Logo

    Punisher (Symbols)

    enMarch 02, 2021
    What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
    Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
    Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
    Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
    Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
    Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?

    About this Episode

    THE PUNISHER, is a comic book character who is an ex-military, badass vigilante. He is all dark and broody, and smashy and gunsy.

    In 2019 the Punisher death’s head skull logo became conflated with the police movement ‘blue lives matter’ and ‘the thin blue line.’ What we want to do, is not only recognize where this comes from, but how it works in our society, despite it’s myriad contradictions.

    PART I:
    becoming the punisher

    Did you know that baby birds, shortly after their eyes open, instinctually know the shape of a predator bird’s silhouette? They are born with this knowledge. When a non-predator flies over, they just keep on chirping and pooping, but the second a predator’s silhouette comes into view they shut up and scrunch down. This is called the Hawk/Goose effect.

    Now, police, once wearing brown or light blue, have almost uniformly shifted to black. Pair this up with bulky body armor, sunglasses to prevent reading the eyes, monosyllabic encounters, and a utility belt laden with human submission tools, and we see the shaping of a predator. 

    Here, we begin to engage with the aesthetics, the construction of symbols and a form that signals something… in this case power and violence. 

    In his comic Strip, “About Face,” Nate Powell maps out this transition of the militarized “eternal warrior” as “forever innocent,” linked to fighting for “lost causes” of the past, like Vietnam or the Confederacy. This misspent youth fighting other men’s wars means they are ultimately innocent, and used. 

    Upon returning home from an unpopular war, they bring back the military signs as “a shield against shame and trauma.” As Powell says, with the cooptation of punisher’s death head logo “power lay in its apolitical mass appeal, cool stuff to buy, while functioning to normalize a paramilitary, proto-fascist presence.” … equally, the flag is rebranded, as the “thin blue line”, now a

    “fully masculinized militarized icon, eager to make way for an authoritarian future.” 

    Nate Powell

    Stripped of symbolic color, it’s black and white redesign, remarketing, and re-branding… some might say desecration… asserts any spectrum is weakness. It now signals “allegiance” (or a higher moral code) that is aggressively above the rule-of-law.

     

    PART II:
    bureaucracy 

    Now, the real gift of a vigilante, is he gets things done with none of that fussy red-tape of bureaucratic legalization. 

    Red-tape? How does you paperwork hold up to my tactical knife? 

    Equally, people have lost their place in the system, and the future is moving beyond them and their skills. To take action, to get results, is to be USEFUL. This dream of action is a dream of freedom.

    But when the bureaucracy in place is to prevent coercion and abuse by civil servants, yet the police see themselves as warriors and sheepdogs embrace the contradictory vigilante symbol… one must pause and consider the implications of this desire portrayal.

    What we see is that those promoting the punisher flag align with a morality and allegiance ‘beyond the law’ and are merely shackled by the law, not servants of it. With the darker implication being that once the shackles are removed… dissenters are in for a world of hurt.

    PART III:
    empty symbols

    This a more Baudrillard conception of the world.

    The world since modernity has exploded, or broken apart the complicated rich histories of all things. It can now travel lighter, and faster, but the means to get that speed was to remove the cumbersome baggage linking it to authentic ideals. The ‘process’ is liberated from ‘meaning,’ thus the process is a simulation without governing ideals, leaving it in a state of indeterminacy or uncertainty. 

    From this place, any meaning can be attributed, but equally (now that it is not weighed down with all that meaning and ideals that you have to reference) the symbol moves faster, dispersing outwards to proliferate, maintaining only the superficial aspect. In this simulated state Baudrillard shows that “evil” and “good” coexist, losing meaning as well without difference.

    Anything that has lost it’s idea is a man without a shadow. Disconnected from reality, and running ahead with rampant virility.

     

    So, when you see a punisher skull, with a thin-blue-line flag, with trumps hair or a MAGA hat, saying ‘blue lives matter’ all smashed into one thing on a cop car…  ~ well, the accumulation of multiple effects is actually a disappearance of causes. (similar to good and evil coexisting.)

