Podcast Summary
Trump Faces Multiple Criminal Investigations: Despite ongoing legal troubles, Trump remains a potential 2024 Republican presidential candidate with about 30% party support.
Former President Donald Trump and his associates are facing multiple criminal investigations and potential indictments in various jurisdictions, including Florida, Washington D.C., Arizona, and Georgia. Special Counsel Jack Smith is leading several of these investigations, and Trump's legal team has attempted to delay some of the trials. Witnesses, including secretaries of state, have cooperated with these investigations, and Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, has testified before the grand jury in Washington D.C. Trump himself has been active in trying to evade these legal proceedings, filing frivolous lawsuits and disregarding court orders. Despite these ongoing legal issues, approximately 30% of the Republican party still supports Trump as a potential presidential candidate in 2024. It's challenging to comprehend how Trump, with his extensive legal troubles, can be seen as a viable option for the presidency.
Political Divide and Legal Challenges: The Republican Party faces internal strife and external criticism, while the legal system grapples with complex cases like the Trump investigation. Adhering to the speedy trial act is crucial for a fair and efficient criminal justice system.
The political landscape is starkly divided, with the Republican Party facing internal challenges and external criticisms. At the same time, the legal system continues to grapple with complex cases, such as the ongoing investigation into former President Trump. The Republican Party, led by Trump and his supporters, is seen as promoting hate, culture wars, and conspiracy theories, while figures like Christopher Wray, a lifelong Republican and FBI director, advocate for facts, evidence, and the rule of law. The speedy trial act requires a timely resolution to criminal cases, and the defense's request for an indefinite delay in Trump's trial was met with skepticism by the court. The public's interest in a fair and efficient criminal justice system underscores the importance of adhering to the speedy trial act.
Defense team fails to argue for 'ends of justice' continuance: The defense team proposed a continuance until almost 2025, but failed to argue for the 'ends of justice' exception required by Supreme Court precedent in their initial filing.
The defense team for Donald Trump, in their proposal for a continuance in his ongoing legal case, failed to adequately argue for an "ends of justice" continuance under the Speedy Trial Act, as required by Supreme Court precedent. Instead, they suggested a continuance until almost 2025, citing unfounded concerns about jury selection and the presidential election period. The prosecution team, led by Jack Smith, criticized this proposal, pointing out that the defense team did not even mention the "ends of justice" exception in their initial filing. The Supreme Court has established that trial dates must be rigidly structured to balance the open-ended ability of a trial judge to delay a case. The judge in this case has already set a trial date, and the defense team must argue for a specific continuance date based on the "ends of justice" exception if they wish to delay the trial. The defense team's failure to do so in their initial filing is a significant issue in the case.
Presidential Records Act doesn't shield Trump from classified docs case: The Presidential Records Act won't protect Trump from investigation into mishandling of classified documents, as the trials must proceed according to the Speedy Trial Act, and any delay could result in further legal action.
There is no connection between the presidential records act and the investigation into former President Trump's handling of classified documents. While Trump's team keeps repeating the presidential records act as a defense, it won't help in this case. Special Counsel Jack Smith is expected to challenge any attempts to delay the trial based on publicity or the ends of justice doctrine. Judge Eileen Cannon, who is presiding over the case, must set a trial date according to the Speedy Trial Act, and any delay could lead to further legal action. The Act not only benefits the defendant but also prevents them from committing additional crimes during the waiting period. Jack Smith's team has already pushed for an expedited trial schedule, indicating their readiness to move forward with the case.
Trump Employee Under Investigation for Handling Classified Information: Former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago employee, Carlos d Oliveria, is under investigation for moving and lying about boxes of classified information, potentially obstructing the investigation, and the team failed to preserve surveillance footage.
There are ongoing investigations against former President Donald Trump regarding the mishandling of classified information at his Mar-a-Lago estate. A potential target of these investigations is a Trump employee, Carlos d Oliveria, the head of Mar-a-Lago's maintenance. Suspicious activity includes Oliveria moving boxes containing classified information, lying to the government about his knowledge of the boxes, and contacting the head IT worker responsible for the surveillance footage shortly after the Department of Justice subpoenaed the footage. These actions raise questions about potential coordination between Trump's team and Oliveria to obstruct the investigation. The investigations also uncovered that Trump's team failed to preserve the surveillance footage after a flood damaged the cameras, further adding to the suspicions.
