Podcast Summary
Media's lack of curiosity towards Democrats: The media's lack of curiosity towards Democrats, evident since Obama's presidency, has compromised their role as a watchdog for the American people, allowing politicians like Kamala Harris to avoid scrutiny and leading to a loss of trust in the media and a perception of bias.
The media's treatment of Kamala Harris, who has gone 25 days without answering questions from the media despite becoming the de facto Democratic nominee, is a continuation of a trend that started with Barack Obama's presidency. The media's lack of curiosity in asking Democrats questions has been a consistent pattern for the past two decades, allowing politicians like Harris to avoid scrutiny. This has real-world consequences, as the media's role as a watchdog for the American people is compromised. The media's inability to challenge Democrats has been particularly evident during the Obama and Biden administrations, with the media becoming more of a PR machine than a source of objective journalism. This trend has led to a loss of trust in the media and a perception that they are biased towards Democrats. The American people are aware of this, as evidenced by their reaction to Stephen Colbert's claim that CNN is objective. Trump's struggle to attack Harris effectively highlights the media's failure to hold Democrats accountable.
Media bias against Kamala Harris: The media are hiding relevant information about Kamala Harris and her positions during the 2020 election, while continuing to claim they are unbiased and not wrongly accused of being right-wing. This behavior allows politicians to switch positions and hide information without consequence, undermining the democratic process.
The media are actively trying to obscure information about political candidates, particularly Kamala Harris, during the 2020 election. This was evident during the last month of the election when they labeled information about Hunter Biden's laptop as disinformation and suppressed it. Now, they are doing the same thing with Kamala Harris, hiding relevant information about her and her positions. Meanwhile, the media continue to claim they are not biased and are being wrongly accused of being right-wing. However, this argument does not hold water as the media have given cover to politicians like Kamala Harris to skate across the campaign trail without scrutiny. The media's actions allow politicians to switch positions and hide information without consequence. The media's behavior is a disservice to the public and undermines the democratic process. To get access to unbiased news and entertainment, consider switching to PureTalk's cell phone service and receiving a free one-year subscription to Daily Wire Plus. This offer includes unlimited talk, text, data, and mobile hotspot on America's most dependable 5G network, as well as access to Daily Wire's entire library of movies, series, and documentaries. Go to PureTalk.com/Shapiro to take advantage of this amazing deal.
Media's protection of Kamala Harris: The media's focus on Kamala Harris as a fresh face and a source of positivity in the election may be helping her avoid negative attention and maintain a favorable public image despite criticism and challenges on her positions and past associations.
Kamala Harris' positions and past statements on issues like fracking and Medicare for All have faced criticism and challenges, particularly in swing states. However, the media's coverage of Harris has been described as acting as a protective shield, allowing her to avoid direct questions and scrutiny on these issues. Meanwhile, Harris' running mate, Kamala Harris, has faced criticism for past associations with individuals and groups with controversial views. Despite these challenges, the media's focus on Harris as a fresh face and a source of joy and positivity in the election may be helping her avoid negative attention and maintain a favorable public image.
Harris's stance on Israel: Activists pressure Harris on Israel stance, some plan to protest at DNC; Harris promises engagement, potential ceasefire; Supporters believe Harris's ability to connect, potential change make her strong candidate
Kamala Harris, the Democratic Vice Presidential nominee, is facing pressure from activists within her party regarding her stance on Israel and the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Some activists plan to protest her nomination at the Democratic National Convention, but others, like Asma Mohammed, have expressed joy about Harris's rise and her potential to bring about change. Harris has been associated with radical pro-Palestinian groups and has named her Jewish liaison from a radical anti-Israel organization. She has promised to engage with the Arab and Muslim community to end the war in Gaza and secure a ceasefire deal. Harris has yet to lay out her full policy agenda, but she has been filling arenas and talking about her economic message and women's rights. Critics argue that she doesn't need to answer questions as long as she can sustain large crowds and the media don't scrutinize her too closely. Despite her lack of transparency on policy, Harris's supporters believe that her ability to connect with voters and her potential to bring about change make her a strong candidate.
