Logo
    Search

    The Mystery of the Man Who Died Twice

    enDecember 20, 2018

    Podcast Summary

    • The mysterious case of Joseph Newton Chandler IIIA man's death revealed a 50-year-old identity theft, highlighting the importance of questioning assumptions and considering the unexpected consequences of scientific discoveries.

      The world of science is full of fascinating and unexpected discoveries, as shown in the podcast "Ologies" and the mysterious case of Joseph Newton Chandler III. In the podcast, host Ally Ward explores various scientific fields, from etymology to neuroparasitology. Meanwhile, in the real world, the widespread use of DNA tests has created a massive DNA family tree, leading to unintended consequences such as the case of a man who lived under a stolen identity for decades. In this story, a man named Joseph Newton Chandler III was found dead in 2002, and from the evidence, it appeared that he had lived a lonely life and taken his own life. However, when the police searched for his relatives, they discovered that he had already been dead for over 50 years. US Marshal Peter Elliott, who was investigating the case, became suspicious and set out to uncover the truth about the mysterious dead man. The case highlights the importance of questioning assumptions and the unexpected consequences that can arise from new scientific discoveries. Listen to Science Versus from Gimlet Media for the full story.

    • The lack of concrete evidence makes it challenging for law enforcement to solve crimesContinued advancements in technology and methods are crucial for solving cold cases despite the absence of concrete evidence

      The lack of concrete evidence, such as DNA or fingerprints, can make it difficult for law enforcement to solve crimes. In the case discussed, a man lived under a stolen identity for over 20 years, leaving the police with few leads. He led a secretive life, paying in cash and avoiding relationships outside of work. When he was eventually found dead, his medical records revealed a suspicious injury, but the origins were unclear. The case went cold until a new cold case unit reviewed it and discovered a tissue sample from a hospital where the man had been treated for cancer. Despite the DNA not matching any known criminals, advances in technology now allow for the creation of a network of potential relatives, which could eventually lead to the identification of the mystery man. This case highlights the importance of continued advancements in technology and methods for solving cold cases.

    • Revolutionizing Unsolved Mysteries with Genealogy and DNA TestingAmateur genealogists use advanced techniques and DNA testing to help solve unsolved mysteries, with GEDmatch providing access to a vast database for finding potential relatives.

      The combination of advanced genealogy techniques and accessible DNA testing is revolutionizing the way unsolved mysteries are approached. Amateur genealogists, like Margaret Press, are teaming up with law enforcement to use their skills and resources to solve cases that have stumped professionals. GEDmatch, a unique genealogy website, allows users to upload their DNA results from other testing sites, providing access to a vast database for finding potential relatives. This has led to breakthroughs in cases where traditional methods have failed. For instance, the team of volunteers was able to use this method to identify a long-dead man, Joseph Newton Chandler, by finding distant relatives in his DNA. This not only brought closure to the case but also highlighted the importance of utilizing the power of technology and community in solving mysteries.

    • Unraveling a Decades-Old Identity Mystery with GenealogyA team of genealogists used DNA and extensive research to reveal a man's true identity after decades of living under a stolen one, highlighting the power of crowdsourcing and genealogy in solving complex identity mysteries.

      A team of armchair genealogists were able to unravel the identity of a man who had lived under a stolen identity for decades, using DNA and extensive genealogical research. They started with a few distant cousins of the mystery man and built a vast interconnected family tree, which eventually led them to the dead man they were looking for. The process involved finding the first common relative connecting the fake identity to the distant cousin, and then filling out the branches with more and more relatives using various records. After months of painstaking work, they discovered that the mystery man was actually Robert Ivan Nichols, and that he had been hiding from an unknown past. This case demonstrates the power of crowdsourcing and genealogical research in solving complex identity mysteries.

    • Genealogists uncover man's true identity after 20 years of living under a false nameA team of genealogists identified a man using a deceased boy's identity, leading to the solution of a long-standing cold case.

      A team of genealogists, led by Colleen Fitzpatrick, made a groundbreaking discovery by uncovering the true identity of a man who had been living under a false name for over 20 years. The man, identified as Robert Ivan Nichols, had been using a deceased boy's identity, and the team found this connection by noticing a consistent address in both Nichols' and Joseph Newton Chandler's (the deceased boy's identity) records. This discovery was significant because it helped US Marshal Pete Elliott solve a long-standing cold case. The team's work not only identified Nichols but also uncovered photos, addresses, and other information about him. This discovery was a major breakthrough in the case, but the question of why Nichols had assumed this identity and what he was running from remained unanswered. The team's work opened up new avenues of investigation for Pete, providing crucial information to help solve the rest of the case. The use of genealogy and public records to solve crimes is a powerful tool, as demonstrated by this case and the subsequent capture of the Golden State Killer.

