Podcast Summary
New developments in the Mike Flynn lobbying case: Mike Flynn filed late lobbying paperwork for work done before filing was due, adding to scrutiny in ongoing investigation
The Mike Flynn case, involving the former national security advisor under President Trump, has taken a new turn. Flynn, who resigned due to allegations of dishonesty with the White House regarding his contacts with the Russian ambassador, has been under scrutiny for his lobbying work for a company with ties to the Turkish government. Yesterday brought new developments, with Flynn filing paperwork for his lobbying activities after the alleged lobbying had taken place. This discrepancy has raised questions and concerns, promising to bring more heat to the ongoing investigation. The Dan Bongino Show promises updates on this developing story. In addition, Bongino mentioned attending a White House social media conference and having big news ahead. The show also promoted Stamps.com as a time-saving tool for small businesses, offering a special offer for listeners.
Legal proceedings against Michael Flynn involve two separate issues: Judge is deciding whether to allow government to label Flynn as a co-conspirator in a foreign agent registration case, while Flynn's team argues the form is overly complicated and potentially trapping.
The case against Michael Flynn, a former national security advisor, involves two separate issues: lying to the FBI about his communications with the Russian ambassador, and failing to register as a foreign agent for work he did on behalf of the Turkish government. The government is pressing Flynn to sign a form admitting to the latter offense as a condition for leniency in the former case. However, Flynn's team argues that the form is overly complicated and potentially designed to trap him into making an incorrect statement. The judge has yet to decide whether to allow the government to label Flynn as a co-conspirator in the foreign agent registration case. The controversy highlights the complexity of the legal proceedings against Flynn and the potential for overzealous prosecution.
Confusing legal proceedings against Michael Flynn: The government's inconsistent labeling of Michael Flynn as a cooperator and then a co-conspirator, along with the judge's concerns, casts doubt on the validity of the case against him. The context of his FARA filing, potentially forced upon him, raises questions about the motivations behind the investigation.
The legal proceedings involving Michael Flynn's filing of a Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) form have become confusing and contradictory. The government initially considered Flynn a cooperator in the case, but now, due to his refusal to admit to lying on the form, they are labeling him a co-conspirator. However, the judge in the case has raised concerns about this shift, stating that the government's filings do not reflect the existence of the alleged conspiracy. This inconsistency casts doubt on the government's case against Flynn. Additionally, the context of Flynn's FARA filing, which was reportedly forced upon him by the government in February 2017, raises questions about the motivations behind the investigation. Some commentators have suggested that the Spygate scandal, which involves the alleged targeting of political enemies by the Obama administration, may be bigger than previously thought, with Flynn being a victim as early as 2015.
Obama Administration's Role in Michael Flynn's Prosecution: The Obama administration may have set up Michael Flynn by exploiting his past ties to a Turkish-linked company and pressuring him to sign false documents, potentially constituting government entrapment and legal malfeasance.
The Obama administration may have set up Michael Flynn by knowing about his connections to a Turkish-linked company before he filed inaccurate paperwork in 2017. The government had been spying on Flynn since 2015 and knew about the alleged ties. They manipulated the situation by threatening to charge him with a false statement offense and pressured him to sign a false document. Despite having no evidence, they attempted to label him as a co-conspirator. This is a disturbing example of what appears to be government entrapment and legal malfeasance.
Mainstream media's delay in reporting on FISA investigation and Michael Flynn: Independent journalists broke the story on FISA investigation and Michael Flynn's collusion with Russian disinfo specialists months ago, while mainstream media like the New York Times only recently reported on it. Explore credible sources for accurate information and new technologies to enhance skills and efficiency.
The mainstream media, specifically the New York Times, has failed to report accurately and in a timely manner on significant stories, such as the investigation into the FISA process and Michael Flynn. Three months ago, independent journalists like Jeff Carlson, Chuck Ross, Molly Hemingway, Sarah Carter, and John Solomon reported on the issue of Steele's credibility and his collusion with Russian disinformation specialists. The New York Times only recently published a story on the same topic. Additionally, Dan O'Donnell introduced the iTarget Pro system, which allows individuals to improve their marksmanship safely and effectively at home. This innovative solution saves time and money compared to going to a range regularly. Overall, it's essential to rely on credible sources for accurate information and to explore new tools and technologies to enhance skills and efficiency.
FBI used unreliable Russian source to spy on Trump team: The FBI knowingly used an unreliable Russian source's information to obtain warrants to spy on the Trump team, despite evidence of his dishonesty.
The FBI used a discredited Russian source, identified as Christopher Steele, to spy on the Trump team during the Russia investigation. This was known to the FBI as early as January 2017 when they interviewed one of Steele's Russian sources and found his information to be unreliable. Despite this knowledge, the FBI continued to use Steele's information to obtain warrants to spy on the Trump team. The New York Times recently reported on this, but downplayed the significance by suggesting that the Russian source may have added his own interpretations to the information. However, sources familiar with the matter state that the Russian source was deemed untrustworthy and lying. The upcoming inspector general report is expected to provide more details on this matter, but the New York Times appears to be attempting to get out ahead of it with this damage control story.
