Podcast Summary
Preparing for emergencies with Dan Vongino: Invest in emergency food supplies and ignore sensationalized news, focusing on practical emergency preparation instead.
It's important to prepare for emergencies by stocking up on food and supplies beforehand. Dan Vongino emphasizes this on his show, urging listeners to invest in emergency food from My Patriot Supply, which lasts up to 25 years. Yesterday's news, involving Michael Cohen's guilty plea, was not as catastrophic as the media portrayed, according to Vongino. He believes Cohen, Trump's former attorney, hired a Clinton hack as his lawyer to gain media favor and become an anti-Trump advocate. The payment to Stormy Daniels, which Cohen admitted to, does not legally imply any wrongdoing on Trump's part. Instead of focusing on negative news, Vongino encourages taking practical steps to prepare for emergencies and not giving up.
Michael Cohen's payment to Stormy Daniels was not a campaign violation: Michael Cohen's $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels was a personal expense, not a campaign violation, according to Mark Levin. The Justice Department's pursuit of campaign finance violations against Trump is criticized for being politically motivated and potentially threatening democratic processes.
The $130,000 payment made during the 2016 campaign by Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels was not a campaign violation, despite allegations to the contrary. Mark Levin argues that these payments were made with personal funds and not campaign funds. He also criticizes the Justice Department for weaponizing the government against the Trump team and using questionable tactics to implicate Trump in campaign finance violations. Levin believes that these charges are included in the plea deal solely to implicate Trump, and that the general counsel for the Clinton family, Lanny Davis, used similar tactics in the past. Levin urges listeners to understand the importance of this situation and the potential threat it poses to the democratic process. He emphasizes that acknowledging past wrongdoings does not justify attempts to overturn the results of an election.
Democrats aggressively investigating Trump associates: Democrats investigate Trump associates, questioning legal use of funds and manipulation of legal system
The Democrats are aggressively investigating individuals associated with President Trump as part of a larger strategy to undermine future elections and potential candidates. The investigation into Michael Cohen and the payment to Stormy Daniels is an example of this, as it was not a campaign violation but rather a manipulation of the legal system to implicate Trump. The Democrats are using every means available to go after those who have "scratched and sniffed" Trump, regardless of their past actions or morality. This is a serious matter and should be viewed as a significant development in the ongoing political landscape. It's important to remember that not all campaign expenses are eligible for campaign funds, and the Cohen case represents a questionable use of the legal system to make headlines.
Campaign expenses must be paid with campaign funds: Campaign rules require all expenses related to a campaign to be paid with campaign funds to ensure transparency and fairness in campaign financing, avoiding personal funds or loans.
Campaign expenses must be paid for with campaign funds and not personal funds or loans, as outlined by FEC rules. This includes items directly related to the campaign, such as bumper stickers, buttons, and campaign ads. The Stormy Daniels case, where Trump allegedly paid hush money, is not considered campaign-related because the expense would have existed regardless, and the payments were made with personal funds, not campaign funds. The FEC rules are in place to ensure transparency and fairness in campaign financing. Violations can result in significant consequences, including fines and damage to a candidate's reputation. The distinction between campaign and personal expenses can be complex, but it is crucial for candidates and their teams to understand and follow these rules to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
Understanding the Complexity of Trump's Alleged Campaign Finance Violations: The ongoing investigation into Trump's campaign finance violations is more complex than some believe, with the use of hush money payments not necessarily constituting campaign expenses as seen in the Watergate scandal.
The ongoing investigation into President Trump and the alleged use of campaign funds for hush money payments is not as cut and dried as some may believe. Michael Cohen, Trump's former lawyer, was accused of making such a payment to a woman claiming to have had an affair with Trump. However, as Bradley Johnson points out in Law and Crime, this payment would not necessarily be considered a campaign expense. The Watergate scandal, which led to modern campaign finance law, involved the use of campaign funds for hush money, but this is not the same as what allegedly happened with Trump. Johnson argues that the inclusion of this allegation in the indictment was merely to bait Trump into a trap. The fight against this investigation and the subsequent media frenzy is a significant one that defines our movement for a generation. It's important to remember that suffering and taking on meaningful fights can lead to true happiness.