    • Unexpected family connections help solve a mysterySurprising encounters with family members and their shared memories can provide valuable insights and lead to solving long-standing mysteries.

      The element of surprise and family connections were crucial in solving a decades-old mystery. Pete, a detective, drove unannounced to meet Robert Ivan Nichols' son, believing he could provide valuable information. When they met, the resemblance was striking, leaving no doubt they were related. Later, federal agents visited Phil, asking about his father. Phil described his dad as an intelligent and quiet man, with a methodical engineering brain. He shared a memorable childhood experience where his father, who was usually reserved, grabbed a big chunk of cake on Phil's birthday. This outburst was unusual for Robert, who was typically quiet and difficult to get close to. Phil speculated that his father's experience in World War 2, which involved the loss of many lives around him, may have contributed to his reserved demeanor. The combination of surprise encounters and family connections ultimately led to new leads and progress in the case.

    • A veteran's mysterious disappearance and new identityA Purple Heart recipient, Robert Nichols, disappeared after a troubled marriage, leaving only a cryptic clue. Decades later, he reappeared as Joseph Newton Chandler, raising suspicions of involvement in the Zodiac Killings.

      Robert Nichols, a military veteran, led a mysterious life after returning from the war. He was injured during battle and received the Purple Heart, but the trauma seemed to have lasting effects on his life. His relationship with his wife eventually broke down, leading to a divorce in the early 1960s. Robert then disappeared, leaving behind only a cryptic penny as a clue to his whereabouts. Decades later, he resurfaced under a new identity, Joseph Newton Chandler, raising suspicions of criminal activity. While it's unclear why Robert chose to steal a new identity, some theories suggest that he may have been connected to the Zodiac Killings in California during the 1960s. Despite extensive investigations, the true reason for Robert's actions remains a mystery.

    • Robert Ivan Nichols: A Possible Suspect in the Zodiac KillingsThe use of genealogy sites in crime solving has led to potential suspects in the Zodiac killings, including Robert Ivan Nichols, but definitive evidence is still lacking.

      The case of Robert Ivan Nichols being a suspect in the Zodiac killings raises intriguing possibilities but remains unproven. The similarities between Nichols and the police sketch of the Zodiac Killer, along with his military background and time in California, make him a compelling suspect. However, no definitive evidence has been presented, and the investigation is ongoing. The use of genealogy sites in crime solving has proven successful in recent times, leading to the identification of new suspects in over 20 violent crimes. For Nichols' son, Phil, the revelation of his father's potential involvement in the Zodiac killings was a shock, but he has come to terms with it through his own struggles with addiction. The case serves as a reminder of the complexities and uncertainties that come with investigating crimes, even as technology continues to provide new tools for solving them.

    • A personal story of transformation and the power of choiceUnexpected challenges and opportunities can lead to personal growth and the discovery of new interests, like essential oils or true crime podcasts.

      Life can present us with unexpected challenges and opportunities, and it's up to us to decide how to respond. In the podcast episode of "Science Versus," the topic of essential oils was discussed, but the speaker shared a personal story about a life-or-death situation and his decision to become a father instead of a mother. This experience showed him that he could be anything he wanted to be. The podcast also recommended the show "Criminal" as a fascinating listen for those who enjoy true crime stories. The episode featured a Texas woman who solved the murder of her college roommate and explored various criminal stories, some of which were funny and some intense. The production of "Science Versus" was a collaborative effort involving many people, including producers, editors, fact-checkers, and recording assistants. Special thanks were given to those who helped with the episode, including Dr. Colleen Fitzpatrick at the DNA Doe Project and Curtis Rogers at GEDmatch. Overall, the podcast episode provided an interesting and thought-provoking discussion on essential oils, but the personal story and recommendation of "Criminal" served as a reminder that life can surprise us and that we have the power to make choices that shape our experiences.