    Through an excess of functionality, it is rebranded with a murderous vitality. Still, devoid of clear ideology, it manifests a rebellious urgency and the need for movement, progress, and affiliation… this is drawn from the most superficial levels and now manifested as the deepest motivation, an allegiant belief. 

    In short, its contradictory messages empower an anti-logic, an obstinate rejection (abreaction) of the status quo and the rules of communication. It signals, like a dark superhero, a willingness to win through pain and loss… a sacrificial dark knight tilting at windmills. 

    What does matter is it clearly bonds wide swaths of our population. The punisher+think-blue-line mash-up is the culmination of reductionist superficial appearances over functional, idea driven processes, like policy reform.

    Yet, that comes from somewhere: a failure in the system. The bricolage ethos manifest in allegiant loyalty and vigilantism expounds a moral truth “beyond the rule of law,” and it speaks of a dark desire rising and swelling. 

    Beware paramilitaries. The next step is the authoritarian state. 

    Timothy Snyder

     

    Recent Episodes from let's THiNK about it

    Art and AI

    Art and AI

    Essay, Deck and Transcript can be found at 
    https://www.letusthinkaboutit.com/step-82-art-and-ai/

    The Future of Art and AI: Promises and Perils

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has exploded onto the cultural scene, raising pressing questions about the role of technology in art and society. Artist and thinker Ryder Richards recently gave a lecture analyzing AI through a philosophical lens, exploring its potential promises and perils.

    Understanding AI Adoption

    Richards began by taking the pulse of AI adoption, finding about a quarter to a third of attendees actively using AI for creative pursuits. With hype swirling, many came curious to know more. Richards set forth to report his findings from the AI landscape.

    Weaving history, art, and philosophy, Richards traced how we arrived at this crossroads. He discussed early 20th-century visions of fusing humans and machines, driven by the worship of progress, machinery, and speed. Richards questioned assumptions of human rationality and effectiveness, asking if AI necessarily leads to worse outcomes.

    The Allure and Alienation of AI

    Richards suggested that while AI promises to democratize creativity, it may also distance us from the personal touch of craft. He demonstrated how artists employ AI to generate variations and select results. While convenient, this process mediates the human-object bond. Richards pondered if submissions lack an imprint of humanity itself.

    Reckoning with Bias

    Examining racial and gender bias in AI datasets, Richards noted the need to peer inside “black box” algorithms. He considered whether language models actually “think” creatively. While founders exude optimism, their infighting hardly inspires confidence. With AI infiltrating emotional resonance and politics, vigilance seems vital.

    The Sentient Machine?

    Richards explored speculation that glitches enable AI creativity, just as neurological differences may have sparked human innovation. He discussed AI’s potential for independent evolution, questioning our ability to discern machine consciousness. If the future remains opaque, Richards suggested artists’ role is to absorb and share cultural truths.

    Owning Our Creations

    Lawsuits against AI companies form growing resistance. But will profit motives trump ethics? How do we balance an accelerating economy with human dignity? As the lines blur between creator and creation, now is the time to ponder what kind of future we want to code.

    Kant and the rise of subjective relativism

    Kant and the rise of subjective relativism

    https://www.letusthinkaboutit.com/step-81-kant-and-the-rise-of-subjective-realism/

    Reality, belief, and the apocalypse. 0:00

    • Ryder Richards discusses the demotion of reality in favor of subjectivity, exploring the tension between science and religion, and the consequences of refusing to acknowledge the apocalypse.
    • Kant's false dichotomy between freedom and determinism is questioned, with a focus on the historical context of Thomas Hobbes and Galileo's views on a mechanical reality.

    Kant's philosophy and its impact on understanding reality. 4:10

    • Kant introduces philosophy that squares God observation conundrum.
    • Kant argues that objects in reality interfere with self-governance, leading to a moral argument that demonizes reality.

