Logo
    Search

    Ep. 157 - Another Innocent Man Gunned Down By Police

    enDecember 06, 2018

    Podcast Summary

    • Innocent men unjustly killed by policeRecent cases of innocent men being shot and killed by police while legally carrying guns raise concerns and questions about gun rights and police accountability

      There is a concerning issue with innocent men being unjustly killed by police, particularly those who are legally carrying guns. Two recent cases, one in Alabama and another in Chicago, involve men trying to help in dangerous situations who were shot and killed by law enforcement. These incidents not only result in the loss of innocent lives but also raise questions about the implications for gun rights advocates. The inconsistencies and lack of transparency in the police reports of these cases further complicate the situation. It is crucial for us to acknowledge this problem and work towards finding solutions to prevent such tragedies from occurring.

    • Police killings of innocent civilians: A complex issueThe issue of police killings of innocent civilians requires a nuanced discussion, addressing underlying causes and finding solutions through open dialogue.

      The issue of police killings of innocent civilians, particularly those who are legal gun owners, is a complex and multifaceted problem that goes beyond statistics and requires a nuanced discussion. While some argue that these cases are isolated incidents and most cops do not harm innocent people, others point out that the number of such incidents may be underreported and that the underlying issue is the way some police approach interactions with the public, often with an adversarial or aggressive mindset. However, both sides have made mistakes in the discussion, with critics sometimes using hyperbole and making the issue solely about race, which does not accurately represent the complexity of the problem. It is essential to have an open and honest dialogue to address the root causes and find solutions.

    • The complexities of police brutality and racial biasWhile addressing racial bias in policing is important, it's crucial to remember that systemic issues underlie the problem. Focusing solely on race can distract from the larger systemic issues. Accountability and justice for victims are essential, as are efforts to prevent future incidents.

      The discussion around police brutality and racial bias should not be oversimplified as a solely racial issue. While there may be racist officers, focusing solely on race can distract from the larger systemic issues at play. On the other hand, defenders of the police should avoid relying too heavily on statistics to dismiss the problem and should provide more substantial rationales for excusing police actions that result in the death of innocent people. Police officers have a responsibility to protect innocent lives, and they should be held accountable for any actions that violate that trust. The conversation should focus on finding solutions to prevent such incidents from happening and ensuring justice for victims and their families.

    • Protecting Innocent Lives: Prioritizing Public Over SelfPolice officers should prioritize saving innocent lives over their own self-preservation. The 'protect and serve' motto implies protecting the public, not just the officer.

      Police officers should prioritize protecting innocent lives over their own self-preservation. The speaker argues that if a police officer's first priority is always self-preservation, they should reconsider their role in law enforcement. Using the example of a firefighter, the speaker emphasizes that while protecting oneself is necessary, putting innocent lives at risk is unacceptable. The speaker criticizes the acceptance of a cop's first priority being self-preservation, even if it means taking an innocent life. They believe that the phrase "protect and serve" implies protecting the public, not just the officer. The speaker also suggests that there may be philosophical shifts leading to these situations, and further exploration is needed to understand why innocent lives are being lost at the hands of those sworn to protect them.

    • Shift from protection to enforcement in law enforcementApproximately 20% of law enforcement officers experience chronic anger and frustration, potentially leading to negative interactions with the public and a vicious cycle of hostility towards law enforcement

      The role of law enforcement officers has shifted from being perceived as servants of the public to enforcers, prioritizing enforcement over protection and service. Additionally, a significant number of officers (approximately 20%) experience chronic anger and frustration on the job, which can negatively impact their interactions with the public. This power dynamic, where officers hold significant authority and can use force, makes it concerning that a large number of them may be consistently frustrated and angry. This can lead to a vicious cycle, as negative interactions between officers and the public can further fuel hostility towards law enforcement.

    • Power dynamics and police interactionsMisunderstandings and overreactions from law enforcement can have tragic consequences. Police officers are public servants and should be held to the same standards of conduct as other public employees.

      The power dynamic between the public and law enforcement can lead to resentment and misunderstandings if not handled properly. Personal experiences with police officers, whether positive or negative, can shape perceptions and attitudes. Some people may hold an exaggerated view of a police officer's power, leading to a lack of accountability and criticism. However, police officers are public servants and should be held to the same standards of conduct as other public employees. The Daniel Shaver case serves as an example of how a misunderstanding and an overreaction from law enforcement can result in tragic consequences. It's crucial to remember that police officers are not demigods or kings, and individuals should be able to maintain their dignity and follow normal instincts without fear of deadly force.

    • Police officers should exercise caution before using lethal forceOfficers should prioritize preserving life over using lethal force, even in potentially dangerous situations, to avoid unnecessary deaths

      Police officers should exercise more caution and patience in potentially dangerous situations, rather than resorting to lethal force immediately. The speaker argues that even if a suspect is reaching for a weapon, there is usually enough time for officers to react and avoid shooting an unarmed person. The consequences of a wrong decision can be devastating, as an innocent life is lost forever. The speaker compares this to medical malpractice, where mistakes can be criticized and held accountable. Police officers have a responsibility to preserve life and should be willing to accept a slight increase in risk to themselves to achieve that goal. The shoot-first-ask-questions-later approach is not acceptable and can result in unnecessary deaths.

    • Addressing concerns in positions of authorityIndividuals in power should listen and respond to concerns raised by marginalized communities, acknowledging potential issues and promoting open dialogue.

      Individuals, especially those in positions of authority, have a responsibility to address issues when they arise, particularly when it comes to concerns raised by marginalized communities. Using the example of a surgeon and a plumber, the speaker emphasizes that the person hired for a job is responsible for its execution, and others should listen and respond when issues are raised. The speaker also encourages listening to the experiences and concerns of people in the black community regarding policing, acknowledging that there may be a problem that needs addressing, even if it's not as widespread as some may claim. Additionally, the speaker touches on the political landscape, mentioning the ongoing 2020 Democratic primary and President Trump considering a new vice president. Lastly, at the University of Texas, a professor was removed from the classroom due to the use of the phrase "be respectful," which is now considered racist. Overall, the speaker encourages open dialogue and acknowledgement of issues, rather than dismissing concerns or ignoring them.

    Recent Episodes from The Matt Walsh Show

    Ep. 1397 - One Thing Is Clear: Biden Is Done

    Ep. 1397 - One Thing Is Clear: Biden Is Done

    Today on the Matt Walsh show, guest hosted by yours truly, David Cone, we will dissect the top 5 takeaways from the most consequential presidential debate of our lifetime. President Joe Biden was barely functional, and Donald Trump took advantage. Louisiana parents sue in response to the state’s governor signing a new bill into law requiring all public schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom. The organization PETA launches a new campaign encouraging members to stop having sexual relations with meat-eaters. And I will be canceling new LA Lakers head coach, JJ Redick.


     

    Ep.1397


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:


     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/MATT


     

    Get 25% off your DailyWire+ Membership here: https://bit.ly/4akO7wC


     

    Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    Birch Gold - Make a qualifying purchase by July 31st and get a GOLDEN Truth Bomb! Text “WALSH” to 989898, or go to https://birchgold.com/WALSH


     

    Tax Network USA - Seize control of your financial future! Call 1(800)245-6000 or visit http://www.TNUSA.com/WALSH


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Backstage: The Presidential Debate

    Backstage: The Presidential Debate

    Watch the exclusive Daily Wire Backstage: Presidential Debate post-show as Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Andrew Klavan, and Jeremy Boreing dissect Trump's landslide victory and Biden's catastrophic performance that sent the Democratic Party into full-blown panic. Our all-star panel delivers the unvarnished truth about this debate's seismic impact on America's future. Don't miss this no-holds-barred analysis of a night that may have already decided the 2024 election.


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    Birch Gold - Make a qualifying purchase by July 31st and get a GOLDEN Truth Bomb! Text "BEN" to 989898, or go to https://birchgold.com/BEN


     

    PreBorn! - Donate today to support PreBorn's life-saving work: https://www.preborn.com/BACKSTAGE


     

    Boll & Branch - Get 15% off your order at https://www.bollandbranch.com/BEN

    The Matt Walsh Show
    enJune 28, 2024

    Ep. 1396 - A System Run By Illiterate Imbeciles

    Ep. 1396 - A System Run By Illiterate Imbeciles

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, a judge in Atlanta was just arrested and removed from the bench after getting into a fight at a nightclub and assaulting a police officer. Again: this woman works as a judge, not a waitress at Waffle House. But, she is just a symptom of a much larger problem. We'll discuss. Also, I'll offer my preview of tonight's presidential debate. Climate protesters attempt a very unique and hilarious method of stopping traffic. And, a guy on Twitter is roundly mocked and ridiculed after offering some unorthodox life advice to young men. As usual, the peanut gallery is wrong.


     

    Ep.1396


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:


     

    Join us live on Backstage for real-time coverage of the presidential debate TONIGHT at 8:30 PM ET on DailyWire+.


     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/MATT


     

    SWEET BABY GANG IS BACK. Buy the shirt: https://bit.ly/3zfUbZE


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    BetOnline - Use code "Walsh" to receive a 50% instant deposit bonus of up to $1,000 at http://www.betonline.ag


     

    ZERO DEBT USA - Learn how to get out of debt today! Visit http://www.zapmydebt.com


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Ep. 1395 - A Flock Of Drag Queens Descend On Capitol Hill

    Ep. 1395 - A Flock Of Drag Queens Descend On Capitol Hill

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, yesterday was "Drag Lobby Day" on Capitol Hill as several drag queens descended on our nation's capital to lobby for a host of awful legislation. The whole event was a flop, though, which may tell us something. Also, the Biden Administration promotes another cross-dressing man. The city of Los Angeles cracks down on people who are committing the crime of trying to make their communities safe and livable. And, the first annual "FatCon," a convention for fat people, just happened. I'll have the highlights, in case you were under the weight limit and couldn't attend.


     

    Ep.1395


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:


     

    Join us live on Backstage for real-time coverage of the presidential debate TOMORROW NIGHT at 8:30 PM ET on DailyWire+.


     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/matt


     

    SWEET BABY GANG IS BACK. Buy the shirt: https://bit.ly/3zfUbZE


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    PureTalk - Start saving on wireless! http://www.PureTalk.com/WALSH


     

    Grand Canyon University - Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University: https://www.gcu.edu/


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Ep. 1394 - The Fight Against Child Mutilation Makes It To The Supreme Court

    Ep. 1394 - The Fight Against Child Mutilation Makes It To The Supreme Court

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the Supreme Court will officially hear a challenge to Tennessee's ban on "gender affirming care" for minors. This will be a huge case that could deliver a devastating blow to the trans agenda. Also, CNN kicks a Trump spokesperson off the air for questioning CNN's objectivity ahead of the presidential debate on Thursday. Taylor Swift makes a brave stand against the patriarchy at her most recent concert. And, British academics are researching milk to discover its ties to racism and colonialism.


     

    Ep.1394


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:
     


    SWEET BABY GANG IS BACK. Buy the shirt: https://bit.ly/3zfUbZE

     

     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/MATT


     

    Get 25% off your DailyWire+ Membership here: https://bit.ly/4akO7wC


     

    Shop my merch collection here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    Birch Gold - Text "WALSH" to 989898, or go to https://birchgold.com/WALSH, for your no-cost, no-obligation, FREE information kit.


     

    Helix Sleep - Get 30% off your order + 2 dream pillows. https://helixsleep.com/WALSH


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Ep. 1393 - Christian Conservatives Proven Right Once Again As Abstinence 'Trend' Gains Popularity

    Ep. 1393 - Christian Conservatives Proven Right Once Again As Abstinence 'Trend' Gains Popularity

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the media has discovered a hot new trend. It's called abstinence. For years the Left mocked Christian conservatives for promoting abstinence. Now, they're coming around, but for all the wrong reasons. Also, Jamaal Bowman and AOC team up for the cringiest campaign rally of all time. Donald Trump made two campaign promises over the weekend: one very good and one very bad. And, the wife of an NFL quarterback says that she convinced her now-husband to date her by hooking up with his backup. Why would any wife share a story like that?


