Drilling down on HR culture, employee engagement and its nexus in the workplace --- with Tammy Triolo, Founder of PCQ Consulting.

We’re honored that you’ve joined us!  Thank you!
We’re currently being downloaded in 111 countries!

We deliver the facts … not fiction, covering every story with integrity and passion.

In this explosive, follow-up, investigative interview, we further shine the light of the truth and drill deeper, farther and wider with Jana Guyewski Latigar (the sister of Crystal McCrory Jones).

♦ We have word that KNOE News Channel 8 has a team of investigators actively working this case and will soon have an investigative report on the fact pattern regarding Crystal’s mysterious, untimely and shocking death.

♦ We've uncovered shocking details regarding the Forensic Pathologist in this case — and devastating errors that led to the exoneration of the West Memphis Three.

On February 9th, 2023 in the sleepy town of Oak Grove, Louisiana, (population: ~2,275), Crystal was found dead in her home from what was reported to be a “self-inflicted” gunshot wound to the head.

The West Carroll Parish Sheriff’s Office (WCPSO) had this case “solved” in 105 minutes — less time than it takes to drive from Oak Grove to Shreveport, LA.

From the initial deputy being notified by WCPSO to perform a “welfare check on the deceased” — law enforcement would've had to find Crystal’s body; secure the crime scene, gathering, bagging and tagging all relevant evidence; canvass the neighborhood; track down any and all investigatory leads; interview any/all relevant suspects; complete all investigative written reports, while preserving the chain of custody … in under 2 hours!

This would be amazing if it happened.  In fact, it DID NOT happen this way!  Police reports were strewn with misspelled words and inaccuracies, timelines of the spouse that don’t match up.  Premortem bruising was ignored and overlooked — which is a clear indication of a pre-death vicious struggle.

♦ What was the hurry?   Why the rush to judgement?
♦ Why the hostile, combative responses from the Sheriff when family members of the deceased simply sought information into the death of their loved one?   Isn’t it normal for a devastated family to have questions, to seek answers?

In this exclusive interview Jana sheds personal insight from her trauma-informed experience on courageously, (slowly) working her way through the life-altering grief stemming from her sister’s death.  She shares insightful coping strategies for anyone dealing with similar traumas.

Also:

♦ We talk about Complicated Grief, which can occur as a result of the traumatic and unexpected death of a loved one. We explore the Cycle of Grief.  Everyone experiences grief — it is part of our human experience.

♦ Other residents of West Carroll Parish have shared their concerns that there’ve been other cases that were quickly ruled a “suicide” when the facts weren't so clear.

Follow Justice for Crystal McCrory Jones (the Facebook Group honoring Crystal’s life and memory) and sign the Change.org petition which seeks to press law enforcement officials to re-open an investigation surrounding her mysterious death.

Tune in and be educated and empowered!
𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐫𝐲!

Note well:  All persons are innocent unless proven otherwise in a court of law.
Follow our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot here:

Welcome to this explosive episode of “Light ‘Em Up” — actively being downloaded in 108 countries!

Thank you so much for your enormous response to our previous multiple record-setting episode!

As we continue to speak truth to power and shine an intense spotlight on the error-filled autopsy report and the unsubstantiated claims of the coroner, as well as the shoddy, crooked, backwoods investigational practices of the West Carroll Parish Sheriff’s Department and the shady, collusive actions on the part of the 5th Judicial Circuit District Attorney Ms. Penny Douciere — we offer this brand new fact-based, investigatory episode to you.

We submit that those involved in the “investigation” of this case willfully have chosen to look the other way.  THAT is a text-book definition of corruption and a dereliction of official duty under the color of authority.  We ask, why?  Why wouldn’t the Louisiana State Police open an investigation?  Why the rush to judgement on the part of the coroner?

On February 9, 2023 in Oak Grove, Louisiana (population 1,441), Crystal McCrory Jones was found dead in her home from what was reported to be a “self-inflicted” gunshot wound to the head.

Her husband, Tony Jones (who reportedly at one time was an employee with the same W. Carroll Sheriff’s Department charged with “investigating” the case) was reported to be the last person who saw her alive, at or around 8 am on the day of her death.

Within 1 hour and 45 minutes of the knowledge of Crystal’s death, the case was ruled to be a suicide.

