Logo
    Search

    Lessons from the Demise of a Voting Rights Bill

    enJune 23, 2021

    Podcast Summary

    • Senate Filibuster Blocks Voting Rights BillThe For the People Act, a voting rights expansion bill, was filibustered in the US Senate, preventing debate and a potential vote on the bill. The filibuster, a Senate rule, allows the minority party to block a vote on a bill they don't support.

      The For the People Act, a voting rights expansion bill, was filibustered in the US Senate, effectively killing it for now. This wasn't a vote on the merits of the bill but rather a vote to begin debate. Republicans, who had previously vowed to block the bill, stood firm and prevented debate from moving forward. The filibuster, a Senate rule requiring 60 votes to advance debate, has been a major obstacle to the Democratic agenda on various issues, including voting rights. It's important to note that this isn't a new concept, but it has gained significant attention since Democrats took control of the Senate in January. The filibuster allows the minority party to prevent a vote on a bill they don't support, without having to give speeches all day or endure any endurance tests.

    • Democratic voting rights bill fails despite control of White House and SenateDespite control of White House and Senate, the Democratic For the People Act failed due to its expansive and contradictory nature, highlighting the importance of practicality and bipartisan support in passing ambitious legislation.

      The For the People Act, a Democratic bill aimed at protecting voting rights, failed due to its expansive and imperfect nature. Originally written as a messaging bill after the 2018 midterm elections, the bill was large and touched many aspects of the electoral process. However, when Democrats gained control of the White House and Senate in early 2021, advocacy groups saw an opportunity to make it a reality. Yet, the bill's size and contradictions made it challenging to implement, especially as Republicans in state houses pushed for restrictive voting laws. Ultimately, the bill lacked the necessary bipartisan support and was denied with a wide margin. This failure underscores the importance of carefully considering the practicality and political feasibility of ambitious legislative proposals.

    • Democratic voting rights bill faces challenges in the SenateThe Democrats' push for a comprehensive voting rights bill faced opposition from senators due to its sweeping nature, leading to a decision to keep the bill in its entirety despite concerns, driven by advocacy groups' demands.

      The Democratic effort to pass a voting rights bill faced significant challenges in the Senate, despite their urgency to address the issue. The bill, which started as a messaging piece, became more contentious when attempts were made to turn it into a real legislation. Senators, including Joe Manchin, raised concerns about the bill's sweeping nature and its potential to undermine trust in elections. Despite these challenges, the Democrats chose to push for the bill in its entirety rather than rewriting it to address specific concerns and make it more palatable to the Senate. This approach was driven by the various interests represented by powerful advocacy groups on the left, who wanted to keep all their issues in the bill and believed that a narrower, more tailored voting bill would not win more votes in the Senate.

    • Democrats Unable to Change Filibuster Rule for Voting Rights BillDespite efforts to pass a voting rights bill and change the filibuster rule, Democrats lacked the necessary support among their own party members, leaving them with limited options to pass major legislation without Republican support.

      Despite Democrats' efforts to pass a voting rights bill and potentially change the filibuster rule, they were unable to garner enough support among their own party members to do so. The filibuster rule, which requires a supermajority of 60 votes to end debate and move to a vote, was used by Republicans to block the bill from advancing. Democrats had argued that this legislation, which deals with the foundations of democracy and the vote itself, was the best argument to convince all 50 Senate Democrats and the Vice President to change the rules. However, they could not organize themselves around this idea, leaving them with few options to pass major pieces of their agenda without Republican support. The most outspoken defenders of the filibuster in the Democratic Party, Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, argue that it promotes civility, bipartisanship, and lasting policy in the Senate. With the filibuster in place, Democrats will likely face unified Republican opposition on many issues central to their political platform, limiting their ability to pass legislation without bipartisan support.

    • Democrats fail to pass election reform bill, states may pass restrictive voting lawsThe Democrats' failure to pass a national election reform bill allows states to implement restrictive voting laws without federal oversight, potentially impacting close elections in favor of Republican candidates.

      The recent failure of the Democrats to pass the election reform bill without Republican support could result in a wave of restrictive voting laws across the country. Senators Manchin and Sinema's decision to uphold the filibuster principle over passing the elections bill has left many states free to implement their own voting laws, some of which may make it harder for certain groups to vote. These laws could potentially tip the balance in favor of Republican candidates in close elections. The Democrats had put all their efforts into this national voting rights fight, but with the threat of federal intervention now diminished, states with Republican legislatures are free to pass restrictive voting laws without congressional oversight. The only remaining option for challenging these laws may be through the courts.

