Podcast Summary
Special Counsel pushes for expedited trial against Trump: Special Counsel Jack Smith advocates for a speedy trial against Donald Trump in the DC federal case, citing public interest and the availability of evidence.
Special Counsel Jack Smith is pushing for an expedited trial against Donald Trump in the Washington DC federal criminal case related to the 2020 election and the January 6th insurrection. Smith argues that the public has a right to a speedy trial and that the requested trial date of January 2nd, 2024, is in the public's interest. Trump's team had argued for a trial date in April 2026, but Smith disputes this, stating that the volume of discovery is not a relevant factor and that Trump will have the necessary time to review the materials. Smith also dismisses Trump's team's argument that the height of the discovery is a concern, and points out that many of the documents being turned over are not even relevant to the case. The scheduling proposed by Smith is consistent with similar cases, and Smith takes issue with the cases and data cited by Trump in support of his requested trial date.
Special Counsel Argues Against Trump's 2026 Trial Date Request: Judge may set an earlier trial date due to Trump's team's irrelevant factors and potential jury pool taint.
During a recent court hearing, Special Counsel Jack Smith argued against former President Donald Trump's request for a trial date in 2026, stating that Trump's team has factored in irrelevant factors, such as sentencing briefs and superseding indictments, instead of focusing on the actual trial date. Smith also offered to explain exhibits to Trump in advance to avoid potential delays. However, Judge Chutkan had previously warned Trump's lawyers about the consequences of his harassment and egregious conduct towards witnesses, which could result in an earlier trial date to prevent jury pool taint. Trump's team did not address this issue in their reply brief, but it is expected to be discussed at the scheduled August 28th hearing. The hearing will determine the trial date, with Chutkan previously expressing concern over Trump's conduct potentially influencing the jury pool. The motions and reply brief were filed quickly, with Smith requesting and being granted the ability to file a reply brief within hours.
Government opposes Trump's proposed trial date in 2026: The government argues that a fair and prompt trial can be held in early 2024, despite Trump's proposed delay until 2026, as the defendant's reasons for delay do not impede a fair trial and overlook important context.
Despite both the government and Jack Smith being ready for the trial to begin on January 2, 2024, Donald Trump has opposed this date and proposed a trial date in April 2026. The government's reply to Trump's opposition argues that the defendant's reasons for delay, including disputes over discovery, do not impede a fair trial on the proposed schedule. The government also points out that Trump's comparisons to other cases and statistics overlook important context, such as the fact that the median time for section 371 cases to be completed includes the time after the trial for sentencing. The government maintains that a fair and prompt trial can be held on the proposed schedule and that the defendant's arguments for delay do not justify a trial date in 2026.
Upgrade your personal hygiene with the Hello Tushy bidet: The Hello Tushy bidet is a practical investment for effective and efficient personal hygiene, saving toilet paper and time, and easy to install without additional plumbing or electricity.
The Hello Tushy bidet is a game-changer for personal hygiene. It's easy to install, cleans more effectively than wiping, and saves a significant amount of toilet paper. The device attaches to your existing toilet, requires no electricity or additional plumbing, and pays for itself in under a year. While there may be debates about trial dates in legal cases, the discussion about the Hello Tushy bidet emphasizes its practical benefits and convenience. In contrast, the details of court cases and their lengthy trial processes are not relevant to the bidet's value proposition. In summary, if you're looking for a more efficient and cleaner alternative to toilet paper, the Hello Tushy bidet is a worthwhile investment. Visit hellotushy.com/midas and use promo code Midas for a 10% discount on your first order.
Trump's Claims of Destroyed Docs Disproven: Despite Trump's assertions, over 90% of the discovery material for his legal case was already known to him or his team, with the rest coming from various government sources and the January 6th Capitol investigation
Despite Donald Trump's claims, there is a significant amount of relevant discovery material available for his ongoing legal case, much of which he or his representatives had access to before it was handed over to the government. According to Jack Smith, the prosecutor, approximately 65% of the initial discovery production from the government consisted of materials that Trump or his team already had or were duplicative. Furthermore, about 25% of the first production came from entities associated with Trump, and hundreds of thousands of pages came from the National Archives, including Trump's tweets. Nearly 1,000,000 more pages came from the House Select Committee investigating the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Trump's claims that these documents had been destroyed were proven false. The trial is scheduled to begin on January 2, 2024, and the government is prepared to provide all necessary exhibits, despite any scheduling conflicts.
Trump's legal team engages with the court system: Trump's legal team is actively working to resolve potential hearing conflicts and effectively advocating in court
Trump's legal team, led by Molly Gaston and Thomas Windham, recently filed a reply brief in response to a motion by Judge Cannon regarding certain hearing dates. The team argued that the requested dates conflict with a hearing before Judge Chutkan, which was addressed in detail in the powerful reply brief. This is significant because it shows that the legal team is actively engaging with the court system and working to resolve potential conflicts. The team's effective advocacy was highlighted in the report by Ben Miceldis from the Midas Touch Network. For those interested in staying updated on the latest developments, be sure to follow Midas Touch on Instagram and subscribe to their podcast.