The fact pattern shows that there was extensive bruising on her hands, inner thighs, and a fingernail was broken off of her left hand: evidence of a pre-mortem struggle.

Bruising is bleeding into the surrounding tissue and there's no bleeding if the heart isn't pumping. Bruising is indicative of clear signs that there was an intense struggle, before she died — as once the heart stops pumping blood --- there can be no bruising.

As education is always a foundational pillar of Light ‘Em Up, in this fact-packed episode we drill down on:

♦ What is a medico-legal death investigation — and why it is of the utmost importance that it takes place in a timely, professional and painstakingly thorough manner.  It didn’t!

We define:

♦ What an autopsy and autopsy report are, the cause and manner of death and criteria for determining a suicide.

We ask:

♦ Who called in a “welfare check” on Crystal in her home, and why? Were they trying to establish an alibi?

We investigate:

♦ The difference between a suicide and a homicide.

We highlight:

♦ specific Louisiana laws governing coroners’ duties, autopsies and investigations — which expose officials as derelict in their duty.

We clarify:

♦ the 4 major problems in conducting death investigations.

♦ And we instruct on the 5 objectives of an autopsy and a ton of other compelling aspects of this mysterious case.

How is it that every aspect of the criminal justice system and those officials charged with honoring their oath to protect and serve and do their sworn duty failed Crystal?

Crystal loved life — her presence blessed everyone who encountered her.
The sad truth is that if this can happen to her — it can happen to you!

We’re in this fight!  We’ll continue with this case until we see some form of “justice” delivered to Crystal's surviving family members.

Follow this link to the Change.org petition for Crystal as well as the Facebook page remembering her here.

All persons are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Visit our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot

Thank you for joining us!  We’ve now penetrated 108 countries globally, 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 because of YOU!

This case stunk from its inception.

Tonight, we explore the death of Crystal McCrory Jones, a sweet mother of 2 and a friend to all who were blessed to know her.

You’ve heard of homicide, defined as the unlawful killing of one human being by another. We’re betting you may not have heard as much about uxoricide.  The killing of one’s wife. You’ll have to determine for yourself, but there are very suspicious details.

We were very fortunate to sit down with Jana Guyewski-Latigar (the sister of the deceased).

On February 9, 2023, in the sleepy town of Oak Grove, Louisiana, (2020 Census population: 1,441), Crystal was found dead in her home from what was reported to be a “self-inflicted” gunshot wound to the head.

Within 1 hour & 45 minutes, cause of death was ruled a suicide.

Here are just a few more of the highly suspicious facts:

♦ Two days prior to Crystal’s death, the Ring Doorbell Camera to her home was cut off. Coincidence, or evidence of pre-planning or conspiracy?

♦ Fact: Her husband, Tony Joe Jones, was an employee of the West Carroll Parrish Sheriff’s Department — the department charged with “investigating” the case.

♦ No matter who you are or what you do in life, if your spouse is dead in your home, under any questionable circumstances you can expect to be considered a suspect. 
That never happened in this case. Why not?

♦ There is argument that Tony changed his story as to his whereabouts and specific location on the day Crystal died. 

♦ Google Location Data place him near the home, consistent with and in conjunction to the time of death initially listed on Crystal’s Death Certificate.

♦ The Parish Coroner initially changed the time of death from 10:35 AM to 5:05 PM, why?

♦ Shortly following his wife’s death, Tony vigorously pursued efforts to collect on a $63K group life insurance policy. 

♦ Soon thereafter, facts show that the husband had Crystal’s body cremated. Was this evidence of a “guilty mind”, establishing the necessary legal “mens rea” in an effort to destroy any physical evidence or prevent any hope of a 3rd party, independent forensic exam of the body?

♦ Upon Crystal’s death Jana and Crystal’s surviving family members were denied an investigation into her sister’s death by the Louisiana State Police Department. Why?

♦ Why the rush to judgement with so little, if any, investigation?

Help to give her life and legacy a voice. Help to solve Crystal’s murder. Tune in and hear the rest of the salacious details.