    • Republican voting restrictions unlikely to be challenged in courts or CongressDemocrats face voter backlash for inability to pass voting rights legislation, as anxiety grows over GOP's anti-democratic image

      The Republican-led voting restrictions are unlikely to be challenged by the Supreme Court or Democrats in Congress, leaving the issue to be resolved through political means in the upcoming elections. Democrats are trying to frame the Republican Party as an anti-democratic force and position themselves as protectors of the democratic process. However, the lack of progress on passing legislation due to the filibuster is causing anxiety among Democrats, as they may face voter backlash for their inability to deliver results. Democrats passed a large stimulus bill early on, but the lack of progress on voting rights legislation may lead voters to question their effectiveness and consider giving Republicans a chance.

    • Democrats Face Challenges in Congress and Voting Rights, While Biden Administration Struggles with Vaccine RolloutDemocrats confront legislative hurdles, Republicans push for stricter voting laws, Biden admin misses 70% vaccination goal, and uncertainty surrounds moral high ground strategy.

      The Democratic Party is facing challenges in getting their legislative agenda through Congress, while Republican-led states are pushing for stricter voting laws. The Biden administration also missed its original goal of vaccinating 70% of adults by July 4th, particularly struggling to convince younger Americans to get vaccinated. Democrats are trying to use the moral high ground on protecting democracy against Republican efforts to restrict voting rights, but the effectiveness of this strategy is uncertain. The special session of the Texas legislature is expected to pass bills making it harder to vote by mail and giving more power to partisan poll watchers. The Biden administration is working to increase vaccination rates, but older Americans are more likely to get vaccinated than younger demographics. The podcast was produced, edited, and engineered by various team members, and Michael Alvaro hosted.

    Recent Episodes from The Daily

    Trump Wins Broad Immunity

    Trump Wins Broad Immunity

    On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald J. Trump is entitled to broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions that he took while in office.

    Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times, explains how that ruling will weaken the federal case against Mr. Trump for trying to overturn the last U.S. presidential election, and will drastically expand the power of the presidency itself.

    Guest: Adam Liptak, a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 02, 2024

    Will Biden Withdraw?

    Will Biden Withdraw?

    President Biden’s disastrous debate performance last week set off a furious discussion among Democratic officials, donors and strategists about whether and how to replace him as the party’s nominee.

    Peter Baker, who is the chief White House correspondent for The Times, takes us inside those discussions and Biden’s effort to shut them down.

    Guest: Peter Baker, the chief White House correspondent for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 01, 2024

    'Animal,' Episode 5: Wolves

    'Animal,' Episode 5: Wolves

    In a broken world, what can we gain by looking another animal in the eye? "Animal" is a six-part, round-the-world journey in search of an answer. In Episode 5, the writer Sam Anderson travels to an obscure memorial in rural Japan: the statue of the last Japanese wolf.

    For photos and videos of Sam's journey to Japan, visit nytimes.com/animal

    The Daily
    enJune 30, 2024

    A Brutal Debate for Biden

    A Brutal Debate for Biden

    In the first debate of the 2024 race, President Biden hoped to make the case that Donald J. Trump was unfit to return to the White House. Instead, Mr. Biden’s weak performance deepened doubts about his own fitness for the job.

    Astead W. Herndon, who covers politics for The Times, explains what happened.

    Guest: Astead W. Herndon, a national politics reporter for The New York Times and the host of the politics podcast “The Run-Up.”

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 28, 2024

    The Doping Scandal Rocking the Upcoming Olympics

    The Doping Scandal Rocking the Upcoming Olympics

    A new doping scandal is rocking the world of competitive swimming, as the Paris Olympics approach. These allegations are raising questions about fairness in the sport and whether the results at the summer games can be trusted.

    Michael S. Schmidt, one of the reporters who broke the story, explains the controversy and what it reveals about the struggle to police doping in sports.

    Guest: Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 27, 2024

    France’s Far Right at the Gates of Power

    France’s Far Right at the Gates of Power

    The far right in France had a big win this month, crushing the party of President Emmanuel Macron in elections for the European Parliament. But the results did not affect France’s government at home — until Mr. Macron changed that.

