Logo
    Search

    About this Episode

    Gun violence prevention and domestic violence are inextricably linked. And today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case, U.S. v Rahimi, that could potentially determine the constitutionality of a gun violence prevention law that has saved millions of lives. Sabrina Talukder, Director of the Women’s Initiative at the Center for American Progress, sits down to talk with us about this upcoming Supreme Court case and its implications for those experiencing domestic violence.  

     

    When there is a firearm in the home during a domestic violence incident, the risk of death increases by 500 percent. And in 2017, over 5.9 million women reported being shot by a gun by an intimate partner at some point in their life. A 1996 law prevented those with domestic violence records from attaining a firearm—and the law has been incredibly effective. But adherence to originalism in the Supreme Court may discard that law and put the health and lives of domestic abuse survivors at risk.

     

    Links

    Center for American Progress Women on Twitter (they will be live Tweeting the case today)

    Center for American Progress on Twitter

    Center for American Progress on Facebook

    The Supreme Court Case United States v. Rahimi Underscores the Ugly Truth About Originalism and Women

     

    Take Action

     

    Make space for survivors who are telling their stories and listen to their experiences. 

     

    You can follow Center for American progress on Twitter and Facebook to keep up-to-date on their gun violence prevention work.

     

    Read more about the concept of Originalism here.

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Recent Episodes from rePROs Fight Back

    Finding Progress and Joy in State-Level Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice Policy

    Finding Progress and Joy in State-Level Reproductive Health, Rights, and Justice Policy

    Particularly after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, reproductive health, rights, and justice can feel very doom-and-gloom. Yet, states around the country are continuing to undertake progressive and opportunistic legislative advancement. Jennifer Driver, Senior Director of Reproductive Rights with the State Innovation Exchange, sits down to talk with us about exciting state-level movement, how to successfully work with legislators, and what wins we may expect to see in the near future. 

    Increasing contraceptive access, the removal of funding for crisis pregnancy centers, and the introduction of constitutional protections are just some examples of progressive state legislature that may expand and support sexual and reproductive health and rights. In addition, some bills focused around maternal health, doulas, and midwifery are sources of hopeful change. While it can often feel like SRHRJ is impacted by one bad policy after the next, let’s take a moment to celebrate the encouraging push for access across the country. 

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Alabama’s Supreme Court Ruling: IVF, Fetal Personhood, and a Ripple Effect

    Alabama’s Supreme Court Ruling: IVF, Fetal Personhood, and a Ripple Effect

    In a recent decision, the Alabama Supreme Court declared frozen embryos the same status as people. The decision, which is not grounded in law, references theology and the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case as a citation. Jessica Mason Pieklo, Senior Vice President and Executive Editor at Rewire News Group and cohost of Boom! Lawyered, sits down to talk with us about the recent Alabama Supreme Court ruling, in vitro fertilization, and the concept of fetal personhood.

    This ruling stems from a legal situation in which an in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic worker dropped some embryo dishes, accidentally destroying them. This court case ruling has effectively shut down IVF therapy across the state, which will undoubtedly cause a ripple effect and disproportionately impact those who depend upon IVF for family planning. This ruling may also have implications for contraception—if life, according to Alabama, truly “begins at conception,” then IUDs, which purposefully interferes with implantation, may be at risk.

     Another upcoming Supreme Court case, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA, will prove threatening to medication abortion and telehealth generally. You can learn more here.

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Gretchen Sisson on her New Book, Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood

    Gretchen Sisson on her New Book, Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood

    Per year in the U.S., there are around 4 million births, between 850,000 - 1,000,0000 abortions, and 18,000 - 22,000 private domestic infant adoptions. Gretchen Sisson, Sociologist in Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) at the University of San Francisco and author of Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood, sits down to talk to us about the history of American domestic adoption, busts some adoption myths, and underlines how adoption and reproductive health and rights intertwine.  

    Adoption is the U.S. has a long, complicated, and often painful history. In the modern day, adoption is often presented as an alternative to abortion, but Gretchen’s research showed that study participants rarely weighed an abortion vs. adoption; most often, people who couldn’t get an abortion then turned to adoption relinquishment as an option. There is no telling what the overturning of Roe will mean for the future of abortion and adoption in the U.S.—data on adoptions pre-Roe is still sparse. 