    Kant's philosophy and its implications. 8:46

    • Ryder Richards argues that our perceptions are limited to appearances and cannot account for reality, leading to the idea of a "noble realm" beyond our understanding.
    • Kant suggests that this inaccessible realm, the "nomina," contains the truth of objects beyond what we can know, but is beyond physical laws and changeable.
    • Kant argues that autonomy and free will are possible despite determinism.
    • Transcendental ideologies promise freedom and understanding but also introduce contradictions and limit rational contemplation.

    Free will and agency in Kant's philosophy. 15:43

    • Kant's philosophy on freedom vs. determinism challenged by Matthew Crawford.
    • Crawford proposes meaningful choice emerges through attentive interaction with realities, not abstract visions.

    Kant's philosophy and its impact on modern society. 19:45

    • Ryder Richards critiques Kant's moral philosophy, arguing that it leads to self-entitlement and diluted agency.
    • Ryder Richards argues that society's tendency to believe in self-important truths can lead to scapegoating and denial of implications, despite the appearance of novelty and esotericism.
    • Ryder Richards argues that Kant's philosophy led to overconfidence in transcendent visions without evidence.

     

    Transcendent Escapism

    Transcendent Escapism

    In this episode of Let's Think About It, host Ryder Richards examines the relationship between truth, reality, and abstraction. He proposes reality filters profound ideologies like religion and science, which rely on belief, from superficial falsehoods like marketing propaganda that obscure reality. Richards argues both sides undermine truth, but marketing inflames desire and bypasses reality altogether. Using quantum physics and art as examples, he shows how we use weighty abstractions to escape reality's limits. Ultimately, Richards says our tendency is to use fantasy to disregard reality, envisioning catastrophe to then deny it through rigid universal rules that validate our desires.

    https://www.letusthinkaboutit.com/step-80-transcendent-escapism/

    Richards begins by reminding us that while seeking transcendent truths, religion and science require belief, making them vulnerable to subjectivity. Next he discusses how marketing contains truth but uses it to inflame desire and promote amnesia. From here Richards explores how quantum physics appeals precisely because it hints at being free from reality's rules. He shares an anecdote about artists citing ungrasped quantum concepts as justification for unrelated work. Finally, Richards applies Slavoj Žižek's ideas about imagining catastrophe to then envision rigid orders that deny reality. Our escapist visions allow necessary blindness to humanity's failings but spawn dangerous universals.


    0:00 Truth, abstraction, and manipulation. 
    4:22 Reality, science, religion, and marketing. 
    7:57 The relationship between science, reality, and abstraction. 
    11:50 Epistemology, science, and art. 
    15:44 Escaping reality through abstraction.

    Skipping Reality

    Skipping Reality

    Ryder Richards builds on thinkers like Kant, Rorty, and Baudrillard in this podcast to argue that reality can filter problematic abstractions. He proposes reality as a net separating transcendental truths and superficial advertising. Without reality's grounding, these abstractions reinforce each other's weaknesses.

    Part 1 - Reality as a Net for Abstractions

    Richards lays out the idea of reality as a net dividing two types of abstraction. On one side is a transcendental ideology or truth claim, such as religion or science. On the other is superficial simulacra like advertising. Usually, reality forces these to grapple with concrete pragmatism. But as reality's power fades, these abstractions intertwine dangerously.

    Richards relates this to Plato's cave - the shadows are lies, but the light of the exterior, truth itself, can also be an abstraction. Modern thinkers like Rorty argued truth and reality are separate. So, going from cave to light just shifts one abstraction for another.

    Part 2 - Disneyland as an Example

    Richards uses Baudrillard's concrete example of Disneyland as an abstraction slipping into dangerous territory. Disneyland pretends to be fiction but reveals a desire for moral truth. However, this yearning abstracted into blind faith leads to fanaticism and policing "outsiders." The virtues represented become ways to enforce arbitrary hierarchies. In this case, the morality play of virtuousness, combined with fictional advertising, exemplifies Hofstader's 'hyper system," or tangled hierarchy, without referencing reality. 

