Foley’s List is pleased to present the 2022 Family Law Breakfast Seminar in podcast form. This episode will take you through questions and answers about a post-covid hypothetical fact scenario. The topics covered are: contraventions, valuations and adversarial experts, gifts and the assessment of contributions.
We appreciate the special appearance of Justice Hartnett of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia in asking the questions in this Q & A. Presenting the answers are Foley’s List Barristers: Vanessa Bacchetti, Amrita Malik, Bronia Tulloch, Laurence Fudim, Harriet Geddes and Alex Finemore.
These presenters have also written detailed papers about the topics upon which they have been asked questions. The hypothetic fact scenario and each of the papers can be found on the CPD resources page of Foley’s website.
This is a recording of Session 3 of the Foley's February Criminal Law CPD Series of 2024. In this episode, Foley’s List barristers Michael Stanton and Julia Kretzenbacher explores what exactly Section 137: Exclusion of prejudicial evidence in criminal proceedings means and how it has been applied in the Courts, with an in-depth look at IMM v the Queen 2016.
This is a recording of session 2 of the Foley’s February Criminal Law CPD Series of 2024. In this episode, Sharon Lacy S.C. and Hetty de Crespigny touch on the law, the science and the philosophy behind doli incapax, then discusses the preparation and forensic decision making in doli incapax cases.
This is a recording of Session 1 of the Foley's February Criminal Law CPD Series of 2024. In this episode, Daniel Gurvich KC, Tristan Joseph and Leigh Crosbie discuss responding to Notices to Produce, Obligations of Disclosure, and contrast Continuing and Non-Continuing Offences.
In this episode of Think Foley's, barristers Phillip Bloemen, Tim McCulloch and Kaitlyn Foote shares practical tips, tricks and advice on how a junior practitioner can step into preparing and running contested hearings - specifically for matters that run for less than a day, and focus on a confined legal or evidentiary issue.
Her Honour Magistrate Burnside joins the barristers in sharing a Magistrates' perspective on what should - and shouldn't - occur during contested hearings.
In this episode, Campbell Hangay explores the causational concept of counterfactual hypothesis in personal injury law and how it has been applied in recent matters, including in the context of mental harm. An explanation of causation is followed by a deep-dive into cases using a counterfactual hypothesis, and the importance of expert evidence in establishing a counter factual claim in mental injury cases.
In this episode, Priscilla Blackadder examines the substantial developments in the use of generative AI and investigates the legal questions and ongoing claims surrounding the new technology, including: Do AI creations infringe on intellectual property? Are AI creations copyright protected? And who owns the content that an AI platform generates?
Paul Holdenson KC and Jack O'Connor analyse the most recent decisions in the court of appeal across nine categories. Cases of complicity, evidence of incriminating conduct and retrials are discussed, among others.
The fourth 2023 Foley's February session is presented by Ruth Champion and Natalie Simpson. This episode is covers what an abuse of process is and how courts can prevent them. Ruth and Natalie give tips on making permanent stay applications, and appeals and recent cases in the area are discussed.
[Reupload: Audio Issues Fixed]
The third 2023 Foley's February session is presented by Julie Condon KC and Bridie Kelly. This episode is concerned with second and subsequent appeals, going through the procedural history and the notable case of Roberts v the Queen.
Complimentary paper can be found on Foley's website at www.foleys.com.au/cpdresources.aspx.
Stay up to date
For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io