Economics should focus on improving human well-being: Economics should prioritize human well-being over models and equilibrium, with the ultimate goal of making people better off
The economic field, particularly after the financial crisis, has faced criticism for losing sight of its primary goal: improving human well-being. Economists have been criticized for focusing too much on models and equilibrium, forgetting that the ultimate goal is to create better conditions for people. The COVID-19 crisis has brought renewed attention to this issue, leading to a greater focus on the purpose of economics and the problems it aims to solve. Some proposed solutions, such as distributing more money, have gained currency due to this increased clarity. Principal Asset Management, as a real estate manager, embodies the importance of considering human well-being in investment decisions, combining local insights and global expertise to identify the most compelling opportunities. Economics, at its core, should be about making people better off than they would be otherwise.
Prejudice hinders profits during industrial revolutions: Prejudice can reject valuable resources, leading to inefficiencies and missed opportunities during industrial revolutions, requiring recognition and mitigation for maximum profits and gains.
Prejudice, as irrational discrimination, can significantly hinder profits and economic well-being, particularly during periods of industrial revolution like the current 4th Industrial Revolution. This revolution, characterized by artificial intelligence, robotics, and automation, requires the right people in the right jobs to effectively apply technology and adapt to changes. However, the uncertainty and shifting social positions brought about by this revolution can also encourage more prejudice, creating a vicious cycle that could hinder progress. Prejudice, which is rejecting someone based on non-rational grounds like race, gender, or sexuality, can result in the rejection of potentially valuable resources, leading to inefficiencies and missed opportunities. Previous industrial revolutions have also seen prejudice, providing valuable lessons on how to mitigate its negative effects. Ultimately, recognizing and addressing prejudice is crucial for maximizing profits and gains in this era of technological upheaval.
Seeking Simple Solutions to Complex Problems: During times of change, it's common to identify scapegoats rather than understanding complex economic forces. Resist this simplistic thinking and seek a nuanced understanding to make informed decisions.
Throughout history, during times of industrial change and economic upheaval, people have sought simple solutions to complex problems. This often involves identifying a scapegoat group to blame for their hardships, rather than understanding the complex forces at play. From the Luddites in the first industrial revolution, to working-class Britons in the second, and even women in the third, this pattern has repeated itself. It's a compelling narrative, but ultimately, it's based on fear and misunderstanding. As we navigate the ongoing changes brought about by the fourth industrial revolution, it's important to resist this simplistic thinking and instead seek out a nuanced understanding of the economic forces at play. This will require open-mindedness, education, and a willingness to challenge our assumptions. Only then can we make informed decisions and work towards creating a more equitable and prosperous future for all. Principal Asset Management, as a leading real estate manager, recognizes the importance of this perspective and harnesses it to deliver local insights and global expertise, giving clients an exclusive advantage in today's market.
Irrational decisions and their economic costs: Irrational decisions driven by false information and propaganda lead to lost productivity and flawed decision-making due to lack of diversity in perspectives.
Irrational decisions, driven by prejudice and discrimination, have always existed and have significant economic costs. However, the source of irrationality often lies in the dissemination of false information and propaganda. From the Luddites in the 18th century to the fascist movements in the 19th and 20th centuries, and even to the present day with fake news and social media, irrationality exploits new means of communication. The opportunity cost of irrational decisions is difficult to quantify as economies become more complex, but it comes in two forms: lost productivity from not employing the right person for the job, and flawed decision-making from a lack of diversity in perspectives around the table.
The Hidden Costs of Prejudice in Business: Prejudice and discrimination can lead to significant economic losses for organizations, particularly in diverse teams and industries. Diverse teams can lead to increased productivity and economic growth.
Prejudice and bad decision-making based on biases can lead to significant economic costs for organizations. However, these costs can be challenging to quantify as people may hide their prejudices and some forms of prejudice can be invisible. Research suggests that more diverse teams, particularly in creative roles, can lead to increased productivity. For instance, in the US, studies have shown that racial diversity in financial services leads to higher productivity. Similarly, lifting restrictions on women entrepreneurs in Saudi Arabia resulted in an explosion of new businesses and economic activity. These examples illustrate the potential economic losses when prejudice and discrimination are present. It's crucial for firms to make an effort to address these issues to avoid suffering from the hidden costs of prejudice.