Investigation into Trump associates by Special Counsel Jack Smith: Several individuals linked to former President Trump, including Yusuf Tavares and Melania Trump's lawyers, are under investigation by Special Counsel Jack Smith for potential involvement in surveillance. The scope and target of the investigation are unclear.
During the discussion, it was revealed that several individuals connected to former President Trump, including Yusuf Tavares represented by Stanley Woodward, are being investigated by Special Counsel Jack Smith. Trump hires the same lawyers for his political action committees, who also represent his wife Melania, raising suspicions about their conversations. The focus of the investigation seems to be on surveillance, but the identity of the potential target is unclear. Meanwhile, advertisements for Roan's commuter collection and Miracle Made's bed sheets were featured, offering solutions for comfortable clothing and temperature regulation during sleep.
Two Individuals Under Scrutiny: Carlos de Alavera and Youssiel Tavares: The investigation into Mar-a-Lago document mishandling focuses on Carlos de Alavera, head of maintenance, and Youssiel Tavares, IT guy, both represented by Save America PAC lawyers. They're under investigation for deleted footage and potential criminal liability.
The focus of the investigation into the mishandling of documents at Mar-a-Lago has shifted to two individuals: Carlos de Alavera, the head of maintenance, and Youssiel Tavares, the IT guy. Both men are represented by lawyers funded by Save America PAC, and they are under scrutiny for their alleged communication and actions regarding the storage of the documents and the surveillance footage. The evidence suggests that someone intentionally deleted certain video footage showing Walt Nauta, a maintenance worker, moving boxes at the wrong times when search warrants were imminent. This deletion created a gap in the footage, which the DOJ is now investigating. The implications of this discovery could lead to these individuals becoming targets in the investigation, as they may have criminal liability for their actions. Additionally, Walt Nauta faces potential jail time or the need to cooperate against Donald Trump, adding complexity to the situation.
Mar-a-Lago investigation evolves with potential criminal charges, witnesses subpoenaed and lies detected: The Mar-a-Lago investigation is escalating with potential criminal charges, witnesses being subpoenaed, and individuals choosing to cooperate or face indictment. The investigation may result in a superseding amended indictment with multiple new counts and a wider scope, including potential election interference.
The investigation into potential wrongdoing at Mar-a-Lago has evolved from initial inquiries to potential criminal charges. Witnesses, including employees and third-party sources, have been subpoenaed and have provided crucial information. The Department of Justice has reportedly determined that some individuals, such as Tavares, have lied to the grand jury. These individuals are being given a choice: cooperate and tell the truth or face indictment. The investigation is expected to result in a superseding amended indictment with multiple new counts and potentially many more individuals involved. Jared Kushner, a former senior adviser to Donald Trump, has also reportedly testified before the grand jury. The first major status conference is scheduled for July 18th. The scope of the investigation extends beyond the criminal case filed in Florida to potential election interference before a Washington DC grand jury.
Trump and Kushner's Grand Jury Testimonies: Prosecutors investigate Trump and Kushner for potential crimes, focusing on Trump's corrupt intent regarding election results and Kushner's testimony. Trump's inconsistent statements and defense strategy could be used against him.
The investigation into former President Donald Trump and his associates, including Jared Kushner, continues to unfold with the focus on their potential involvement in various alleged crimes. Kushner testified before the grand jury about Donald Trump's state of mind regarding the election results, but it's unlikely that was the only topic of discussion. Prosecutors are likely trying to establish Trump's corrupt intent in his efforts to cling to power, which is a key element in potential criminal charges. Trump's inconsistent statements about the election results and his defense strategy could be used against him in the proceedings. Additionally, former White House communications director Alyssa Farah Griffin also testified before the grand jury during the same time period. The investigation into Trump and his associates' actions continues to evolve, and the potential implications for those involved remain significant.
Investigations focus on disproving Trump's belief of stolen election: Testimonies and evidence contradicting Trump's belief could lead to charges for corrupt intent.