I’ve witnessed a lot of examples of bad policing throughout my career— having spent many years as an investigator.  THIS case may very well be the worst example of unprofessional, shoddy, backwoods, good ol’ boy, overt and intentionally corrupt actions on the part of law enforcement to cover up a murder that evidence suggests that perhaps one of their own may have been involved in — that I have ever heard of in my life.

Note:  All persons are innocent unless proven otherwise in a court of law.
Follow our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot here:

• HIV infection and other sexually transmitted diseases
• unwanted pregnancies
• unsafe abortions
• maternal mortality and many other devastating outcomes.

As we close out another fantastic year filled with one accomplishment after another for “Light ‘Em Up” … which included new sponsorships … and new underwriters -- we wanted to focus on what is most important to us other than searching out the truth.

We wanted to take some special time to recognize you, our listeners for your TSL (time spent listening) to us throughout this past year.

We thank you for another fantastic year of growth and achievements and express our appreciation for your wonderful engagement and your role in helping us grow to 107 countries globally as we close out Season 4.

We never thought this kind of success would be something that we could attain, and we never were concerned about our growth at the inception of this project.

Initially we set out to tell the truth about topics of importance in the U.S. criminal justice system --- and look what it has become!

We have been able to advocate for so many people.

The corporate plan is to take the remainder of the year off in order to rest for a week or so, recover and enjoy some quality time with our families.

We then will begin the process for Season 5 of Light ‘Em Up where we strive to achieve new goals and break even more records with the reach of our podcast.

Also, to add more sponsors and underwriters.

The truth is under attack – and the truth is worth defending!

We have labored tirelessly to dig deep, vast and wide to bring you a special insight that you really won’t find anywhere else regarding the U.S. criminal justice system.

We are loyal, consistent and dedicated to you, our listeners.  We are truly here for you and because of you!

Our commitment to you here on Light ‘Em Up is that we’ve endeavored to tackle topics that have a real impact in your daily lives.

We’ve worked tirelessly to try to be the “Voice of the people”.

Please consider joining our Criminal Justice Foundation Justice Rolls Down and its page found on Facebook as well as our worldwide presence on YouTube at:  Rizzo's Protective Group.

Here is our complete catalogue.  Here is our last full episode of the year regarding the war that is presently raging in Gaza.

This advocacy piece irritated a lot of people but was wildly popular and downloaded at a record (for us) and at a tremendous rate/amount.

Thank you to Feedspot — online at Feedspot.com as we are featured in their top 60 poll of the 60 Best Criminal Justice Podcasts.  Visit their blog at www.Feedspot.com or simply follow this link:  Best 60 Criminal Justice Podcasts You Follow in 2023 (feedspot.com)

And for all your news and current affairs check out our friends at Newsly by visiting https://newsly.me.  Use the promo code L1GHTEMUP to launch your 10% savings.

We thank you and we look forward to you joining us in 2024!

Merry Christmas, Feliz Navidad! Buon Natale & Happy Hanukkah, and a Happy and Prosperous New Year to each and every one of our listeners.

You'll hear from us early on in January 2024. 
 
Thank you!
Phil Rizzo
Executive Producer 

Welcome to the 70th episode of Light ‘Em Up! We’re excited and honored that you’ve joined us!  We know your podcasting options are vast.

As we air our final full-length, explosive episode of 2023, just like the 3 Wise Men — we come bearing very exciting news.  Light ‘Em Up is actively being downloaded in 107 countries globally!

Tonight, as the war continues to rage on in Gaza — we provide an intense, investigative journalistic focus on “Terrorism and the Terroristic Threat” — with a special focus on the war in Gaza and the barbaric October 7th terror attack in Israel — which caught its citizenry, the Israeli government, its defense forces (the IDF) completely and utterly by surprise, unaware and ill prepared as was the case with the terror attacks here, in the U.S., on 9/11/2001.

Hamas leaders say they launched the attack on Israel because they believed the “Palestinian cause was slipping away, and that only violence could revive it”.

In an assault without recent precedent in its complexity and scale, the militants crossed into Israel by land, sea and air, according to the Israeli military, leading to some of the first pitched battles.  The attack, which was clearly meticulously planned — used rockets, paragliders, boats, motorcycles, other vehicles, and whatever other means they could use.

