Logo
    Search

    Pit Bulls: Bad to the Bone?

    enApril 20, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • Perception vs. Reality: Debunking the Myth of Pit Bulls Being Inherently DangerousDespite negative stereotypes, individual dog behaviors are not determined solely by breed, and proper training and socialization are key to preventing aggression, regardless of breed.

      The perception of certain dog breeds, such as pit bulls, being inherently dangerous is influenced by anecdotal evidence and media portrayals. Meryl and Chris's experience with their dog Penny, who was identified as having a significant pit bull heritage through a DNA test, highlights this issue. Penny's breed mix also included other breeds with reputations for aggression, such as Rottweilers and German Shepherds. Meryl's initial reaction was fear due to the negative stereotypes she had heard about these breeds. However, it's important to note that individual dogs' behaviors are not determined solely by their breed. The debate around pit bulls being dangerous has been a contentious one, with some arguing that these dogs are naturally aggressive and dangerous, while others believe that the blame lies with their owners. Statistics show that dog bites are a common issue, with over 300,000 people seeking ER treatment in the US each year, and pit bulls being frequently cited as the breed most often involved. However, it's crucial to remember that any breed, including pit bulls, can be loving and well-behaved with proper training and socialization. Ultimately, the focus should be on responsible pet ownership and addressing the root causes of dog aggression rather than stigmatizing specific breeds.

    • Studies on pit bull attacksOne study found pit bulls were the most common breed to bite people, but correlation doesn't imply causation, and more research is needed to understand dog behavior and aggression. Each dog is unique and should be evaluated individually.

      The perception of pit bulls being inherently dangerous is rooted in their historical background as fighting dogs, but it's essential to consider that many other breeds have similarly violent origins. However, fear and misconceptions persist, leading some to believe that pit bulls are more likely to bite people based on various studies. One such study, titled "Mortality, Mauling, and Maiming by Vicious Dogs," found that pit bulls were the most common breed to bite people in a trauma center in Texas. The study's conclusion suggested regulating pit bulls like wild animals. However, it's crucial to note that correlation does not imply causation, and more research is needed to understand the complexities of dog behavior and aggression. Ultimately, it's essential to recognize that each dog is an individual and should be evaluated based on its unique characteristics and upbringing.

    • Studies on pit bull aggression have inconsistent methodologies and lack reliable dataA new study aims to accurately track pit bull adoptions and monitor their behavior post-adoption to provide more precise and reliable data on their aggression.

      The reliability of studies on dog breeds and aggression, specifically those focusing on pit bulls, is questionable due to inconsistent methodologies and lack of proper denominators. The American Veterinary Medical Association has criticized these studies for not providing accurate pictures of dogs that bite. Anna McNeil, a researcher, recognized this gap and initiated a study with the University of British Columbia and the British Columbia SPCA to track the outcomes of pit bull adoptions. The study aimed to categorize dogs correctly and monitor their behavior post-adoption, providing more precise and reliable data.

    • Study on shelter dogs shows pit bulls less likely to be returned for aggressionOne small study found pit bulls less likely to be returned for aggression, but larger studies suggest smaller breeds, like chihuahuas, are more aggressive on average. All breeds have varying tendencies towards aggression.

      A study focusing on 80 dogs in a shelter found that only one pit bull was returned for aggression, while 10 non-pit bulls were returned for the same reason. This suggests that pit bulls are less likely to be returned for aggression by their owners. However, it's important to note that this study was small and there are larger studies indicating that smaller breeds, such as chihuahuas, are more likely to be aggressive towards people, on average. Researcher Isaias Zapata's study with 60,000-70,000 dog owner participants supports this finding. While the debate around pit bulls' aggression continues, it's essential to consider that all breeds have varying tendencies towards aggression, and size is a significant factor.

    • No 'aggression gene' for pit bulls, but they can cause more damage due to strengthDespite no evidence of an 'aggression gene' for pit bulls, they may cause more harm due to their strength and size when they bite. Factors like genetics, environment, and experiences influence aggression in all breeds, including pit bulls. Proper ownership, training, and socialization are key to reducing potential aggression.

