Podcast Summary
Investigations against Former President Trump: Several prosecutors are investigating Trump for potential crimes including theft, falsification, and conduct in multiple states. Key developments include obtained recordings, court disputes, and focus on conspiracy and conduct in other states. Possible consequences for Trump are significant.
Several prosecutors, including Special Counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and Fulton County District Attorney Fawnee Willis, are actively investigating and pursuing potential criminal cases against former President Donald Trump. The investigations cover various allegations, such as the theft and mishandling of government records, falsifying business records, and potential criminal conduct in multiple states. Key developments include the obtaining of recordings by Jack Smith in which Trump reportedly discusses a classified document, Trump's attempts to remove the Manhattan case to federal court and disqualify the judge, and Fulton County DA Fawnee Willis' focus on potential conspiracy and criminal conduct in other states. These investigations could result in significant consequences for Trump, and it is crucial for the public to stay informed about these legal political developments.
Trump's Handling of Classified Documents Under Investigation: From May 2022 to November 2022, Trump and associates faced DOJ investigation for mishandling classified docs. Trump returned incomplete doc boxes, obstructed search, and withheld info. Ongoing investigation includes potential obstruction charges.
During the period of around six months from May 2022 to November 2022, former President Donald Trump and his associates were under investigation by the Department of Justice for mishandling classified documents. Trump initially returned 15 boxes of documents, but when the National Archives discovered sensitive compartmented information in them, they referred the matter to the DOJ. Trump and his lawyers claimed they had returned all documents, but investigators found that they had not. Evan Corcoran, Trump's lawyer, led the search for documents at Mar-a-Lago, but Trump and his aids, including Walt Nauta and Carlos de Oliveira, allegedly obstructed the search by moving boxes containing classified material. The DOJ issued a subpoena for all documents and surveillance footage, which led to the discovery of thousands of government records and over 100 additional classified records. Trump filed a motion to stop the investigation, but the DOJ appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith to continue the investigation, which is ongoing and believed to include obstruction of justice charges.
Former prosecutors propose potential crimes for Mar-a-Lago investigation: Former prosecutors suggest Trump and lawyer could face charges for mishandling gov't docs, concealing records, obstruction, contempt, false statements under Espionage Act.
Former prosecutors Norm Eisen and Dania Perry have prepared a draft prosecution memo outlining potential crimes related to Mar-a-Lago, including mishandling of government documents under the Espionage Act, concealing government records, obstruction, criminal contempt, and false statements to a federal official. New information includes the discovery of video evidence and misleading statements from Donald Trump to his lawyers about the location of documents. Evan Corcoran, Trump's lawyer, may also face consequences for not conducting a thorough search and trusting Trump's word. The crimes outlined in the memo could result in serious consequences if proven in a court of law.
Expansion of Mar-a-Lago investigation to Trump Organization's Bedminster golf club: Government obtained footage and worker testimonies in Bedminster investigation, potential search warrant or subpoena, false attestations could lead to new charges with prison time
The investigation into the alleged mishandling of classified documents at former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate has expanded to include the Trump Organization's Bedminster golf club. The government obtained video footage showing movement of boxes in and out of a storage room before and after a June 2021 meeting, as well as missing video that they are trying to obtain from the security company. A maintenance worker has cooperated with the investigation and provided photographs and information about the loading of boxes into an SUV. The government has reportedly taken the workers' testimonies seriously but has not yet issued a search warrant or subpoena for Bedminster. The lawyers representing the Trump Organization have claimed obstruction during the search process, leading some to speculate that a search warrant or subpoena may be imminent. The investigation involves several lawyers with reputable backgrounds, and false attestations during the search process could lead to new charges with potential prison time. The investigation continues to unfold with new developments expected soon.
Investigation into Trump's handling of classified documents reveals potential missing documents and concerns about a document's authenticity: An investigation into Trump's handling of classified documents uncovered potential missing documents and a questionable document's authenticity, emphasizing the significance of thorough document searches and the potential consequences of mishandling sensitive information.
During the investigation into former President Trump's handling of classified documents, the search at Mar-a-Lago led to concerns about potential missing documents, and a search at Bedminster or Trump Tower could have provided crucial information. Additionally, a meeting in July 2021 between Trump, his aides, and ghostwriters for Mark Meadows revealed Trump's disdain for General Milley and his accusations of Milley's warmongering tendencies. However, Trump's claim of having a document proving Milley's war plans against Iran raises questions about the inventory of documents Trump claimed to have and the authenticity of the document itself. Overall, these revelations add complexity to the ongoing investigation and highlight the importance of thorough document searches and the potential consequences of mishandling classified information.