    Part 3 - Lowering Abstractions' Power

    To counter abstraction's excesses, Richards offers two main methods:

    Way 1 - Communicative Rationality

    The first way is Isiah Berlin's communicative rationality - agreeing on language, intent, and logic tied to reality. This raises the "net" by grounding thought in the concrete.

    Way 2 - Meditation

    The second way is meditation, recognizing our physical body to quiet constant abstraction. This reduces reactivity and teaches us to filter manipulations.

    Conclusion

    In sum, abstraction untethered from reality breeds instability and vulnerability to facile beliefs. Reality anchors us against these excesses. In future episodes, Richards will continue exploring pragmatism, AI, and the limits of language.

    The Parallax View

    The Parallax View

    https://www.letusthinkaboutit.com/step-78-the-parallax-view/

    Ryder discusses the concept of Slavoj Zizek's "The Parallax View" in three parts.

    Part 1: Ryder defines the parallax view as the convergence of seemingly parallel perspectives. He draws a connection to optical illusions of perspective and discusses how the parallax view involves looking beyond the central focus point. The author also touches on its use in astronomy.

    Part 2: Ryder discusses Slavoj Žižek's use of the parallax view in his book and how it reconsiders the traditional Hegelian dialectic of synthesis or sublation. He explains how Žižek's approach doesn't seek to overcome oppositional positions but acknowledges their inherent contradictions as perspectival points. (This involves Lacan, Freud, Marxism, and Levi-Strauss's sociology, and more.)

    Part 3: Ryder provides two examples of how the real-life parallax view works. First, he discusses faith and love as a parallax, emphasizing the need to change one's position to understand faith truly. Second, he references a scene from the movie "Guardians of the Galaxy" to illustrate how understanding can shift over time, emphasizing the importance of changing perspectives. He also shares the paralysis that multiple positions can invoke.

    Perspective Framing

    Perspective Framing

    Welcome to the problematic realm of perspective framing. Ryder Richards will be your dubious guide through this profound exploration of self-awareness and understanding. Central to our journey is the parallax view, a powerful method of finding our place in the world by establishing reference points by Slavoj Zizek. But first, we must challenge hegemonic narratives and reconsider Hegel’s notion of negation, as breaking free from (or subsuming and overcoming) conventional beliefs allows us to envision new possibilities.

    As we progress, we’ll examine how psychology analysis, meditation, and Buddhism provide tools to reshape our perspectives and alleviate societal discontent. Psychoanalysis will offer unique insights into the human psyche, highlighting the potential for multiple points of fixation as normalcy which creates markers to allow a fixed identity.

    Moreover, we’ll consider all of these topics related to the “desiring self” and its role in identity. Most pointedly, we will look at Christianity’s perspective on sin related to desire, and how desire is necessary to align with God.

    Stay tuned for the next post, where we will dive deep into the intricacies of the Parallax View, a possibly revolutionary approach to subjective positioning that allows understanding without always negating the negation, as deconstrcutionism does.

     

    0:00 Introduction of the parallax view.

    • Introducing ryder richards and the concept of the parallax view, which is a means to find a position by establishing points of reference.
    • The next episode is all about the next episode.

    2:19 Breaking the power of hegemonic narratives.

    • Post structuralist or deconstructionist. All of their arguments today can arguably be post-structuralist or post-deconstructionist, where brains are trained to be creatively destructive.
    • Hegel's notion of negation, the ability to negate impact or power of something.

    4:28 We must retain the positions we've just cancelled.

    • Hegel makes his point that cancellation preserves the positions that were just cancelled, but that there is a need for a visual goal to position ourselves in society.
    • Hegel argues that every cancellation is a new position, so every cancellation adds more gravel to the pile.

    6:44 Why we need to break traditional beliefs.

    • How modernist thinkers broke traditional beliefs to avoid the totalitarian narrative and nationalistic mindset that was sweeping through Europe 100 years ago.
    • Two dispositions in the rubble of the rubble.