The armed militants infiltrated the Jewish state and murdered around 1,200 people, including 30 Americans — injured over 5,400, and captured and fled with some 230+ hostages back deep into Gaza (more than 100 hostages held in the Gaza Strip have since been released).

It’s been said that “the only thing we learn from history … is that we do not learn from it”.

In this episode we challenge you to think critically as we delve into and unpack:

♦ The concept and phrase: One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.

♦Some myths about terrorism (stemming from our usage of the Global Terrorism Database).

♦ We highlight examples of designated terrorist organizations.

♦ We ask: Does it help to label a person or a group as being terrorists?  “Terrorism” is a contested and politicized term that may be applied or rejected by different actors depending on their interests and perspectives.

♦ We’ll drill down on the main challenges of negotiating with terrorists and share some historic examples of successful negotiations that built trust through diplomacy and effective communication.

This episode proved to be one of our most challenging and ambitious episodes of the year.  I’m very proud of our team and the research behind it.

Don’t forget to follow our sponsors Newsly &  Feedspot here:

Merry Christmas!  Feliz Navidad!  Buon’ Natale! Happy Hannukah!

Thank you so much for being a loyal listener and a fan of Light ‘Em Up.

On this in-depth, investigative edition of Light ‘Em Up we expose what we maintain is an illegal invasion of your personal privacy and an illegal search and seizure in violation of the 4th Amendment.

Picture this:  During your annual physical checkup — your doctor draws near to you with the stethoscope and asks you to perform a few deep breaths — is she really listening to your lungs or is she looking for signs of extensive drug use or smelling for the use of alcohol?

This is a very odd dilemma.  The doctor writes a prescription for you, and has been doing so for years. Suddenly, without advanced notice, she has an “issue” with doing so. She says, “We need to run a toxicology screen on you”.   A what?

You may have no clue whatsoever that your rights are even being violated — by, of all people, your primary care physician and local hospital. In an extension of the “War on Drugs” — as it continues to target the poor and the neediest among us, many hospitals across the country have begun drug testing their patients, especially Medicaid recipients, through urinalysis.

The 4th Amendment has been hotly debated since its ratification in 1791.  How much do you know about the rights granted to you by the 4th Amendment?

Subjecting patients, especially poor patients, seeking medication for a health condition to an intrusive seizure of his/her bodily fluids is an intentional act of intimidation. Threatening to withhold essential medications from patients — the use of condescending and coercive, bullying tactics through the use of a “pain contract” or a “controlled substance agreement” — serves only to further damage the quality of care that has already been compromised due to the way insurance companies have rigged the system in their favor.

This bullying and forced compliance are completely contrary to the “do no harm” motto that has served as the foundational pillar of the medical profession since its inception.

Who wants to have a medical doctor who in reality is a “narc” — eager to “report” anything she observes?  What benefit is it to have a “doctor” that violates the doctor-patient trust that is essential and at the core of quality, comprehensive care?

If patients distrust their physician, or feel stigmatized or distrusted by them, this will impact greatly upon the therapeutic relationship and deeply compromise care.

Lacking sufficient financial means should not be a criminal offense — nor should a course of action apply to only one group of people as a “suspect class”, treating them as if they are not  “worthy” to be afforded the same Constitutional rights as others.

At Light ‘Em Up — we have always fought against THIS kind of disparate treatment.

In this episode as we lobby for justice and speak truth to power, we shall:

♦ Dissect the 4th amendment and provide analysis of what the U.S. Supreme Court says about this process as we delve into what a “pain contract” is.

♦ Examine “controlled-substance agreements” for patients on chronic opioid therapy, with a keen eye on “indifferent enforcement” from a criminal justice perspective. Are they binding, or enforceable in a court of law?

♦ Dig into our case study:  Rivers vs The Administration of Children Services (ACS) for the City of New York.

It’s easy to turn a blind eye when the violation of rights applies to someone else. What happens when it happens to you?

Tune in - be empowered!  Check here for bonus content.

Follow our sponsors Newsly &  Feedspot here:

Tonight, on this provocative, incendiary and investigatory episode of Light ‘Em Up.

 We return to the scene of the crime!  Your response was overwhelmingly favorable regarding our first episode with our special guest, the high-ranking police administrator, so we invited him back to the witness stand for another episode.