    Recent Episodes from Science Vs

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?
    We’re hearing stories of people having amazing, cosmic orgasms. So what buttons are they pressing to do this?? Well, it's just one. The “male G spot,” also called the “P spot,” because that P stands for prostate. Word on the street is that if you touch your prostate in just the right way — BAM — one helluva orgasm. But is that really true? And if you don't have a prostate (ahem, me): are you stuck with your garden variety orgasms? To get to the bottom of this, Science Vs surveyed almost 16,000 people about anal sex and masturbation! We also speak with Dr Dan Dickstein, Dr Tom Gaither and Neuroscientist Dr Nan Wise. Have an idea for a Science Vs episode? Let us know! On Instagram we're Science_Vs, Wendy's Tiktok is @wendyzukerman and our email is sciencevs@gimletmedia.com Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMind-BlowingOrgasms In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Absolutely cosmic orgasms (04:47) Anal sex is big right now (08:52) What makes the prostate special (12:02) The hole story. The butthole story. (20:19) How to get a cosmic orgasm (29:19) Tips and tricks for great anal sex (34:54) The real G spot This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. A huge thank you to Sam Levang for her help analyzing our data. And Professor Caroline Pukall and Dan Dickstein for your help with our survey questions. Thanks to the researchers we spoke to including Dr Devon Hensel. Thanks to Jack Weinstein, Hunter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 20, 2024

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?
    Protein influencers are big right now, telling us that we're probably missing out on the protein we need — and giving us a bunch of hacks for getting it. Why? They say that eating extra protein helps us build muscle, feel full, and lose weight. So is that true? We talk to kinesiology professor Stuart Phillips and nutrition professor Faidon Magkos.  Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsPROTEIN In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Protein is all the rage right now (02:53) Why protein matters (05:32) How much protein is enough? (11:33) Do you need more protein if you’re working out? (15:06) Is it risky to eat a LOT of protein? (18:46) Should you pound protein right after a workout? (23:09) Protein and weight loss This episode was produced by Rose Rimler and Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Prof. Brad Schoenfeld and Dr. Nicholas Burd. And special thanks to the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 13, 2024

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot
    Today we’re presenting Trillion Dollar Shot, a new series that explores the business story behind the rise of Ozempic and other blockbuster drugs being used for weight loss. The first episode focuses on the Novo Nordisk scientist who invented the compound that paved the way for Ozempic. You can find every episode on The Journal’s show feed. Trillion Dollar Shot is part of The Journal, which is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. This episode was hosted by Jessica Mendoza, with Bradley Olson. It was produced by Matt Kwong, with help from Jeevika Verma. Additional production from Adrienne Murray Nielsen. The series is edited by Katherine Brewer. Sound design and mixing by Peter Leonard. Mixing for Science Vs by Bobby Lord. Music in this episode by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Theme music by So Wylie, remixed for this series by Peter Leonard. Special thanks to Maria Byrne, Stefanie Ilgenfritz, Kate Linebaugh, Peter Loftus, Sara O’Brien, Enrique Perez De La Rosa, Sarah Platt, Sune Rasumssen, Jonathan Sanders, Nathan Singhapok, Leying Tang, Rolfe Winkler, Liz Essley Whyte, and Tatiana Zamis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 11, 2024

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?
    Health care for trans kids has been in the spotlight, with battles over what the science says and tons of U.S. states restricting the care that children can get. And then there’s a new report out of the UK, called the Cass Review, saying that a bunch of the evidence that doctors have been relying on to treat trans kids is “remarkably weak.” So what’s going on here? What is the best health care for trans kids? We sort through the science with Professor Stephen Russell, Dr. Cal Horton, and Dr. Ada Cheung. UPDATE 6/6/24: In a previous version of this episode, we said a study was published this year, when it was actually published last year. The episode has been updated. Mental health resources, including suicide lifelines, for around the world: spotify.com/resources Trans Lifeline: A Trans peer support hotline: 1-877-565-8860 Trevor Project: crisis support services to LGBTQ young people: Call 1-866-488-7386 or Text ‘START’ to 678-678 Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsTransKidsCassReviewTranscript  Here are links to our previous episodes about the science of being transgender and misinformation about care for trans kids. In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over care for trans kids (02:45) What to do when a kid wants to change their name and pronouns (13:44) Do puberty blockers help trans kids’ mental health? (20:44) Does hormone therapy help trans people’s mental health? (25:25) How often are people "retransitioning"? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang and Rose Rimler. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Consulting by Rebecca Kling. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Blake Cavve, Dr. Doug VanderLaan, and Dr. Quinnehtukqut McLamore. And a very special thanks to the trans folks and their families we talked to, Christopher Suter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 06, 2024