New recording contradicts Trump's defenses on handling of classified documents: Recording exposes Trump's awareness of classified documents' status and contradicts his claims of declassification or lack of knowledge about their existence
The recently released recording of Donald Trump discussing classified documents contradicts his previous defenses regarding his handling of such materials after leaving office. The recording, which was known to CNN since March, indicates that Trump was aware of the classified nature of the documents and had not declassified them. This revelation destroys many of the defenses that Trump and his team had been carefully crafting, including the claim that he overpacked and didn't know what was in the boxes or that he had declassified everything. The recording also raises questions about whether the document in question even exists, as Trump or his lawyers have not been able to produce it despite a subpoena from the government. Overall, the recording further undermines trust in Trump's handling of classified information and adds to the mounting evidence against him in the ongoing investigation.
Trump's handling of classified records: New layers of complexity: The ongoing investigation into Trump's handling of classified records adds complexity with the involvement of Special Counsel Jack Smith, General Mark Milley, and Trump's former attorney Tim Parlatori. Proper handling of classified info and potential consequences for mishandling it are highlighted.
There is strong evidence suggesting the existence of a subpoenaed document related to former President Trump's handling of classified records, and this incident underscores his transactional approach towards such documents. The cooperation between Special Counsel Jack Smith and General Mark Milley, as well as the potential involvement of Trump's former attorney Tim Parlatori in leaking information, adds layers of complexity to this developing story. While the details are still unfolding, it's clear that this situation underscores the importance of proper handling of classified information and the potential consequences for those who mishandle it.
Prosecutors strategically leak information to pressure witnesses: Prosecutors like Jack Smith are using leaks to put pressure on witnesses and indicate their intentions, potentially leading to indictments for individuals like Walt Douda, while Trump faces potential state and federal charges in Manhattan.
The leaks in the ongoing investigations into Donald Trump are not just coming from unauthorized sources, but also strategically released by prosecutors like Jack Smith to put pressure on witnesses and indicate their intentions. For instance, Smith's recent moves have put the spotlight on individuals like Walt Douda, who have yet to cooperate fully, and could potentially face indictments. Meanwhile, in the Manhattan District Attorney's case against Trump, his attempts to remove the case to federal court and his preference for a different judge have not gone as planned, leaving him potentially facing both state and federal charges.
Trump team's attempts to manipulate the judiciary: Trump legal team and some MAGA Republicans are attempting to exploit ethical responsibilities of pro-democracy judges by filing motions for recusal or disqualification, but these efforts are unlikely to succeed as ethical judges take their responsibilities seriously.
The Trump legal team and some MAGA Republicans have been attempting to exploit the ethical responsibilities of pro-democracy judges by filing motions for recusal or disqualification. This pattern of judge shopping is aimed at undermining the judiciary and is not limited to the current case involving Judge Juan Mershon. In the past few days, several judges have stepped down from cases due to perceived conflicts of interest, some of which were questionable. For instance, a judge in Florida removed himself due to a distant relative's ownership of Disney shares, while another judge, who had represented Trump in the past, refused to recuse himself despite having worked on a case involving Trump Tower. In the case of Judge Juan Mershon, Trump's team filed a motion due to a small donation the judge made to a political campaign. However, these attempts to manipulate the judiciary are unlikely to succeed, as ethical judges take their responsibilities seriously and are committed to upholding the law.
Trump's lawyers unsuccessfully attempt to remove judge from Allen Weisselberg case: Trump's lawyers have argued for a judge recusal based on a past campaign donation, but the burden is on them to prove a substantial conflict. The attempt to move the case to federal court based on Trump's status as a federal officer has also been unsuccessful.
Despite Donald Trump's criticism of Judge Juan Merchan's handling of the Allen Weisselberg case against the Trump Organization, it is unlikely that Merchan will recuse himself based on the standards in New York courts. Trump's lawyers have argued that Merchan should step down due to a perceived conflict of interest based on a past campaign donation, but the burden is on them to prove a substantial conflict. The lawyers also attempted to remove the case to federal court based on Trump's status as a federal officer at the time of the alleged crimes, but this argument is not likely to succeed. The case is currently proceeding in state court.
New York and Georgia legal proceedings challenge Trump's claim of presidential immunity for hush money payments: New York case may keep proceeding against Trump over hush money payments, while Georgia anticipates high-profile indictments and RICO charges against Trump and associates
Despite former President Trump's argument that paying hush money to Stormy Daniels was a presidential act, the ongoing legal proceedings in New York and Georgia paint a different picture. In New York, the court is expected to keep the case, and Trump's own words from tweets and interviews are being used against him, emphasizing that these were private matters. In contrast, Fulton County, Georgia, is anticipating high-profile indictments against Trump and his associates, possibly in late July or early August, as part of a wider investigation into criminal activities. The RICO racketeering charges, a powerful tool in mob investigations, are being used to potentially implicate Trump in crimes committed by those lower in the alleged conspiracy.