    8:47 How to choose a new perspective.

    • Society is more unhappy, anxious and despairing than it was in the past, according to the studies.
    • Psychology analysis and therapy are tools for relief from the society that we live in and what we feel we deserve, and help pull us out of instant reactions

    11:23 Psychoanalysis is more about sizing the psychotic subject than the ego.

    • Zizek, Lacanian psychoanalysis is more about hysteria sizing the psychotic subject. To be non-psychotic is either to have multiple points of fixation or never know exactly who you are.
    • Buddhism and meditation.

    13:41 How to become an individual subject without ego.

    • CBT therapy and meditation help reframe how you fit into the world and how you see your position in the world. It allows you to prioritize your desires differently.
    • Buddhism is ridding yourself of attempting to desire anything at all.

    16:18 To sin is to miss the mark.

    • To sin is to position yourself further away from god, to miss the mark, and to be aligned with god to grow near the object of desire.
    • Christianity uses desire rather than negates it.

    18:44 Reframing the problem into parallax.

    • Walking us through the conundrum of the desiring self and the methods of reframing it and positioning in it.
    • Instead of the negation that is a deconstructivist rubble that has created an apocalyptic landscape, there might actually be a solution that is apparent here.

    Concrete Universal (trash and art)

    Concrete Universal (trash and art)

    🗑️ Garbage represents the concrete universal of waste.

    🎨 Picasso's art exemplifies the concrete universal through different periods and works.

    🌌 Failures and contradictions can lead to transcendence.

    🎭 Art expresses both expression and concealment simultaneously.

    🔀 Concrete universalism combines the concrete and the abstract into one concept.

    💡 The concept of concrete universalism challenges fixed definitions and highlights the dynamic nature of objects, people, and ideas.

    🔄 The concrete universal constantly expands, while the defining object fails to fully capture its totality.

     

    ---- TIMING/CHAPTERS----

    0:00 Welcome back to the show.

    • Fiction is bleeding into reality and confusing.

    1:34 Relating to god through the son.

    • How god was impossible to relate to.
    • Concrete universalism and the food processor.

    2:53 How can something be concrete but applicable to everything?

    • Concrete universalism vs abstract universalism.
    • Kantian antinomies or even Hegelian antagonisms.

    5:04 The apex of the movement is the definition.

    • Overcoming the other side, overcoming their limits.
    • The movement has an extreme peak, which defines it.

    7:20 A new more robust form of universalism.

    • New universalism founded on a very real thing, trash.
    • Example of concrete universalism, garbage.

    9:02 Definition of the concrete universal.

    • The concrete universal and the black sack of trash.
    • How to use the concrete universal.

    10:53 The central problem of art.

    • The central problem of art, referencing Picasso.
    • How art expresses the inability to clearly express.

    12:33 The antagonisms in Guernica.

    • Back to the concrete universal in the case of Pablo Picasso.
    • The antagonisms in Guernica.

    14:18 The problem with the object definition of the universal.

    • Deification of objects, people and ideas.
    • The parallax gap.

    holy to holy s***

    holy to holy s***

    Christianity operates through a lack: we cannot know God, so a “gap” must be filled between God and Humans. Christ is God splitting from 1 into 2, allowing us to identify and get closer to the mystery of God, but in so doing, Christ was subjected to the filth of this world. (Zizek) 

    The reversal of the one God splitting into two (only to mysteriously re-unify us) is the process of poop: taking all values and reducing them into one homogenous, non-mysterious pile. (Bataille) 

    Growth can occur from this filth (otherwise known as manure), producing roses. Beauty from secular waste, rather than an excessive effort towards mysteries that only slip away as you approach them. (Hegel) 

    {{This is a continuation of Step 74: Symbolic Victory}} 

    https://www.letusthinkaboutit.com/step-75-holy-to-holy-s/

    ---

    0:00 Introduction to this episode.

    • Introduction to the episode.
    • How symbols create a mystery which drives us.