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup
    More than 150 years ago, just before dino-mania struck, New York City was supposed to get a majestic dinosaur museum full of amazing models of dinos. There would have been nothing like it in the world. Until a bunch of thugs showed up with sledgehammers and smashed every bit of the models to smithereens — and buried it all in Central Park. Today we’re finding out what happened — and WHY. We speak with doctoral researcher Vicky Coules and paleontologist Carl Mehling. SURVEY!! HELP US SCIENCE!! WE NEED YOUR HELP TO UNCOVER THE LAST MYSTERIES OF SEX https://bit.ly/ScienceVsSurvey Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheGreatDinosaurSmashup In this episode, we cover: (00:00) ​​The amazing dino museum we didn’t get to have (03:15) What we knew about dinos in the 1800s (04:57) The famous Crystal Palace dinosaurs (06:48) The plan for the Paleozoic Museum is born (10:40) The Great Dinosaur Smashup of 1871 (12:52) Suspect No. 1: Boss Tweed (17:58) Vicky cracks the case! (26:17) One final mystery — where are the dino pieces?? This episode was produced by Blythe Terrell with help from Wendy Zukerman, R.E. Natowicz, Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler and Joel Werner. Editing by Wendy Zukerman. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to everyone we spoke to about this episode, including Gowan Dawson, Robert Peck, Wendy Anthony and Jessica M. Lydon. Also thanks to Jack Weinstein, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 30, 2024

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?
    The Abortion Pill is now the most common way to have an abortion in the US. Yet what exactly happens when you take these pills is shrouded in mystery. Even many doctors don't know how well they work! Today, we're letting the sun shine on the abortion pill. We'll walk you through what happens when you take these pills: what they do to your body, and how safe are they for your physical and mental health? To explore all this - and more - we speak to Dr Sara Whitburn, Professor Oskari Heikinheimo, and Professor Ushma Upadhyay. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheAbortionPiill The Abortion Project's Instagram @theabortionproject Science Vs's Instagram @science_vs If you want to talk to someone - there's some great resources in here: spotify.com/resources In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over the abortion pill  (04:28) How does the abortion pill work?  (09:05) How it feels to take the abortion pill (14:34) How often do people hemorrhage? (21:22) What's "normal" bleeding?  (24:11) Does taking the abortion pill affect your mental health?  (32:02) Why some people prefer the abortion pill This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr. Tiffany Green, Dr. Ned Calonge, Professor Jenny Higgins, Dr. Daniel Aaron, Dr. Beverly Winikoff, and Dr. Abigail Aiken. Also thanks to Lauren Silverman, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 23, 2024

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?
    With the powers of the James Webb Space Telescope, scientists discovered some super weird things in the early Universe, and it's making some nerds question our theory of everything.  This story comes to us from our friends at Unexplainable at Vox Media. Find Unexplainable’s transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsUnexplainable In this episode, we cover: (0:00) Liftoff (01:10) The James Webb Space Telescope  (04:57) Party of the early universe  (08:39) Mysteries of the early galaxies  (15:23) How do we figure it out? This episode was produced by Brian Resnick, with help from Noam Hassenfeld and Meradith Hoddinott, who also manages the Unexplainable team. Editing from Jorge Just, music from Noam, and mixing and sound design from Cristian Ayala. Fact checking from Kelsey Lannin. Mandy Nguyen is searching for new forms of life. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 16, 2024

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky
    Getting your heart broken sucks — and for some of us, it even feels physically painful. So why does it hurt so bad? And what can science tell us about how to get over it? We dive into all of this with neuroscientist Prof. Lucy Brown.  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsHeartbreak In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Heartbreak sucks (07:17) What heartbreak does in the brain (12:14) What heartbreak does in the body (15:07) How to get over heartbreak  The episode does mention abuse. Here are some resources if you’re struggling to move on from abuse:  https://resources.byspotify.com/ https://www.loveisrespect.org/resources/why-am-i-struggling-to-move-on-after-abuse/ This episode was produced by Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler, Meryl Horn, Kaitlyn Sawrey and Lexi Krupp. Editing by Caitlin Kenney and Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly and Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, and Bobby Lord. A huge thanks to all the scientists we got in touch with for this episode, including Professor Larry Young, Professor Tiffany Field, Professor Ethan Kross, Professor Sandra Langeslag, and Professor Naomi Eisenberger. Thanks to Lori Segal. A special thanks to the Zukerman family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes
    Comedian Tig Notaro, who just released her fifth comedy special, "Hello Again," joins us for a chat about the science of her comedy: telling us how she builds jokes, and of course sharing a bunch of dumb and fabulous jokes. Enjoy!  Here's our Funniest Joke in the World Episode!!  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTigNotaro In this episode, we cover: (00:00) We're interviewing Tig!  (01:22) I could be a comedian?  (02:47) How Tig creates a joke  (08:59) The element of surprise (12:27) The world's funniest joke? (13:55) Tig's favorite jokes This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Funniest Joke in the World