    Roger Cohen, the Paris bureau chief for The Times, discusses the huge political gamble Mr. Macron has taken, which has brought the far right closer than ever to gaining real power in France.

    Guest: Roger Cohen, the Paris bureau chief for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    • Battered by the far right in voting for the European Parliament, Emmanuel Macron called for new elections in France.
    • The president has challenged voters to test the sincerity of their support for the far right. Were the French letting off steam in the European elections, or did they really mean it?

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 26, 2024

    The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress

    The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress

    A powerful group supporting Israel is trying to defeat sitting members of Congress who have criticized the country’s deadly war against Hamas.

    Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics for The Times, explains why it appears that strategy may work in today’s Democratic primary in New York.

    Guest: Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics and government for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 25, 2024

    The Army of Poets and Students Fighting a Forgotten War

    The Army of Poets and Students Fighting a Forgotten War

    Warning: this episode contains descriptions of injuries.

    Myanmar is home to one of the deadliest, most intractable civil wars on the planet. But something new is happening. Unusual numbers of young people from the cities, including students, poets and baristas, have joined the country’s rebel militias. And this coalition is making startling gains against the country’s military dictatorship.

    Hannah Beech, who covers stories across Asia for The Times, discusses this surprising resistance movement.

    Guest: Hannah Beech, a Bangkok-based reporter for The New York Times, focusing on investigative and in-depth stories in Asia.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 24, 2024

    'Animal,' Episode 4: Ferrets

    'Animal,' Episode 4: Ferrets

    In a broken world, what can we gain by looking another animal in the eye? "Animal" is a six-part, round-the-world journey in search of an answer. In Episode 4, the writer Sam Anderson soothes his anxiety by visiting a convention center in Ohio.

    For photos and videos of Sam's adventure with manatees, visit nytimes.com/animal.

    The Daily
    enJune 23, 2024

    Related Episodes

    A Last-Gasp Push on Voting Rights

    A Last-Gasp Push on Voting Rights

    It’s a big week in the Senate for voting rights. Democrats have two bills that include measures to bolster and protect elections.

    But the bills are almost certain to fail.

    Why has it proved almost impossible to pass legislation so integral to the agenda of President Biden and the Democrats?

    Guest: Astead W. Herndon, a national political reporter for The New York Times.

    Sign up here to get The Daily in your inbox each morning. And for an exclusive look at how the biggest stories on our show come together, subscribe to our newsletter

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit 

    nytimes.com/thedaily

    . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    “Democracy in Disarray.”

    “Democracy in Disarray.”

    Joe Biden and just about every elected Democrat in America make one final run at Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema on voting rights, Dr. Fauci says we’re all getting Omicron and calls one Republican Senator a moron, and Alyssa Mastromonaco joins to break down the worst punditry of the week in another round of Take Appreciator. 



    For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast.

    Herschel Walker's campaign imposes 20 feet ban on reporters

    Herschel Walker's campaign imposes 20 feet ban on reporters

    Republican U.S. Senate candidate Herschel Walker has not spoken to reporters at campaign stops since October 6th and this week his campaign said no journalist will get closer than 20 feet to their candidate. The podcast team of WABE's Susanna Capelouto, Rahul Bali, Sam Gringlas and Emma Hurt of Axios Atlanta talk about what it's like to cover the Walker campaign in the runoff. They also check in on the campaign of incumbent Democrat Raphael Warnock. and talk about long lines of early voters in Georgia.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Could Asian American Voters again be key to winning Georgia?

    Could Asian American Voters again be key to winning Georgia?

    AAPI voters are credited with tipping the balance for Democrats in 2020 in Georgia, but Republicans have started to court them, too. WABE's Susanna Capelouto, Sam Gringlas and Rahul Bali talk about how the parties are engaging a small, but powerful voting minority. They also discuss recent polling that shows tight races, election integrity, and UGA football.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Georgia Votes 2022: Can Marjorie Taylor Greene be defeated?

    Georgia Votes 2022: Can Marjorie Taylor Greene be defeated?

    Controversial Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene faces at least 4 opponents in the Republican primary on May 24th, but is she vulnerable? WABE politics editor Susanna Capelouto, and politics reporters Sam Gringlas and Rahul Bali discuss the race in Georgia's 14th congressional district. They also have updates on Georgia's race for governor and discuss a brewing voter registration controversy involving the Department of Driver's Services.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.