     

    Ep.1393


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:


     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/MATT


     

    Get 25% off your DailyWire+ Membership here: https://bit.ly/4akO7wC


     

    Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    ZERO DEBT USA - Learn how to get out of debt today! Visit http://www.zapmydebt.com


     

    Tax Network USA - Seize control of your financial future! Call 1(800)245-6000 or visit http://www.TNUSA.com/WALSH


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Ep. 1392 - Disney’s Not So Secret Anti-White Agenda

    Ep. 1392 - Disney’s Not So Secret Anti-White Agenda

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, we've heard about Disney's not-so-secret gay agenda. Now, thanks to James O'Keefe, we know more about their not-so-secret anti-white agenda. Also, MSNBC talking heads do their best to explain why classrooms should have pride flags but shouldn't have the Ten Commandments. Their argument is more revealing than they wanted it to be. And, can racism cause cancer? That was the premise of an episode of an NBC medical drama. It was not satire. Not intentionally, anyway.


     

    Ep.1392


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:


     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/MATT


     

    Get 25% off your DailyWire+ Membership here: https://bit.ly/4akO7wC


     

    Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    Birch Gold - Text "WALSH" to 989898, or go to https://birchgold.com/WALSH, for your no-cost, no-obligation, FREE information kit.


     

    Good Ranchers - Get $100 off PLUS FREE smoked brats for a year with promo code WALSH: https://www.goodranchers.com


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Ep. 1391 - Anti-Human Eco Brats Deface One Of The Oldest Monuments On Earth

    Ep. 1391 - Anti-Human Eco Brats Deface One Of The Oldest Monuments On Earth

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the anti-human climate alarmist brats are at it again. This time, they defaced one of the oldest and most historically significant monuments on the planet. These people don't love the planet. They just hate humanity. Also, Louisiana is mandating a copy of the Ten Commandments for every classroom in the state. The usual suspects are claiming that this is an attack on the First Amendment. I'll explain why that's ridiculous. And, the "bio-hacking" movement continues to grow. These are people who think that dying is a choice, rather than an inevitable fact of human existence.


     

    Ep.1391


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:


     

    It’s a boy! Celebrate the arrival of Michael Knowles’ latest newborn. TODAY ONLY, use code “FATHER” for 8.1% off of your order from Mayflower Cigars: https://bit.ly/3Qwwxx2 
    (Must be 21+ to purchase. Exclusions may apply)


     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/MATT


     

    Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    Tax Network USA - Seize control of your financial future! Call 1(800)245-6000 or visit http://www.TNUSA.com/WALSH


     

    ZipRecruiter - Rated #1 Hiring Site. Try ZipRecruiter for FREE! http://www.ZipRecruiter.com/WALSH


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Ep. 1390 - Major Polling Firm Changes Its Own Results After Left-Wing Activists Complain

    Ep. 1390 - Major Polling Firm Changes Its Own Results After Left-Wing Activists Complain

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the term "Orwellian" is overused these days–but, no other word can describe what just happened with a Pew survey finding that a vast majority of black Americans believe in racial conspiracy theories. The findings were so upsetting to activists that Pew went back and changed the report. This is a crazy story that few are talking about. We'll discuss. Also, Donald Trump reportedly floated the idea of abolishing the income tax. That's a great idea that should garner a lot more enthusiasm than it does. And, a democratic congresswoman claims that she miraculously cured cancer. Where are the fact-checkers on this one?


     

    Ep.1390


     

    - - -


     

    DailyWire+:


     

    Join us live on Backstage for real-time coverage of the presidential debate on 6/27 at 8:30 PM ET on DailyWire+.


     

    Get 10% off your tickets to Sound of Hope: The Story of Possum Trot at http://angel.com/MATT


     

    Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj


     

    - - - 


     

    Today’s Sponsors:


     

    Balance of Nature - Get 35% off Your Order + FREE Fiber & Spice Supplements. Use promo code WALSH at checkout: https://www.balanceofnature.com/


     

    Envita Health - Learn more about their treatment options at http://www.EnvitaHealth.com or http://www.Envita.com


     

    - - -


     

    Socials: 


     

    Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF


     

    Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA


     

    Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA


     

    Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs

    Related Episodes

    Policing, Privacy, and Public Safety with Representative Debra Entenman

    Policing, Privacy, and Public Safety with Representative Debra Entenman

    Today Representative Debra Entenman (District 47) joins Crystal to discuss triumphs of police accountability legislation in the most recent legislative session, how much public safety work still needs to be done, and the strong and immediate need for privacy protections. Additionally, Rep. Entenman discusses how you can best support legislation to protect your communities and your privacy, and reminds you to get your Covid vaccine, because “the Delta variant is not playing!”

    As always, a full text transcript of the show is available below and at officialhacksandwonks.com.

    Find the host, Crystal Fincher on Twitter at @finchfrii and find today’s guest, Representative Debra Entenman at @DebraEntenman. More info is available at officialhacksandwonks.com.

     

    Resources

    “Bill to create civilian office to investigate lethal force, serious injuries by police advances in Washington Legislature” by Maya Lesikar from The Seattle Times: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/bill-to-create-civilian-office-to-investigate-lethal-force-serious-injuries-by-police-advances-in-washington-legislature/ 

    “New Law Demands De-escalation, Not Abandoning People in Crisis” by Kim Mosolf from Disability Rights Washington and Enoka Herat from ACLU-WA: https://www.aclu-wa.org/story/new-law-demands-de-escalation-not-abandoning-people-crisis 

    “Washington Legislature bans police chokeholds and neck restraints and sets limits on tear gas and use of force” by Joseph O’Sullivan from The Seattle Times: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/washington-legislature-bans-police-chokeholds-neck-restraints-and-sets-limits-on-tear-gas-and-use-of-force/ 

    “What new WA police accountability laws do and don’t do” by Melissa Santos from Crosscut: https://crosscut.com/politics/2021/07/what-new-wa-police-accountability-laws-do-and-dont-do 

    “‘The Computer Got It Wrong’: How Facial Recognition Led To False Arrest of Black Man” by Bobby Allyn from NPR:  https://www.npr.org/2020/06/24/882683463/the-computer-got-it-wrong-how-facial-recognition-led-to-a-false-arrest-in-michig 

    “The WIRED Guide to Your Personal Data (and Who Is Using It)” by Louise Matsakis from WIRED: https://www.wired.com/story/wired-guide-personal-data-collection/ 

    “Google Says It Doesn’t ‘Sell’ Your Data. Here’s How the Company Shares, Monetizes, and Exploits It.” by Bennett Cyphers from the Electronic Frontiers Foundation: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/03/google-says-it-doesnt-sell-your-data-heres-how-company-shares-monetizes-and 

    “King County rent relief still slow to reach tenants” by David Kroman from Crosscut: https://crosscut.com/news/2021/08/king-county-rent-relief-still-slow-reach-tenants 

     

    Transcript

    [00:00:00] Crystal Fincher: Welcome to Hacks & Wonks. I'm your host, Crystal Fincher. On this show, we talk to political hacks and policy wonks to gather insight into local politics and policy through the lens of those doing the work and provide behind-the-scenes perspectives on politics in our state. Full transcripts and resources referenced in the show are always available at officialhacksandwonks.com and in our episode notes.

    Well today, I am thrilled to have with us the esteemed and fabulous representative from the 47th District, Representative Debra Entenman. Thank you so much for joining the podcast today.

    [00:01:06] Representative Debra Entenman: Thank you very much for that kind and generous introduction. I am looking forward to this discussion.

    [00:01:13] Crystal Fincher: Well, I'm definitely looking forward to this - as someone who lives in the South End and is a neighbor to your district and get to see the work that you do - see you in the community, see you in meetings - you are quite busy and quite active, which I definitely appreciate. I wanted to talk about what you've been working on, what you're going to be working on - particularly coming out of this past legislative session - one of the headlines from the session was working on police accountability and some reform bills, which you definitely took leadership on. And so, what were you able to work on and accomplish when it comes to policing and public safety?

    [00:02:03] Representative Debra Entenman: Well, what I was able to work on - and I have to say it was governor-request legislation. There was a task force that the governor put together because of the unfortunate death of Manuel Ellis - from that, there were recommendations that were made. Many of these people had come together in the past, working on [I-9]40 and had done other work around police accountability. So first of all, I want to give thanks to those people who came together with recommendations. Then working with staff, we created legislation around an independent investigative body, funding in the governor's budget. And so, we were able to pass legislation to create an independent investigative body, which will be under the auspice of the Attorney General's Office, but there will be a firewall. And there will be a firewall because people were concerned that if the Attorney General had to work with the Washington State Patrol, and he works with them on some of the issues, that there may be a conflict of interest.

    We hope with the implementation of this legislation that passed this last session, we will not have any conflicts and I look forward to having the teams put together, the director hired, and we can start working on independent investigations in Washington State. Also, a bill for independent prosecutions that was heard at the very end of session, too late to be voted on out of committee, but it was heard in committee. And I'm really hoping to bring that bill back. I have been working since the interim - meeting with community members, members of the Coalition for Police Accountability, and police officers representing the Fraternal Order of Police on what they'd like to see changed in the proposed prosecution bill. So we are now having discussions on that and we hope for a positive outcome in the next legislative session.

    What I want people to understand about police accountability is that we started last session. It was just the beginning - continuous and more work to do. I know that there has been some pushback on the two pieces of legislation that were passed, which is 1310 and 1054. 1310 is about intervention when someone is in a behavioral health crisis and 1054 is about tactics that the police may use or are no longer allowed to use. And so there has been some serious discussion. We had a wonderful - that many people saw from the Attorney General and Representative Jesse Johnson that talked about the misinformation that was being spread by different police departments. I'm hoping that we have a handle on that now. I have been reaching out to the local police departments in my community, specifically the police chief in Kent, Chief Padilla, who was quoted as saying in the Associated Press that the bills were poorly written and other things. We know that we talked to seven different guilds and organizations that represent police. They weighed in on the legislations. We of course have an excellent legal team and although I know that they are not perfect, I do not believe the bills were poorly written.

    [00:06:07] Crystal Fincher: And they certainly do not appear to be poorly written. They also were not a surprise. There was plenty of opportunity for input. There was a lot of collaboration. There was concern that there might have been too much collaboration even throughout parts of the process.

    [00:06:24] Representative Debra Entenman: That's right.

    [00:06:25] Crystal Fincher: Because so many people from the law enforcement community were at the table and being heard and submitting feedback and suggested edits to this process. But it's not unusual to, as we've seen in a lot of different areas throughout the state, even here in King County, to see a pushback now to any change - which is different. It seems that there's been a circling of the wagons, because if you go back 5 years ago, 10 years ago, a number of the things that you're talking about and that you passed were not controversial in law enforcement circles.

    I remember going to a number of meetings - you brought up Chief Padilla, who is the City of Kent's police chief - to Kent Police Department community meetings and them talking about they're not social workers, they're not equipped to handle those kinds of issues and problems - and they're more systemic, and the tools that they have to address that are inadequate to fix the issues that are creating that problem. That came from them before. And so, to hear the change in - certainly in tone and substance - is curious now that those things are actually being put into place. It sounds like there's a lot of fear of change. It sounds like they are feeling like this is just an attack instead of an opportunity to help them focus on the things that actually make people safer, and that the community who they serve and work alongside are saying, "You know what? These are the things that make us safer."

    So I appreciate you for listening to so many people throughout the crafting of these bills. I think next week, there's going to be a town hall in Kent to talk about this and certainly the chief has indicated that he has issues with the legislation, but these are things that are largely uncontroversial that have been passed in several areas throughout the country. And that seem, like you said, it's the start and certainly not the end of the road. These are kind of the lowest hanging fruit where there was fairly broad consensus that this was necessary. Really I just think-

    [00:09:01] Representative Debra Entenman: I think the shot over the bow by some people representing law enforcement was to see how strong coalitions would come together and resist their narrative on what this legislation would do. The fact that we have been able to build coalitions, not only in Western Washington, but Eastern Washington to push back on the narrative from the police department has been - well, for me, it has been a joy. But it has also opened people's eyes, because there were many people in community who thought that many of the things that we implemented - like you had said - in this last legislative session were already in place and they were not.

    We also have been - I know that I personally am not anti police person as much as I am a pro public safety person. And that means not only public safety for community, but public safety for the police as well. You need to have a clear demarcation on what you can and cannot do - so that we know what you can do and so that you know what you can't do. And I think that we need to be able to look at the profession of policing and improve it. There is more work to do. I think we need to raise the age of a person who is in a police department or the Washington State Patrol. I think they need to have more education and training. I'd like them to come in with at least an AA, more points even for a BA. I'm also concerned that we have through what I think was an honorable thing to do, which is to try to hire veterans - we have moved to the point where we have militarized our police. When you are in the military police, your actions and your responsibilities are different than when you're in a civilian police department. I don't think we have done a good enough job in making police officers understand that they are in a civilian police department.

