Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Ulrich sisters' tragic experience with the Ford Pinto and hindsight biasOur understanding of past events can be influenced by their outcomes, leading to hindsight bias. Be aware of this bias to make informed decisions.

      Our perception of past events can be significantly influenced by the outcome, a phenomenon known as hindsight bias. This was highlighted in the tragic story of the Ulrich sisters and their cousin, whose Ford Pinto was involved in a fatal crash in 1978. The event took place during a time when the American car industry was under pressure from federal regulations and competition from foreign carmakers. Ford responded by introducing the fuel-efficient Pinto, but the car's safety features were later found to be inadequate. The Ulrich family's experience of the crash was shaped by the tragic outcome, leading to a recall of the car and heightened awareness of the dangers of hindsight bias. The story serves as a reminder that our understanding of past events can be influenced by the knowledge of their outcomes, and it's essential to be aware of this bias in our daily lives.

    • The Pinto's Safety Issues in the Aftermath of the Oil CrisisThe oil crisis boosted sales for Ford's cost-effective Pinto, but the subsequent safety controversies led to recalls, investigations, and a damaged reputation, ultimately impacting Ford's bottom line.

      The oil crisis of the 1970s significantly impacted the automobile industry, particularly for Ford and its Pinto model. The Pinto, initially designed for cost-effectiveness and minimalism, gained popularity due to the fuel shortage and high gas prices. However, the decade following the oil crisis brought PR troubles for Ford, as the Pinto became associated with fatal rear-end crashes and resulting fires. The controversy surrounding the Pinto's safety led to numerous recalls and investigations, tarnishing the company's reputation. Despite initial success during the oil crisis, Ford's bottom line was negatively affected by the long-term consequences of the Pinto controversy.

    • The Ford Pinto: A Car with a Dangerous Design and Corporate NegligenceThe Ford Pinto's design flaws and Ford's prioritization of profits over safety led to numerous accidents, injuries, and deaths, damaging Ford's reputation and becoming a symbol of corporate negligence.

      The Ford Pinto, produced in the 1970s, was involved in numerous rear-end collisions resulting in fires, leading to injuries and deaths. The design of the car, specifically the placement of the gas tank and the protruding bolts, made it vulnerable in low-speed crashes. Additionally, Ford was accused of prioritizing profits over safety, as shown in a memo that calculated the cost-benefit analysis of preventing fuel leakages in certain crashes. The memo determined that the cost of implementing changes would not outweigh the expected benefits, with human lives valued at approximately $200,000 each. This memo, along with the numerous accidents and subsequent lawsuits, damaged Ford's reputation and led to the Pinto becoming a symbol of corporate negligence.

    • A cautionary tale of the Ford Pinto's fuel system defectSolid evidence and data are crucial for making informed decisions about recalls, rather than relying on anecdotes or magical thinking. Ignoring potential safety issues can have serious consequences for employees, customers, and the public.

      The Ford Pinto's fuel system defect and subsequent recall serve as a cautionary tale about the importance of transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision-making in business. Denny Joya, a former Ford insider, shares his experience as a young recall coordinator in the 1970s, where he had the power to decide which cars would be recalled based on patterns of failures and traceable causes. He emphasized the need for solid evidence and data to justify a recall, rather than relying on anecdotes or magical thinking. This story underscores the significance of having a rigorous approach to identifying and addressing potential safety issues, and the potential consequences of ignoring them. It also highlights the importance of considering the impact on employees, customers, and the public when making corporate decisions.

    • Emotional Decision to Recall PintoRecall decision based on emotional response to a burned-car, despite lack of data or pattern.

      Denny, Ford's recall coordinator in the early 1970s, made the decision to recall the Pinto based on emotional response to a burned-out car he encountered in the company warehouse, despite having no identifiable cause or pattern for rear-end fires. He put the case up for a vote, but the decision was not an easy one for him, as he had been trained to focus on data rather than emotions. The encounter in the warehouse was a turning point for him, as he had never seen a burned-out car before and learning that it was a death vehicle was a shock. Despite his usual standards, he decided to recommend the recall, which eventually led to the infamous Pinto recall.

    • The Importance of Data Analysis in Making Informed DecisionsA balanced approach combining data analysis and critical thinking is necessary to ensure safety and make informed decisions, as seen in the Ford Pinto case where cost-cutting measures led to a dangerous fuel tank issue.

      Data and analysis are crucial in making informed decisions, especially in engineering and manufacturing industries. The discussion highlights the Ford Pinto case, where an emotional response to an incident was not enough to justify a recall. Instead, engineers needed data to identify patterns and potential causes. However, it's important to note that focusing solely on data can overlook idiosyncratic cases. The Pinto's design flaw was a result of cost-cutting measures, which led to the use of off-the-shelf components that were not suitable for the car's design. This oversight resulted in a dangerous fuel tank issue that could only be identified through a thorough analysis of engineering reports. The takeaway is that a balanced approach, combining data analysis and critical thinking, is necessary to ensure safety and make informed decisions.

    • Understanding Complex DecisionsDecision-making can be influenced by our desire for simplicity and certainty, but it's crucial to consider the complexity of situations and resist oversimplifying when making decisions.

      Our understanding of the past and decision-making processes can be influenced by our desire for simplicity and certainty. In the case of the Ford Pinto, Ford executives, including Denny Shaldoneau, compared the Pinto to competitor cars and found minimal differences in fuel tank rupture speeds. Faced with a difficult decision, Shaldoneau voted against recalling the Pinto, a decision that was later regretted. However, sociologist Duncan Watts argues that our tendency to attribute bad outcomes to flawed processes may oversimplify complex situations. Using the example of a minivan crash, Watts emphasizes that the causes of accidents are often multifaceted and not easily attributable to a single cause. Therefore, it's essential to consider the complexity of situations and resist the urge to oversimplify when making decisions.

    • The role of chance and circumstance in accidentsWhile accidents can be influenced by numerous factors, individuals have a responsibility to make safe choices to minimize risk. Reckless decisions increase the likelihood of an accident, but chance and circumstance can also play a role.

      The chain of events that led to a tragic accident is often complex and influenced by numerous factors beyond the control of the individuals involved. Joseph Gray's decision to drink and drive ultimately resulted in a devastating accident, but it's important to consider the role of chance and circumstance in shaping the outcome. If certain events hadn't occurred, such as the rainy morning or the lack of a cab call, the accident might not have happened at all. However, it's also crucial to acknowledge that individuals have a responsibility to make safe choices, and Joseph's decision to get behind the wheel after drinking was reckless and increased the likelihood of an accident. Ultimately, the accident was a tragic reminder of the unpredictability of life and the importance of making responsible decisions.

    • Finding Meaning in RandomnessThough random events may seem meaningless, we create meaning and purpose in our own lives. The world is complex and uncertain, but our need to understand and control drives us to seek explanations.

      Our need to find meaning and purpose in events, even random ones, is a deeply ingrained human response. When we encounter randomness, we feel uneasy and may even feel that nothing matters. However, meaning is something we create, not something the world gives us. Random events can still be meaningful, whether they're mundane, delightful, or heartbreaking. But when it comes to good and bad events, the notion that they happen for no reason leaves us dissatisfied. This may be an adaptive response to the uncertainty of the world, allowing us to feel in control and take action. However, when something terrible happens, it can be difficult to look back on the actions of those involved with a sense of dispassion. Our psychological defense systems demand a tidy explanation, and we may focus on specific actions or individuals as a way of making sense of the randomness and uncertainty. Ultimately, the world is complex and full of randomness, but it's up to us to give it meaning.

    • The Halo Effect on Perception of Past DecisionsOur perception of past decisions can be skewed by their outcomes, making it difficult to evaluate processes objectively and leading to oversimplified narratives

      Our perception of past events can be heavily influenced by their outcomes, leading to a distorted view of the processes and decisions that led to those outcomes. This was exemplified in the case of Denny Shaldon, a Ford executive who was involved in the decision-making process regarding the recall of the dangerous Pinto car. Despite having clear criteria for recall decisions and not finding sufficient evidence to meet those criteria for the Pinto, Denny's decisions have been criticized and even labeled as villainous due to the tragic outcomes. However, it's important to consider that sometimes, despite our best efforts, bad outcomes can still occur. This phenomenon, known as the halo effect, can make it difficult to evaluate processes objectively and can lead to oversimplified narratives of good versus bad. Understanding this effect can help us approach evaluations of past events and future processes with more nuance and complexity.

    • The importance of humility in understanding the pastRecognize the uncertainty and limitations of our knowledge, learn from the past with humility, and focus on continuous improvement.

      The future is uncertain and unpredictable, and we should approach the past with humility about what we think we know. The example of the Ford Pinto recall illustrates this point, as even with hindsight and more information, it's unclear if a different decision would have been made. Duncan Watts advocates for epistemic humility, which encourages us to be cautious about our assumptions and confident predictions, especially when based on limited information. By acknowledging our limitations, we can avoid overconfidence and potentially damaging consequences. In a world shaped by epistemic humility, we would approach investigations and problem-solving with a focus on continuous learning and improvement, rather than just reacting to crises.

    • Unsung Heroes and the Uncertainty of LifeAcknowledge uncertainty, appreciate unsung heroes, and help each other through life's challenges

      It's human nature to point fingers during times of tragedy, but it's more honest to acknowledge the uncertainty and confusion that led to the outcome. The past, like the present, was filled with doubt and confusion when it came to making decisions. At Hidden Brain, we're grateful for the unsung heroes who make things happen behind the scenes, like Erin Register, who brings different teams together to make big projects successful. Additionally, we encourage you to check out our new podcast, My Unsung Hero, which shares inspiring stories of people who step up to help others during moments of crisis. Each episode is short and sure to boost your faith in humanity. Erin, thank you for your hard work and dedication to making Hidden Brain a success. And to all of you, remember that uncertainty and doubt are a part of life, but the choices we make in those moments can lead to positive outcomes if we choose to help each other.

    Recent Episodes from Hidden Brain

    Making the World Sparkle Again

    Making the World Sparkle Again

    Across every domain of our lives, our minds have a tendency to get accustomed to things. In fact, the brain seems evolutionarily designed to focus on the new and unexpected, on novel threats and opportunities. In our daily lives, this means we take wonderful things for granted. We cease to appreciate amazing people, or the good fortune of being healthy. This week, neuroscientist Tali Sharot explains why we get used to things — and how to see with fresh eyes.

    Our podcast subscription, Hidden Brain+, is now available across platforms and devices. You can sign up for a free seven-day trial at support.hiddenbrain.org or apple.co/hiddenbrain. Your subscription provides key support to help us build you many more episodes of Hidden Brain. We’re truly grateful. 

    Hidden Brain
    enJune 24, 2024

    Our God-Shaped Brains

    Our God-Shaped Brains

    Some think of religious faith as just that: a leap of faith. But psychologists are increasingly filling in the gaps in our understanding of how beliefs shape — and are shaped by — the human mind. This week, psychologist Ara Norenzayan explores features in the brain that are tied to our capacity for faith. And he shows how all of us, both religious and non-religious people, can use this knowledge to find more meaning in our lives.

    For more of our reporting on religion and the mind, be sure to check out our episode "Creating God."
     

    Hidden Brain
    enJune 17, 2024

    Why You Feel Empty

    Why You Feel Empty

    Have you ever had an unexplainable feeling of emptiness? Life seems perfect - and yet - something is missing. This week, sociologist Corey Keyes helps us understand where feelings of emptiness come from, how to navigate them and why they're more common than we might assume.

    If you missed it, make sure to listen to last week's episode on Why Trying Too Hard Can Backfire On You. Thanks for listening!

    Hidden Brain
    enJune 10, 2024

    Why Trying Too Hard Can Backfire On You

    Why Trying Too Hard Can Backfire On You

    Thinking is a human superpower. On a daily basis, thinking and planning and effort bring us innumerable benefits. But like all aspects of human behavior, you can sometimes get too much of a good thing. This week, we talk with philosopher Ted Slingerland about techniques to prevent overthinking, and how we can cultivate the under-appreciated skill of letting go. 

    To hear more of our conversation with Ted Slingerland, be sure to check out our Hidden Brain+ episode with him, available now. You can join Hidden Brain+ via Patreon or Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening! 

    Hidden Brain
    enJune 03, 2024

    Innovation 2.0: Do Less

    Innovation 2.0: Do Less

    The human drive to invent new things has led to pathbreaking achievements in medicine, science and society. But our desire to create can keep us from seeing one of the most powerful paths to progress: subtraction. In a favorite conversation from 2022, engineer Leidy Klotz shares how streamlining and simplifying is sometimes the best path to innovation. 

    Today's episode concludes our Innovation 2.0 series. If you've enjoyed these episodes, please tell a friend about them! They can find all of the stories in this series in this podcast feed, or at https://hiddenbrain.org/. Thanks for listening! 

    Hidden Brain
    enMay 27, 2024

    Innovation 2.0: Shortcuts and Speed Bumps

    Innovation 2.0: Shortcuts and Speed Bumps

    Most of us love to brainstorm with colleagues. But so often, our idea-generating sessions don't lead to anything tangible. Teams fill up walls with sticky notes about creative possibilities and suggestions for improvement, but nothing actually gets implemented. Some researchers even have a name for it: "innovation theater." This week, we explore the science of execution. Psychologist Bob Sutton tells us how to move from innovation theater . . . to actual innovation.

    You can find all the episodes in our Innovation 2.0 series in this podcast feed, or on our website, hiddenbrain.org

    Hidden Brain
    enMay 20, 2024

    Innovation 2.0: The Influence You Have

    Innovation 2.0: The Influence You Have

    Think about the last time you asked someone for something. Maybe you were nervous or worried about what the person would think of you. Chances are that you didn’t stop to think about the pressure you were exerting on that person. This week, we continue our Innovation 2.0 series with a 2020 episode about a phenomenon known as as “egocentric bias.” We talk with psychologist Vanessa Bohns about how this bias leads us astray, and how we can use this knowledge to ask for the things we need. 

    Did you catch the first two episodes in our Innovation 2.0 series? You can find them in this podcast feed or on our website. And if you're enjoying this series, please share it with a friend or family member. Thanks! 

    Hidden Brain
    enMay 13, 2024

    Innovation 2.0: Multiplying the Growth Mindset

    Innovation 2.0: Multiplying the Growth Mindset

    Have you ever been in a situation where you felt that people wrote you off? Maybe a teacher suggested you weren't talented enough to take a certain class, or a boss implied that you didn't have the smarts needed to handle a big project. In the latest in our "Innovation 2.0 series," we talk with Mary Murphy, who studies what she calls "cultures of genius." We'll look at how these cultures can keep people and organizations from thriving, and how we can create environments that better foster our growth.

    Do you know someone who'd find the ideas in today's episode to be useful? Please share it with them! And if you liked today's conversation, you might also like these classic Hidden Brain episodes: 

     The Edge Effect

    The Secret to Great Teams

    Dream Jobs

    Innovation 2.0: How Big Ideas Are Born

    Innovation 2.0: How Big Ideas Are Born

    Why is it so hard to guess where we're meant to be? To predict where we'll end up? Nearly all of us have had the experience of traveling down one road, only to realize it's not the road for us. At the University of Virginia, Saras Sarasvathy uses the lens of entrepreneurship to study how we plan and prepare for the future. We kick off our new "Innovation 2.0" series by talking with Saras about how we pursue goals and make decisions.

    Do you know someone who might benefit from our conversation with Saras about expert entrepreneurs? Please share it with them if so! And be sure to check out our other conversations about how to get out of ruts and figure out a path forward: 

    Who Do You Want to Be?

    You 2.0 : How to Break Out of a Rut

    Parents: Keep Out!

    Parents: Keep Out!

    If you're a parent or a teacher, you've probably wondered how to balance play and safety for the kids in your care. You don't want to put children in danger, but you also don't want to rob them of the joy of exploration. This week, we talk with psychologist Peter Gray about how this balance has changed — for parents and children alike — and what we can do about it.

    For more of our reporting on children and parents, check out these classic Hidden Brain episodes:

    Kinder-Gardening

    Bringing Up Baby 

     

    Related Episodes

    Problem Solving Like a Boss, Part 2

    Problem Solving Like a Boss, Part 2

    Every leader faces problems in every organization. In Part 2 of “Problem Solving Like a Boss,” Craig Groeschel teaches you three more practical ways to start solving more problems, and he helps you answer the question, "What if I'm the problem?" 

    Watch video and download the leader guide: https://www.life.church/leadershippodcast/problem-solving-like-a-boss-part-2/

    Daryl Morey - Systems Thinking in Sports - [Invest Like the Best, REPLAY]