      While certain breeds like Chihuahuas and Dachshunds may have a higher likelihood of aggression due to their genes, there is currently no evidence to suggest that pit bulls have an aggression gene that sets them apart from other breeds. However, when pit bulls do bite, they may cause more damage due to their strength and size. It's important to remember that aggression in dogs can be influenced by various factors, including genetics, environment, and individual experiences. Therefore, it's essential to consider the complex interplay of these factors when assessing the behavior of any breed, including pit bulls. Additionally, it's crucial to remember that responsible ownership, proper training, and socialization can help mitigate potential aggression in all breeds, including pit bulls.

    • Myth of Pit Bull's Stronger Bite DebunkedStudy shows pit bull bite force is comparable to other breeds, debunking common misconception

      Contrary to popular belief, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that pit bulls have stronger or nastier bites than other breeds. This misconception is often perpetuated by sensationalized news reports of pit bull attacks. To debunk this myth, researchers like Anthony Harrell have measured the bite forces of various species, including dogs, and found that a pit bull's bite force falls within the normal range for its size and build. Harrell and his team dissected 47 dog cadavers and measured their jaw muscles and skull shapes to predict bite force. They also measured the bite force of live dogs trained to bite on command. The study found that a pit bull's bite force is comparable to that of other breeds, such as the Rottweiler and the German Shepherd. The idea that pit bulls have an unusually strong or dangerous bite is a common fear, but it's not based on factual evidence.

    • Dog bite force depends on size and head shapeSize and head shape determine a dog's bite force, but aggression is a separate trait, and misconceptions about pit bulls' bite holding ability are unfounded.

      The strength of a dog's bite depends on its size and head shape. Smaller dogs generally have weaker bites, while larger breeds with wide, bulky heads have stronger ones. For instance, pit bulls, rottweilers, and mastiffs were found to have some of the strongest bites due to their large heads providing ample space for powerful jaw muscles. However, it's essential to note that a dog's bite force and aggression are separate traits. The misconception that pit bulls can hold on to their victims longer than other dogs lacks scientific backing. Instead, the root cause of dog bites lies primarily with the owners, not the breeds themselves.

    • Dog behavior influenced by owners and environmentIsolated dogs and miscommunication can lead to dog bites. Understanding dog behavior and teaching proper interaction can prevent attacks.

      The behavior of dogs is heavily influenced by their owners and environment, rather than their breed. A study found that over 76% of dogs involved in fatal attacks were kept isolated from regular human interaction. Miscommunication between humans and dogs can also lead to biting incidents. Experts suggest that recognizing and understanding dog behavior can prevent many attacks. Dogs may give warning signs such as hard stares, growls, or showing teeth before biting. Teaching kids and adults alike how to behave around dogs, including not running away or staring directly at them, can help prevent bites. While any dog has the potential to bite, proper socialization and understanding of dog behavior can significantly reduce the risk.

    • Understanding and addressing potential warning signs in pit bull relationshipsObserving and responding promptly to any signs of threat or aggression in pit bull relationships is crucial for safety and harmony.

      Key takeaway from this episode of Science Versus is the importance of understanding and addressing potential warning signs in relationships, especially those involving pit bulls. Meryl Horne, the episode's lead researcher, emphasized the need to observe and respond promptly to any signs of threat or aggression. This episode featured a whopping 80 citations, which can be found in the show notes. Next week, Science Versus will explore the topic of ketamine as a potential treatment for depression. The team is investigating whether this drug, often referred to as a "magical new drug," is legitimate and effective. The podcast is produced by Meryl Horne, Wendy Zuckerman, Ari Netovich, Joel Werner, Rose Rimmler, and Michelle Dang. It is edited by Blige Tyrell, and fact-checked by Diane Kelly. A special thanks to all the researchers and individuals who shared their stories about pit bulls for this episode. Science Versus is a Spotify original podcast and a Gimlet production. To receive notifications for new episodes, listeners can press the bell icon on Spotify.