    [00:11:12] Crystal Fincher: Yeah, that's-

    [00:11:13] Representative Debra Entenman: So all of these things are - there's still work to be done and I am very proud of everyone on our team. It was not always easy work to do, but we have all tried our best and there's more legislation to come. I want to talk about Representative Thai's bill that didn't make it out of [inaudible] to be heard in committee. I want to bring back the bill talking about limiting the immunity for police officers. Senator Solomon also had a bill and I honestly say I like some of it, some of it I didn't like, but I think that we can come together and have something strong that comes out around immunity. I think that police officers have a responsibility because they have the ability to take someone's life and in our legal justice system, I don't think a person should be shot just because they encountered the police. There is no justice when you don't get to go to court and have your voice heard. I do believe a person is innocent until proven guilty and I don't think we should have extra-judicial killings in the United States of America.

    [00:12:25] Crystal Fincher: Well, I wholeheartedly agree and it's such an important issue - and to your point, they have such an incredible responsibility. They directly impact people's civil rights and a lot of times the conversation, because we see it too often, is about killings. But my goodness, just the ability to arrest someone if you're in a bad mood or you have a bad day. And just what is involved with someone having to defend themselves - sometimes they may have to sit in jail if they can't afford to bail themselves out of jail or they don't have resources or connections to do that. There's just so much involved with that, that it does make plain sense to make sure that we're holding people to a high standard as we do in so many other professions who don't have the freedom and flexibility to impact the civil rights and the freedom and the future, really the future of so many people in their community.

    So I appreciate the work that you continue to do. One question I always want to make sure we ask is - with work that's important and you're pushing hard within the legislative process, what can people in the community do who want to see this happen and who want to support the bills you're working on? What can they do to help?

    [00:13:53] Representative Debra Entenman: I think one of the things that they can do is to continue to hold elected officials' feet to the fire. So now that we've passed these bills, I need them to start asking about implementation. I need them to start trying to get on the committees where these implementations - if there's community input, I need them to participate in that. COVID brought us many things, but it did bring us one thing, which was the increase in participation by people who cannot get to Olympia because we were able to use Zoom. I want us to continue to use Zoom as a tool to hear as many voices as we can. We had record participation in our committees around testimony on these particular police bills and it was amazing to me. And to go back now - because see, once you put your testimony on the record, I as a legislator can go back and listen later, hear things differently. And I think it's really important for that to happen, and I want to continue to be able to have remote testimony, even as we make it through this COVID pandemic.

    I think that what also is important is for people to get involved with their local law enforcement. We should have relationships with law enforcement before an emergency happens, and I know that for some people, this is very difficult and challenging. But if we can, I'd like us to, and my thing is - don't go alone. If you think you need somebody with you, have a buddy, make a buddy system and say, "We're going to go to these City Council meetings and then we're going to listen to the testimony. We're going to go to when the police chief invites us to community events, we're going to listen. We might not always agree with them, but we're going to sign our name on the dotted line and turn out so that they will know that community members were there because the word that we always hear is that, Oh, those people were troublemakers and they were coming from Seattle. Those people aren't the true voices of Kent.

    So what I really want people to do is to step up, sign up - even if you sign up and give your name and address and say thank you for having this meeting, I think it's an important community meeting, I might not always agree with what you say, but to have the opportunity to hear you is important. If you do just that, I think it will help to make our community stronger. We can't just believe that electing people to office is enough. There is some responsibility that we all have for participation. So wherever you are, however you can, it is important for you to think about these pieces of legislation and work with your local police department, city council, and mayor, and the legislature to make sure these are implemented. And keep asking questions, keep asking questions - hold our feet to the fire.

    [00:17:07] Crystal Fincher: Keep asking questions. Yes.

    [00:17:08] Representative Debra Entenman: Keep asking questions.

    [00:17:09] Crystal Fincher: You know what I love? I love an elected official who asks people to hold their feet to the fire. I love that. Especially you in your position and pushing to make sure that we're all safer - doesn't necessarily come without any risk to you. I don't know how many people listening are familiar with the 47th Legislative District, but that is absolutely a purple, if not reddish-leaning district. And we'll see what it looks like after the redistricting process, but this is not a district that is safe for Democrats. This is not district that elects Democrats to local government positions. You are in the midst of a lot of red territory in Covington and Maple Valley. It's a lot there, so you are certainly not satisfied with just playing it safe and saying things that are safe to everyone. While at the same time, you're listening to people in the community and you're taking a common sense, collaborative approach to addressing these issues - but it doesn't come without pushback. I do definitely encourage people who are passionate about police reform, about supporting someone who is pushing for things to be better, to make sure that you're familiar with Representative Entenman in the 47th Legislative District, that you support, because this is how we keep good people in office and this is how we get some of the great policies, like the ones that she just talked about, passed.

    I also want to talk about another issue in the public safety sphere and that's privacy. I don't know if people know your background and that you are an expert in the area of privacy, but I just want you to talk a little bit about your background, why this issue is important, and what you've worked on.

    [00:19:15] Representative Debra Entenman: Well, first, I want to say thank you for the compliment of saying that I'm an expert. I think that I have always been a very curious person. And when, in the Legislature, we started talking about privacy and the lack of privacy, specifically around the Department of Licensing - it was very eye-opening for me to learn how much information was given to law enforcement, how much information was shared with law enforcement, and how many people had access to the information. Some of them had access to the information and I was concerned about the safeguards that were put in place, especially around entities that are contracted to work with the Department of Licensing to issue license tabs, so we had sub-agents. How much information do they have? How much information do they have access to? What's the accountability measures that we put in place for them? That's where this all started for me - was around privacy.

    And then of course we had a bill in 20... - well, we've been trying to pass a privacy bill even since before I got to the legislation - it's been very challenging. So we decided in 2018, 2019 to sever the facial recognition apart from the privacy bill. And so, I worked with Senator Nguyen in the Senate, and we had come to an agreement on a privacy bill - was very successful - it was new, it was innovative in the fact that we were one of the few states to actually regulate the use of facial recognition software, because there were many things that people were saying about facial recognition that just weren't true. We wanted to make sure that we had some level of privacy protection and that a person who was just generally walking about - this is how I always say it - when I am in a public space, I have not given up my right to privacy. If I'm at the mall, I have not given up my right to privacy. So what do we need to do to protect my privacy? Well, I have to say, just a little COVID sidebar, but us wearing mask does protect our privacy. It's really hard for the computer to tell who we are when we're wearing those masks. I'm not mad about that - I'm just going to say.

    But we had facial recognition that - we had entities who were creating it, telling us that they couldn't see Black women. They couldn't tell the difference between a Black woman and a Black man, that it was identifying African-American people who were well-known figures, comparing them with people who had been arrested and had arrest records. It was flawed and we needed to have work done.

    Now, there is still a lot to do. I want to make sure people understand this. We have passed a facial recognition bill, but we still have a long way to go around privacy. We have a long way to go around the use of social media in our regular lives. I'm not talking about things we don't do. Most of us are on Facebook, we use Amazon - I know the young babies are on TikTok - I'm not there yet, I'm on the Instagram, and I don't know if Snapchat's still a thing, I'm not sure, but what people need to understand about these things is that you don't get something for nothing. You have to ask yourself, if I'm using this and I'm having fun, what is happening on the back end? What information are they finding out about me and how are they using that information? If they're monetizing that information - because I had a person pound on the desk and tell me we don't sell your information, we monetize it. And I said, "Well, what's the difference if you're making money and I'm not?" And I didn't get a clear answer to that - but you, at least to me, need to know that when you go on to these platforms, the information that even though they keep on saying it's anonymous and they can't be sent back to you, it can't get back to you directly - that's not true. We all know that they have a profile on all of us. They monetize that profile and that is how they are billionaires.

    If you are doing that, I should be able to say, "I don't want you to do that with me - with my image, with the way I look, with my name, with my age, with my weight, whatever it is." And so, what we are trying to do now in the privacy sphere, is say whose information is it and what can be done with it? And that has been a very challenging thing, because there are a lot of people who have made a lot of money off of us and don't want to give up that access.

    [00:24:37] Crystal Fincher: And that's really the bottom line. I don't know that a lot of - so easy not to have to think about this. These companies who are monetizing, selling this information, make it very easy for us not to have to think about anything other than the immediate task that we're doing or whatever we're looking at. But my goodness, you brought up anonymous information. There was a couple of weeks ago, a recent case where a priest was outed - an example of information that they say, "Oh, this is not tied to your identity. We collect information, but it's not tied to you personally. It's just analytics and data that we're using to do stuff." Well, when you have a lot of data points and most of us carry mobile phones and it is giving away our location, it is giving away where we're shopping. If you have a rewards card, that's tracked. If you're going from home to work, that's tracked - your location data is tracked and sold. So you can take these anonymous pieces of data - and if you know where someone works, you can say, Okay, well, what phone IDs are pinging from this location? What phone IDs are pinging from that location? What did this person attach to this rewards card by? And all of that information can be tied back to your identity because there's enough independently verifiable data that only ties back to you.

    And I don't know if people engage with how much that data is and how accessible it is to people. I can buy that data if I want to. That data is commercially available to a lot of different people. It is for sale to whoever wants to buy it. And so, you engaging with this is really meaningful, because we are - I don't know if we're at or past a tipping point, but the amount of data that people have on us that is not anonymous if they don't want it to be is alarming. I think most people would not want to wear a T-shirt that has all their personal details and information for everyone to consume, but we're doing the equivalent of that with privacy. So I appreciate you engaging in this issue and encourage people to support that bill and make their voices heard on those issues. I do want to talk in the few minutes - oh, go ahead.

    [00:27:14] Representative Debra Entenman: No, I just wanted to say, this is the thing that made me understand it. What I learned was - and we kept on using the term of the dry cleaner - right now, we think of our dry cleaner as just a dry cleaner. We take in our dirty clothes and we get back our clean clothes, but what we don't always know is that the dry cleaner can decide that the dry cleaner wants to be a part of the business of providing information. So the dry cleaner can have a percentage of his business come from dry cleaning, but have another percentage of his business coming from monetizing data. Now, most of us are thinking about the dry cleaner and thinking, Well, I don't really want my dry cleaner monetizing my data. It's the same with Facebook. That's how you have to think about it. If you don't want your dry cleaner monetizing your data, why do you want Facebook monetizing your data?

    Facebook, to me, is supposed to be for entertainment and I can be on it or I can be off of it. If you want me to pay for Facebook, then tell me that you want me to pay for Facebook. If you want to charge me a fee, I can decide whether or not I want to be on Facebook or not. If you're making money off of me on Facebook, then why can't I either have some of that money, or you stop making money. Those are the questions.

    [00:28:32] Crystal Fincher: They're your details, it's your data.

    [00:28:35] Representative Debra Entenman: It's your data. Those are the questions that we should be asking everywhere we go, anywhere we are. But go ahead - I'm sorry, Crystal, I didn't mean to interrupt.

    [00:28:46] Crystal Fincher: No problem. Look, we are here to hear from you. I wanted to just talk a little bit about us - we're still dealing with this pandemic that seems - I don't know if the light at the end of the tunnel is actually an oncoming train or not, if we're dealing with this Delta variant and cases are spiking. We've got an eviction moratorium that's going to be sunsetting. There is rent relief for renters and landlords that has been allocated to counties and localities, but man, that's having a tough time getting dispersed and distributed. What can be done?

    [00:29:28] Representative Debra Entenman: Let me tell you about some of the problems with - first of all, you need to understand how the distribution system is supposed to work. And everybody right now seems to be blaming it on how it's getting distributed, but not really on some of the people who are putting roadblocks. Some of the people are landlords and I'll tell you why. Let's have the scenario - you are the landlord and I am the tenant. We both go for relief. You as the landlord have to commit to not evicting me if you take the landlord relief dollars. And I as a tenant have to commit to making sure that if I take money to pay my back rent, that I pay my back rent. Most tenants are willing to have that money passed through them and go to the landlord, but some landlords don't want to make the commitment that they won't evict the tenant after they take the money to help them - because they not only want to be able to get their back rent, they want to be able to evict the tenant so they can turn over that apartment, raise the rent, and get first and last months from another person. So it isn't that the money is going out slowly. In some cases - is that the landlord that's not wanting to commit to the agreement. I want people to understand this. It's not necessarily about the money getting out, it's about the landlord not wanting to commit to the agreement so that he or she can receive funds.