    1:16 Limitations of the self and the symbolic unknowable.

    • The gap between being human and achieving the transcendental.
    • The symbolic unknowable and god's sacrifice.

    3:41 How we identify with the filth and alienation. 3:41

    • God forces himself to become a fragment of himself.
    • The shape of conflict.

    5:30 The fragmentation of the monolith.

    • Division creates a distance in the one god.
    • The holy nature of shit.

    7:30 Moving the sacred to the secular.

    • Moving the sacred to the secular in pop culture.
    • Non-mysterious, non-motivation unification.

    9:39 Solving the mystery leads to more mysteries.

    • The attempt to resolve the mystery is the point of failure.
    • Mimetic desire, scapegoating and sacrifice.

    12:16 How mimetic desire works.

    • Mimetic desire and the hedonic treadmill.
    • The steam valve of society is sanctioned murder.

    13:41 Moving from the real to the symbolic.

    • Moving from the real to the symbolic for stability.
    • The egyptians and their claims to permanence.

    15:29 We shun the real shit and believe bullshit.

    • We shun the real shit and believe the bullshit.
    • The beauty of the poop pile.

    Symbolic Victory

    Symbolic Victory

    0:00 The contradictory injunction of double binds.

    • The contradictory injunction in double binds.

    • The binary trap in cyberpunk.

     

    2:15 The death drive of determinism.

    • The death drive of determinism.

    • How to transcend the binary.

     

    4:44 How the capitalist system capitalizes on our stress.

    • The capitalist system surprisingly capitalizes on stress.

    • The anxious revolt is fuel for the bureaucratic nightmare.

     

    6:33 Intro to the show.

    • America and political symbolic winning, and camouflage.

    • The wild west of America.

     

    8:55 Virtue signaling to win elections.

    • Virtue-signaling to win elections.

     

    10:58 Trump's anointed tool.

    • Trump as an anointed tool of the Christian right.

    • Winning dignity is absurd.

     

    12:54 How symbolic acts can function in reality.

    • How the symbolic act can function in reality.

    • Culture of honor, reputational honor.

     

    14:30 Protecting your reputation through overreaction.

    • Protection through overreaction

    • The reversal of the reversal.

     

    16:10 You become what you fight you become.

    • The unseen aspect of antagonistic opposition in step 65.

    • Respect for native americans over time.

     

    17:47 How we grasp and use models.

    • Mimetic desire to dissimulate thoughts into the real.

    • Symbolism as a faulty translation.

    • Symbols can become an affectation.

    • The danger of the symbol that is mistaken

    Camouflage (sex and trust)

    Camouflage (sex and trust)

    0:01 Why camouflage is like a rhizome.

    • The complexity of camouflage and abstraction.
    • Why camouflage is a better survival strategy.

    2:44 The servant as master.

    • How to become low like water and remain powerful.
    • Master as servant - martyr. 

    5:16 The boss who tries to also be your best friend.

    • The parent who guilts you. 
    • Undermined core self: camouflage needed for shame concealment. 

    6:56 The ubiquity of repetition and mass media.

    • The ubiquity of marilyn monroe as a sex symbol. (Andy Warhol)
    • Society normalization disperses desire: at once object and landscape. 

    9:18 Desire has become decentralized and dispersed

    • Mimetic desire has become decentralized and mimetically dispersed. 
    • The role of libido in camouflaging.

    12:13 The decentralization of the self.

    • Camouflage through subject, context, confusion or dispersal at scale.
    • Decentralization of self: the self or desire as a rhizome.

    14:45 Disguise is the facade that shelters the self, but also enables psychopathic killers. 

    • The digital world lacks trust, artificial intelligence, and the travails of insecurity.
    • Crowdsourcing wikipedia is a battleground.

    16:57 We no longer trust the image.

    • The attention economy and the loss of trust.
    • The destabilization of America, 

    19:28 Do you still have the power to focus or just act?

    • Focus is the only thing that can determine who we are.
    • Hunker down and live dangerously. 
    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io