The importance of addressing prejudice for businesses: Businesses benefit from addressing prejudice, but smaller firms may need government intervention to ensure equal treatment and prevent damage to society.
While large global businesses understand the importance of addressing prejudice and are taking active steps to do so due to the profit incentive, smaller firms may not fully grasp the benefits and continue to make damaging decisions. The example given is from baseball's history of segregation and desegregation, where integrated teams outperformed but it took time for all teams to follow suit. The speaker emphasizes the need for both the profit motive and government intervention to ensure equal treatment and prevent damage to businesses and society. In essence, the government's role is to treat everyone equally and create an environment where all groups have the opportunity to succeed.
Reducing prejudice for economic benefits: Addressing prejudice can lead to increased productivity, economic growth, and a higher standard of living, while reducing environmental damage. Central banks and policymakers addressing unemployment gaps can contribute to a stronger economy.
Reducing prejudice in society can lead to significant economic benefits, including increased productivity, economic growth, and a higher standard of living, while also reducing environmental damage. The global economy has experienced low productivity and growth in recent years, and addressing prejudice could be a potential solution. This can result in a more efficient society that maintains or improves living standards with less environmental impact, or it could lead to additional growth. The GDP, while widely used as a measure of economic success, may not fully capture these changes. Central banks and policymakers taking a more expansive view of employment and addressing unemployment gaps between different races can lead to better household income and opportunities for children, ultimately contributing to a stronger economy.
Social status shapes political leanings beyond income inequality: Social status significantly influences political preferences, and addressing this issue through practical solutions can contribute to more efficient labor and capital use, leading to future growth.
While income inequality plays a role in shaping political preferences, it's not the only factor. Social status, or perceived standing in society, can also significantly influence political leanings, especially when income doesn't offset the loss of social status. Central banks can help mitigate some of the economic damage, but they may not be well-equipped to address social status over time. Companies and economies should pay attention to this issue, as productivity improvements will likely be a major driver of future growth, and addressing social status can contribute to more efficient use of labor capital. However, acknowledging this issue isn't enough. Practical solutions, such as implementing diversity initiatives and providing financial support, are necessary to address the complex issue of prejudice and its impact on social status.
Traditional economic institutions acknowledge economic inequality: The conversation around economics and social justice is evolving, with traditional economic institutions recognizing the importance of addressing economic inequality. The Federal Reserve's focus on this issue under both Powell and Yellen is a significant development.
The conversation around economics and social justice is evolving, and traditional economic institutions are starting to acknowledge the importance of addressing economic inequality. This shift is a promising sign that we may be entering a new economic paradigm where prosperity is not just seen as an end goal, but as something that should benefit all people. The fact that this conversation is happening in mainstream economic circles is encouraging and suggests that progress is being made. The Federal Reserve's focus on economic inequality under both Powell and Yellen is a significant development, and the idea that economics should ultimately improve people's well-being is gaining traction. Listeners of Odd Lots can get a discount on Paul Donovan's book "Profit and Prejudice: The Luddites of the 4th Industrial Revolution" by using the code "ol25" on the Rutledge website. For more finance news and insights, check out Bloomberg's Money Stuff podcast, available every Friday on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
This Is How Prejudice Can Hinder the Economy
Recent Episodes from Odd Lots
Lots More With Sam Ro on the Booming World of RIAs
The Future Proof Festival takes place right on the beach in Huntington Beach, California. Thousands of registered investment advisors from all over the country come to talk shop, take pitches from vendors, eat tacos, drink beer, and listen to a concert from Third Eye Blind. On this Lots More, we talk with Sam Ro, the author of the Tker.co newsletter about the RIA scene, financial media, behavioral finance, the Fed, and the business of musical artists playing at conferences.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Next Stage of the Credit Cycle with Oaktree’s Poli
This week, the Fed cut benchmark rates by 50 basis points. Lower financing costs should be a relief for companies that need to borrow in the form of bonds or loans. But, the weird thing about the previous few years of high rates and high inflation is how much corporate credit has defied expectations. While defaults increased slightly, there wasn’t a huge wave of bankruptcies. And most companies haven’t really had trouble finding financing, with a smorgasbord of options available to them — including from the booming private credit market. So what happens now that the Fed is lowering rates? In this episode, we speak with Danielle Poli, co-portfolio manager of Oaktree’s Diversified Income Fund and a founding member of the firm’s investment committee, about how she sees the next leg of the credit cycle unfolding, and how she decides between a multitude of potential investments in the space.