    Recent Episodes from Science Vs

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?
    We’re hearing stories of people having amazing, cosmic orgasms. So what buttons are they pressing to do this?? Well, it's just one. The “male G spot,” also called the “P spot,” because that P stands for prostate. Word on the street is that if you touch your prostate in just the right way — BAM — one helluva orgasm. But is that really true? And if you don't have a prostate (ahem, me): are you stuck with your garden variety orgasms? To get to the bottom of this, Science Vs surveyed almost 16,000 people about anal sex and masturbation! We also speak with Dr Dan Dickstein, Dr Tom Gaither and Neuroscientist Dr Nan Wise. Have an idea for a Science Vs episode? Let us know! On Instagram we're Science_Vs, Wendy's Tiktok is @wendyzukerman and our email is sciencevs@gimletmedia.com Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMind-BlowingOrgasms In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Absolutely cosmic orgasms (04:47) Anal sex is big right now (08:52) What makes the prostate special (12:02) The hole story. The butthole story. (20:19) How to get a cosmic orgasm (29:19) Tips and tricks for great anal sex (34:54) The real G spot This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. A huge thank you to Sam Levang for her help analyzing our data. And Professor Caroline Pukall and Dan Dickstein for your help with our survey questions. Thanks to the researchers we spoke to including Dr Devon Hensel. Thanks to Jack Weinstein, Hunter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 20, 2024

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?
    Protein influencers are big right now, telling us that we're probably missing out on the protein we need — and giving us a bunch of hacks for getting it. Why? They say that eating extra protein helps us build muscle, feel full, and lose weight. So is that true? We talk to kinesiology professor Stuart Phillips and nutrition professor Faidon Magkos.  Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsPROTEIN In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Protein is all the rage right now (02:53) Why protein matters (05:32) How much protein is enough? (11:33) Do you need more protein if you’re working out? (15:06) Is it risky to eat a LOT of protein? (18:46) Should you pound protein right after a workout? (23:09) Protein and weight loss This episode was produced by Rose Rimler and Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Prof. Brad Schoenfeld and Dr. Nicholas Burd. And special thanks to the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 13, 2024

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot
    Today we’re presenting Trillion Dollar Shot, a new series that explores the business story behind the rise of Ozempic and other blockbuster drugs being used for weight loss. The first episode focuses on the Novo Nordisk scientist who invented the compound that paved the way for Ozempic. You can find every episode on The Journal’s show feed. Trillion Dollar Shot is part of The Journal, which is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. This episode was hosted by Jessica Mendoza, with Bradley Olson. It was produced by Matt Kwong, with help from Jeevika Verma. Additional production from Adrienne Murray Nielsen. The series is edited by Katherine Brewer. Sound design and mixing by Peter Leonard. Mixing for Science Vs by Bobby Lord. Music in this episode by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Theme music by So Wylie, remixed for this series by Peter Leonard. Special thanks to Maria Byrne, Stefanie Ilgenfritz, Kate Linebaugh, Peter Loftus, Sara O’Brien, Enrique Perez De La Rosa, Sarah Platt, Sune Rasumssen, Jonathan Sanders, Nathan Singhapok, Leying Tang, Rolfe Winkler, Liz Essley Whyte, and Tatiana Zamis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 11, 2024