Protecting principles of presumed innocence and due process: The ongoing political climate requires standing up for principles of presumed innocence and due process to prevent the destruction of individuals' lives and reputations based on fabricated charges.
The current political climate is a difficult and complex situation that requires making tough ethical decisions. The destruction of individuals' lives and reputations, even for past indiscretions, should not be the price paid for attacking those who hold opposing political views or for attempting to undermine the constitutional republic. The ongoing investigations and calls for impeachment are not just about personal indiscretions, but a dangerous precedent that could be used to take down future presidents based on fabricated charges. It's important to recognize this and stand up for the principles of presumed innocence and due process. The fight to protect these values may be tough and uncomfortable, but it's a necessary one. We must not give up, but instead, stay engaged and work towards a better future.
Call for Mueller's firing and pardons: Speaker advocates for Mueller's dismissal, pardons for charged individuals, believes midterms best time, views impeachment as inevitable but with acquittal in Senate trial, expresses frustration with media and Democrats.
The speaker is advocating for the firing of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the pardoning of those charged in the ongoing investigation, as they believe the investigation is politically motivated and a violation of due process. They argue that the political response to such actions would be minimal, and that the midterms are the best time to make these moves. They also believe that President Trump will be impeached regardless, and that he will ultimately be acquitted in a Senate trial. The speaker expresses frustration with the media and Democratic reactions to the situation, and believes that the investigation is an attempt to overturn the election results.
Manafort and Cohen convictions don't directly implicate Trump: Despite Manafort's hung jury and Cohen's guilty plea for non-campaign related crimes, it's important to stay informed, vote in midterms, and keep the House Republican to protect the constitutional republic.
Despite intense investigations and media celebration, neither Paul Manafort nor Michael Cohen's convictions directly implicate President Trump. Manafort received a hung jury on 10 counts and was convicted on 8 unrelated charges. Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion and a campaign violation that is not considered a crime. Yet, there are calls for Mueller's removal and mass firings. Amidst this political turmoil, it's crucial not to give up. Instead, use this energy to engage in the generational fight for the future of our constitutional republic. Don't let negative energies contagion. Encourage friends to vote in the midterms and keep the House from falling into Democratic hands. Stay informed and involved.
Potential ulterior motives in the Mueller investigation: The Mueller investigation may have been used to cover up government malfeasance and set up fall guys, as seen in the case of George Papadopoulos. Staying informed and vigilant can lead to better outcomes, whether it's uncovering potential corruption or maintaining a well-functioning home.
The Mueller investigation may have been used to cover up disturbing government malfeasance, as seen in the case of George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos was targeted by individuals with connections to Fusion GPS and the US government, attempting to set him up as a fall guy. An intriguing development occurred in July 2017, after Papadopoulos had been interviewed by the FBI. A man named Charles Tuan offered him $10,000 for a consulting contract in Greece. While taking consulting contracts is not illegal, the fact that this offer came after the FBI interview raises suspicions. The government's inclusion of this detail in their sentencing memo further highlights the potential ulterior motives behind the Mueller investigation. Another key takeaway is the importance of maintaining clean air filters for HVAC systems. As the speaker shared his personal experience of dealing with pest infestations and malfunctioning AC units, it's a reminder to regularly change filters to ensure optimal performance and healthier indoor air quality. Overall, these two seemingly unrelated topics share a common thread - the importance of transparency and awareness in understanding complex situations. Whether it's uncovering potential government corruption or maintaining a well-functioning home, staying informed and vigilant can lead to better outcomes.
Former Trump advisor arrested without a warrant for $10,000 cash from foreign national: A former Trump campaign advisor, George Papadopoulos, was arrested at Dulles Airport without a warrant for receiving $10,000 in cash from a foreign national believed to be an intelligence officer, raising questions about potential bribery or influence in the 2016 U.S. election investigation.