 With you in mind, we deliver another exclusive, in-depth, behind the scenes, “truth tellin’” session with the Assistant Chief of a small, rural police department in the “Magnolia State”.

To be clear, he's speaking on the promise of his anonymity, identified only by his title. The municipality that he serves has approximately 8,500 people with not a lot of “pass through” traffic in the jurisdiction.  It is staffed by approximately 30 accredited officers.

Throughout his dedicated career in law enforcement, he’s always thought critically about racial disparities, especially stemming from his own personal experiences as early back as being a patrolman and from the training he was given.

He researched and authored a rigorous in-depth white paper study entitled: “Seeing Color in Police Discretion”.

His study interrogates the question ultimately of “what kind of a society do we want to live in”?  It examines unconscious bias and how it may impact officer discretion and decision making. This analysis forces officers to self-reflect on why they are reacting in the style and manner that they do.  This ultimately aides police to sit with and realize the consequences of their actions.

We roll up our sleeves and dig deep on:

♦ Conscious and unconscious bias and we examine how this is more so a human problem and not necessarily solely a law enforcement problem.

♦ How police officers and administrators react to claims like selective enforcement and racial profiling, and he corrects and refocuses our thinking on the fact that racial profiling is pursued under the 14th amendment, not the 4th amendment.

♦His in-depth analysis of several landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases that directly impact upon law enforcement and how it is constitutionally bound to carry out its duties on a daily basis with a focus on:

Whren v US — which held that “Any stop as long as it is based on a valid law or justification is a legal stop even if the reason(s) given for the stop is not the true motivation”.  Thus, paving the way for “pretextual stops”.

♦ Terry v Ohio, Delaware v Prouse & Graham v Connor et al.,
♦ The contentious topic of “qualified immunity.”

In 1967, the Supreme Court recognized qualified immunity as a defense to §1983 claims. In 1982, the Supreme Court adopted the current test for the doctrine. Qualified immunity is generally available if the law a government official violated isn't “clearly established.”

From time to time, it is imperative that you pinch yourself —reminding you that this is a high-ranking law enforcement administrator sharing these hard hitting, impacting truths that the majority of officers would stay silent on. He is a man of integrity, and it shows.

Because we think the world of you, our listeners, and you’ve helped us grow to date to 104 countries globally, we’ve included additional in-depth analysis and an expansion of the specific methodology used in the rigorous white paper study for you.  You can use this link to access this exclusive, bonus content.

Note well: Email me at prizzo@rpgconsultingltd.com in order to receive a copy of the white paper statistical study.  In your request, we ask that you share with us one fact from this specific episode.

Follow our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot here:

All this y mucho, mucho más on this edition of Light ‘Em Up.

Welcome to this incendiary edition of Light ‘Em Up.  We’re now being heard in 104 countries!

We have an exclusive in-depth interview with a high-ranking police administrator with a small police department in the “Magnolia State”.

Speaking on the promise of his anonymity, identified only by his title (Assistant Chief of Police), the municipality that he serves has about 8,500 people, staffed by about 30 accredited officers.

The Assistant Chief mentioned that “working in a small town brings to focus the importance of the development of relationships. The good news is — is that at the present crime is low and it is getting lower” in this growing town.

In this fact-laden episode we explore:

♦ The never-ending challenges of 21st century policing in a small town, including budgeting and the struggle to pay its personnel a competitive wage.
♦ Police “culture” & how retaining staff is a constant struggle.
♦ The findings following a comprehensive, in-depth study on the importance of prioritizing and reducing unconscious bias among officers entitled Seeing Color in Police Discretion.
♦ Unconscious bias and how this can affect officer discretion, views, and perceptions.
♦ The importance of discretion in law enforcement & the wide latitude officers have in their use of that discretion and how this can be relevant to non-law enforcement industries that you may serve.
♦ Systems and standards: The foundational set of good management practices, methods, systems, requirements that must be established to produce high-caliber, top quality, constitutional policing that the citizenry deserves.
♦ How policing changed in his municipality following the killing of George Floyd.  

He emphatically stated that, “The presence of the Black Lives Matter movement absolutely raised the bar for police officers and police leaders to know what they are talking about when it comes to equal protection and racial disparities.  It no longer cuts it to say, ‘Hey we’re out here doing our jobs — leave us alone’”.