    [00:31:07] Crystal Fincher: So what can be done? Is there anything that can be done about that or is that just something that we have to shine a light on?

    [00:31:13] Representative Debra Entenman: I think that more people need to talk about it. More people need to talk about it. If you are a tenant and you are willing to participate in this entity so that your back rent can be paid, and you have a landlord who doesn't want to participate - as we would say in the community, that landlord needs to be put on blast. That's the bottom line. Let's get Jesse - let's focus, let's call attention to landlords who don't want to participate in the process because they want to be able to kick off a tenant. You can't do both.

    [00:31:58] Crystal Fincher: Can't do both.

    [00:31:59] Representative Debra Entenman: You have to keep the tenant in the apartment if you're going to take the federal dollars so that you can be made whole. And there is - right now, we are not asking for any deductions or any reductions. Whatever the tenant owes is what the federal government is willing to pay. So if people are saying, "They're only offering me such and such," - to my knowledge, that is not true. The rent that they are offering to pay you is what the rent that you charge the tenant. Let's make sure that we are honest about the money and how it's going out.

    Now, we do have systems that are always slow because they're government systems, and we do want to prevent fraud. We've already seen fraud in the unemployment system - we do not want to have fraud in the system where we are paying landlords for back rent. We don't need to have that scandal. We just don't need to have that scandal. If landlords and tenants agree to go together - there are some community-based organizations - where they come to the community-based organization, they make an agreement, they sign the papers and within a certain amount of time, they receive their checks.

    [00:33:14] Crystal Fincher: I will certainly do some digging.

    [00:33:16] Representative Debra Entenman: But it's not all, it's not - and we also have to remember now that there really are small landlords, but there are now people who are investing in multifamily homes that are hedge funds. They are not individual mom and pop landlords. We hear about these mom and pop landlords. And I do have sympathy because I have family members who have been able to save up enough money so they have a small house that they rent out. They're not getting wealthy. It's a part of their retirement plan. And they have been very good to their tenants and not kicked them out, and they would like to participate. And so, they are signing up and doing all of the things that they're supposed to do so that they can prove that there was back rent, that they had a rental agreement, and that the tenant wasn't able to pay. It does take time to do all of that, but there are some people who truly are - it's going to be a very large wealth transfer from the federal government to some private entity and I don't think that that's fair.

    [00:34:26] Crystal Fincher: No. And unfortunately, we see in crisis after crisis and emergency after emergency that wealth transfer take place. We did in the last great recession. We certainly have during this pandemic - the amount that the richest billionaires have grown their fortunes is just staggering, just absolutely staggering. So we will continue to keep an eye on that. We will try and do our part to put landlords on blast who are being a hindrance to people just attempting to stay in their homes.

    And I just appreciate you and the work that you do and encourage people to stay in contact with Representative Entenman, stay up to date with what she is doing, and make sure that you support - because particularly in districts like the 47th Legislative District, which is a toss up every time there's an election there, you never know what's going to happen - if it's going to go red or blue.

    [00:35:31] Representative Debra Entenman: Yes, it is

    [00:35:31] Crystal Fincher: it is always a battle that - and once again, next year, you're up for election again, several other people are up for election. The Senator's seat is up for election, so we will make sure that we stay up to date, but appreciate the work that you do and thank you for joining us today.

    [00:35:54] Representative Debra Entenman: Well, thank you for having me. I want to say that - one, I appreciate your voice in this space. I appreciate the voice of an African-American woman having a podcast and inviting me to participate. For many who don't know, I very seldom get to speak with an African-American person who is interviewing me on a podcast. And I have to say that I'm very proud of Crystal. And so, it is always an honor when she asks me to do something. Thank you very much, I appreciate the work that you do. Please continue to blaze trails yourself because you are also a trailblazer.

    And for those who are listening, the Delta variant is not playing, the racial reckoning in this country is not over - it was only the beginning. COVID is not over, it was only the beginning. So please take care of yourselves. There is a lot of work that we want you to be here to do and if you have not gotten vaccinated, please get vaccinated if not for yourself, for the other people who you care about and who care about you. And just remember, as our children are going to go back to school, the more people who are vaccinated, the less likely they are to get sick. As we look at COVID, it is now starting to strike younger people, children. I do not want to lose a generation of babies because we were stubborn and wanted to hold onto our ignorance and fear. Please get vaccinated for the children.

    [00:37:42] Crystal Fincher: Amen. Thank you and thank everybody for joining us today. We'll talk to you next time.

    Thank you for listening to Hacks & Wonks. Our chief audio engineer at KVRU is Maurice Jones, Jr. The producer of Hacks & Wonks is Lisl Stadler. You can find me on Twitter @finchfrii, spelled F-I-N-C-H-F-R-I-I, and now you can follow Hacks & Wonks on iTunes, Spotify or wherever else you get your podcasts. Just type in "Hacks & Wonks" into the search bar, be sure to subscribe to get our Friday almost-live shows and our mid-week show delivered to your podcast feed. You can also get a full text transcript of this episode and links to the resources referenced during the show at officialhacksandwonks.com and in the podcast episode notes.

    Thanks for tuning in. Talk to you next time.

    Chats in the Emerald City with Amy Sundberg

    Chats in the Emerald City with Amy Sundberg

    This week Crystal talks with Amy Sundberg, author of the newsletter Notes from the Emerald City. They get into the intricacies of local governments, developments on the city’s participatory budgeting process, roadblocks placed in front of the Black Brilliance Project, and why the public must be attentive and involved if we want to see change.

    As always, a full text transcript of the show is available below and at officialhacksandwonks.com.

    Find the host, Crystal Fincher on Twitter at @finchfrii and find today’s guest, Amy Sundberg, at @amysundberg. More info is available at officialhacksandwonks.com.

     

    Resources

    Subscribe to Notes from the Emerald City here: https://www.getrevue.co/profile/amysundberg

    “Participatory Budgeting ‘Clearly Delayed Until Next Year’” by Paul Kiefer: https://southseattleemerald.com/2021/05/14/participatory-budgeting-clearly-delayed-until-next-year/#more-66722

    “Tensions rise as Seattle City Hall seeks alternatives to police” by David Kroman: https://crosscut.com/news/2021/05/tensions-rise-seattle-city-hall-seeks-alternatives-police

    “Seattle police chief overturns watchdog’s discipline recommendation in ‘pink umbrella’ protest clash” by Elise Takahama: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/seattle-police-chief-overturns-watchdogs-discipline-recommendation-in-pink-umbrella-protest-clash/

    “Not just the mayor: Text messages of Seattle police and fire chiefs from June 2020 also missing” by Daniel Beekman and Lewis Kamb: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/not-just-the-mayor-text-messages-of-seattle-police-and-fire-chiefs-from-june-2020-also-missing/?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=owned_echobox_tw_m&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1620445745

    The full letters detailing how Durkan’s office has been a barrier for the Black Brilliance Project and harmful to Black women:

    Twitter thread in explanation by Councilmember Tammy Morales: https://twitter.com/CMTammyMorales/status/1395094230104567810

    Letter 1: https://council.seattle.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/IDT-Letter-1.pdf

    Letter 2: https://council.seattle.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Ubax-Bo-Break-letter.pdf

     

    Transcript

    Crystal Fincher: [00:00:00] Welcome to Hacks and Wonks. I'm your host, Crystal Fincher. On this show, we talk to political hacks and policy wonks to gather insight into local politics and policy through the lens of those doing the work and provide behind-the-scenes perspectives on politics in our state. Full transcripts and resources referenced in the show are always available at officialhacksandwonks.com and in our episode notes.

    Today, I'm thrilled to have Amy Sundberg joining us, who's the author of Notes From the Emerald City. Thank you so much for being here, Amy.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:00:58] Thank you for having me.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:01:00] Now, if you have seen my Twitter or have talked to me in person, you've heard me excitedly talk about Amy Sundberg because she is basically doing an invaluable public service by live tweeting most public meetings in the City of Seattle. So meetings for the City Council - hearings, public hearings, the committee meetings, or special meetings about police accountability and all of that - she actually brings to us live in real-time and gives us more information than is even available from a lot of reporters who do an excellent job covering it. But she gives you the full package.

    So if I'm looking to see what happens in the City of Seattle, or where a piece of legislation is at, or where a City Council person is at on a policy - what they believe, what they have said - the most reliable place I can go to turn is often Amy's Twitter timeline. And then she also has an excellent newsletter, Notes from the [Emerald] City, which just really synthesizes all of that information and makes it easy to follow. I have just been appreciating her for a while and thought I would have her on. So I'm excited that you are here and what I'm first off wondering is - what even started you on the path to doing that?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:02:22] Well, it started last June. It was soon after the murder of George Floyd and a lot of people were out protesting, and a lot of my friends were out protesting. For various physical reasons, I was not able to go out and protest - and I decided instead of beating myself up for my inability to do it, I would try to figure out a different way to be useful. I think we hear a lot in activism circles - that there are different ways that you can be an activist. And I decided to take that to heart and really try to figure out a way that I could be helpful with my particular talents.

    So I attended the early June meeting of the CPC to try to figure out kind of just what was going on and that meeting really opened my eyes. A lot of the members of the CPC were testifying about their experiences in the protest - being overpoliced and brutalized by police officers at the protests. And as well, Mayor Durkan came to the meeting and I was really struck and honestly appalled by the seeming disregard with which she was interacting with the CPC. And so, it opened my eyes. I was like, "Oh, things are really, really not okay on any level here, and people don't know."

    So I started attending meetings. I found out about the City Council Monday morning Council Briefing - when each councilmember kind of gives the report of what they're doing during the week, what committee meetings they have, what legislation they're working on. It's a really great overview if you just want to know a lot about what's going on in a fairly fast timeframe. So I started attending that and tweeting that, and I started reporting out on my Facebook to my friends who also had no idea what was going on. And eventually, that turned into the newsletter because I didn't want to limit to just the people who are friends with me on Facebook. And that was how Notes from the Emerald City was born.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:04:53] Well, I really appreciate that - one, you really turned your rage into action, basically. A lot of people have a hard time making that transition in figuring out exactly what to do. And you've done it in a way that helps make the process more transparent for everyone, and helps everyone better understand how they can help hold our leaders more accountable, and how they can play a part in the process, and understanding exactly what's happening. Because it's really challenging - these meetings happen during the day when most people are working. It is challenging to understand some of the terminology and what's happening. Is a proviso being lifted good or bad? What does that do? What's a proviso? And just the way that you help to explain what's going on to everyone - I really appreciate. As you've gone through this process further and further - have you changed opinions, attitudes - just from continuing to pay attention to the process?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:05:59] I mean, when I started, I didn't know anything about how local government worked. I had been hearing for some years that local government was important, but I didn't have the firsthand knowledge of how it impacted my life and my community members' lives. And having spent so much time now - listening into all these meetings and analyzing what's going on - I see all of the very direct ways in which the decisions that are being made in City Council and in City Hall have a direct impact on all of the residents of Seattle and surrounding areas, quite honestly.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:06:40] Yeah. I'm known as a local government evangelist. Obviously, this podcast is very centered on state and local politics - and very much not national. That's intentional. I get asked about that a lot. There's more than enough coverage of federal politics - even if it hasn't penetrated, there's information out there. But a lot of times there just isn't even any information about what's happening within cities, within municipalities and counties, and the state - and those decisions impact our daily lives to a greater degree than a lot of what happens on the national level. So the coverage to me has always actually been backwards.

    And so, it is really enlightening to see how impactful the decisions that are made on our everyday lives, whether it's a school board or a City Council - where we live, our experiences - just from what we're allowed to do in our house, our options in the community, the traffic that we're sitting in, where are we going to go park, who our neighbors are and aren't, and how we treat people in our communities - is so influenced by and dictated by what happens in these meetings. And they're just so opaque, and hardly anyone attends them because there's just not much visibility about why it's important.