    Daryl Morey - Systems Thinking in Sports - [Invest Like the Best, REPLAY]
    This week, we are running a replay of my conversation with Daryl Morey from last year. Daryl is the President of basketball operations for the Philadelphia 76ers. Together with my friend and past guest of the show, Sam Hinkie, Daryl pioneered the analytics movement in basketball. He’s been so influential his style has its own name, “Moreyball”, a nod to Michael Lewis’s book about baseball, Moneyball. I had a blast talking to him about negotiation tactics, systems thinking, hiring, and a ton more. Please enjoy this great conversation with Daryl Morey. For the full show notes, transcript, and links to mentioned content, check out the episode page here. Listen to Founders Podcast. ----- This episode is brought to you by Tegus, the modern research platform for leading investors. The gold standard for research, the Tegus platform delivers unmatched access to timely, qualitative insights through the largest and most differentiated expert call transcript database. With over 60,000 transcripts spanning 22,000 public and private companies, investors can accelerate their fundamental research process by discovering highly-differentiated and reliable insights that can’t be found anywhere else in the market. As a listener, drive your next investment thesis forward with Tegus for free at tegus.co/patrick. ----- Invest Like the Best is a property of Colossus, LLC. For more episodes of Invest Like the Best, visit joincolossus.com/episodes.  Stay up to date on all our podcasts by signing up to Colossus Weekly, our quick dive every Sunday highlighting the top business and investing concepts from our podcasts and the best of what we read that week. Sign up here. Follow us on Twitter: @patrick_oshag | @JoinColossus Editing and post-production work for this episode was provided by The Podcast Consultant (https://thepodcastconsultant.com). Show Notes (00:00:00) Welcome to Invest Like the Best (00:03:15) The basic principles of sports and what makes for a great sport (00:09:54) How resource concentration influences outcomes in various sports (00:13:13) The degree of certainty in predicting sports outcomes based on existing data (00:16:32) Using the concept of KPIs to optimize for certain characteristics to win games (00:18:45) Training teams on specific systems and plays versus leveraging individual talent (00:21:07) Why superstar athletes are key to success in basketball (00:24:02) Dealing with constant expected value calculations to appease stakeholders (00:25:30) Building the organization’s back office to find talented athletes (00:28:32) How he and other GMs make organization-level decisions (00:34:12) Why he’s involved with basketball as opposed to other sports (00:36:17) How he uses his frameworks to figure out systems outside of mainstream sports (00:37:41) Problems with the rules and economic factors of professional soccer (00:41:53) Suggestions to mitigate huge point spreads that make viewers disinterested (00:42:54) Trends he’s observed in the worlds of music, movies, and books (00:45:33) His perspective on developing one’s own career path (00:48:22) How challenges in his youth benefited him in the long run (00:49:28) The person he would call for advice if he was stuck in a foreign prison (00:51:01) His emphasis on first principles and why he supports free speech (00:52:31) Takeaways from a Harvard negotiation class he took (00:57:07) The power of refining the terms and definitions of a deal post-negotiation (00:58:51) The four people in the world that intrigue him most (01:01:40) The kindest thing anyone has ever done for him

    Your gut instinct is usually wrong

    Your gut instinct is usually wrong
    Sean Illing talks with former Google data scientist Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, author of Don't Trust Your Gut. Seth argues that the way we make decisions is wrong, outdated, and based on methods or conventional wisdom that lead us astray from getting what we want. Sean and Seth discuss the idea of using data in place of our own intuition and reason to help us through things like online dating, picking a place to live, and being a better parent. Plus, how can we trust "experience sampling" studies that rely on self-reporting, when — after all — everybody lies? Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), Interviews Writer, Vox Guest: Seth Stephens-Davidowitz (@SethS_D), author References:  Don't Trust Your Gut: Using Data to Get What You Really Want in Life by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz (Dey Street; 2022) Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz (Dey Street; 2018) Moneyball (dir. Bennett Miller, 2011); based on the book Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game by Michael Lewis (W.W. Norton; 2004) "Capitalists in the Twenty-First Century" by Matthew Smith et al. (Quarterly Journal of Economics v. 134 (4); 2019) The Mappiness Project, created by George MacKerron and Susanna Mourato "Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies" by Samantha Joel et al. (PNAS v. 117 (32); 2020) "Are You Happy While You Work?" by Alex Bryson and George MacKerron (The Economic Journal v. 127 (599); Feb. 2017) "Experienced well-being rises with income, even above $75,000 per year" by Matthew Killingsworth (PNAS v. 118 (4); 2021) "The Amount and Source of Millionaires' Wealth (Moderately) Predicts Their Happiness" by Grand Edward Donnelly et al. (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin v. 44 (5); May 2018) “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” by Sheena S. Iyengar and Mark R. Lepper (J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6); 2000) "The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New EvidenceFfrom the Moving to Opportunity Project" by Raj Chetty et al. (American Economic Review v. 106 (4); 2016) "Education Doesn't Work" by Freddie deBoer (Substack; Apr. 12, 2021) "Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments" by Charles C. Ballew and Alexander Todorov (PNAS v. 104 (46); 2007) Dataclysm: Love, Sex, Race, and Identity — What Our Online Lives Tell Us About Our Offline Selves by Christian Rudder (Crown; 2015)   Enjoyed this episode? Rate Vox Conversations ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of Vox Conversations by subscribing in your favorite podcast app. Support Vox Conversations by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Erikk Geannikis Editor: Amy Drozdowska Engineer: Patrick Boyd Deputy Editorial Director, Vox Talk: Amber Hall Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The art of counting

    The art of counting

    Who is counting, why are they counting, and what are they are counting? These three questions are important to ask when trying to understand numbers, according to Deborah Stone, author of Counting, How We Use Numbers to Decide What Matters. In this episode, she explains how different ways of totting up can have real-world consequences.

    (Image: Betta Blue Red Veiltail/Getty Images/zygotehasnobrain)