Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Roald Dahl's Books Undergo Updates: Necessary or Censorship?Roald Dahl's classic children's books are being updated with changes to language and character descriptions, sparking debate over necessary sensitivity vs preserving original intent and artistic expression.

      Roald Dahl's classic children's books are undergoing updates by their publishers, Puffin. These changes, which include altering the language used to describe certain characters, have sparked debate over whether they are necessary or an instance of censorship. The Guardian reported on this topic, revealing that hundreds of small changes have been made in the 2022 editions compared to earlier ones. While Puffin defends these updates as routine, some readers have strong opinions about them. The publisher has since announced plans to release unaltered versions of the books in a new collection. The ongoing conversation highlights the importance of balancing the need for sensitivity and representation with preserving the original intent and artistic expression in literature.

    • Roald Dahl's Controversial Edits: Updating Language for Younger ReadersRoald Dahl's works undergo updates to language regarding weight, mental health, violence, gender, and race, sparking controversy. Some resist these changes, while others argue they carry the same sentiment despite being more inclusive. The decision to make these changes is made through Dahl's estate.

      Roald Dahl's works continue to spark controversy due to ongoing updates to their editions, aimed at younger readers. The changes, which include adjustments to language regarding weight, mental health, violence, gender, and race, have been met with resistance from some, including political figures. Dahl's enduring popularity can be attributed to his humor, nostalgia, and iconic illustrations, as well as the Roald Dahl Story Company's adaptations and collaborations. The significance of these changes is debatable, with some arguing they carry the same sentiment despite being more inclusive. The decision to make these changes goes through Dahl's estate, which has been managing his work since his death 32 years ago.

    • Roald Dahl's Classic Children's Literature Undergoes Changes for InclusivityPublishers hire sensitivity readers to advise on making texts more inclusive, sparking controversy over potential censorship

      In an effort to keep Roald Dahl's classic children's literature relevant, Puffin, the publisher, made content changes with the help of a sensitivity reading service called Inclusive Minds. These changes have been met with controversy, with some authors and readers expressing concern over potential censorship. Sensitivity readers are individuals with lived experiences of various minorities who advise publishers on making texts more inclusive. The decision to make these changes began before Netflix acquired the Roald Dahl story company, but commercial reasons may have also played a role. The response has been divisive, with some authors advocating for continuing to read and promote Roald Dahl's work, while others argue for moving towards more diverse contemporary authors. The use of sensitivity readers is a common practice in the publishing industry, aiming to both do the right thing and cover the publisher and author's backs from potential backlash.

    • Separating Roald Dahl's art from his antisemitic viewsRoald Dahl's antisemitic views don't negate the value of his literary contributions, but acknowledging and learning from the past is crucial.

      Roald Dahl, a renowned children's author, is a complex figure whose literary contributions should be separated from his personal antisemitic views. Dahl, who wrote beloved books like "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" and "Matilda," has been identified as an antisemite, having made statements blaming Jews for the Holocaust and expressing antisemitic sentiments. However, despite his personal beliefs, his works continue to be celebrated for their storytelling prowess. The recent changes made to his texts, such as omitting or altering certain words, are an attempt to address the prevailing attitudes towards sensitivity and inclusivity in literature. While some argue that separating the art from the artist is a valid approach, others believe that the impact of an author's words and actions cannot be ignored. It's essential to acknowledge and learn from the past while continuing to appreciate the art that has shaped our cultural landscape.

    • Balancing Authenticity and Inclusivity in Children's LiteratureRoald Dahl's use of words like 'ugly' or 'fat' in his writing was part of his comedic style, but removing them can diminish the impact of his humor. Maintaining the original intent while ensuring inclusivity is a delicate balance.

      While being sensitive to potential offenses in children's literature is important, removing the "naughtiness" and "dark joy" of an author's original writing can result in a watered-down version that feels inauthentic. Roald Dahl's use of words like "ugly" or "fat" in his writing was part of his unique comedic style, and removing them can diminish the impact of his humor. However, it's crucial to acknowledge that the use of such words can be offensive when applied to children. In the case of adult characters, the use of such words can still be acceptable if the character is celebrated and not made fun of. The author in question acknowledges the complexity of this issue and believes that laughter does not always mean mockery. It's a delicate balance to maintain the original intent of the author while ensuring that the literature is inclusive and respectful to all readers.

    • The role and controversy of sensitivity readers in literatureChanges suggested by sensitivity readers in literature can be viewed as an intrusion or educational experience, with a few dominant authors under increased scrutiny. The goal is to increase diversity and offer varied experiences to readers.

      The role of sensitivity readers in literature and the controversy surrounding the changes they suggest is a complex issue. While some authors view it as an unwelcome intrusion and an attempt to sanitize their work, others find it to be an educational and positive experience. The prevalence of a few dominant authors in the children's book market, such as Roald Dahl, may contribute to the heightened scrutiny of their works posthumously. However, it's important to remember that changes to previously published works are not unheard of, and even authors like Agatha Christie and Enid Blyton have had their works altered for sensitivity reasons. Ultimately, the goal should be to increase diversity in literature and offer a wider range of experiences and viewpoints to readers.

    • Including diverse characters authenticallyAuthors should write genuine, non-stereotypical characters, preserve context, address offensive content with care, and be open to feedback for inclusive stories.

      Authors have a responsibility to include diverse characters in their stories, but they must do so with authenticity and sensitivity. The author in this discussion shares her experiences of including disabled characters in her books and the positive responses she's received. She trusts herself to write genuine characters and avoid stereotypes, but acknowledges that she may get it wrong sometimes. The context of books written in the past should be preserved, but offensive content should be addressed and changed with care. Sensitivity readers should be good writers who can maintain the style and essence of the original work while removing offensive elements. It's important for authors to be self-reflective and open to feedback, as societal attitudes and norms evolve. Ultimately, the goal is to create authentic and inclusive stories that resonate with readers of all backgrounds.

    • Facebook and Third-Party Apps: Still Concerns for User DataExperts call for more transparency and stricter regulations as concerns persist about third-party apps' access to user data on Facebook

      While there have been changes made in response to the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal, some experts believe that more transparency and stricter regulations are necessary to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future. David Bedell, a cybersecurity expert, pointed out that while Facebook has made some improvements, there are still concerns about the amount of user data that third-party apps can access. Lucy Knight, a technology journalist, has been reporting on this issue and emphasized the importance of greater transparency and accountability from tech companies. The episode was produced by Natalie Chtena and Sami Gejsoiler, with sound design by Solomon King and executive production by Hummer Khalili and Phil Maynard. For more insights on this topic and others, check out Lucy Knight's articles on theguardian.com. Stay tuned for more on The Guardian.

    Recent Episodes from Today in Focus

    Rishi Sunak staggers on – but for how long?

    Rishi Sunak staggers on – but for how long?
    The prime minister is another MP down after Natalie Elphicke crossed the floor to join Labour. With the Conservatives trailing by 30 points after heavy local election losses, what options does Rishi Sunak now have? Guardian political correspondent Kiran Stacey tells Helen Pidd what these losses mean for the PM, and looks at what calculation Keir Starmer made in taking in a rightwing Tory. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

    The London Bridge ‘hero’ who could go to prison for 99 years

    The London Bridge ‘hero’ who could go to prison for 99 years
    In 2019, ex-offender Marc Conway helped hold down a knifeman who killed two people in a terror attack. But by doing so he risked being recalled to prison. Simon Hattenstone reports Marc Conway risked his life to stop the London Bridge terror attack. Why did he fear being sent to prison for it?. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

    Related Episodes