    In this process, you've done a lot of coverage of the CPC, the Community Police Commission, and the City Council. Right now, what are the biggest issues on deck?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:08:22] Well, one of the issues that has been ongoing - when we're talking about public safety, is what changes are we going to make to increase public safety for everyone and to be equitable - more equitable about it than we have been in the past. And that is my main focus - is on public safety and that public debate that we're having right now in Seattle, and frankly, across the country. In Seattle, we're spending a lot of time right now talking about participatory budgeting. We're also spending a lot of time talking about - we're still talking about the protest last year - the OPA still hasn't released - they're kind of releasing slowly the case files. And then we're seeing that kind of trickle down as a lot of findings are not holding the police accountable.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:09:27] I guess from your perspective - there was just a decision recently made to not uphold discipline from the chief. Do you want to explain what happened and the reaction to it?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:09:44] Yeah, sure. Chief Diaz decided to overturn an OPA finding - it was about the pink umbrella case. This was a protest case that happened in June and it was one of the very famous ones - because, I think, of the iconic image of the pink umbrella. It was improper use of tear gas, improper use of blast balls, and et cetera. The OPA actually did hold the named officer accountable for misuse of force. And Chief Diaz announced very suddenly, as far as I can tell, that he decided not to uphold that finding, that he was overturning it - because he didn't feel that it was fair, that he felt that there were decisions made further up the chain of command, and that the named officer was not responsible for what happened.

    The problem with that is that no one else has been held accountable for the actions that happened that day. It's unclear if someone will be held accountable. Chief Diaz has said there is new evidence in the case, and we do not know where that new evidence came from - whether the OPA has access to that new evidence, who is now conducting the investigation. Is it Chief Diaz who's continuing that investigation or has he handed it back over to the OPA to continue it? We don't know. I'm not speaking about just me. I'm talking about City Council who is overseeing this - they don't know, the CPC doesn't know. So, there's a lot of confusion as to what's happening and a lack of transparency.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:11:48] Well and this lack of transparency is a theme that seems to be happening in the City, and especially now with the recent news that we've talked about on prior podcasts about text messages - from Jenny Durkan, from former police Chief Carmen Best, from the Fire Department Chief - disappearing, being deleted, being unavailable, and seemingly a very intentional effort to cover that up. And so, it's kind of punting to say, "Well, those decisions were made higher up." suggesting that it was somewhere in the mayor's office - someone who had the ability to supersede the decisions within the department. Yet, that is basically a black hole because they deleted all of the evidence that probably wasn't going to turn out pretty well in their favor. 

    Yet, now we're just not holding anyone accountable. There have been hundreds of complaints against Seattle Police Department officers from activity throughout the protests. Lots of people are still waiting to see some legitimate discipline being handed out and some accountability attached to that. It just seems to be over and over again. "No, we can't hold this person accountable. No, we don't know." without making a real effort to find out who knows and what we know and following it from there. And really, for most people, just throwing our hands up and saying, "Well, I guess that's that" is what they expect, but I don't know that's what people are in the mood to give.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:13:33] No.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:13:35] Yeah.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:13:35] And I also think the City Hall - that is an interesting case because, I mean, it's quite possible a felon was committed, a felony. And I'm like - if a felony has been committed, is someone going to investigate this? And as far as I can tell, the City Attorney would have to decide to investigate it. And it's not at all clear that he would do that, and neither is it clear that anyone will bring a lawsuit that would perhaps bring this more to light.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:14:11] Where does the Council stand - from what you have been listening to and reporting on - where does the Council stand on this issue? What is the next step? What's the next step for the Community Police Commission? Where does this go from here?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:14:26] I mean, I think the Council seems to be fairly concerned about this overturn of the OPA finding. And so, they are asking questions. Councilmember Herbold, who's the Chair of Public Safety, has been sending emails and publishing the emails she's sending to Chief Diaz. I will say at least they are aware of the problem, which isn't much but it's something. The CPC, unfortunately, does not have a lot of power. Most of their power is in the form of relationship building and information releasing. They can try to raise public awareness of what's happening, and condemn what's happening, and give recommendations for best practices of what they think should happen, and how they think things should be resolved - but as far as I can tell, the City of Seattle has a pretty easy time ignoring the CPC's recommendations. So I don't know that we would see anything different in this case.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:15:42] I guess the other question I have is - in general, with policing issues, and I guess we'll talk about participatory budgeting in just a moment - what is the dynamic you see between the City Council and the mayor's office on these issues and also in dealing with the CPC?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:16:03] I would say - we all can see that the City Council and the mayor's office are very diametrically opposed. They're not getting along. And I believe that's been the case for a while. It's certainly been the case for the last year. And we've seen that play out in various dramatic vetoes, and veto overturns, et cetera. Because they don't see eye to eye, I do think that puts additional obstacles in place to making any significant changes - because there's a lot of political jockeying between them. As for the Council's attitude towards the CPC - I mean, I don't see them interacting directly a lot. I can't remember - I can't remember a meeting in which the CPC was invited to come to a Council meeting and present. That doesn't mean that hasn't happened, but I'm not remembering one off the top of my head, so if it has happened, it certainly doesn't happen frequently. So, I do think that the Council will reference CPC recommendations from time to time.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:17:16] In terms of OPA and the CPC - and there are supposed to be levers of oversight, but they seem to be falling far short and that actually seems to be a matter of design and neutering their ability to do much. From what you've seen, what is the best way - one, to address their lack of power to do anything substantive? What types of accountability levers do you see that would be helpful in fixing what we have now?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:17:55] I mean, one relatively simple, and none of this stuff is simple, but one relatively simple thing we could do is have more - right now, the OPA's mostly staffed with sworn officers as their investigators - if we were to have more civilian investigators in that department, I think that could help. But that's an issue with the SPOG contract - so right now that's not possible because of that contract. But that is certainly something that was in the 2017 Accountability Ordinance, I believe, and something that we've been interested in implementing in the city. And I do think that would help. Would that help enough? I'm not sure about that. It would not help the CPC in particular. If they don't have any authority to act - basically to have a bite with their bark - it's then hard for them to be taken as seriously, I think, on the City landscape.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:19:05] I agree with that. It seems like we keep on running into situations where fundamentally, police are investigating police, which seem to come up with decisions that are really sympathetic to police - and resistance and inability for anyone who is a community member, independent authority to have any say in that process. It's certainly frustrating to continue to watch and to watch the attempts to move in that direction be pushed back against so severely.

    Looking at participatory budgeting - lot of talk about that, lot of confusion about that. What is participatory budgeting? Where do we stand on that today?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:19:53] Participatory budgeting is an idea - I mean, it's a very fundamentally democratic idea. It's the idea that the community can come together, and can come up with a bunch of ideas for projects of things that would materially make life better for everybody, and vote on those projects, and then direct some of the City's budget to those projects. In Seattle, our participatory budgeting process - that we've been discussing and that has passed Council - is specifically focused on alternatives for community safety, for public safety, community-driven alternatives. And that was passed in 2021's budget - they budgeted $30 million for this participatory budgeting process. And they allocated, I think, $3 million to the Black Brilliance Research Project to kind of get the process started - and research what the barriers were, and what community needed to make this process be successful.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:21:13] There's been conflicting stories coming out about the Black Brilliance Project being delayed, who is responsible for the delay. Certainly, it's something I want to see come to fruition, especially because people have traditionally historically been excluded from the process. And when it comes to what community needs, what better way, especially in the policing conversation and how to keep our community safe in looking at alternatives, looking at the most impacted communities engaging with this Black Brilliance Project to - through our own lens - say, "What are our needs? What is happening? How do we address that?" is crucially important. They have since reported on their findings. Where does the funding for that start? How is that moving forward?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:22:13] The funding is reserved but it is under proviso, which means that it's kind of locked up in the budget right now. In order for that funding to be sent out to community, the proviso has to be lifted and that has to be voted on by the full Council, ultimately. The holdup has been deciding how to implement this program - it is a large program - $30 million is a lot of money. Seattle has done participatory budgeting programs in the past, but for much smaller amounts of money and there have been some issues with implementation. I think that the debate now is how can we best implement this program so that it really helps the people we wanted to help and gives a voice to everyone, in particularly the impacted communities.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:23:10] Yeah, and actually today, there was a recent development with just understanding this process and the challenges that come. And I will say as a Black woman that we're familiar with seeing - that when significant funding is pointed in the direction of Black people, there is usually much more intense scrutiny attached to that. And that that often also raises alarm bells for other people within institutions that feel like their place in their institution or in their organization is being threatened. And just today actually, Councilmember Tammy Morales, in response to another inquiry, posted letters talking - letters from employees in the City of Seattle, from the Office of Planning and Community Development's Equitable Development Initiative, who have done work within this process - saying that the mayor has been a roadblock, and that the culture in the City is just exhausting and bad - horrible and drives people of color, specifically women of color, out of the City. That just came out shortly before we started airing this, but have you heard things consistent with this throughout your time following and reporting on this?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:24:45] Yes. Yeah, I definitely have. I've heard people talking about various concerns. There've been little things that have popped up - most of them haven't really necessarily been very reported on. A lot of them are not - they don't have all the facts on the ground. I'm really pleased that these letters have now been made public so that everyone can see them, and read them, and really become more informed about what has been happening. And we even see it in the quality of coverage in the local media about participatory budgeting - and I have seen it being under more intense scrutiny in certain ways.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:25:33] Yeah. And just to give you an example of what we're talking about here - portions of these letters have been reported on before. Many people may have heard the quote, "We're done working for a dictator posturing as mayor," referring to Mayor Jenny Durkan. "We're done feeling increasingly out of touch with our communities and friends. And we're done being women of color bearing a disproportionate emotional labor burden in our civilization's collective reckoning with our mid-life (or is it end-of-life?) crisis." 

    But it goes into detail - "We can tell you more about all these things, in due time. Now, we're taking some time off to reclaim our mental health. Before we do, we want to share with you some changes that we'd suggest." 

    Especially the intersection of policy and politics here - "First, in this election cycle, consider this: when we select candidates for how good they are at convincing us that they are the best, we elect exactly the wrong kinds of leaders who can bring out the best in others. Ask candidates to show their work. What is the process by which you've arrived at your current beliefs? Who did you include, and what lived experiences do they bring? Do those with different views feel heard by you, or left out by your process, or maybe even bullied into swallowing their own values to do it your way? Give love to candidates who know something about trauma and vulnerability. How are you taking care of yourself? How can we support you, hold space for you where you don't need to show up for us every day with your armor on and your quiver ready?"

    And it just goes in - "For years, the two of us witnessed firsthand the toll it takes inside City Hall when a Mayor is elected more for their conviction than for their curiosity. We might call this "trickle-down politics": the mindset that if we just get a leader who believes what a majority of voters believe, the institution can do great things. Trickle-down politics was a good foundation for a society built on conditional belonging, but deep democracy - true collective decision making - is what we need if we truly intend a society of unconditional belonging."

    I mean, I appreciate them for pushing past - in this letter - not just exploring and expressing their pain and frustration and experiences, but also saying, "We see a path that we can be better. And here, we want to share that with you also." 

    And then also just talking about - in another separate letter - looking at why this process was established anyway, and to clarify that the letter that was shared before, the contents of the letter shared, I think that was from the representative from Mayor Durkan's office - do not represent or reflect the work of staff. Basically saying that their work was misrepresented and they felt silenced. To call attention to the ways this process has harmed BIPOC and particularly the Black community and staff. I mean, this goes on and on. Worth reading - we'll link them in the show notes here in the podcast. 

    But my goodness, how many red flags do people have to raise before people take this seriously? How many resignations, in the City, of high-level employees do we have to see? How many employees of color do we have to see leave the City? Jenny Durkan, your house is on fire - do something to put it out finally. And if that means stepping aside, so someone else can - please, also do that. Something needs to happen here. There is a problem, that I also want to say is not completely Jenny Durkan's fault. It's not like none of this existed before, and it's not like it will automatically go away once Jenny Durkan is gone. There has to be intention and work put into solving the issues of policing and public safety, and making sure your employees feel safe and protected and heard, and in making sure that we're actually serving all of the residents in this City and not the ones that just traditionally have their own access specially into the system.