The ongoing investigations into former President Donald Trump's actions surrounding the 2020 election are focusing on disproving his good faith belief that the election was stolen. Testimonies from figures like Jared Kushner and Alyssa Farah Griffin, as well as evidence like the reports of independent investigators hired by Trump's campaign, have been presented to the grand jury. These testimonies and evidence contradict Trump's belief and could potentially be used to prove corrupt intent. The federal prosecutors, led by Jack Smith, are prioritizing their case and are not concerned about coordination with state cases or the timing of indictments.
Investigations into 2020 election interference expand beyond Georgia: Special Counsel Jack Smith's ongoing probes could implicate multiple battleground states, including Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, as Trump aimed to overturn Biden's win. Top political leaders are under scrutiny, highlighting the importance of maintaining electoral integrity and the role of pro-democracy leaders.
The ongoing investigations into election interference in the 2020 presidential election, led by Special Counsel Jack Smith, have expanded beyond Georgia and could potentially involve multiple battleground states. The importance of these investigations lies in the fact that former President Trump was not just trying to find enough votes to win Georgia, but also in Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania to overtake President Biden's victory. The involvement of top political leaders, including secretaries of state from these states, in the investigations adds a personal touch and underscores the significance of the elections and the threats they faced. Additionally, having pro-democracy leaders in key positions, such as in Arizona, makes a significant difference in maintaining the integrity of the electoral process. The use of technology, like the PodCover by 8 Sleep, which can improve sleep quality by automatically adjusting the temperature, can also contribute to better overall health and productivity.
Improve health and well-being with quality sleep, clean eating, and peace of mind: Personalized sleep experience with temperature regulation and health tracking from 8 Sleep pod, clean meal kits with Green Chef, and affordable life insurance policies from Policygenius promote overall wellness and peace of mind
Investing in quality sleep and clean eating can significantly improve your overall health and well-being. The 8 Sleep pod offers a personalized sleep experience with temperature regulation and health tracking, allowing you to understand how various behaviors impact your sleep. Meanwhile, Green Chef provides nutritionist-approved meal kits with clean ingredients, making it easier to maintain a healthy diet. Additionally, Policygenius simplifies the process of finding affordable life insurance policies, providing peace of mind for those who have loved ones depending on them. In the news, Arizona Attorney General Chris Mays is taking a stand against election interference by investigating potential issues from her predecessor's tenure. These actions demonstrate the importance of prioritizing health, wellness, and democratic integrity. To enhance your sleep experience, visit eightsleep.com/legalaf and save $150 on the pod cover. For clean eating, go to greenchef.com/legalaf50 and use code legalaf50 to get 50% off plus free shipping. Lastly, secure your family's financial future with life insurance quotes from policygenius.com.
Arizona AG investigates potential 2020 election crimes, involving Trump and Giuliani: Arizona AG Kris Mayes is proactively investigating potential crimes related to the 2020 election, including those involving former President Trump and Rudy Giuliani, to build public confidence and prevent future incidents.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes is taking a proactive approach in investigating potential crimes related to the 2020 election in her state, even if it involves former President Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others. Mayes believes it's important to build public confidence in the election process and prevent similar incidents from happening again. She has opened an investigation into the attempted interference with the Arizona election and has reached out to other prosecutors and attorney generals for cooperation. The pace of criminal investigations and prosecutions related to the 2020 election may seem slow, but significant progress has been made, with indictments and stiff sentences being handed down. The Department of Justice is taking an aggressive stance to ensure law and order and protect democracy. This coordinated effort across different divisions and departments within the DOJ is expected to be looked back on as one of the most significant in ensuring the democratic process prevails.
Fulton County Grand Jury Begins Hearing Evidence on Trump Indictment: Fulton County grand jury begins hearing evidence on potential crimes including falsified certificates, data theft, and threats to election officials. DA Fani Willis can present evidence from a previous grand jury or new evidence, while Trump has filed an unusual petition in the Supreme Court of Georgia.
