Podcast Summary
A 37% increase in murders in 57 cities in 2020, with over 2,000 more Americans killed, particularly black people, compared to 2019: The homicide rate in the US increased significantly in 2020, surpassing the rates of the late 1980s and 1990s, and disproportionately affecting black communities
The homicide epidemic in the United States, which saw a near 37% increase in murders in 57 large and medium-sized cities in 2020, is a significant issue deserving of more attention than it has received. With at least 2,000 more Americans, most of them black, killed in 2020 compared to 2019, this trend exceeds the rates of the late 1980s and 1990s before the significant crime drop. The pandemic is a contributing factor, as critics warned about the potential for unrest, rioting, chaos, and violence as a result of lockdown policies, mass job losses, and school closures. This historically awful development calls for a deeper examination and dialogue.
Predictable Consequences of Pandemic Policies: Unaccounted human nature led to devastating societal consequences from pandemic policies, including homicide epidemics and unrest.
The policies implemented during the pandemic, particularly the lockdowns, had devastating consequences on society, leading to unprecedented levels of unrest, violence, and poverty. This outcome was predictable given human nature, and the failure to account for it in policy-making resulted in dire predictions coming true. The homicide epidemic is just one example of this, with the surge in crime linked to de-policing in response to anti-police sentiments and policies. The consequences of these policies are only becoming clearer now, and it's important to acknowledge the role that human nature plays in policy-making to prevent similar outcomes in the future.
Societal challenges, personal growth, and political developments: The current societal climate poses challenges for law enforcement and creates negative consequences regardless of actions taken. Personal growth is important despite setbacks. President Biden continues to sign executive orders at an unprecedented rate.
The current societal climate creates a challenging and lose-lose situation for law enforcement, particularly when dealing with black suspects. The media and societal response to police actions can result in negative consequences regardless of the actions taken. This issue, combined with the pandemic, job loss, school closures, and ideological divisions, has created a perfect storm of unrest. Meanwhile, personal commitments to self-improvement can be challenging, as demonstrated by the speaker's failed attempt to adopt a healthier diet. Despite setbacks, the determination to make positive changes remains important. On a political note, President Joe Biden continues to sign executive orders at an unprecedented rate. The impact and significance of these orders remain to be seen. These are just a few of the key topics discussed in the conversation. The larger themes of societal challenges, personal growth, and political developments offer much to reflect upon.
Biden Signs Executive Orders on Racial Equity and Private Prisons: President Biden signed executive orders on racial equity and abolishing private prisons, while the previous administration's 1776 Commission report was criticized and later rescinded.
President Biden is taking swift action on various issues through executive orders, surpassing the number signed by former President Trump. One significant order was a racial equity executive order, which Biden tied to the death of George Floyd and the need for justice and equality. Another order aimed to abolish private prisons and end their use by the Justice Department. In contrast, the previous administration's 1776 Commission report, which presented facts about American history, was criticized by the media and left as misrepresenting truth. However, it's unclear exactly which parts of the report were deemed false. The Biden administration has since rescinded the commission.
Understanding historical figures requires considering moral standards of the time: Moral relativists criticize historical figures based on modern standards, ignoring the context of their time. America is not a zero-sum game, and everyone can succeed together.
Understanding historical figures requires context. Morality is not absolute but relative to the time and place. While it's clear that slavery is an objective evil, it's essential to consider the moral standards of the time when evaluating individuals' actions. The irony lies in the fact that moral relativists, who argue that morality is subjective, are the ones criticizing historical figures based on modern standards. Biden's statement that America is a zero-sum game is incorrect, and it's a view propagated by the left, not the right. Conservatives argue that success and wealth creation do not come at the expense of others. It's crucial to challenge the incorrect belief that America is a zero-sum game and recognize that everyone can succeed together.
The myth of a zero-sum game and the power of helping others: Believing success is finite and helping others harms the successful is a flawed perspective. Framing in media can manipulate perceptions, and assumptions based on limited info can be dangerous.
Success is not a finite resource, and helping others does not mean taking away from those who are already successful. This was discussed in relation to the idea that some people believe in a zero-sum game, where one person's gain comes at the expense of another. However, this perspective is incorrect, as demonstrated by the example of Biden's transgender policies. Another important takeaway is the power of framing in media and how it can be used to manipulate perceptions. An example of this was given through an article in The Washington Post, which framed conservative Christians as asking for accommodations when they object to transgender policies. This framing is not only misleading but also potentially harmful, as it can sway public opinion and create unnecessary conflict. Lastly, a cautionary tale was shared about the dangers of making assumptions based on limited information. A woman who frequently posted about decrying white privilege on social media was later charged with the murder of a white foster child. The heavily redacted police report raised many questions, and the public's perception of the situation was influenced by the woman's social media presence. This highlights the importance of being careful not to jump to conclusions based on incomplete information.
