Logo
    Search

    Nizar Banat: Palestinian Activist and Critic of Palestinian Authority "Died" or "Assassinated"?

    en-auJuly 01, 2021

    About this Episode

    Nizar Banat, a Palestinian activist, an outspoken critic of Palestinian Authority and its corruption, was murdered on the 24 June 2021, by the Palestinian Preventive Security force – policing arm of the Palestinian Authority, in the occupied West Bank. This isn’t shocking to many who have studied Oslo Accords and have followed Israel-Palestine relationship/conflict over the years. It can be argued that Palestinian Authority since its inception, has acted similar to those “Slave Patrols” in the antebellum United States which were set up with enslaved African Americans to monitor and enforce discipline, at the behest of their white masters, upon their fellow enslaved African Americans.

     The history of corruption within and by Palestinian Authority (PA) is well documented, recent instances of such corruption include - people in the occupied West Bank who were close to the inner sanctum of PA received COVID vaccines, at the expense of front-line health workers and other essential services’ workers, when there was a shortage of vaccines in general, then there was that scandal of salaries being paid to “employees” of a non-existent Palestinian Airlines, but what often is not widely reported in the mainstream media is its history of collaborating with the State of Israel to suppress and crackdown on any dissent from the people it supposed governs, i.e., Palestinians. 

     Palestinians in a way face oppression from not only their occupier, but also from people who are supposed to govern them and when an activist like Nizar Banat comes along and openly challenges these corrupt authorities, in a civilised manner, they act with impunity and respond with brute force and violence. In the recent years PA’s dominance over occupied West Bank has been overshadowed by its decades long corruption and its perceived inability to act in a manner that would deliver Palestine its statehood, therefore, there is little doubt that Banat’s assassination wasn’t motivated by political insecurity of Palestinian Authority.

     The other not so surprising element of Banat’s assassination is its coverage by the mainstream western media, for example:

     BBC reported, “Prominent Abbas critic dies in PA Custody after ‘vicious beating’ by officers”

    NBC referred to it as “Outspoken critic of Palestinian Authority Nizar Banat dies after violent arrest”

    DW News called it “Palestinian Authority critic Nizar Banat dies after arrest”

    The Times of Israel phrased it as “Activist critical of Palestinian Authority dies after arrest”

     The thing that is missing from all of these headlines is Banat just didn’t die, he did not have a cardiac arrest, he did not have a stroke, he wasn’t 100 years old and therefore did not “die” of aging. Banat was beaten mercilessly and allegedly with wooden and iron batons by the policing arm of Palestinian Authority, which has a history of violence against its own citizenry and Banat not only dared to speak out against the authority but also challenged them in the elections that were postponed indefinitely by Mahmoud Abbas, who has been the President of Palestinian Authority for over 16 years. Therefore, it can be argued that Banat’s death was an assassination. 


    Recent Episodes from The Hyat Report

    AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM - A GENERIC DISCUSSION

    AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION SYSTEM - A GENERIC DISCUSSION

    I recently hosted a space where my guest speaker and I discussed Australian Immigration System, it was a generic discussion ranging from how Australian in the recent past treated refugees who attempted to seek asylum but had come by boats to how both parties Liberals and Labour despite promising reforms in Parent visas, did not deliver  substantive change in that aspect. 

    MUSLIM WOMEN SOFT TARGETS IN INDIA AND CASE OF VANIA SHAIKH

    MUSLIM WOMEN SOFT TARGETS IN INDIA AND CASE OF VANIA SHAIKH

    Hi Everyone, so Today, I wanna talk about Vania Shaikh, a female dental student, a Muslim in India who was allegedly sexually harassed by a Hindu man, according to some reports on social media, Vania in fact protested against this harassment, however, she was allegedly physically assaulted for protesting by her abuser. This then led to vania committing suicide at her university or college campus.

     

    Now, before we get into how the Indian authorities are responding or not responding to this case or how Indian media is covering or not covering this story, I just wanna call out that anytime Muslims are persecuted anywhere in the world, be it in the east or the west, the usual narrative that is pushed is “human rights” or “women’s rights” or “let’s save Muslim women from Muslim men”. We saw this when Afghanistan was invaded, we saw this when Iraq was invaded, we saw this when the occupation of both Afghanistan and Iraq  was justified.

     

    When it comes to India, Muslims have been facing persecution since Britain’s colonisation of the sub-continent, however, it became really intense pretty much since 1947, which is the year when India got its independence. Since 1947, Muslims in India have faced numerous massacres, pogroms and riots and in each of these scenarios Muslim women were specifically targeted by the perpetrators of violence. 

     

    In light of this, I’d like to argue that the reason Muslim women face these atrocities is because the oppressors who in my opinion are filled with Anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia, want to humiliate Muslim men and this is not just applicable to India, but if you notice, this theory of mine can be applied to western liberal societies as well, where Muslim women are consistently demonised or in some cases even criminalised for their clothing. I think it’s very clear that these Anti-Muslim Islamophobes know that us Muslim men are very protective of our women and therefore, these people target our women to get to us or humiliate us.

     

    So let’s go back to India, where not long ago we saw how Muslim girls in the southern Indian state of Karnataka were targeted for wearing Hijab, they were barred from attending school, those girls then went to Karnataka High Court, which delivered a judgement barring Hijab, then they went to Supreme Court of India, which then delivered a split judgement meaning Hijab remains banned in those colleges of Karnataka even today. We also saw how recently convicted rapists of Bilkis Bano, a victim of Gujrat riots were released based on good behaviour. I mean…how can convicted rapists be released on good behaviour grounds? Not just this, but there is also consistent rhetoric from Hindu saints in India where they are riling up Hindu men to go after or target Muslim women. 

     

    In all of this, Muslims of India remain hopeful in the sense they still rely on their law enforcement agencies to potentially take action against these perpetrators, they still on their justice system to do the right thing. But in my opinion both Indian law enforcement and the justice system has failed Muslims of India not just once but over and over and over again. This then makes me that this is a system’s failure, that this is a systematic failure which the Indian Muslim leadership to a large extent still refuses to acknowledge. 

     

    Now coming back to Vania Shaikh, I think this crime stems from the fact that Hindu men in India are emboldened to go after and target Muslim women, because they know that they enjoy the immunity from the system that released rapists of Bilkis Bano on good behavioural grounds. So I absolutely think it is the liberal, secular system that is responsible for Muslim women being targeted without any consequences and I do not think that it is only one political party that is responsible for this, I think the silence from most other ‘secular’ parties in India on th

    IT'S NAIVE TO THINK THAT "PERSECUTION OF MUSLIMS" IN INDIA STARTED IN 2014

    IT'S NAIVE TO THINK THAT "PERSECUTION OF MUSLIMS" IN INDIA STARTED IN 2014

    In this episode I talk about why it's a simplistic and a very naive argument to say that if the current government of India loses next elections then everything will be hunky dory for Muslims of India.

    In this episode, I list various events, where Muslims were the victims and these events took place under various regimes.