    The Funniest Joke in the World
    If you Google "The Funniest Joke in the World," you'll be very disappointed. The internet might serve you something like, "What has many keys but can't open a single lock??” (Answer: A piano). Screw that. That's not funny. Enter Science Vs. We’re going on a romp to find out once and for all: What is the funniest joke in the world. According to science. And for this quest we've interviewed a bunch of amazing comics including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Dr Jason Leong, Loni Love, as well as special guest Latif Nasser of Radiolab and, of course, some scientists: Neuroscientist Professor Sophie Scott and Psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman. Which Joke Will Win???    Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsFunniestJoke In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The Quest Begins (08:40) Why laughing matters (13:13) The scientific search for the world's funniest joke (17:40) Woof, quack or moo? (21:33) The comedy K (26:30) Do different cultures have different senses of humour? (28:27) The winner! (32:15) Scientific theories of humour (lol) (38:28) Why the winning joke isn't funny (40:26) How do you stop a dog from humping your leg?  (44:43) Meet the comedy gods This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Joel Werner, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Sarah Baum. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr Andrew Farkas, Professor Penny MacDonald, Dr Maggie Prenger and a huge thank you to Professor Chris Westbury for sharing your amazing spreadsheet!! Thanks to all the comedians we interviewed in this episode including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Loni Love, Takashi Wakasugi, Urooj Ashfaq, Dr Jason Leong, Penny Greenhalgh and Mohammed Magdi. Another big thanks to Lindsay Farber, Roland Campos, Lauren LoGiudice, Andrea Jones-Rooy and the other comics at The Joke Lab; and all the comics that we spoke to and couldn't fit into the episode, we really really appreciate you and your time! Thanks to Ben Milam, the Melbourne International Comedy Festival, Stupid Old Studios, Paige Ransbury, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    How Police Used Genetics in Idaho Murders Case, and Solving Crimes with Genealogy, with CeCe Moore | Ep. 470

    How Police Used Genetics in Idaho Murders Case, and Solving Crimes with Genealogy, with CeCe Moore | Ep. 470

    Megyn Kelly is joined by CeCe Moore, Chief Genetic Genealogist at Parabon NanoLabs and founder of DNA Detectives, to talk about how DNA and genealogy helped lead to Idaho college murders suspect Bryan Kohberger's arrest, the genetic genealogy process and his father's involvement, the lengths the killer went to avoid leaving DNA at the crime scene, the possibility the killer used an alias in online chatrooms about the case, whether genetic genealogy can help solve the JonBenet Ramsey murder case, how "touch DNA" is used to develop a composite of the killer, how genealogy started to be used to solve crimes, the way 23andMe changed the way genetics could be used, other cases Moore has helped to solve, the future of genetic genealogy, and more.

    Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:
     

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/MegynKelly

    Twitter: http://Twitter.com/MegynKellyShow

    Instagram: http://Instagram.com/MegynKellyShow

    Facebook: http://Facebook.com/MegynKellyShow

     

    Find out more information at:

     

    https://www.devilmaycaremedia.com/megynkellyshow

    My True Crime Episode with David Mittelman

    My True Crime Episode with David Mittelman

    Less than 5% of major crimes end in a conviction. For cold cases, that number drops to 1%.      

    Those numbers won’t stay low forever.  

    David Mittelman’s company, Othram Inc., is revolutionizing DNA sequencing and, in the process, greatly reducing the number of “unsolvable” cases.   

     I called David to learn more about how the new technology works, what it means for the future of crime-fighting, and maybe get some fascinating stories out of the bargain too.      

    This is… A Bit of Optimism.   

     For more on David and his work visit:   

    DNASolves.com 

    Othram.com

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    HS 41 – A Christmas Story & Mortgage Planning with “A Tale of Two Brothers”

    HS 41 – A Christmas Story & Mortgage Planning with “A Tale of Two Brothers”
    Jason Hartman welcomes Ronald Reagan to the show to share a moving Christmas story. Next, some mortgage financial planning illustrated by “A Tale of Two Brothers” by Ric Edelman who has educated his clients for years on the benefits of integrating their mortgage into their overall financial plan.In his book, The New Rules of Money, [...]