Racial bias in news coverage and child protective services: The lack of attention to a black woman's alleged child abuse raises concerns about racial bias and the need for increased awareness and action to ensure the safety of all children.
The lack of attention and scrutiny given to a case involving a black woman allegedly abusing her white adoptive daughter raises questions about racial bias in news coverage and child protective services. The woman, Ariel Robinson, had publicly joked about abusing her children before the alleged incident. Despite this, there were reportedly no red flags during the adoption process. If the races were reversed in this situation, the case would likely receive significant media attention and be linked to systemic racism. The heavy redaction of the police report also raises concerns. These issues highlight the need for increased awareness and action to ensure the safety and well-being of all children, regardless of race.
Media's Role in Addressing Accountability and Justice: The media's reluctance to cover sensitive topics, especially those with racial undertones, can hinder accountability and justice. Individual agency, such as Keira Knightley's decision to no longer perform sex scenes under male directors, can also impact societal change.
Accountability and justice are crucial in addressing serious issues, but the media may not touch sensitive topics, especially those with racial undertones. In the first part of the discussion, there was a debate about a woman's adoption and potential wrongdoing. The speaker expressed frustration with the lack of accountability and the media's reluctance to cover the racial aspects of the story. In the second part, Keira Knightley's decision to no longer perform sex scenes under male directors was discussed. While some see it as a feminist statement, others criticized it as hollow virtue signaling. The speaker also shared a personal experience of feeling uncomfortable in a car and promoted the ReliefBAND as a solution for motion sickness and other causes of nausea. Overall, the conversation touched upon themes of accountability, justice, and individual agency.
Staying Informed and Managing Nausea: Stay updated on COVID-19 guidelines while managing nausea with the Relief Band. Use promo code 'Walsh' for discount and free shipping. Become a Daily Wire member with promo code 'rhf' for a film and discount.
It's important to prioritize relief from nausea and not miss out on life's moments. The Relief Band, an over-the-counter wearable device used in hospitals and oncology clinics, can help with this issue. Listeners can get a discount and free shipping by using the promo code "Walsh" on reliefband.com. Additionally, becoming a Daily Wire member using the promo code "rhf" offers access to their new feature film, "Run Hide Fight," and a 25% discount. Regarding masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was initial confusion about their effectiveness. In March 2020, the Surgeon General and Dr. Fauci both advised against wearing masks in public. However, as the situation evolved, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended wearing masks to prevent the spread of the virus. Following the science involves staying informed about new information and adjusting actions accordingly.
Public health mask usage guidelines have been inconsistent during the pandemic: Despite mask usage for centuries, the effectiveness against COVID-19 is still being studied. Inconsistent and rapidly changing guidelines have raised concerns about the credibility of the information and potential harm caused by misinformation.
The public health guidelines regarding mask usage have seen significant shifts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, leaving some people questioning the credibility of the information being provided. Initially, officials advised against wearing masks, then encouraged their use, and now recommend double or even triple masking. This inconsistency, coupled with the rapidity of these changes, has led some to suspect that the messaging may not be rooted in science but rather in response to the evolving situation. While masks have been used for centuries, the specifics of their effectiveness against the coronavirus are still being studied. The potential for conflicting information and the potential consequences of misinformation can be significant, leading some to question the motives behind the shifting recommendations and raising concerns about the potential for harm caused by inaccurate information.
A devotion to science without questioning it can lead to dogmatic beliefs and disregard for skepticism.: Extreme devotion to science without questioning it can lead to disregard for skepticism and potentially dictatorial actions.
The speaker in the text expresses an extreme devotion to science, to the point of disregarding skepticism and adhering dogmatically to the prevailing notions. He equates wearing masks with expressing love for humanity and believes that not following the latest scientific guidelines is a sign of disrespect for science. The speaker's perspective on science is presented as superior and anyone who does not follow it is criticized and "canceled." In the Ben Shapiro Show segment, there is a contrast drawn between the media's warnings of a potential dictatorship under the previous administration and President Biden's actions that some might view as dictatorial. These two seemingly unrelated topics highlight the importance of critical thinking and questioning prevailing notions, even in the realm of science.