George Papadopoulos, a former Trump campaign advisor, was arrested at Dulles Airport on July 27, 2017, without a warrant, after receiving $10,000 in cash from a foreign national believed to be an intelligence officer. The lack of an arrest warrant is unusual in the federal system, and the timing of the encounter raises questions. The CTR (currency transaction report) system requires reporting for cash deposits over $10,000, and it's also illegal not to declare that amount when entering the country. Papadopoulos left the money with a lawyer in Greece instead of declaring it at customs. The FBI might have been expecting to seize the money upon his return. While it's speculation, it's plausible that the foreign national intended to bribe or influence Papadopoulos, and the lack of a warrant could indicate an effort to avoid detection. The $10,000 cash transaction adds another layer to the ongoing investigation into potential foreign influence in the 2016 U.S. election.
FBI used undeclared cash as reason to arrest Papadopoulos: The FBI used a traveler's undeclared cash as an opportunity to arrest him, potentially protecting their sources, but it raises questions about who else they were working with and their motivations.
The FBI's investigation into George Papadopoulos involved setting him up for failing to declare $10,000 in cash upon returning to the United States from Greece. The FBI may have been aware of the money and used this as an opportunity to arrest him and potentially protect their sources. If a traveler enters the country with undeclared cash of that amount, they could face significant legal trouble. The investigation raises questions about who else the FBI was working with to target Papadopoulos and the potential motivations behind their actions. The uncertainty surrounding the sources and their roles in the investigation adds to the complexity of the situation.
FBI may have set up George Papadopoulos as part of an operation: Texts between Strzok and Page indicate urgency to 'shut down' Papadopoulos, but it's unclear why or what he allegedly lied about.
The discussion suggests that there were potentially multiple sources within the FBI involved in setting up George Papadopoulos as part of an operation to investigate Donald Trump. The texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page indicate that there was a sense of urgency to "shut Papa D down" when it was discovered that he didn't have the $10,000 he was supposed to bring back from Greece. The FBI ultimately interviewed Papadopoulos and charged him with making false statements, but it's unclear what exactly he was alleged to have lied about. The discussion also implies that the DOJ and Mueller team have a history of stonewalling when pressed for information about their sources and methods, and of making arrests or plea deals to divert attention from potentially damaging revelations. Overall, the conversation suggests a complex web of deceit and manipulation surrounding the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Criticism of Russian Collusion Investigations: The Cohen plea deal and Manafort trial are seen as attempts to rope in Trump, with only a few convictions and no clear evidence of collusion. Calls for Mueller's dismissal, pardons, and disbanding the team.
The ongoing investigations into Russian collusion and the Cohen-Manafort case are being viewed as a scam and a witch hunt against President Trump. According to the speaker, the Cohen plea deal is a way to rope in Trump, and the Manafort trial resulted in only a few convictions out of 18 charges, most of which have no connection to Trump. The speaker suggests that Mueller should be fired, everyone should be pardoned, and the entire team disbanded since they have shown no evidence of collusion. The Papadopoulos story adds another layer to the investigation, with speculation that one of the individuals who contacted him, Charles Tawil, may have been a previous intelligence asset of the CIA and FBI. The speaker finds this an interesting side note but emphasizes that it's not yet confirmed that it's the same person. Overall, the tone of the discussion is critical of the investigations and advocates for a change in direction.
FBI's Complex Scheme to Arrest Papa Dizzle: The FBI used a draft warrant and a false statement to arrest Papa Dizzle, emphasizing the importance of staying engaged in the political fight despite no saints involved.
The discussion suggests an intricate scheme involving the FBI and Papa Dizzle's arrest. Papa Dizzle appeared to be the target of an FBI operation, and the FBI's reason for not disclosing their actions was to protect their sources and methods. The conversation implies that the FBI had a draft warrant ready to arrest Papa Dizzle if he returned with the $10,000, and when he didn't, they made a probable cause arrest based on a lie he told during the interview. The speaker encourages listeners to stay engaged in the political fight, emphasizing that there are no saints in this situation but that they are on the right side.