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?
    Health care for trans kids has been in the spotlight, with battles over what the science says and tons of U.S. states restricting the care that children can get. And then there’s a new report out of the UK, called the Cass Review, saying that a bunch of the evidence that doctors have been relying on to treat trans kids is “remarkably weak.” So what’s going on here? What is the best health care for trans kids? We sort through the science with Professor Stephen Russell, Dr. Cal Horton, and Dr. Ada Cheung. UPDATE 6/6/24: In a previous version of this episode, we said a study was published this year, when it was actually published last year. The episode has been updated. Mental health resources, including suicide lifelines, for around the world: spotify.com/resources Trans Lifeline: A Trans peer support hotline: 1-877-565-8860 Trevor Project: crisis support services to LGBTQ young people: Call 1-866-488-7386 or Text ‘START’ to 678-678 Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsTransKidsCassReviewTranscript  Here are links to our previous episodes about the science of being transgender and misinformation about care for trans kids. In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over care for trans kids (02:45) What to do when a kid wants to change their name and pronouns (13:44) Do puberty blockers help trans kids’ mental health? (20:44) Does hormone therapy help trans people’s mental health? (25:25) How often are people "retransitioning"? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang and Rose Rimler. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Consulting by Rebecca Kling. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Blake Cavve, Dr. Doug VanderLaan, and Dr. Quinnehtukqut McLamore. And a very special thanks to the trans folks and their families we talked to, Christopher Suter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 06, 2024

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup
    More than 150 years ago, just before dino-mania struck, New York City was supposed to get a majestic dinosaur museum full of amazing models of dinos. There would have been nothing like it in the world. Until a bunch of thugs showed up with sledgehammers and smashed every bit of the models to smithereens — and buried it all in Central Park. Today we’re finding out what happened — and WHY. We speak with doctoral researcher Vicky Coules and paleontologist Carl Mehling. SURVEY!! HELP US SCIENCE!! WE NEED YOUR HELP TO UNCOVER THE LAST MYSTERIES OF SEX https://bit.ly/ScienceVsSurvey Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheGreatDinosaurSmashup In this episode, we cover: (00:00) ​​The amazing dino museum we didn’t get to have (03:15) What we knew about dinos in the 1800s (04:57) The famous Crystal Palace dinosaurs (06:48) The plan for the Paleozoic Museum is born (10:40) The Great Dinosaur Smashup of 1871 (12:52) Suspect No. 1: Boss Tweed (17:58) Vicky cracks the case! (26:17) One final mystery — where are the dino pieces?? This episode was produced by Blythe Terrell with help from Wendy Zukerman, R.E. Natowicz, Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler and Joel Werner. Editing by Wendy Zukerman. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to everyone we spoke to about this episode, including Gowan Dawson, Robert Peck, Wendy Anthony and Jessica M. Lydon. Also thanks to Jack Weinstein, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 30, 2024

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?
    The Abortion Pill is now the most common way to have an abortion in the US. Yet what exactly happens when you take these pills is shrouded in mystery. Even many doctors don't know how well they work! Today, we're letting the sun shine on the abortion pill. We'll walk you through what happens when you take these pills: what they do to your body, and how safe are they for your physical and mental health? To explore all this - and more - we speak to Dr Sara Whitburn, Professor Oskari Heikinheimo, and Professor Ushma Upadhyay. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheAbortionPiill The Abortion Project's Instagram @theabortionproject Science Vs's Instagram @science_vs If you want to talk to someone - there's some great resources in here: spotify.com/resources In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over the abortion pill  (04:28) How does the abortion pill work?  (09:05) How it feels to take the abortion pill (14:34) How often do people hemorrhage? (21:22) What's "normal" bleeding?  (24:11) Does taking the abortion pill affect your mental health?  (32:02) Why some people prefer the abortion pill This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr. Tiffany Green, Dr. Ned Calonge, Professor Jenny Higgins, Dr. Daniel Aaron, Dr. Beverly Winikoff, and Dr. Abigail Aiken. Also thanks to Lauren Silverman, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 23, 2024

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?
    With the powers of the James Webb Space Telescope, scientists discovered some super weird things in the early Universe, and it's making some nerds question our theory of everything.  This story comes to us from our friends at Unexplainable at Vox Media. Find Unexplainable’s transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsUnexplainable In this episode, we cover: (0:00) Liftoff (01:10) The James Webb Space Telescope  (04:57) Party of the early universe  (08:39) Mysteries of the early galaxies  (15:23) How do we figure it out? This episode was produced by Brian Resnick, with help from Noam Hassenfeld and Meradith Hoddinott, who also manages the Unexplainable team. Editing from Jorge Just, music from Noam, and mixing and sound design from Cristian Ayala. Fact checking from Kelsey Lannin. Mandy Nguyen is searching for new forms of life. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 16, 2024