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Roe Was Never Enough: A Conversation with Abortion Fund of Ohio’s Executive Director

    Roe Was Never Enough: A Conversation with Abortion Fund of Ohio’s Executive Director

    For decades, abortion funds have worked tirelessly to bridge the gaps in access for people who needed abortion care. Their very existence highlights the fact that Roe failed to protect and address the needs of many communities marginalized by systems of oppression. Lexis Dotson-Dufault, Executive Director of the Abortion Fund of Ohio (AFO), sits down to talk with us about her first abortion, the importance of reproductive justice, and why Roe was never enough.

    Having grown up in a conservative environment, Lexis initially did not see abortion as an option when she discovered she was experiencing an unwanted pregnancy. Open and de-stigmatized  conversations about abortion empowered Lexis to get the care that she needed. Now an abortion storyteller and champion herself, Lexis’s abortion story exemplifies that abortion storytelling changes and saves lives. As Executive Director of AFO—an organization grounded in reproductive justice—Lexis has borne first-hand witness to the profound impact of the Dobbs decision. In the journey towards collective liberation, it is imperative that we center the visionary leadership of Black reproductive justice activists and organizations and transform sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice in the United States.

     

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    This Valentine’s Day, We’re Talking Pleasure!

    This Valentine’s Day, We’re Talking Pleasure!

    As Valentine’s Day approaches, we’re talking about the ultimate sexual and reproductive health and rights topic-- pleasure! Having researched how Black women experience and internalize pleasure, Lorraine Lacroix-Williamson, public health researcher, sits down to talk with us about sexual pleasure, how it fits into the sexual and reproductive health and rights umbrella, and how it relates to public health.

    Stigma, purity culture, mis- and dis-information and limited sex education act as barriers to honest feelings and conversations about sexual pleasure. These barriers disproportionately impact women; a 2018 study looking at national data found a huge discrepancy in orgasm experience. Heterosexual men experienced an orgasm 95% of the time they engaged in sexual activity, followed by gay men at 89% of the time and bisexual men at 88%. Lesbian women experienced orgasm 86% of the time, followed by bisexual women at 66%, and heterosexual women at 65%. The good news? There’s plenty of resources to use, things to learn, and ideas to explore to define what pleasure means to you.

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Project 2025 is a Road Map to a Conservative United States. Here’s What You Need to Know.

    Project 2025 is a Road Map to a Conservative United States. Here’s What You Need to Know.

    Politicizing independent institutions, spreading misinformation, aggrandizing and consolidating executive power, weakening checks and balances, quashing criticism and dissent, marginalizing and restricting rights of specific communities, corrupting election, and stoking violence are patterns right out of authoritarian playbook. These patterns are written all over Project 2025, an initiative out of the Heritage Foundation. Beirne Roose-Snyder, Senior Policy Fellow at the Council for Global Equality, sits down to talk with us about Project 2025—what is it, how it seeks to shape America, and what it means for LGBTQI+ rights and sexual and reproductive health and rights.

    Project 2025 is a broad vision about the future of the United States led by the Heritage Foundation. The project includes a 950-page map to achieving the project, which is centered maintaining a conservative President and, ultimately, continuing a conservative United States of America. Approximately 80 organizations have signed on to this project, and the targeting and restricting of LGBTQI+ rights and sexual and reproductive health and rights is overrepresented throughout the project and roadmap.

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    A Deep Dive into Idaho’s Increasingly Extremist Abortion Landscape

    A Deep Dive into Idaho’s Increasingly Extremist Abortion Landscape

    White supremacist, Christian nationalist extremists have infiltrated state government on all levels in Idaho, which has created the political environment that led to abortion bans in the state. Garnet Henderson, Senior Multiplatform Reporter for Rewire News Group and host and producer of ACCESS: A Podcast About Abortion, sits down to talk to us about her 10-day reporting trip to the state of Idaho and what she uncovered.

     Idaho, which was one of the first states to ban abortion outright after the Dobbs decision, and implemented the “abortion trafficking” law (which is currently blocked as a legal challenge proceeds), faces a variety of abortion and pregnancy/childbirth barriers. Severe driving times, hospital closures in rural communities, a dissolved maternal mortality review board, stigma, and abortion bans themselves create a climate of fear and impact people’s reproductive decisions.  Thankfully, Idaho has introduced a progressive voting campaign and recently voted to expand Medicaid. 