Life Insurance vs. Political Campaigns: Policy Genius provides affordable life insurance options online, while political campaigns face scrutiny over transparency and media coverage
Policy Genius offers affordable life insurance options with some policies available entirely online, allowing consumers to compare quotes from top insurers and find the best price. Meanwhile, in the political sphere, there has been criticism over candidates avoiding media interviews and focusing on their messages to the public. A notable example is Tim Walz, who has been under scrutiny for misrepresenting his military rank. Despite this, Walz has remained unapologetic about his service record and has continued to receive support from his party. The media's role in these situations has also been questioned, with some criticizing the press for acting as a defensive wall rather than a window to the campaigns. Ultimately, it's up to the American people to make informed decisions based on the information available to them.
Self-defense alternatives: The Burnout gun, a non-lethal self-defense platform, is a safer alternative to traditional weapons. It's lightweight, easy to use, and requires no permits or background checks.
Self-defense is an important consideration in life, and the Burnout gun, a non-lethal self-defense platform, offers a safer alternative that could potentially save lives. It is lightweight, easy to use, and requires no permits or background checks. Meanwhile, the political landscape is fraught with corruption and attempts to silence opposing voices. The UAW's recent attempt to silence Elon Musk for discussing potential labor issues during an interview with Donald Trump is an example of this. The left has spent generations baking their biases into the law, using it as a tool to silence those they don't agree with. In other news, tensions in Russia and Ukraine continue to escalate, and the lack of clear leadership from the White House is concerning. Additionally, the upcoming film "MI Racist" aims to expose the absurdity of DEI ideology and needs support to be shown in theaters nationwide. Every ticket sale is a blow against the left's narrative.
Digital manipulation in politics: Both the Harris and Trump campaigns have used digital manipulation during the 2020 presidential campaign, with the Harris campaign editing Google ads to rewrite news headlines and the Trump campaign not reported to engage in similar practices. The international situation between Iran and Israel highlights the importance of transparency and sound decision-making in times of conflict.
The 2020 presidential campaign between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump has seen an unprecedented use of digital manipulation by both sides. While the Harris campaign has been found to edit Google ads to rewrite news headlines and make it appear as if major publications endorse her, the Trump campaign has not been reported to engage in similar practices. Meanwhile, in international news, tensions between Iran and Israel continue to escalate, with American troops being injured in a drone attack on a base in Syria. Despite the ongoing conflict and potential for further escalation, the Biden administration is pushing for a ceasefire deal, disregarding the lack of participation from the Palestinian militant group Hamas. The use of manipulative tactics in politics and the administration's questionable foreign policy decisions highlight the importance of transparency and sound decision-making in times of conflict.
Historical peace through decisive victory: Peace often comes through decisive victory in war, not negotiated settlements, as demonstrated in the aftermath of WWI and the current Middle East conflict
Historically, lasting peace is often achieved through a decisive victory in war, rather than a negotiated settlement. This was the case with the peace following World War I, which many people argue was too harsh on Germany and led to World War II. The same dynamic is at play in the Middle East, where Hamas is not interested in a negotiated settlement and continues to provoke conflict. The Biden administration's push for a ceasefire and hostage release may be well-intentioned, but it ignores the historical reality that peace often comes through ignoring and isolating major terror groups. The current situation in the Middle East follows this pattern, as the Abraham Accords demonstrate. However, the administration's actions, such as condemning Israeli officials for visiting holy sites, may only serve to escalate tensions.
US criticism of Jews praying at Temple Mount: US criticism of Jews praying at Temple Mount is misguided, ignoring real issues fueling tensions in the region. Positive development: US approval of $20B military aid to Israel.
The United States State Department's criticism of Jews praying at the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is misguided and ignores the real issues fueling tensions in the region. Meanwhile, the approval of over $20 billion in military aid to Israel, including F-15 fighter jets, is a positive development. However, the discussion also touched on broader issues, such as the perception of the United States as inherently racist and the need for greater sensitivity and understanding towards different communities. Matt, a certified DEI expert, emphasized the importance of acknowledging and addressing systemic racism in America. The conversation also addressed the ongoing controversy surrounding the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia.