Suburban women's voting patterns shifting towards Democrats: Suburban women, a key voting bloc, have been shifting towards Democratic candidates, as shown in the 2018 midterm elections. Their engagement in politics could significantly impact the 2020 presidential election.
Suburban white women have emerged as a key voting bloc capable of swinging elections. As mentioned in the discussion, during the 2016 presidential election, their surprising support for Donald Trump played a significant role in his victory. However, in the past few years, polling data shows that this demographic has shifted towards Democratic candidates. The midterm elections of 2018 provided the first clear indication of this trend, with suburban women favoring Democratic candidates by substantial margins. This shift was particularly noticeable in states like Ohio, where Democrats failed to make any gains despite the national "blue wave." Katy Paris, a Democrat and a mother living in a suburb of Cleveland, was inspired by this trend and decided to get involved in politics to help flip Ohio blue in 2020. The power of suburban women engaging in politics is a potent force, and it could play a decisive role in the upcoming presidential election.
Discovering the power of suburban women in Ohio politics: Katie Paris, inspired by the impact of black voters and apathy of white suburban women in 2018 midterms, quit her job to engage suburban women, forming 'Red Wine and Blue' to amplify their voices and bridge political divide
The 2018 midterm elections served as a wake-up call for Katie Paris, leading her to discover the significant role black voters play in Ohio elections and the apathy of white suburban women towards voting. Motivated by this realization, Katie quit her job and dedicated herself to engaging suburban women in Ohio politics. She started by meeting women in groups, often at places like Panera, and watched as these groups grew through word-of-mouth. Eventually, she founded her own group, Red Wine and Blue, to connect and amplify the voices of these women. These women, who were not typical political activists, offered relatable stories and could help bridge the political divide. Their voices, Katie believed, were crucial to making politics more accessible and less polarizing for other moms.
Utilizing local women organizers to reach suburban voters: Leveraging deep community connections of local women organizers to effectively engage suburban voters and challenge opposing candidates' narratives using humor.
Katie's group is utilizing unconventional political organizers – local women with deep community connections – to reach suburban voters in a way that resonates with them. These women, unlike typical paid organizers, are known and trusted within their communities, and their personal networks hold valuable information about potential voters. The group is also capitalizing on the political rhetoric surrounding suburban women and using it to their advantage, creating content that challenges and mocks opposing candidates' attempts to appeal to this demographic. By owning the narrative and using humor, they are effectively flipping the script and engaging voters in a way that traditional methods may not be able to achieve.
Democrats Engaging Women Voters with Diverse Backgrounds: The Democratic Party is attracting women voters with diverse political backgrounds, including those who previously voted for third-party or opposing candidates, by engaging and welcoming their perspectives.
The Democratic Party is successfully attracting women voters who previously didn't engage in politics or voted for third-party or opposing candidates. During a meeting with Katie, a member of the group Red Wine and Blue, they shared their strategy of bringing together women with diverse political backgrounds. The group includes Hannah, a stay-at-home mom who voted for Gary Johnson in 2016, Andrea, a public charter school employee who was a lifelong Republican until she voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and Kate, who voted for Trump in 2016 but plans to vote for Joe Biden in 2020. Each woman shared her reasons for their past votes and how their perspectives have changed. Hannah, who felt guilty about her vote for Gary Johnson, acknowledged that her decision didn't impact the election outcome. Kate, the Trump voter, expressed feelings of guilt and limited beliefs that led to her vote. These women's stories demonstrate the importance of engaging and welcoming diverse perspectives within the political community.
Women's experiences as mothers shape their political decisions: Personal moments and observations, like debates on abortion rights and mask-wearing during a pandemic, have influenced women's votes in the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. Motivated by their desire to model good behavior and values for their children, they have supported Joe Biden and encouraged others to do the same.
The experiences of women, particularly as mothers, have played a significant role in shaping their political decisions during the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. The stories shared by Kate, Hannah, and Andrea illustrate how personal moments and observations, such as debates on abortion rights or the importance of wearing masks during a pandemic, have influenced their votes. The cumulative effect of these experiences, and the desire to model good behavior and values for their children, has motivated them to support Joe Biden and encourage others to do the same.
The 2016 election led to increased political engagement, particularly among women.: The 2016 election inspired many to become politically active and some have vowed never to vote for a Republican again due to Trump's actions.
The 2016 election resulted in many people, including those who had never considered themselves activists, feeling compelled to engage in political discourse and activism. This was particularly true for women, who expressed a strong desire to avoid the feelings of regret and stress experienced after the election. The 2020 election has seen a significant shift in suburban Ohio, with Biden leading by a large margin, indicating a change in voting patterns. Some interviewees expressed doubt that they would ever vote for a Republican candidate again due to the damage done by Donald Trump to the party. Overall, the 2016 election served as a catalyst for many to become more politically engaged, and the impact of this engagement is still being felt in the lead up to the 2020 election.
Women, especially white suburban mothers, are shifting their voting behavior due to social justice movements: Women, particularly white suburban mothers, are reevaluating their political allegiances and prioritizing issues of race and equality, leading to a significant shift in voting behavior.
The events of the last few years, particularly the death of George Floyd and the subsequent social justice movements, have led to a significant shift in values and voting behavior for many women, especially white suburban mothers. This shift is not just about changing political parties, but a deeper recognition of systemic issues and a commitment to consider the well-being of all communities. For some, like Andrea, this meant moving away from Republican ideologies and policies that seemed to be against the interests of marginalized communities. For others, like Kate, the realization of the lack of action from the Republican party on issues of race and equality was a turning point. This profound shift in voting behavior is a testament to the power of events and social movements to challenge deeply held beliefs and values.
Personal Evolution on Political Issues: Abortion and COVID-19: Speakers shared their evolving perspectives on abortion and expressed regret for past judgments. They also questioned the logic behind labeling Vice President Pence's campaigning as essential work during the COVID-19 surge.
The speakers in this conversation shared their personal experiences and how they have evolved in their views on political issues, particularly regarding abortion. They acknowledged that their understanding had become more complex, and they expressed feelings of shame for past judgments they had made about others' experiences. On a different note, the conversation also touched on the current surge in COVID-19 cases and the controversy surrounding Vice President Pence's continued campaigning despite being potentially exposed to the virus. The speakers questioned the rationale behind labeling Pence's campaigning as "essential work," which should exempt him from quarantine rules.
The Field: Why Suburban Women Changed Their Minds
Recent Episodes from The Daily
'The Interview': Sally Rooney Thinks Career Growth Is Overrated
Six Weeks to Go
As the presidential race enters its final 45 days, we assemble a campaign round table with our colleagues from the politics desk.
Maggie Haberman, Shane Goldmacher and Nate Cohn interpret this week’s biggest developments.
Guest:
- Maggie Haberman, a senior political correspondent for The New York Times.
- Shane Goldmacher, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.
- Nate Cohn, the chief political analyst for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- Harris had stronger debate, polls find, but the race remains deadlocked.
- Here’s the latest on the 2024 elections.
For more information on today’s episode, visit
. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
The Day Thousands of Pagers Exploded in Lebanon
Hundreds of electronic devices carried by Hezbollah members exploded simultaneously across Lebanon on Tuesday and Wednesday in an audacious plot by Israel.
Patrick Kingsley, the Jerusalem bureau chief for The New York Times, discusses what the attack accomplished, and what it cost.
Guest: Patrick Kingsley, the Jerusalem bureau chief for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- What we know about the deadly wireless-device explosions in Lebanon.
- Israel’s pager attack was a tactical success without a strategic goal, analysts say.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Israel's Existential Threat From Within
Warning: this episode contains descriptions of violence.
In the last year, the world’s eyes have been on the war in Gaza, which still has no end in sight. But there is a conflict in another Palestinian territory that has gotten far less attention, where life has become increasingly untenable: the West Bank.
Ronen Bergman, who has been covering the conflict, explains why things are likely to get worse, and the long history of extremist political forces inside Israel that he says are leading the country to an existential crisis.
Guest: Ronen Bergman, a staff writer for The New York Times Magazine.
Background reading:
- How extremist settlers took over Israel.
- What is the West Bank and who controls it?
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
A Second Assassination Plot and the New Era of Political Violence
A suspect was charged on Monday in connection with what appears to be a second assassination attempt on Donald J. Trump.
Thomas Gibbons-Neff and Glenn Thrush, who have been covering the case, and Peter Baker, The Times’s chief White House correspondent, discuss the suspect’s background, the Secret Service’s struggle to protect the former president, and this new era of political violence.
Guests:
- Thomas Gibbons-Neff, a correspondent on the National desk of The New York Times.
- Glenn Thrush, who reports on the Justice Department for The New York Times.
- Peter Baker, the chief White House correspondent for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- What we know about the latest apparent assassination attempt.
- The case is another sign of how much the American political landscape has been shaped by anger stirred by Mr. Trump and against him.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Three Undecided Voters, Two Swing States, One Big Decision
From the moment Donald Trump and Kamala Harris walked off the debate stage, both their campaigns have argued about who won the showdown.