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Good News: The Biden Administration Finalized New Refusal Rules

    Good News: The Biden Administration Finalized New Refusal Rules

    There are a number of provisions in federal statutes that allow providers and hospitals the ability to refuse to provide care, or the information a patient may need to get care elsewhere, if the provider objects on moral or religious grounds. Katie O’Connor, Director of Federal Abortion Policy at the National Women’s Law Center, sits down to talk with us about the history of refusal statutes and rules, what it looks like to be a patient up against refusals, and the new refusal rules out of the Biden administration.

    The Trump administration finalized rules that defined refusals and greatly expanded the amount of people in the healthcare systems that could potentially refuse care. The Biden administration’s new rules around refusals rescind the Trump rules, taking us back to the refusal of care statutes with no extended reach. Ideally, and in congruence with this, stripping the Weldon amendment from the Labor HHS appropriations bill and repealing the Hyde amendment would expand access to abortion.  

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Need Help Getting an Abortion? r/abortion Has Answers

    Need Help Getting an Abortion? r/abortion Has Answers

    Abortion information, policies, and access is always changing. Ariella Messing, founder and Executive Director of the Online Abortion Resource Squad (OARS), sits down to talk with us about the r/abortion subreddit, a landscape of constantly shifting information, and navigating abortion mis- and disinformation on the internet. 

     

    The Online Abortion Resource Squad was born of a Slack channel and has since shifted to run the abortion subreddit, r/abortion. OARS has provided information throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, after the passage of Texas’s SB8, and after the Supreme Court ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Volunteers, including moderator volunteers who are on for 12-hours a day, undergo intensive training and point those seeking assistance on r/abortion towards information and resources.

     

    Links

    Online Abortion Resource Squad

    Online Abortion Resource Squad on Twitter

    Online Abortion Resource Squad on LinkedIn

    r/abortion on Reddit

     

    Take Action

    First and foremost, follow the Online Abortion Resource Squad on Twitter and LinkedIn. You can also follow r/abortion on Reddit here.

     

    Figure out whatever steps you would need to take to access an abortion in your community, and make sure you are intimately familiar with those steps. Next, apply the same steps for loved ones in your life. Learn the laws where you live. Talk to your doctor, talk to your local representatives, and talk to people in your communities about ways to strengthen abortion access.

     

    If you see someone on Reddit who needs abortion help, send them to/abortion. 

     

    If possible, donate

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    So Many Sexual and Reproductive Health Court Cases, So Little Time

    So Many Sexual and Reproductive Health Court Cases, So Little Time

    A variety of court cases, which have the ability to severely restrict, limit, and criminalize sexual and reproductive health care—such as abortion— are circulating throughout the U.S. Jessica Mason Pieklo, Senior Vice President and Executive Editor, at Rewire News Group and co-host of Rewire News Group's podcast Boom! Lawyered, sits down to talk with us about current court cases around the country and what these cases may mean for protecting basic SHRH care.

     

    The pillars of these court cases include that of miscarriage criminalization, abortion ban exceptions, criminalizing medical providers, placing care limitations on emergency rooms, state abortion bans, and access to mifepristone; the decisions that come from these cases may have erect more barriers to care, spread additional stigma, and create legal concerns for patients and providers.  

     

    Links

    Jessica Mason Pieklo on Twitter

    Rewire.News on Twitter

    Rewire.News on Facebook

    SCOTUS Is Likely to Decide if Abortion Is Health Care

    Idaho's Reproductive Health Crisis and Christian Nationalism

    Ohio Woman Who Miscarried Faces Charge That She Abused Corpse

    Kate Cox sought an abortion in Texas. A court said no because she didn’t show her life was in danger

     

    Take Action

    Follow Rewire.News on Twitter and Facebook, and find Jessica Mason Pieklo on Twitter here

     

    Take care of yourself. These court fights will require a long haul approach, and do what you need to do to engage in self-care. Make sure you are supporting direct aid services—donate, if possible, to your local abortion funds. In addition, amplify local voices, which most intimately understand the network of care.

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!