    So, let me hop off my soapbox for a second, but it is just infuriating to read. And obviously, especially as a Black woman, I can identify with a number of these experiences and with being silenced and overlooked. I just hope people pay as much attention - and put as much credibility into the words that are coming from the people who are deeply involved with, familiar with, and experts in this work - that they do from the people who are trying to keep them from speaking out publicly. As we've seen reported, the mayor's office does not let a number of people in departments speak to the media or outside entities themselves, and they are directed to the mayor's office. Maybe we should look at - when people are silenced, as we've seen in other administrations, our recent past administration that we can think of - that's usually not for a good reason. It's usually because people are really trying to control that narrative. 

    So, I appreciate you, Amy, for breaking down those barriers and for just reporting on what is happening on what is the inside, to a lot of people every day. With the Council and those meetings, people usually aren't aware of when CPC meetings are, or what is happening with the OPA. And we're relying on good work done by newspaper staff, that are often understaffed, to cover all of these meetings and issues, but we often don't get the full story about what happens. And it has been really enlightening for me to read the difference between your complete coverage of a meeting and the synopsis that we get in various media publications.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:31:42] Yeah.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:31:42] And my goodness, I recommend people read Amy's live tweets, read her newsletter - because there's just so much more information there and we need to know - if we're going to help make this any better.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:31:59] And my hope, also, is that people will take this information and take all these things we see going wrong right now in our City and our County, and vote, you know?

    Crystal Fincher: [00:32:11] Yeah.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:32:12] Because that is one of our rights and powers as individual citizens - is to go out, and research the candidates, and vote for someone who might bring about the desired change.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:32:28] Yep. Absolutely. Vote and then pay attention - call your councilmembers, call your representatives - and understand that your vote carried some weight and some expectation, and you're paying attention. Just the fact that they know you're paying attention - changes the trajectory of where conversations head. I've seen that play out over and over again.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:32:56] It really 100% does, and I've seen it play out directly in meetings - in the City Council meetings. They referenced the protests many, many times. We would not have gotten half of what we got without those daily protests for months. And they reference the number of emails that they get. They talk about speaking with their constituents. And because we're talking about local government, I feel like your voice carries more weight because there aren't as many of us as there are if you're talking about national issues.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:33:26] It absolutely does.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:33:28] So I do think you can make a real difference by speaking up about Seattle issues or King County issues.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:33:35] You absolutely can - I've seen just comments from a handful of people bring an issue from relatively unknown to a councilmember being like, "This is a priority that we need to address." So, absolutely vote, absolutely continue to pay attention, and engage in the process - let people know where you stand, be heard. And follow Amy Sundberg. Amy, where can they find you on Twitter? What's your Twitter handle? How do they subscribe to your newsletter?

    Amy Sundberg: [00:34:06] My Twitter handle is @amysundberg, A-M-Y-S-U-N-D-B-E-R-G. I have a link to my newsletter on the Twitter, so that's probably the easiest way to find it.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:34:19] Yep. And it is called Notes from the Emerald City - excellent synopsis of Seattle politics and policy, and what I turn to quite frequently just to catch up on what is happening. One of my essential sources. Thank you so much for joining us here today.

    Amy Sundberg: [00:34:37] Thank you for having me.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:34:39] Thank you all for tuning in. We'll talk to you next time. Thank you for listening to Hacks and Wonks. Our chief audio engineer at KVRU is Maurice Jones Jr. The producer of Hacks and Wonks is Lisl Stadler. You can find me on Twitter, @finchfrii, spelled F-I-N-C-H-F-R-I-I, and now you can follow Hacks and Wonks on iTunes, Spotify, or wherever else you get your podcasts. Just type in "Hacks and Wonks" into the search bar. Be sure to subscribe to get our Friday almost-live shows and our midweek show delivered to your podcast feed. You can also get a full text transcript of this episode and links to the resources referenced during the show at officialhacksandwonks.com and in the podcast episode notes. Thanks for tuning in. Talk to you next time.

    A Chat with Senator Karen Keiser

    A Chat with Senator Karen Keiser

    This week on the show Crystal is joined by Senator Karen Keiser, Washington State Senate President Pro Tempore and one of the busiest women in the Washington State legislature. They discuss what happened in the past legislative session this year, as well as changes that will be worked toward next year. Highlights include more than a dozen public safety bills passed, protection of essential workers during the pandemic, attempts to rectify Washington State’s upside-down tax code, worker protections in the unprecedentedly hot conditions we’ve experienced due to climate change, passage of the Working Families Tax Credit, supporting childcare workers as we face a massive childcare shortage, and more. This was indeed a busy legislative session!

    As always, a full text transcript of the show is available below and at officialhacksandwonks.com.

    Find the host, Crystal Fincher on Twitter at @finchfrii and find Senator Karen Keiser at @karenkeiser1. More info is available at officialhacksandwonks.com.

     

    Resources 

    "What would it cost to house and provide treatment for Seattle's homeless?" by Scott Greenstone at The Seattle Times: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/homeless/what-is-the-cost-to-house-and-provide-treatment-for-seattles-homeless/ 

    "With 12 New Laws, Washington State Joins Movement to Overhaul Policing" by Austin Jenkins from NPR: https://www.npr.org/2021/05/18/997974519/a-dozen-police-reform-bills-signed-into-law-in-washington-state 

    "A year after George Floyd's murder, what's changed in Washington state?" by Melissa Santos from Crosscut: https://crosscut.com/news/2021/05/year-after-george-floyds-murder-whats-changed-washington-state 

    "With the Washington Legislature halfway through its session, here's where policing bill stand" by Joseph O'Sullivan from The Seattle Times: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/washington-legislature-passes-bill-requiring-police-officers-to-intervene-if-they-witness-excessive-force/ 

    "Washington Legislature charts 'new beginning' in climate change fight" by Levi Pulkkinen from Investigate West via Crosscut: https://crosscut.com/politics/2021/05/washington-legislature-charts-new-beginning-climate-change-fight 

    "Inslee signs off on capital gains tax for wealthy and tax rebate for lower-income workers in Washington" by Jim Brunner from The Seattle Times: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/inslee-signs-capital-gains-tax-for-wealthy-and-tax-rebate-for-lower-income-workers-in-washington/ 

    "Return to Work? Now With Child Care Still in Limbo, Some Parents Say." by Claire Cain Miller from The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/05/upshot/covid-child-care-schools.html 

    "2021 heat wave is now the deadliest weather-related event in Washington history" by John Ryan from KUOW: https://www.kuow.org/stories/heat-wave-death-toll-in-washington-state-jumps-to-112-people 

    "Washington Joins Oregon, California, British Columbia In Passing Low-Carbon Fuel Standard" by Courtney Flatt from KUOW: https://www.kuow.org/stories/washington-joins-oregon-california-british-columbia-in-passing-low-carbon-fuel-standard 

    "The HEAL Act gives WA a path to environmental justice" by Jennifer Calkins from Crosscut: https://crosscut.com/opinion/2021/03/heal-act-gives-wa-path-environmental-justice 

    The Front and Centered Coalition: https://frontandcentered.org/ 

    "Relief slow to reach King County renters as evictions set to resume" by David Kroman from Crosscut: https://crosscut.com/news/2021/06/relief-slow-reach-king-county-renters-evictions-set-resume 

    Hacks & Wonks interview with Pierce County Councilmember Derek Young: https://www.officialhacksandwonks.com/listenpodcast/episode/32ca17ec/seattle-pay-attention-to-pierce-county-a-conversation-with-pierce-county-council-chair-derek-young 

    Hacks & Wonks interview with Senator and King County Executive Candidate Joe Nguyen: https://www.officialhacksandwonks.com/listenpodcast/episode/1e38d0ac/meet-senator-and-kc-exec-candidate-joe-nguyen-again 

    A Chat with Dow Constantine, King County Executive

    A Chat with Dow Constantine, King County Executive

    This week Crystal talks with King County Executive Dow Constantine about his decision to run for a fourth term as County Executive. They discuss the path to Covid-19 recovery, persisting inequality in King County, the comparatively low rate of vaccination in BIPoC communities in South King County, the role of government in bailing out large private projects, campaign finance, public safety, and more.

    As always, a full text transcript of the show is available below and at officialhacksandwonks.com.

    Find the host, Crystal Fincher on Twitter at @finchfrii and find today’s guest, King County Executive Dow Constantine, at @DowC. More info is available at officialhacksandwonks.com.

     

    Resources

    “Joe Nguyen challenging Dow Constantine for King County executive” by Melissa Santos: https://crosscut.com/politics/2021/04/joe-nguyen-challenging-dow-constantine-king-county-executive

    “Seattle Elections 2021: Digging deeper into voters’ top priorities” by Anne Christnovich: https://crosscut.com/inside-crosscut/2021/06/seattle-elections-2021-digging-deeper-voters-top-priorities

    “King County passes $631M rescue plan for COVID recovery; Seattle unveils its $128M proposal” by Daniel Beekman: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/king-county-passes-rescue-plan-spending-for-covid-19-recovery-seattle-unveils-its-proposal/

    “Community Health Centers Work to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Inequity” by Sally James: https://southseattleemerald.com/2021/03/02/community-health-centers-work-to-address-covid-19-vaccine-inequity/

    “Elders of Color Face Major Hurdles Getting COVID Vaccine” by Carolyn Bick: https://southseattleemerald.com/2021/03/04/elders-of-color-face-major-hurdles-getting-covid-vaccine/

    “Seattle’s COVID relief money to focus on direct aid, housing” by David Kroman: https://crosscut.com/news/2021/05/seattles-covid-relief-money-focus-direct-aid-housing

    “Despite criticism, King County Council gives Mariners $135M” by Manola Secaira: https://crosscut.com/2018/09/despite-criticism-king-county-council-gives-mariners-135m

    “No bailout needed for Washington State Convention Center expansion, as private financing presumes economic rebound” by David Gutman: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/washington-state-convention-center-expansion-secures-financing-no-longer-needs-a-bailout/

    “County Exec Candidates Spar Over PACs, City Finally Funds Street Sinks” from Publicola: https://publicola.com/2021/05/25/county-exec-candidates-spar-over-pacs-city-finally-funds-street-sinks/

    “A guide to political money: campaigns, PACs, super PACs” by Philip Elliott: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/a-guide-to-political-money-campaigns-pacs-super-pacs

    “Police Accountability and Inquests in King County: Representing families calling for a fair and transparent process” by Leslie Brown: https://www.aclu-wa.org/story/police-accountability-and-inquests-king-county-representing-families-calling-fair-and

    “King County voters have spoken: Police reform and a new sheriff are coming” by Dow Constantine: https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/king-county-voters-have-spoken-police-reform-and-a-new-sheriff-are-coming/

     

    Transcript

    Crystal Fincher: [00:00:00] Welcome to Hacks and Wonks. I'm your host Crystal Fincher. On this show, we talk to political hacks and policy wonks to gather insight in the local politics and policy through the lens of those doing the work and provide behind the scenes perspectives on politics in our state. Full transcripts and resources referenced in the show are always available at officialhacksandwonks.com and in our episode notes.

    Well, today we are very happy to have Dow Constantine, King County Executive, and a candidate running for reelection this year. Thanks so much for joining us Dow.

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:01:02] No, thanks for inviting me on Crystal. I appreciate it.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:01:05] So now you are in a competitive race. You've drawn a competitor in Senator Joe Nguyen in this case. So just starting off, why are you one running for a fourth term? Is it a fourth term this time? A fourth term and why do you feel you're up for the challenges that we're facing today?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:01:26] Well, it's an exciting moment for us. I mean, we're coming out of this sort of constellation of crises. And I think that the very fact of COVID and the economic collapse and the civil rights awakening and realization about climate change that people are coming to and many other sort of disruptions in society has created an environment where we can make a lot more progress on the issues that we've been dutifully pushing forward over the course of the last four years on equity and social justice and anti-racism on climate, on transformation in the criminal legal system and a lot more and homelessness, I guess I would say.

    And so it's an exciting moment. We've made enormous strides since I've been in office, but there are these difficult issues that it was very hard to get traction on. And now we have a chance to really run the open field on them. And that is in a nutshell why I'm excited about running for another term. What was your other question?

    Crystal Fincher: [00:02:42] And why you feel you're up for addressing the challenges that we're facing today? You talked about these crises. I mean, certainly with the pandemic, our economy, facing the climate, we're in a world of hurt at the moment. I mean, I guess some people are, some people have been having a great time through this pandemic.

