Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Fox News' $1B Lawsuit Exposes Prioritization of Viewership Over TruthThe Fox News lawsuit reveals the network's focus on ratings led to the spread of baseless election fraud conspiracies, potentially damaging their reputation and underscoring the importance of factual reporting.

      The $1,000,000,000 lawsuit against Fox News, led by Dominion Voting Systems, has exposed the inner workings of the network and its prioritization of viewership over truth during the 2020 U.S. presidential election. This shift, which saw Fox News and its biggest stars echoing baseless conspiracy theories about election fraud, has made the network the target of a massive lawsuit and has exposed the depths of the media empire's controversies, adding to the long list of scandals Rupert Murdoch has faced throughout his 70-year career in journalism. The fallout from this scandal underscores the importance of factual reporting and the potential consequences when truth is sacrificed for ratings.

    • Murdoch's Scandal Handling Pattern and Fox News' Role in Spreading MisinformationRupert Murdoch often tries to minimize damage to himself and his media empire by handling scandals at arm's length, while Fox News spread misinformation about Dominion, a voting machine company, without fact-checking, contributing to the spread of baseless conspiracy theories during the 2020 election.

      Rupert Murdoch, known for his media empire, has a pattern of handling scandals by trying to make them go away through payments and pleading ignorance. He keeps scandals at arm's length to minimize damage to himself and his company. In the latest scandal involving the 2020 election and allegations against the voting machine company Dominion, Trump and his associates spread bizarre conspiracy theories on Fox News, which initially covered the story as news but later invited them on to present their theories without correction or challenge. These theories, which lacked evidence, suggested Dominion was owned by Venezuelans and had ties to George Soros and international conspiracies. The baseless claims gained traction despite their lack of substance, highlighting the power of misinformation and the importance of fact-checking.

    • Fear of losing viewers drives Fox News to promote election conspiracy theoriesFox News shifted its coverage during the 2020 US Presidential election due to fear of losing viewers to more right-wing networks, leading to the promotion of conspiracy theories about the stolen election.

      During the 2020 US Presidential election, Fox News underwent a significant shift in its coverage, moving from grudgingly accepting the results to promoting conspiracy theories that the election was stolen. This shift can be linked to emails revealing that Rupert Murdoch, the CEO of Fox, was concerned about losing viewers to more right-wing networks like Newsmax and OAN, and the fear of upsetting Trump and his supporters. The fear of losing viewers led to the promotion of conspiracy theories, including those pushed by Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell. This shift was revealed through emails obtained as part of a lawsuit against Fox by Dominion Voting Systems, which claimed damages due to the harm caused by the conspiracy theories. The emails provide an unprecedented look into the inner workings of Fox during a critical time for US democracy.

    • Fox News personalities' private communications reveal contrasting views on 2020 electionFox News figures privately dismissed election fraud claims while publicly promoting them, attempted to silence colleagues debunking falsehoods, and faced financial consequences for their pursuit of baseless conspiracy theories

      The private communications of top Fox News personalities, such as Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson, revealed a stark contrast between their on-air statements and their private beliefs regarding the 2020 presidential election. Despite publicly promoting conspiracy theories about election fraud and the supposedly unreliable Dominion voting systems, they expressed skepticism and even contempt for these claims in their emails. Furthermore, they attempted to silence colleagues who debunked these falsehoods and even advocated for their dismissal. This discrepancy raises serious questions about the integrity and trustworthiness of Fox News during a time of national political turmoil. Additionally, the pursuit of these baseless conspiracy theories reportedly had negative financial consequences for the company.

    • Dominion Voting Systems sues Fox News for defamationDominion Voting Systems is suing Fox News for defamation, alleging the company knowingly spread false info, but winning such lawsuits against public figures and media organizations in America is challenging due to First Amendment's protection of free speech, requiring Dominion to prove 'absolute malice' in court

      Dominion Voting Systems is suing Fox News for defamation, alleging that the company knowingly spread false information about Dominion. Dominion claims that Fox knew the information was false and yet continued to broadcast it. Defamation lawsuits against public figures and media organizations in America are extremely difficult to win due to the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech and thought. Dominion must prove "absolute malice" in court, which means proving that Fox knew the information was false or recklessly disregarded the truth. The trial, set for April 17th, is expected to last at least a month, indicating the complexity of the case. Dominion's lawsuit becomes more intriguing as evidence emerges suggesting that Fox may have admitted to knowing the information was false. Whether this evidence is enough to prove absolute malice remains to be seen.

    • Murdoch's Acknowledgement of Fox's Role in Spreading Election LiesRupert Murdoch admitted under oath that he allowed Fox News to prioritize profits over truth, enabling hosts to spread election lies, potentially weakening First Amendment protection.

      Learning from the recent deposition of Rupert Murdoch in the Dominion Voting Systems defamation case is that Murdoch acknowledged that several top Fox News hosts endorsed election denial lies and conspiracy theories about Dominion. Murdoch admitted under oath that he had the power to stop Sydney Powell and Mike Lindell from spreading these false claims on his network but chose not to. Furthermore, Murdoch revealed that Fox prioritizes profits over politics, allowing controversial figures like Lindell, a major advertiser, to continue spreading lies on the network. These admissions could potentially weaken Fox News' First Amendment protection and strengthen Dominion's defamation case.