But the real question is what the debate meant to a small sliver of voters in a handful of swing states.
Campbell Robertson, a reporter on The Times’s National desk, and Stella Tan, a producer on “The Daily,” speak to three undecided voters about what they saw during the debate, and how much closer it brought them to a decision.
Guest:
- Campbell Robertson, a reporter for the National desk at The New York Times, who has been tracking undecided voters in Pennsylvania.
- Stella Tan, an audio producer for “The Daily,” who spoke to an undecided voter in Wisconsin.
Background reading:
- Voters said the vice president talked about a sweeping vision to fix the country’s most stubborn problems. But they wanted to hear more.
- “The Run-Up”: Here’s what undecided voters are thinking.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
The Sunday Read: ‘The For-Profit City That Might Come Crashing Down’
If Próspera were a normal town, Jorge Colindres, a freshly cologned and shaven lawyer, would be considered its mayor. His title here is “technical secretary.” Looking out over a clearing in the trees in February, he pointed to the small office complex where he works collecting taxes and managing public finances for the city’s 2,000 or so physical residents and e-residents, many of whom have paid a fee for the option of living in Próspera, on the Honduran island of Roatán, or remotely incorporating a business there.
Nearby is a manufacturing plant that is slated to build modular houses along the coast. About a mile in the other direction are some of the city’s businesses: a Bitcoin cafe and education center, a genetics clinic, a scuba shop. A delivery service for food and medical supplies will deploy its drones from this rooftop.
Próspera was built in a semiautonomous jurisdiction known as a ZEDE (a Spanish acronym for Zone for Employment and Economic Development). It is a private, for-profit city, with its own government that courts foreign investors through low taxes and light regulation. Now, the Honduran government wants it gone.
'The Interview': Demi Moore Is Done With the Male Gaze
The Story Behind ‘They’re Eating the Pets’
At this week’s presidential debate, Donald J. Trump went into an unprompted digression about immigrants eating people’s pets. While the claims were debunked, the topic was left unexplained.
Miriam Jordan, who covers the impact of immigration policies for The Times, explains the story behind the shocking claims and the tragedy that gave rise to them.
Guest: Miriam Jordan, a national immigration correspondent for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- A local official said there was “absolutely no evidence” for the outlandish claim about Haitian migrants that Mr. Trump and his campaign have amplified.
- How an Ohio town landed in the middle of the immigration debate.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
How the Election Is Sinking a $15 Billion Business Deal
In a highly unusual move, the Biden administration signaled last week that it would block a Japanese company from buying an iconic American company in a critical swing state.
Alan Rappeport, who covers the Treasury Department for The Times, discusses the politics that could doom the multibillion-dollar deal, and what it says about the new power of American labor.
Guest: Alan Rappeport, an economic policy reporter for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- President Biden is expected to block Nippon Steel’s takeover of U.S. Steel.
- How swing-state politics are sinking a global steel deal.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Related Episodes
Live Show Preview: Wednesday May 4
Every Monday - Thursday, Jason and Molly record live at https://youtube.com/thisweekin - it has bonus content that doesn't make it into the edited version of the show. This is a sample of the LIVE version recorded today. If you like this, subscribe, sign up for notifications and join us live in the YouTube chat.
Ep. 261 Fake news on fake news!
Sam and I sit down with our good friend Scott Archer to chat about China brokering an Iranian/Saudi peace, abortion rights, human rights, right to privacy, local parody websites, and much much more. Oh and those awesome fake pics of Trump getting arrested floating around the social sphere...
Website, Facebook, Twitter
It Could Happen Here Weekly 82
All of this week's episodes of It Could Happen Here put together in one large file.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Mexican Model of Abortion Rights
When the Supreme Court decriminalized abortion with Roe v. Wade, it established the United States as a global leader on abortion rights, decades ahead of many other countries.
Now, with Roe likely to be overturned, we look to Mexico, a country where the playbook for securing legalized abortion could be a model for activists in the United States.
Guest: Natalie Kitroeff, a correspondent covering Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean for The New York Times.
Want more from The Daily? For one big idea on the news each week from our team, subscribe to our newsletter.
Background reading:
- Verónica Cruz spent years defying the law in Mexico, helping thousands of women get abortions. Now that Mexico has legalized abortion, activists are bringing their mission to a country moving in the opposite direction: the United States.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Monday Afternoon Update | 1.30.23
Developing stories you need to know just in time for your drive home. Get the facts first on Morning Wire.