Logo

    Hull on Estates Episode #325 – Top Cases of 2012

    enMarch 27, 2013
    What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
    Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
    Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
    Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
    Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
    Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?

    About this Episode

    Today on Hull on Estates, Stuart Clark and Natalia Angelini discuss two of the most interesting cases of 2012 - Rasouli v. Sunnybrook Health Services Centre and another case dealing with proprietary estoppel. If you have any questions, please email us at or leave a comment on our blog page.

    Recent Episodes from Hull on Estates

    685 - Sham Trusts: Exploring a Purported Settlor’s Intentions

    685 - Sham Trusts: Exploring a Purported Settlor’s Intentions
    This week on Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Doug Higgins review the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in McGoey (Re), 2019 ONSC 80. Through this unique case and its interesting evidentiary issue, Nick and Doug discuss the concept of a “sham” trust, and the principles applied by Ontario courts in evaluating a purported settlor’s intention to settle a valid trust. McGoey (Re), 2019 ONSC 80 (CanLII)

    684 - A Case of Moral Obligation

    684 - A Case of Moral Obligation
    This week on the podcast, Natalia Angelini and Diana McBey discuss a case from British Columbia, Bautista v Gutkowski Estate, 2023 BCSC 1485.  In a pivotal decision, the BC Court of Appeal varied a will in favor of an estranged son, recognizing the testator’s moral obligation. The case of Bautista v Gutkowski Estate reiterates the significance of moral duties in estate planning, especially towards one's children. Contact Us:

    683 - Parental Support under s. 32 of the Family Law Act

    683 - Parental Support under s. 32 of the Family Law Act
    This week on Hull on Estates, Stuart Clark and Aaron Chan discuss a child’s obligation to support their parents under s. 32 of the Family Law Act.   Links to the cases that were talked about are: L.F.D. v. X. Stravino v. Buttinelli Godwin v. Bolsco Dragulin v. Dragulin   Parental Support – A child’s obligation to support their parents Contact Us: info@hullandhull.com

    682 - Hermes and Adult Adoption

    682 - Hermes and Adult Adoption
    In today’s podcast, Natalia Angelini and Sydney Osmar discuss the recent news cycle involving an 80 year old billionaire who is apparently in the midst of a succession plan which includes adopting his 51 year old gardener. Natalia and Sydney discuss their love of Hermes and what the legal test and implications of adult adoption look like in Ontario. Contact Us:

    681 - Pragmatism in ETDL Appointments

    681 - Pragmatism in ETDL Appointments
    This week on Hull on Estates, Jonathon Kappy and Margarita Grup​​, discuss two cases dealing with the appointments of Estate Trustees during litigation with two different outcomes. We explore the topic of when and where it is appropriate to appoint an ETDL and some of the consequences that could occur during the process.   Mayer v Rubin, 2017 ONSC 3498 Armstrong v Laviolette, 2023 ONSC 6783

    #680 - About Guardianship Bonds

    #680 - About Guardianship Bonds
    This week on Hull on Estates, Nick Esterbauer and Zahra Attir follow up to their podcast on Estate Administration Bonds to discuss the nature of guardianship bonds and the circumstances under which those applying to become guardians of property of an incapable adult in Ontario may be required to post a bond. Conversely, they discuss circumstances under which posting such a bond may not be required. Contact Us: info@hullandhull.com
    Hull on Estates
    enDecember 05, 2023