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:03:01] Yeah. Some people made out this time.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:03:02] But why do you feel you're the person to take on these challenges in the next four years?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:03:08] Well, I think because I've shown that I and my team are the people who have been able to solve the tough challenges, to take on the big issues, not to simply kick the can, but to be able to create a high capacity transit system for three counties or the nation's leading early childhood development program, or tackle the COVID crisis and do a better job than just about anybody in the country, even though it landed here first.

    So we are I think an arguably very good at this work and that doesn't mean the challenges are easy to stand up and knock down. But it does mean that we have the team that has proven that we can take on the tough challenges and ultimately defeat them.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:03:57] So you mentioned the COVID recovery and certainly doing better than many counties across the country. On the overall rate, I guess, how would you grade yourself on your response and your leadership throughout this recovery and how do you think it's going?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:04:14] Yeah, well, there's the question of the public health response. And I think we've been in the upper tier in terms of our ability to respond to the health crisis, to keep people from contracting the virus, to get people through this. For much of this, we were, I think the top county out of the 3000 largest counties. Right now I think we're number 94 or five out of 97 in terms of the high quality of our response.

    We've got San Francisco and Honolulu doing slightly better than we are in infection rate right now. But this is a real accomplishment and it's put us in a strong position for recovery. But recovery means a lot more than simply people getting physically healthy, although that's important. And we're working to make sure that we get the vaccines out to as many people as possible.

    It also means rebuilding the economy in a way that is both robust and more equitable than it was before, taking on directly the issue of not just income inequality, though that's critically important, but also of creating opportunity for those who have been historically marginalized, historically left behind. And we have here in this region, the ability to connect everyone to economic opportunity that puts them in a position to do what we were all told we were going to be able to do, which is do better than our parents and our grandparents did.

    And I had a really fascinating meeting about this yesterday with a group that's working to stand up a program to train and up-skill people to be able to take specific jobs in the new economy at Amazon, at Microsoft, at Google and other companies, technology jobs that will allow them a ladder to greater and greater success. That is the kind of thing that living in King county and in Central Puget Sound , that's the kind of opportunity it provides. But we've got to make the connections for people to be able to get across that divide and into those careers.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:06:29] Absolutely. And talking about the public health response, I mean, certainly overall the vaccination rates are great. Right now slightly less than half of African-Americans are fully vaccinated, right at half, 50.7% of the Hispanic and Latino community are vaccinated, in South King county, only 56% of people are vaccinated. Why do you think that is? And what should you be doing to increase those numbers?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:07:03] Yeah. Well, we should be doing what we are doing and what we have been doing. Our public health department has been extremely aggressive in getting into communities that are underserved by the healthcare system and providing access to vaccines, extremely aggressive and creating partnerships with trusted community-based organizations to reach those who either are not well connected to a traditional systems, or do not trust traditional providers to give them the vaccine and to convince people to come and get the vaccine that's going to allow them to be healthy.

    And we're going to continue doing that work in different modalities. It was first the mass vaccine sites that we set up in Auburn and Kent. We have a clinic with Kaiser Permanente in Federal Way and we're networking with partner organizations to bring people to that clinic, but also partnering to set up pop-ups with community-based organizations.

    And we have a partnership of over 50 community-based organizations around King County helping with this, so that whether you're a community organization or a church or any kind of organization, you can have the vaccines there available for your constituency, invite people to an event. I went to a great one in Redmond with the Latinx community on the east side. And it was set up to appeal to what they themselves viewed as their constituency that was being vaccine resistant to come to be with trusted partners, to be with people they knew, to be in familiar surroundings and to have a sort of mutually supportive environment in order to take this step across into something that's a little bit unknown or about which people were weary.

    I think that has got to be the approach we take in this as we move toward trying to get past those sort of disparities that have plagued this rollout nationally. And we've narrowed the disparities in King County to much, much less than they are nationally, but they still exist and they persist, and we're going to keep fighting to make sure that we're meeting people where they are and offering them information and the healthcare they need to be able to get through this thing.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:09:26] So you were making a great point about the inequities that currently exist, and you have been the incumbent for the past 12 years. And as a lot of people, have observed and I think rightly that the pandemic laid bare the inequities and disparities that already existed and just really exacerbated them. And so, as someone who has been in charge of King county and King county's public health apparatus over the past 12 years, that those inequities and disparities existed on your watch and languished on your watch, do you think you own that? Do you think that you have acted sufficiently to address the inequality that we've seen in the health system that has resulted in such a hard time throughout this pandemic for so many?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:10:15] Well, it is a fact that King County has not managed to solve 400 years of racism in America yet. But we have seized from the very day I took office mantle of equity and social justice and built it from a mere idea to a commitment to an office that's actually seen in my executive office to a strategic plan and an implementation plan and the creation of our internal anti-racism core team and their production of anti-racism budget and policy agendas that we have adopted.

    And this work is both internal to the county and it's 15,000 employees in our programs and external, and about all the institutions of the community. So the fact is that we have been working very vigorously and diligently toward transforming this community. And I would remind you of what we just discussed earlier, which is the notion of this moment as a breakthrough moment, a moment when we can take this work we have been doing and with a suddenly enthusiastic public broadly make rapid progress.

    That is what is exciting about this moment that we've been beating our head against a wall, we've been charging into the defensive line over and over and over. And finally we see in front of us the open field we needed to run with this transformation. And so I'm very excited about it. And I really want folks to be able to better see, and hopefully this campaign will allow them the remarkable work that we have been doing over the course of my administration in equity, social justice and anti-racism.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:12:09] So do you think the... I mean, I certainly think that the public is more aware and enthusiastic about addressing some of the inequities that we now see the consequences that come from letting them languish. Do you think that's the difference and being able to accomplish more than was accomplished in your prior terms is having public buy-in? Is that the big difference that you're seeing?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:12:34] Yeah. We've accomplished quite a lot in terms of building in an equity lens in everything we do and all the work that we set about to do in community. But yes, that's what matters on anti-racism, that's what matters on climate and clean water, that's what matters on criminal legal system transformation. That is what matters is getting the public to focus on the progress that we're working to make and to join in it. And this public now is really ready for it. And it is unfortunate but predictable that it takes the kinds of crises we lived through over the course of the last 15 months to make that so. But it was very clear even last summer that the public mood had changed dramatically. And I said very clearly and publicly, even at that time, this was our moment.

    The door had been kicked open, that progress was possible, and we can't let it close like it did 50 years ago. For example in the, in the 1960s, when change was in the air and the opportunity to transform America and make it live up to its ideals was possible. And then Richard Nixon and his Southern strategy took everything in reverse. And that reverse lasted really for a half century. We made halting forward progress. But having the public be galvanized around the kinds of transformation this nation needs is something that's rare indeed. And we have to keep that door kicked open and put our shoulder to it and drive through.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:14:11] Certainly have to drive through. Do you think that there is the possibility of heading off, I guess, a crisis that comes from the convergence of these problems and them lasting for so long? Do you think that there's a way to galvanize the public without requiring a crisis?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:14:34] There should be, but is often been repeated that with crisis comes opportunity and the opportunity of this crisis is to refocus people on the failings of our nation, the way in which our reality is so misaligned with our ideals and the story we've always told about ourselves. And I think that... I mean, just to be perfectly frank, having white America suddenly wake up to the reality, to have the scales dropped from their eyes and to see what's going on is a critical turn of events and is a chance to drive kind of real change that we have been struggling to create at King county over the course of years with our equity and social justice work.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:15:23] Absolutely. Well, and you mentioned that there's an opportunity now, and there certainly is an opportunity with a lot of renewed or just new public enthusiasm to build a new normal. I mean, we touched on the recovery before, economically a lot of people who already had a lot have done spectacularly financially through this pandemic and headed where they started. [crosstalk] But we still have a lot, particularly women, particularly women of color who have lost their jobs and those jobs haven't come back, who are suffering from not having childcare that disappeared during the pandemic, people struggling still to make bills, people still who are impacted by this eviction moratorium and afraid that the past due rent that's going to come due here real soon is going to make it impossible to stay into their homes. What should you be doing? What can you do? What are you doing and what will you do to help the people who need it the most?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:16:30] Well, we are focusing all the funds that we can get from the federal government, from the state government money that we're able to scrape up locally and into a recovery package. And the council has just passed our seventh COVID supplemental, emergency supplemental measure, and I'm putting together the eighth. And the one that the council just passed, included my proposal for a $25 million for economic recovery for BIPoC and, sorry for using that generic term, and women-owned businesses that have been particularly disadvantaged during the crisis and because, and for rental assistance, the amount of between this budget, one a few weeks before to $150 million in additional rental assistance for people who are behind on the rent in King County and there will need to be more because it is humanitarian challenge to be sure if people lose their homes.

    And it's also enormously more expensive to get people out of homelessness and back into a home than to keep them housed where they are. It is going to require more help from the federal government or the state government or at least more authority from the state government to the local government, which we do not have to be able to raise the funds to get people through the rest of this.

    But I got to say that the key for us is having our economy functioning and functioning for everyone, rather than just those who are fortunate enough to have come here with the skills to land the kinds of jobs as economy is now offering. One of the ways in which we are responding in King County I several weeks ago signed a pro equity contracting executive order. And that is designed to give Black and Latino and Asian and Indigenous owned businesses better access to government contracts.

    For example, construction contracts. We have over $100 billion of public contracts in the pipeline in King County over the course of the next couple of decades, including sound transit. And that is enormous opportunity for entrepreneurs, for skilled trades people, for generations who have been left out of the economic story of this region to be able to build a secure economic future for themselves and their families.

    And as I mentioned before, these high-tech businesses just to give an example, are going to keep hiring, they're going to keep growing and we need to not simply settle for people moving here from elsewhere to take those jobs, and then squeezing people out of the housing market. We need to be much more purposeful about connecting people to the training they need, the skills they need to be able to get those jobs and to have specific jobs targeted for people who are getting skilled up right here in King County.

    So it's exciting. Eddie Rye and others are helping create this organization that is going to be providing this training and making the connections to the big employers and having them figure out how to move people from where they are economically stuck across this gulf into a place of expanding economic opportunity in the businesses that are growing here in King county.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:20:17] That is certainly important. And making sure people have jobs in that opportunity. I've heard your opponent mention and other people mention, in this climate where there certainly has been a significant amount that you and the King County council have authorized to go for a variety of different types of help and assistance throughout this pandemic, there were some other things that popped up that people question. Certainly before the pandemic looking at the, what was it, $135 million that wound up going to Safeco Field and people including Councilmember Dave Upthegrove said, hey, that can be going to affordable housing and should be, or the proposal to bail out the convention center with $100 million of county dollars that I think they ultimately found public (Crystal meant to say private) financing which I think a lot of people were advocating for them to do from the beginning.

    With those during that time, it was certainly talked about, I'm sure you heard, hey, should we be spending it here? Is this the priority? Or should we be giving it more directly to the people who are impacted? How did you work through that? How did you rationalize that?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:21:32] So the visitor taxes, the hotel, motel taxes, the tourist taxes are supposed to go to pay for things that keep the tourism industry, the visitor industry going and creates thousands of jobs, livelihoods for people throughout the county. And baseball is about the biggest tourism thing we have. And it is a public building that has to be kept standing. But what is never said by the critics is that, back then all of this tourism business allowed us to spend some 600, I believe, $660 million on affordable housing.

    It is the goose that laid the golden egg, and we need to continue to foster it because there are direct jobs in the visitor industry. And it also produces a lot more revenue that can go to the important social programs, including housing that we fund.

    The Convention Center is also an enormous economic engine and employer, high quality family wage jobs, building that building. Well, over 1000 of them that were in jeopardy of ending in the middle of a pandemic. But more than that, all of the jobs operating that and the restaurants and all of the services that visitors here, thousands of visitors pay for. And that is going to keep an awful lot of people employed, allow them to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads.

    We cannot allow these important industries to just go by the wayside and Washington state has needed a larger Convention Center for a very long time. I had to go to Olympia. I had to work the legislature over years to try to get them to allow us to expand the Convention Center. When they fail, they finally gave up and handed over control of the entire thing to the county, and we chartered a new organization.

    And then we constructed a very complex real estate transaction to get that block of downtown Seattle, which was becoming obsolete as a bus depot because of the light rail taking over entirely the downtown tunnel. And then work to get the convention center construction started only to have COVID hit and have it be threatened with being shut down.