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky
    Getting your heart broken sucks — and for some of us, it even feels physically painful. So why does it hurt so bad? And what can science tell us about how to get over it? We dive into all of this with neuroscientist Prof. Lucy Brown.  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsHeartbreak In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Heartbreak sucks (07:17) What heartbreak does in the brain (12:14) What heartbreak does in the body (15:07) How to get over heartbreak  The episode does mention abuse. Here are some resources if you’re struggling to move on from abuse:  https://resources.byspotify.com/ https://www.loveisrespect.org/resources/why-am-i-struggling-to-move-on-after-abuse/ This episode was produced by Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler, Meryl Horn, Kaitlyn Sawrey and Lexi Krupp. Editing by Caitlin Kenney and Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly and Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, and Bobby Lord. A huge thanks to all the scientists we got in touch with for this episode, including Professor Larry Young, Professor Tiffany Field, Professor Ethan Kross, Professor Sandra Langeslag, and Professor Naomi Eisenberger. Thanks to Lori Segal. A special thanks to the Zukerman family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes
    Comedian Tig Notaro, who just released her fifth comedy special, "Hello Again," joins us for a chat about the science of her comedy: telling us how she builds jokes, and of course sharing a bunch of dumb and fabulous jokes. Enjoy!  Here's our Funniest Joke in the World Episode!!  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTigNotaro In this episode, we cover: (00:00) We're interviewing Tig!  (01:22) I could be a comedian?  (02:47) How Tig creates a joke  (08:59) The element of surprise (12:27) The world's funniest joke? (13:55) Tig's favorite jokes This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Funniest Joke in the World

    The Funniest Joke in the World
    If you Google "The Funniest Joke in the World," you'll be very disappointed. The internet might serve you something like, "What has many keys but can't open a single lock??” (Answer: A piano). Screw that. That's not funny. Enter Science Vs. We’re going on a romp to find out once and for all: What is the funniest joke in the world. According to science. And for this quest we've interviewed a bunch of amazing comics including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Dr Jason Leong, Loni Love, as well as special guest Latif Nasser of Radiolab and, of course, some scientists: Neuroscientist Professor Sophie Scott and Psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman. Which Joke Will Win???    Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsFunniestJoke In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The Quest Begins (08:40) Why laughing matters (13:13) The scientific search for the world's funniest joke (17:40) Woof, quack or moo? (21:33) The comedy K (26:30) Do different cultures have different senses of humour? (28:27) The winner! (32:15) Scientific theories of humour (lol) (38:28) Why the winning joke isn't funny (40:26) How do you stop a dog from humping your leg?  (44:43) Meet the comedy gods This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Joel Werner, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Sarah Baum. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr Andrew Farkas, Professor Penny MacDonald, Dr Maggie Prenger and a huge thank you to Professor Chris Westbury for sharing your amazing spreadsheet!! Thanks to all the comedians we interviewed in this episode including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Loni Love, Takashi Wakasugi, Urooj Ashfaq, Dr Jason Leong, Penny Greenhalgh and Mohammed Magdi. Another big thanks to Lindsay Farber, Roland Campos, Lauren LoGiudice, Andrea Jones-Rooy and the other comics at The Joke Lab; and all the comics that we spoke to and couldn't fit into the episode, we really really appreciate you and your time! Thanks to Ben Milam, the Melbourne International Comedy Festival, Stupid Old Studios, Paige Ransbury, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Turning the Ship

    Turning the Ship
    When your home seems as chaotic and unruly as the open seas it may be time to turn your ship around. But be forewarned it will take effort and commitment for any major course correction! In this episode, Mary shares an intimate look at an actual mentoring dialog with a weary and desperate mom willing to humbly hear, heed, and work. Her family's story is one of an amazing transformation which will encourage and inspire you to make your own course correction.