why Democrats are worried that Biden could suffer the same fate as Hilary Clinton in 2016

    Thomas Frank: Donald Trump is right but a hypocrite – Behind the Lines podcast

    Thomas Frank: Donald Trump is right but a hypocrite – Behind the Lines podcast
    When the US president talked about ‘the forgotten men and women of our country, people who work hard but no longer have a voice’ he connected with voters. After his winning pitch to the working class have the Democrats lost their relevance? And did Barack Obama miss the chance to create true change?