Podcast Summary
CBD distillery content creation: Creating content for a sponsor requires truthfulness and authenticity, even in the CBD industry. Improve initial attempts and acknowledge the importance of factual information.
During a conversation about creating content for a sponsor, Josh shared an idea for a CBD distillery, but his initial attempt did not meet the desired quality. The group discussed various topics, including debate night live streams, fact-checking, and lies told by politicians. Karine Jean-Pierre was mentioned for denying the authenticity of videos featuring Joe Biden. The conversation also touched on crime rates, age-related ailments, and the importance of factual information. Despite some humorous moments, the group acknowledged the significance of truthfulness in public discourse. Josh's initial CBD distillery script was criticized as terrible and required improvement.
CBD benefits and trust in CBD Distillery: Trustworthy CBD companies like CBD Distillery offer certified and lab-tested products despite higher prices, and CBD is beneficial for inflammation, not a cure-all.
During a podcast discussion, the topic of CBD and its benefits was brought up. The speaker shared his trust in CBD Distillery, a company known for its certified and lab-tested products, despite the higher price point. He also debunked myths about CBD curing diseases and emphasized its role in helping with inflammation. The conversation then shifted to a personal story about a woman who claimed to have made tumors disappear after being touched by Corey Bush, a squad member. The validity of this claim was questioned, but the speaker expressed belief in the power of faith and healing. The discussion also touched upon the upcoming cultural appropriation debate and Biden's recent ad.
Selfishness vs. Public Service: During the 2020 presidential election, it was debated whether Trump, a convicted criminal, was only out for himself, or Biden, a career politician, was fighting for the public. Trump's personal gains and criminal record were contrasted with Biden's use of his position for enrichment and charitable donations.
During the discussion, it was argued that people prioritize their families over society when push comes to shove, and that everyone is a little selfish. However, the focus then shifted to the comparison between Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the context of the 2020 presidential election. It was claimed that Trump is a convicted criminal who stands to gain personally, while Biden is fighting for the public. The conversation touched upon various ads and allegations, including Trump's mugshot, his criminal record, and his financial dealings. It was also mentioned that Biden has been a career politician and has used his position to enrich himself and his family. Trump, on the other hand, was pointed out for taking a pay cut and donating his presidential salary to charity. The overall argument was that Trump is only out for himself, while Biden is fighting for the people.
Trump vs Biden narratives: The narratives surrounding Trump and Biden have been framed differently, with Trump facing allegations of financial crimes lacking clear evidence and Biden's involvement in his son's business dealings having more concrete evidence but manipulated reporting
The discourse surrounding the perceived misdeeds of former President Donald Trump and current President Joe Biden has been framed in vastly different ways. Donald Trump, who was once a beloved figure in entertainment and business, became public enemy number one as soon as he announced his presidential campaign. Allegations of financial crimes and personal gain dominated the narrative, but these claims lacked clear evidence and precedent. On the other hand, allegations against Joe Biden, such as his involvement in his son's business dealings and withholding funds to Ukraine, were also framed as personal gain, but they came with more concrete evidence. However, the tone and framing of these narratives have been manipulated, with some accusing right-wing media of gaslighting and creating "cheap fakes" to make Biden appear frail or mentally confused. Ultimately, the justice system's handling of these allegations and the public perception of the individuals involved have been subjects of intense debate.
Right-wing criticism of Biden: While some right-wing criticism of Biden is based on false information, not all is fake. It's essential to fact-check all information and consider the context to avoid being misled.
The credibility of right-wing critics of President Biden has been questioned due to their repeated spreading of false information. However, it's important to note that not all information from the right is fake, and some may be distorted for clicks or attention. The use of uncut videos of the president without proper context can also be misleading. The administration, on the other hand, has faced criticism for its handling of certain issues, such as immigration and the border, as well as its record on apologies and accountability. The discussion also touched upon the reduction in illegal migration and the importance of vaccinations against COVID-19. Ultimately, it's crucial to fact-check information from all sources and not be swayed by misinformation or blatant lies.
Political Narratives vs. Reality: Political figures present selective narratives that distort current events, undermining accountability and fairness. Cherry-picking facts and inconsistent handling of cases create alternate realities.
There's a significant disconnect between the narrative being presented by some political figures and the reality of current events. The discussion touched upon the perceived fitness of former Vice President Joe Biden, comparisons to past presidents, and the DOJ's handling of investigations. The speaker argued that certain individuals and actions are being selectively targeted and criticized, while others with similar or even more serious issues are being ignored. This selective approach creates an alternate reality and undermines the idea of accountability and fairness. For instance, the speaker mentioned the cases of Hunter Biden and Eric Swalwell, highlighting the inconsistency in how these situations are being handled. Additionally, the conversation touched upon crime rates in cities and the blame being placed on gun laws and the GOP. The speaker challenged this narrative, pointing out that a significant number of illegal guns used in crimes in cities come from states with lax gun laws. Overall, the conversation emphasized the importance of recognizing and addressing the whole truth, rather than cherry-picking facts to fit a particular narrative.
California Theft Crimes: Thieves in California, specifically in Oakland and Los Angeles, are stealing copper and metal from traffic lights and new bridges, causing hazardous conditions and significant financial strain for taxpayers
Crime rates, particularly theft, have been a significant issue in certain areas of California, specifically Oakland and Los Angeles. In Oakland, thieves have been stealing traffic lights and copper wiring, leading to hazardous driving conditions and halted road repairs. The thieves are believed to be imported from Oklahoma. In Los Angeles, thieves have been targeting the new sixth Street Bridge, stealing copper and metal worth millions, leaving the bridge in the dark and causing dismay among residents. These crimes are costing taxpayers significant amounts of money, and the criminals are making only a small profit. The coastal cities of California have been affected by these issues, with Oakland and Los Angeles being notable examples. These crimes not only cause financial strain but also create dangerous conditions for residents.
Crime and root causes: Instead of solely focusing on gun control, authorities should address the root causes of crime within their jurisdiction, enforce laws, and promote accountability.
The issue of crime and gun control is complex and cannot be attributed solely to gun laws in other states or misinformation. The speakers acknowledge that there might be issues with gun control in certain areas, but they also emphasize the importance of enforcing crime laws and addressing the root causes of crime within a jurisdiction. They argue that liberal policies, such as defunding the police and lenient criminal justice systems, contribute to the rise in crime. They suggest that instead of focusing on the source of guns, authorities should focus on enforcing laws and keeping their communities safe. The speakers also challenge the notion that liberal cities have always gotten it right and that their problems are solely due to external factors. They argue that these cities have had their fair share of successes that have since been overshadowed by poor policies and a lack of accountability.
Podcast funding: Podcasters 'Ladderscatter' have been demonetized and ask for audience support through a $89 annual or $9 monthly 'Mug Club' membership, offering extra content. They also encourage listeners to check out Josh Feierstein's shows for $15.
The creators of the "Ladderscatter" podcast are asking for their audience's support to keep their content going. They have been demonetized for a while, which means they don't receive the usual revenue from their shows. By becoming a member of their "Mug Club," listeners can enjoy an extra hour of content each week, including appearances from Nick DePel and Alex Jones. The cost is $89 annually or $9 a month. The creators also encourage people to check out Josh Feierstein's shows, which are only $15. They will be performing a game called "hipster or hobo" soon. The creators also clarified that guns are not demons, but rather inanimate objects, and joked about the perceived danger in Indiana. They also warned YouTube viewers to leave if they couldn't participate in the "hipster or hobo" game. Overall, the message is that the creators need financial support from their audience to continue producing their content.