The Fulton County, Georgia grand jury, which will be deciding on the indictment of former President Donald Trump, is now empaneled and will be hearing evidence. The grand jury process involves selecting jurors, presenting evidence, and requiring a vote of 12 out of 16 jurors for an indictment. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis has the option to present the report from a previous special purpose grand jury, which presented evidence and made recommendations, or to present new evidence and witnesses. Potential crimes under investigation include falsified electoral certificates, theft of election data, and threats to election officials. Trump has responded by filing an original petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition in the Supreme Court of Georgia, which is an unusual move and has not been successful in similar cases for the past 40 years. The framework for charging Trump could be RICO charges for a widespread conspiracy.
Trump Challenges Georgia Grand Jury Proceedings: Trump's team files a longshot motion with the Georgia Supreme Court to challenge the special purpose grand jury investigating him, arguing bias and dismissal of the report.
Former President Donald Trump and his legal team have filed a motion with the Georgia Supreme Court to challenge the special purpose grand jury investigating him, arguing that the process is biased and the grand jury report should be dismissed. Trump's team, led by high-profile attorneys Drew Findling and Jennifer Little, have a history of filing similar motions and have criticized the process, particularly the use of hearsay evidence and the participation of Fani Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, in the investigation. The motion is seen as a longshot and an attempt to generate publicity, as the grand jury is set to begin its work soon. The motion comes as Trump and his allies face multiple investigations and potential legal actions related to various issues, including the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and allegations of financial misconduct.
Trump's team petitions Georgia Supreme Court to halt investigation: Trump's team filed a petition to halt the investigation, but the Supreme Court is unlikely to intervene before an indictment is issued, and they have remedies available once an indictment is issued.
The lawyers for former President Donald Trump have filed a petition with the Georgia Supreme Court to halt the ongoing investigation and potential indictment by a special grand jury. However, the Supreme Court has no precedent for accepting such a petition before an indictment has been issued. Trump's team argues that the investigation is tainted due to the lengthy delay and the composition of the grand jury. But the Supreme Court is unlikely to intervene before an indictment, as it is not their role to interfere with the ongoing criminal process. The grand jury is expected to meet and begin its work on Tuesday. Trump's team can raise any objections or arguments once an indictment is issued and assigned to a criminal judge. The process for challenging the grand jury's actions is through motions and appeals. Trump's team's actions can be seen as an attempt to disrupt the process and delay the inevitable, as they have a remedy available to them once an indictment is issued.
Sanctions for Giuliani and Lake's Lawyers for False Claims in Election Cases: Trump lawyers Giuliani and Lake's lawyers were sanctioned for lying to the court and making false claims, resulting in hefty fines, and Giuliani faces potential disbarment. The legal system is being tested as Trump appointee judges rule on various election-related cases.
Rudy Giuliani and his lawyers have been sanctioned for lying to the court and making false claims in legal cases related to election disputes. Giuliani was ordered to pay $90,000 in sanctions for withholding documents in a defamation case, and Kary Lake's lawyers, including Alan Dershowitz, were ordered to pay $122,000 for filing a frivolous lawsuit. These sanctions come as Giuliani faces potential disbarment in multiple states for his actions related to the 2020 election. The legal system is being tested as Trump appointee judges rule on various election-related cases, highlighting the importance of understanding the facts and evidence behind the legal proceedings. To support independent media coverage of these issues, consider becoming a member of the Midas Touch Network YouTube channel.
Supporting Midas Touch with actions big and small: Spreading the word, subscribing, shopping, and joining the Midas Touch network are free or low-cost ways to contribute and support their mission for democracy.
Supporting the Midas Touch channel and its mission to provide legal education and advocacy can lead to exclusive perks, such as access to Karen and brother emojis with 250 memberships. The best way to contribute is by spreading the word, subscribing on both YouTube and audio podcasts, and shopping at the Midas Touch store for pro-democracy and union-made gear. By doing so, you're not only supporting the cause but also helping to expand the reach of the channel. Additionally, all of these actions are free or low-cost, making it an accessible way for everyone to contribute. The Midas Touch team is grateful for the support and appreciates the community's involvement in their efforts to make a difference. So, keep spreading the word, subscribe, shop, and join the Midas Touch network in their mission to make a positive impact on democracy.