    • Rupert Murdoch's Deposition in Dominion Lawsuit Reveals His Knowledge of False Election Conspiracies on Fox NewsRupert Murdoch's admission in a deposition that he was aware of false election conspiracy theories on Fox News and endorsed it by employees could lead to financial and reputational damages for the company, including potential shareholder lawsuits and cancellation of a proposed merger.

      The ongoing lawsuit between Dominion Voting Systems and Fox News has taken a significant turn with Rupert Murdoch's admission in a deposition that he was aware of the spread of false election conspiracy theories on Fox News, and that his employees endorsed it. This admission raises the stakes for Fox News, as it brings the scandal closer to Murdoch's personal office, potentially leading to more severe consequences for the company. Fox News, in its defense, argues that it had no choice but to cover the election denial theories due to Trump being the sitting president and the hosts being commentators, not news journalists. Legal experts are divided on Dominion's chances of winning the case, but some believe that Murdoch's admission could lead to financial and reputational damages for Fox News, including potential shareholder lawsuits and a cancellation of a proposed merger between News Corp and Fox Corp. The damages Dominion is seeking are $1.6 billion, and it remains to be seen if the actual damages could extend that far if Fox loses.

    • Fox News' $1.6 billion potential damages vs. $14 billion annual revenueFox News faces significant damages but its large revenue could help mitigate the impact. However, potential punitive damages and loss of viewer trust pose additional risks.

      Despite the $1.6 billion potential damages Fox News might face in the Dominion lawsuit, the company's enormous annual revenue of $14 billion could help them weather the storm. However, the prospect of punitive damages and the loss of viewer trust due to perceived capitulation to "woke" lawyers could pose additional risks. Trump's ongoing presidential campaign and Fox's delicate balance between satisfying their pro-Trump audience and avoiding controversy are also significant factors. The case continues to unfold, raising questions about truth, media responsibility, and the lengths powerful media figures will go to protect their businesses.

    • Dominion vs. Fox legal battle continues during summary judgment phaseBoth parties are engaging in intense legal battles during the summary judgment phase of the Dominion vs. Fox defamation case, with Fox trying to dismiss the jury trial and Dominion insisting on it. The outcome remains uncertain, and a settlement could be possible before the trial.

      The ongoing Dominion vs. Fox defamation case is far from over, with both parties engaging in intense legal battles during the summary judgment phase. Fox is attempting to have the jury trial dismissed and have the judge decide the matter, while Dominion insists on a jury trial due to the strength of their defamation case. The case has produced a flood of documents, emails, and depositions as evidence. While some believe Rupert Murdoch, the Fox Corporation head, may opt for a settlement to avoid a potential multi-billion-dollar payout, others suggest he might be making an uncharacteristic decision to fight the case to protect his Fox empire's legacy. Ultimately, the outcome remains uncertain, and we'll have to wait and see if a settlement is reached before the trial.

    Recent Episodes from Today in Focus

    Rishi Sunak staggers on – but for how long?

    Rishi Sunak staggers on – but for how long?
    The prime minister is another MP down after Natalie Elphicke crossed the floor to join Labour. With the Conservatives trailing by 30 points after heavy local election losses, what options does Rishi Sunak now have? Guardian political correspondent Kiran Stacey tells Helen Pidd what these losses mean for the PM, and looks at what calculation Keir Starmer made in taking in a rightwing Tory. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

    The London Bridge ‘hero’ who could go to prison for 99 years

    The London Bridge ‘hero’ who could go to prison for 99 years
    In 2019, ex-offender Marc Conway helped hold down a knifeman who killed two people in a terror attack. But by doing so he risked being recalled to prison. Simon Hattenstone reports Marc Conway risked his life to stop the London Bridge terror attack. Why did he fear being sent to prison for it?. Help support our independent journalism at theguardian.com/infocus

    Related Episodes

    Is Trump back in Murdoch’s good books? Politics Weekly America

    Is Trump back in Murdoch’s good books? Politics Weekly America
    At the end of July, it was reported that Fox News and other publications owned by Rupert Murdoch were starting to abandon their extensive coverage of Donald Trump. However, after the FBI launched an unprecedented raid on his Mar-a-Lago home as part of an investigation into Trump’s potentially unlawful removal of White House records when he left office, the former president was back to getting some favourable coverage, at least on Fox News. This week, Joan E Greve speaks to former Republican congressional communications director Tara Setmayer about how in the long term, this ongoing scandal could be beneficial to Trump

    How should the media cover sexual predator Trump?

    How should the media cover sexual predator Trump?
    On Tuesday, a jury in New York found that the former president Donald Trump sexually abused magazine writer E Jean Carroll in the 1990s and then defamed her by branding her a liar. On Wednesday, Trump made the same baseless claims about Carroll that led to him losing the case – this time, live on CNN to millions of viewers. This week, Jonathan Freedland talks to Guardian US columnist Margaret Sullivan about the fallout from the E Jean Carroll case. The pair discuss how the media should cover a 2024 presidential candidate who has been impeached twice, indicted by a federal court, and who is now legally defined as a sexual predator

    Bill Abernathy - More Than Meets The Eye - New Single