Public Banks and Ideological Agendas: Public banks proposed by Democratic Congresswomen Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez could potentially advance ideological agendas and lack transparency and accountability due to being not subject to market forces.
The proposal for public banks by Democratic Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, while marketed as a solution to make financial institutions more accountable and consumer-friendly, could potentially lead to the advancement of ideological agendas. Public banks, as envisioned, would not be subject to market forces and could be used primarily to promote leftist causes. This raises concerns about the potential misuse of public funds and the lack of transparency and accountability. Despite the claimed need for public banks due to the private sector being rigged against certain groups, private banks are already heavily regulated and answerable to both regulators and market forces. The vague reasons given for the proposal, such as addressing the unbanked population, do not fully explain why for-profit institutions would intentionally turn away potential customers.
Public banks and progressive policies: Public banks, proposed by Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez, could bypass democratic process to advance progressive policies, depending on federal funding and federal regulations, raising concerns about misuse of taxpayer dollars and centralization of power.
The push for public banks by Congresswomen Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez goes beyond protecting people from discrimination. Instead, it's a way to bypass the democratic process and advance progressive policies. While public banks would be under state and municipal control, they would still depend on federal agencies for funding. The Public Banking Act allows for grants for operational expenses and unexpected losses, which could be used for various activities determined by unelected federal officials. The continued existence of public banks is contingent on their advancement of progressive policy goals, which includes strict lending instructions, such as rent control for residential properties. This raises concerns about the potential for misuse of taxpayer dollars and the centralization of power. The discussion also highlighted the existing regulations against discrimination and the effectiveness of government regulations in general.
Public banks corruption risk: Public banks funding non-profit, progressive programs could become slush funds for democratic lobbyists, increasing political corruption risk
The proposed bill for public banks to lend to tenants and progressive causes could lead to significant issues with political corruption and unaccountability. Tenants would be allowed to form unions, and certain industries like gun manufacturers and tobacco would be barred from receiving loans. With public banks funding non-profit, progressive programs, there's a risk that these institutions could become slush funds for democratic lobbyists. The lack of profitability requirement for borrowers further increases the potential for misuse of funds. This situation is a recipe for political corruption, making the public banks less accountable than traditional pork barrel programs.
Government Banks Would Be a Dangerous Tool for Progressive Ideologues
Recent Episodes from Audio Mises Wire
The Folly of Criminalizing “Hate”
Yet another discouraging trend in law in the UK, Europe, and the US has been the criminalization of what authorities call “hate speech.” However, much of what passes for such “speech” is innocuous at worst and historically has been protected.
Original article: The Folly of Criminalizing “Hate”
Governments Had a Major Role in Sustaining Slavery
Despite claims from progressive historians that US slavery was a natural outgrowth of a free market economy, the reality is that slavery would have been much costlier without governments—federal and state—subsidizing it. It is time to set the record straight.
Original article: Governments Had a Major Role in Sustaining Slavery
Conceptual Clarity in Dismantling Economic Jargon
Keynesians are known for using obscure and jumbled jargon to explain their fallacious ideas. The hope being that, the more confusing the language, the greater the perceived scholarship. Good economics can and should be clearly logically explained.
Original article: Conceptual Clarity in Dismantling Economic Jargon
Is GDP an Accurate Measure of Reality?
Mainstream economists speak of GDP as though it is the economy itself, however, GDP is not a good measure of economic reality. Instead, it presents a distorted picture of genuine economic activity and leads to mistaken conclusions about the economy.
Original article: Is GDP an Accurate Measure of Reality?
Diego Garcia and Cocos Islands: Another Example of US Imperialism
The US Armed Forces expand their footprints in the Indian Ocean, not to defend this country, but to expand military power. The Diego Garcia base has left a trail of ruined lives for those forced off their land to make room for yet another military base.
Original article: Diego Garcia and Cocos Islands: Another Example of US Imperialism
Debunking Alarmism over Artificial Intelligence
As AI continues to develop, so does the hysteria that AI will soon take over and relegate us to a dystopian future. We need to realize that, like so many other tools, AI can have good and bad uses, but it cannot control itself.
Original article: Debunking Alarmism over Artificial Intelligence
How to Contradict Yourself about Rights
What is the source of our rights, natural Law or the state? Unfortunately, too many people who should know better choose the latter. David Gordon makes short work of their internal contradictions.
Original article: How to Contradict Yourself about Rights
Is Artificial Intelligence the Next Easy-Money Bust?
While the world is abuzz over artificial intelligence (AI), present technologies are limited more than most people want to believe. The situation is ripe for malinvestments.
Original article: Is Artificial Intelligence the Next Easy-Money Bust?
The Regime’s War on Cash Could Destroy the Economy
Progressive and even many mainstream economists believe that cash is a relic from the past and should be replaced with digital money. There are many good reasons why not to follow this course, and no good reasons to replace cash.
Original article: The Regime’s War on Cash Could Destroy the Economy
Education: Labeling vs. Tailoring
Despite opposition from government at every turn, homeschooling has developed into an industry with astounding resources and high-quality results. Contrast the individual educational tailoring of homeschooling versus the government's version of individual care: the IEP label.
Original article: Education: Labeling vs. Tailoring