He went on to say, “We really have to have real answers for why things look the way that they do and to me it really raised the bar for accountability. It really raised the bar for us — just because you’re not being held accountable internally — doesn’t mean that it’s not going to come externally … so, it is comin’ one way or another. We need to be competent in order to be able to explain ourselves and serve in a responsible manner.”

While mistakes and errors soak up the bulk of media attention locally and nationally, it is imperative to pause and remember that police officers are people too and the vast majority of them serve with dignity, honor and often times in a heroic and valorous manner.

Through many of the direct efforts of the Assistant Chief of Police, it is clear that his department has put a lot of work in internally which clearly shows on the external side of police management and administration into doing an excellent job at serving the good people of the Magnolia State.

Tune in and be empowered and find out about the footballs in each trunk of every patrol car in their fleet and the awesome news about the police department sponsored youth football league.

Share your thoughts with us on this episode and any of our episodes that you’ve listened to.  Email us at:  prizzo@rpgconsultingltd.com

Follow our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot  here:

Note well:  Email me at prizzo@rpgconsultingltd.com in order to receive a copy of the white paper statistical study.  In your request, we ask that you share with us one fact from this specific episode.

On this educational and explosive edition of Light ‘Em Up, we’re excited to announce that we are being actively downloaded in 103 countries! All thanks to you!

Ripped straight from the headlines from the Atlanta Fulton County Superior Courthouse where Donald J. Trump and 18 of his co-defendants have been indicted under the Georgia Racketeering Act — we’ll take an in-depth, investigative look at the Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

RICO was designed by the U.S. Congress in order to “whack” the mob — to be the ultimate “hit man”.

The Act has extremely sharp legal teeth in order to accomplish that task.

This legislation was signed into law by President Richard M. Nixon on October 15, 1970, as Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act (OCCA) as a means by which the federal government could combat organized crime. The Act today is covered in 18 USC §§ 1961-1968 and provides the legal means by which prosecutors can identify and convict those who operate illegal businesses.

The roots of RICO, however, extend as far back as 1950, when the problem of criminal infiltration of legitimate business was first documented.  The U.S. was a very different place then than it is today.  Organized crime was a highly sophisticated, diversified and widespread activity that annually drained billions of dollars from America’s economy by the illegal use of force, fraud and corruption.

Congress found that organized crime had extensively infiltrated and exercised corrupt influence over numerous legitimate businesses and labor unions throughout the U.S. and posed a “new threat to the American economic system”.  Congress further established that organized crime derived a major portion of its power through money obtained from crimes such as gambling, loan sharking, theft and fencing of property, the drug trade, and other forms of social exploitation.

While in prison together at the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary, the then Genovese Crime Family Mob Boss Vito Genevese -- mistakenly thinking that Joseph Valachi was a “rat” -- gave Valachi the “kiss of death”.

That solitary action sent a chilling message to Valachi, putting the fear of death in his heart, mind and soul.  Valachi sought revenge, choosing to “rat out” the mob before the U.S. Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous Drugs, the FBI, the DOJ and the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation. Valachi’s testimony would prove crucial in the government’s efforts to combat organized crime, which would eventually lead to RICO.

As we set the scene — we dive headfirst into:

♦ Defining the purpose, scope and breadth of RICO as well as provide its contextual and historical background and legislative origins.

♦ Comparing, contrasting and highlighting another high-profile RICO case currently underway in the very same courthouse as the former president’s (that case involves the rapper Young Thug, whose real name is Jeffery Williams).

♦ The specific crimes that fall under the vast “umbrella” of RICO.

♦ How a person violates the RICO statute.

♦ The length of sentences for those found guilty of violating RICO.

♦ Important terms and relevant vocabulary words.

We want to hear from you!  Share your thoughts with us on this episode and any of our episodes that you’ve listened to.  Email us at:  prizzo@rpgconsultingltd.com

The pursuit of justice is a slow and methodical process. There are costs involved with seeking justice!

Tune in and be empowered, and follow our sponsors Newsly & Feedspot  here:
We are here for you and because of you!

All this y mucho mucho más on this explosive, investigatory edition of Light ‘Em Up.