Instances of voting data breaches and criminal conduct reported during 2020 US elections under investigation: Illegal access to voting data in several states including Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, and Wisconsin under investigation under the RICO Act and racketeering charges
During the 2020 US presidential elections, there were reported instances of breaches and criminal conduct related to voting data in several states including Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, and Wisconsin. For instance, in Georgia, Kathy Latham, the chair of the Coffee County GOP, allowed people in the Trump campaign to access voting data illegally. Similar incidents were reported in other states. These incidents are being investigated under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and racketeering charges. Meanwhile, if you're looking for a sweet distraction from the news, Manacura's honey is a delicious and healthy option. With unique antioxidants, prebiotics, and the natural antibacterial compound MGO, this honey is not only delicious but also has numerous health benefits. Manacura's honey is available in various formats and can be added to a variety of foods and drinks. Try it today by visiting manakura.com/legalaf and using the code "legalaf" to get a free pack of honey sticks with your order. Lastly, if you've ever dreamed of owning a piece of land in Scotland, Highland Titles offers an affordable and unique opportunity. For less than $50, you can buy a square foot of land and help conserve the Scottish Highlands at the same time. Use the code "legalaf" to get a 20% discount on your purchase and receive a personalized gift pack. Own a piece of land and contribute to the conservation of Scotland's beautiful landscapes.
DA Fani Willis broadens election probe beyond grand jury findings: DA Fani Willis plans to present new evidence to the grand jury in July or August, including potential election interference in Georgia and five other states, and is using the RICO statute to pursue criminal acts as part of a pattern to achieve a common purpose.
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is expanding her investigation into the 2020 Georgia elections beyond the special purpose grand jury's findings. She plans to present two work streams of evidence to the grand jury in July or August, including evidence developed since the initial investigation and individuals not previously called for testimony. Willis aims to connect various crimes, such as mishandling of government documents and conspiracy, to a RICO racketeering influence and corrupt organization act under Georgia law. This strategy allows her to pursue criminal acts, whether federal or state, as long as they form part of a pattern to achieve a common purpose. The investigation now includes potential election interference in Georgia and five other states. Additionally, Willis is reportedly focusing on two outside vendors, Simpatico Software and Berkeley Research, who were hired by Donald Trump to investigate allegations of election fraud but reportedly found no evidence. Willis' use of the RICO statute, which requires only two criminal acts, has been a significant part of her approach to the investigation.
Fulton County DA uses RICO laws to build a comprehensive conspiracy case against Trump: Fani Willis, with RICO expertise, can link seemingly unconnected events and individuals into one criminal conspiracy, making it easier to prove her case against Trump and potentially include unindicted coconspirators like Lindsey Graham in the investigation.
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in Georgia has a significant advantage in her investigation and potential case against former President Donald Trump due to her use of RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) laws. Having a RICO expert on her team, she can piece together seemingly unconnected events and individuals into one criminal conspiracy. This approach makes it easier for her to prove her case and write a comprehensive description of the conspiracy in her indictment. Unindicted coconspirators, like Lindsey Graham, can also be included in the investigation, even if they are not formally charged. The use of RICO laws gives Willis the power to synthesize all evidence and targets into one big conspiracy, which is expected to be a comprehensive and impactful indictment. The timeline for the indictment may have been pushed back, but the legal team's expectation is that it will still come in the summer of 2023.
Pursuing justice requires gathering info, even if it delays deadlines: Transparency and public access to info are crucial in high-profile cases, even if it means pushing back deadlines.
In the pursuit of justice, it's crucial to gather as much information as possible, even if it means pushing back deadlines. This was highlighted in the Fulton County District Attorney's case, where developments and new evidence have led to a delay of about 60 days. Transparency and public access to information are also essential, especially in high-profile cases involving public figures like George Santos. The ongoing legal battle to disclose the identities of those who paid his bail is a clear example of this principle. The public has a right to know, and the process should not be kept secret. The legal system is designed to serve justice, and the timeline should not hinder that goal.
Judge reveals political figure's donors despite privacy concerns: A judge overruled privacy arguments and disclosed political figure's donors, emphasizing transparency in political investigations
A judge recently disclosed the names of individuals who donated large sums of money to a political figure under investigation for financial crimes. The figure had argued for keeping the donor names sealed, citing privacy concerns and potential threats. However, the argument was seen as losing, as donor names are typically reported in federal elections. The figure's associates, including a well-known person and their wife, have been speculated to have supported his campaign financially. The community of legal and political enthusiasts, known as "Legal AF," emphasizes the importance of factual information, intelligence, and compassionate debate in the media, particularly in the context of political investigations. The community's focus on democracy and transparency is critical in bringing back serious discussion and debate to the media landscape.
Join the Midas Touch Network's pro-democracy community: Support the Midas Touch Network by spreading the word, subscribing, and becoming a patron for exclusive access to live meetings and merchandise.
Everyone can contribute to the growth of the Midas Touch Network's pro-democracy community by spreading the word, subscribing to their YouTube channel and podcasts, and considering becoming a patron for exclusive access to live meetings and other perks. The Midas Touch Network is aiming for 1.5 million subscribers this summer and encourages listeners to support them in various ways. Additionally, they invite their audience to engage with them directly during upcoming patron-exclusive Zoom meetings. The Midas Touch Network is dedicated to promoting justice and encourages everyone to join them on this important mission. Don't forget to check out their online store for merchandise and visit their Patreon page for more information. Together, we can make a difference and help spread the message of democracy and justice.