New Sponsor: No Bull Training Gear Recommended: No Bull offers high-quality, affordable footwear and workout attire for dedicated trainers. Focused on durability, breathability, and versatility, it's a go-to brand for those who don't make excuses.
The speaker is excited about a new sponsor, No Bull, a footwear and workout attire brand. He highly recommends their products for people who train hard and value quality. The speaker admires No Bull's mission to create gear for those who don't make excuses. He praises the brand's focus on durability, breathability, and versatility, making it suitable for various workouts. Despite some technical difficulties during the show, the speaker also touched on other topics, including the government's spying on Michael Flynn and the New York Times using questionable sources. However, the main emphasis remains on No Bull and its top-notch training gear.
Ancestors' past actions and current policies: Mitch McConnell addressed personal responsibility and ethical consistency regarding ancestors' past actions, while emphasizing school choice as a civil rights issue for economic prosperity.
The issue of ancestors' past actions and their connection to current policies, such as reparations, is a complex and nuanced topic. Mitch McConnell's response to being questioned about his ancestors owning slaves before the Civil War highlighted the importance of personal responsibility and ethical consistency. Meanwhile, the issue of school choice was also emphasized as a crucial civil rights issue and key to economic prosperity, with the education system being left behind in many areas, leaving children without access to opportunities. The radical left was criticized for wanting to maintain a struggling underclass for votes and government programs. Overall, the conversation underscored the need for ethical consistency and addressing systemic issues, particularly in education, to ensure equal opportunities for all.
Charter School Success Story vs. Struggling Public Schools: Charter schools provide opportunities for students to succeed, while limited choices in public schools leave many behind.
The educational opportunities available to students significantly impact their future prospects. The Bronx charter school discussed in the New York Post story, where 90% of students qualify for subsidized meals, graduated every eighth grader with perfect scores on the Algebra 1 Regents test. In contrast, surrounding public schools had only 34% of students taking the test, with only 82% passing. The speaker, who was able to leave a struggling public school district and attend a Catholic school, emphasizes the importance of school choice and the disparities it reveals. The charter school's success story highlights the potential for students to overcome their circumstances and achieve success, while the lack of choice in other schools leaves many students behind. The speaker urges Democrats to consider the issue and give parents the choice to enroll their children in schools that best suit their needs. The speaker's personal story underscores the importance of this issue and its potential impact on future generations.
Bravo Company's commitment to safety and quality: Bravo Company prioritizes safety and builds high-quality, life-saving rifle and pistol equipment, valued in a non-barter economy.
Bravo Company Manufacturing is a leading company in producing high-quality, life-saving rifle and pistol equipment. They prioritize people's safety and build their products to the highest standards, assuming they may end up in the hands of law enforcement, military personnel, or civilians in critical situations. The gold standard matters because money is a measure of value, and consistency is key in a non-barter economy. Bravo Company's sponsor spotlighted their commitment to providing top-notch equipment and their dedication to the well-being of their customers.
Left's opposition to gold standard for US dollar: The left opposes a gold standard due to fear of limiting money creation and paying off debt, leading to inflation and decreased purchasing power
The left's opposition to a gold standard for the US dollar stems from their desire to monetize the debt and print money without constraint. A gold standard would limit the ability to create new money and thus pay off debt, but it would also maintain the value of money by preventing endless printing. The left's fear of a gold standard, as exemplified by their reaction to Judy Shelton's nomination, is rooted in their preference for unchecked spending and the devaluation of the dollar that comes with it. This approach may benefit profligate governments in the short term, but it ultimately leads to inflation and a decrease in the purchasing power of money.
Inflation's Impact on Debtors and Savers: Inflation reduces debt value for borrowers but decreases purchasing power for savers, sparking debate over nominees like Judy Shelton's stance on monetary policy and gun control's effectiveness in disarming criminals
Inflation, which makes each dollar worth less, benefits debtors, including the government, as it reduces the value of their debts. However, it harms savers, as the purchasing power of their saved dollars decreases. The current debate over Judy Shelton's nomination to the Federal Reserve is rooted in this concept, as some fear her pro-gold standard stance could limit the government's ability to inflate away its debts. Meanwhile, gun control measures, like New Zealand's ban on military-style semi-automatic weapons, have been criticized for being ineffective, as criminals are unlikely to comply with such laws. Instead, law-abiding citizens may choose to resist, leading to the failure of the intended policy.
Dan Bongino's dedication to delivering content despite technical difficulties: Dan Bongino remains committed to providing valuable content to his audience, encouraging them to engage with him on various platforms.
Despite some technical difficulties during the show, Dan Bongino remains committed to delivering content to his audience. He encourages viewers to share the show on Reddit, subscribe to his YouTube channel, listen to his podcasts on iTunes or SoundCloud, and follow him on Twitter for constant updates. Despite the technical issues, Bongino expresses his appreciation for his audience and invites them to engage with him on various platforms. The show may have had some hiccups, but the message remains clear: Dan Bongino is dedicated to providing valuable content to his followers.