    I mean, this is the work that people need to build a better life. If you go to that Convention Center and you talk with the contractors, many, many, or the laborers and the carpenters many, many of them are People  of Color from marginalized communities who have been recruited into apprenticeships and then journey positions where they're able to build a better life than their parents had, where they're able to provide for their kids to buy a house, to build a secure retirement. That's what we need. That is what we need for us to really have economic justice in this county, not just very wealthy people and then a whole bunch of people scraping by. We need to have kinds of jobs that allow people to earn a solid living.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:25:03] And certainly, I don't think you'll find anyone who disagrees with the need to make sure that we are protecting workers and protecting the industries that serve Seattle a lot. And you are endorsed by quite a few labor unions. So they have been seemingly very happy with how you have proceeded in your activities. I guess the question that I have would be, does the fact that they ultimately ended up finding private financing mean that maybe we should push harder on, especially entities who their backers may have more resources than the average person, to try and find private solutions for bailouts, as opposed to the public need to bail them out? How do you think about that?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:25:55] I think it is an appropriate role for government to keep important economic activity happening. And during the pandemic, the credit for projects that were funded by tourism taxes dried up because the tourism economy collapsed. But what the market learned ultimately was that that was not going to be a permanent circumstance, that visitors were going to come back and that they needed to get the Convention Center done and it was a good investment.

    But there was a period when they needed the guarantee of money in order to be able to keep people employed and not have to mothball the project. So this is where, I guess this is sort of taking a step back here, this is where you find the difference between sort of ideology and the reality in which we have to work. And the reality in which I have to work is real people with real jobs and real hard choices.

    Yeah, sure. I would, of course love to be able to just pursue a sort of utopian vision. But the fact is that we have real-world constraints that we have to figure out how to deal with. And the trick has been to figure out how to keep our values front and center to have our budgeting and our policy follow those values. And we've been I think unarguably very successful at that.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:27:16] Well, I think in that vein, there's another issue about values and practicality that has popped up in this campaign about campaign finance and whether it is good and okay. Your opponent made a pledge to not accept PAC dollars or corporate PAC dollars, I think he termed it. And you made the point in a forum, I think it was, hey, it looks like you have accepted PAC donations, which led to a conversation about while it was a different kind of pack or an association.

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:27:57] Yeah, it's splitting hairs. It is posturing and splitting hairs.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:28:04] So how do you view who donates to you and what that says about where you stand and the influence that they have?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:28:15] Well, I think my record is absolute proof of where I stand and you may agree with it, you may disagree with it, but it is very clear, well-documented and I think my record shows that I am pro environment that I'm pro labor, that I'm pro equity, that I'm pro transit mobility. And I've not just said those things out loud, I've actually done the heavy lifting to make them real. And so if he is afraid that he will be influenced by PAC donations then fine by me, if he doesn't want to accept donations, I know who I am. I know what I stand for. I know the work I've done. And I do think that if he is going to say, he's not going to accept PAC donations or corporate PAC donations or corporate association PAC donation or whatever it is, he should at least be consistent. And I don't think he has been.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:29:21] Consistency is key. We were looking back and we've also interviewed Senator Nguyen and he mentioned as we were talking about this, because I asked him, and we had a conversation about, hey, is it really different? Are they special interests ultimately? It does seem like splitting hairs.

    But he brought up, hey, this is after $750,000 of expenditures in this race. And I actually thought he misspoke, but looking back at it, you received over $300,000 in contributions in 2018, over $400,000 almost $400,000, $398,000, in 2019, $142,000 in 2020, $479,000 in 2021. Now first, fundraisers are just excited about this and yours  has done an excellent work.

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:30:15] $175,000 last month.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:30:16] You are a fundraising juggernaut, but you've also spent in 2018, $233,000, in 2019, $312,000, 2020, $77,000. Before you ever drew an opponent, you are comfortable and lots of people would argue, you are a comfortable incumbent. What do you think that says about the state of campaign finance? What are you spending that on in the campaign in the first place? And do you think that is a healthy ecosystem when you're not, I guess in essence, publicly campaigning, in the sense when you look at a lot of the other local elected officials who run campaigns in the years or maybe the year before they run a campaign, but spending multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars on off years? Does that just seem it's kind of a campaign industrial complex? Do you feel like that's healthy?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:31:15] Well, I mean, there definitely is a campaign industrial complex, there are all these consultants out there, including my opponents consultants who are building a living figuring out how to make money off of campaigning.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:31:29] I mean hey, I'm a consultant too. I'm not knocking it all, but man, those are eye popping numbers.

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:31:34] Stuff costs money. I had an amusing conversation just before we started this podcast where the very leftist political candidate who was calling me, asking for my help in raising money and about the fact that no matter how pure your beliefs, everything costs. People who do work need to be able to keep a roof over their heads. People who have expertise deserve to be paid for it. People who contribute their time should be fairly compensated and they don't deliver mail for free and they don't carry your video for free. None of that stuff's free, nothing's free. And this is a county of 2.3 million people. So this is larger than 15 states. So it is an expensive proposition, is also a very big job with over 15,000 employees and over $12 billion budget.

    And as I said 2.3 million people to account for. It is painting on a very large canvas, so it does end up costing money. Yeah. And I don't like having to raise money, I find it painful. I'm sort of by nature an introvert, the act of having to pick up the telephone and ask someone to donate is excruciating. I don't like going to events, I find it exhausting. But the fact is that that's what you have to do. That is what you need to do in order to be able to serve. And if you're not willing to do it, then you can't build a three county light rail system or create the nation's leading early childhood development program. So is it worth it? I don't know. But it is what you got to do in order to be able to do the good work.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:33:29] Sure. And speaking of the hard work and the tough work, public safety has certainly been an issue that a lot of different jurisdictions have been tackling in a variety of different ways or not tackling for some jurisdictions. King County recently voted to stop electing the Sheriff and making it appointed. There have been a number of high profile incidences within the King County Sheriff's department and calls very vocally recently from a broad swath of the public. And looking at the vote for those charter amendments, it looks like the majority of King county wants to see some substantive reform. In looking at that, do you one, agree that there's a need for substantive reform? What are your plans for that reform and why do you think that was not as urgent a need to act on before in the prior 12 years?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:34:30] Well, I mean, I don't know that anybody thought it wasn't an urgent need. So long before the Sheriff's issue was on the ballot, it was long before this sudden awakening in America, around the reality of police violence and Black Lives Matter that we undertook to completely upend and rewrite the system of inquests in officer involved deaths in King County. I did that sitting at the table with the bereaved families of those who died at the hands of police.

    And when we did that, we did it to remove this situation where we got to the end of the process and the police officer was asked, well, did you fear for your life? And that police officer inevitably said, yes, I feared for my life, that's why I shot. And then it was used as some sort of exoneration, subjective fear, and we turned it into a process that would reveal whether that officer followed their training. And if so, whether their training was in fact flawed, whether the policies and the procedures, the equipping of those officers has to be changed by the responsible agency, whichever agency it is.

    And when we did that with these families, I think we created a really enlightened and forward looking process. One that is directed at figuring out how we can change the use of force, the use of force by police officers. And we were immediately sued by the Seattle Police Department by my own King County Sheriff's office, by police agencies all around the county, who said they shouldn't be forced to comply with this. And it's before the Supreme Court now.

    I'm really pleased that we did such good work, but it's only the beginning and getting those charter amendments passed to allow me to take control of the Sheriff's Office is an important step forward.

    We've even panel the community group that is going to be the core of our community co-creation of the new duties and structure of the Sheriff's Office, and will help me identify the person who will be the next Sheriff accountable to me and to the Council and to the people. And we will be taking over as well the hiring, the firing the discipline in the Sheriff's office. But there's a lot more than that, and we can talk about this forever.

    I'm very convinced that as a society and certainly within King County we need to narrow the scope of problems. Of course, the police are called and broaden the availability of public health and human service interventions to help unwind conflict and communities to help individuals who are having behavioral health challenges. And I've deployed in the courthouse area, a 24 hour days, seven day a week team, behavioral health team to do just that, to go out, to engage those who are having behavioral health challenges on the streets, to get them inside, to get them to treatment, the help they need to keep them from being in harm's way and to help them make halting steps forward on the road to recovery. That's possible to do in other communities too.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:37:59] I think that's positive. I guess the thing is, with the inquest process, it doesn't actually have any accountability at the end of it. It's a fact finding exercise. Knowing the facts is absolutely necessary, but what's the connection between finding out those facts and actual accountability. And in a way, go ahead.

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:38:19] The authority rests with the agency that employs the police. So if it was a King County Sheriff's deputy involved, that exercise where we found out whether or not they follow their training or whether it was the training and procedures themselves that were flawed, would then land back in the lap of the person in this case right now, the Sheriff, these separately elected Sheriff, but later the appointed Sheriff and the Executive to fix.

    And the same thing is true if it is a city police department like Kent or Seattle. But the county does not have the ability to go sanction the city of Kent for their officer's actions. However, the prosecuting attorney, if he finds that a crime has been committed can bring criminal charges as our prosecutor has in the case of the city of Auburn.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:39:11] Well, and I guess the ultimate question is with King County Sheriff's deputies in your capacity as King County Executive what responsibility do you have to ensure that there is actual accountability and what are your plans for that?

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:39:28] Well, I'm excited about having the opportunity to create that accountability starting January 1st. So I'm excited that we are now finally going to be able to move forward on the pilot for body-worn cameras, but I want to make them permanent and ubiquitous. I want all officers to have cameras on them, and I want the cameras to be on whether they're in the unincorporated area or in the many cities that contract with King county, because I don't think anybody should be afraid of the truth.

    I am wanting us to get through, and I wish that the current sheriff would get through the huge backlog of disciplinary actions. I want us to be able to negotiate, which they have not succeeded in doing, the ability for the office of law enforcement oversight to have real teeth so that we have an agency that can independently not the internal investigations, one that can independently assess what has happened in police use of force and take corrective action.

    There are a whole bunch of opportunities that come with the public's embrace of these charter amendments. And I do not think that before George Floyd, before last year, the public would have been ready to make this change, but it is one that I've been advocating a long time, and I'm very excited to have the opportunity to move forward on. And now these, I talked earlier about the big difficult issues transforming the criminal legal system, which is fundamentally flawed all across this country is an opportunity for King County not just to fix things here, but to provide models that can be followed by other jurisdictions to begin to create the change we want to see in our nation.

    And that is as you can tell, I'm talking excitedly about this. That is the reason I want to run for reelection, that we have the chance to do things that weren't possible even a year and a half ago or that were going to happen very slowly, haltingly, at a great glacial pace. We have the chance to run the field and I want to do it.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:41:34] Well, this is certainly an interesting and exciting race. It is great to be able to hear in detail your plans and the progress that you've been able to make, and your stance on, on all of these issues that are pressing. And we thank you for spending the time with us today. Thank you so much.

    Executive Dow Constantine: [00:41:55] Thanks for having me.

    Crystal Fincher: [00:41:57] Thank you for listening to Hacks and Wonks. Our chief audio engineer at KVRU is Maurice Jones Jr. The producer of Hacks and Wonks is Lisl Stadler. You can find me on Twitter @finchfrii, spelled, F-I-N-C-H-F-R-I-I. And now you can follow Hacks and Wonks on iTunes, Spotify, or wherever else you get your podcasts. Just type in Hacks and Wonks into the search bar. Be sure to subscribe to get our Friday almost live shows and our mid-week show delivered to your podcast feed. You can also get a full text transcript of this episode and links to the resources referenced during the show at officialhacksandwonks.com and in the podcast episode notes. Thanks for tuning in. Talk to you next time.

    White House Launches Office to Crack Down on Guns

    White House Launches Office to Crack Down on Guns

    The Biden administration has launched a new office aimed at repealing gun rights. The new White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention will be headed by Vice President Kamala Harris. The White House continues calling on Congress to take action on firearms. And with the new office, the country is likely to see more debates on the right to bear arms. Yet, is the office actually focused on gun restrictions as a matter of public safety? Or is it about something else entirely? In this episode, we’ll discuss.

    ⭕️ 🇺🇸Josh's Special Offer👉 https://ept.ms/JoshSpeicalOffer
    ⭕️ Support our fight for the truth👉 https://donorbox.org/crossroads