Related Links:
The Black Hole of Private Credit That’s Swallowing the Economy
The Hottest Way for Banks to Get Risk Off Their Balance Sheets
Only http://Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Pimco CIO Dan Ivascyn on the Biggest Fed Decision in Years
It’s Fed Day, and while everyone expects the central bank to cut benchmark interest rates, the key question is by how much? Will it be 25 basis points or 50? Investors are evenly split between the two possibilities, setting up one of the most uncertain meetings ever. So what does a big bond manager do on a day like this? In this episode, we speak with Dan Ivascyn, Group CIO at Pimco, where he manages the $158 billion Pimco Income Fund. He tells us what he’s expecting from the FOMC, and what he’s seeing in terms of financial conditions and the real restrictiveness of the monetary environment right now. He also walks us through what Fed day is actually like at Pimco, where he thinks the economy is going, and answers the question of whether — with rates finally going down — bonds might be back in favor.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
How Josh Brown Created A Financial Media Empire
15 years ago was a pivotal moment for financial media. On the one hand, we were in the midst of a huge financial crisis, which shook everything up and exposed how little we knew about our own world. In addition to that, we were in the early moments of a revolution, which saw the rise of blogs, podcasts, "Finance Twitter" and other new platforms for disseminating information about markets and business. One of the winners from that era was Josh Brown, a former stockbroker who rose to fame in part on the back of his must-read blog The Reformed Broker. Now he's the CEO of a large investment advisory firm, Ritholtz Wealth Management. He's got a popular podcast. He's got a new book. He's a fixture on CNBC. And he even has a conference business. We talk about his career path, what he's learned, some funny stories from the good old days, and how he became a media giant.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Security, Bookmarked: Finance (Sponsored Content)
Financial institutions have been a leading target for cyber crime since the dawn of the internet. But phishing schemes have become far more intricate, and cyber heists go beyond stealing money from a bank. JF Legault, Deputy CISO at J.P. Morgan Chase, explains how he leads cyber defense on the front lines of work — and lays out a strategy to transform teams into early detection networks. Then David Adrian from Chrome unpacks how web browsing protections, robust monitoring, and a real-time view of threats can fit into this kind of strategy to maximize resilience to a cyber attack.
This episode is sponsored by Chrome Enterprise.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Lots More With Isabella Weber on Draghi's EU Competitiveness Report
This week, former European Central Bank President and Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi published a long-awaited report examining ways to make the European economy more competitive. The report comes at a time when there are major concerns about how Europe is stacking up against the US and China in things like electrical vehicles and AI. It also dovetails with long-running debates about German fiscal austerity, economic tensions between various European Union members, energy crises, and inflation. In this episode, we speak with University of Massachusetts-Amherst economics professor Isabella Weber about her takeaways from the report and potential policy approaches to solving Europe's big competitiveness problem.
Referenced in this episode:
Draghi Says EU Itself at Risk Without More Funds, Joint Debt
Draghi’s Call for Joint EU Bonds Hits Wall of German Opposition
Only Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Adam Tooze on the Big Misconceptions of the Chinese Economy
One of the big buzzwords over the last year or so has been "overcapacity." There's a constant line of argument that China is unfairly flooding the world with unprofitable goods and creating huge, unsustainable imbalances. Western countries, particularly the US (but also Europe), have responded by raising tariffs and engaging in domestic industrial policy in order to compete. But is the strategy sound? Are the basic premises of the problem correct? On this episode of the podcast, we speak with Columbia Professor Adam Tooze, the author of several books, as well as the popular Chartbook newsletter. He argues that the overcapacity framing is misguided, and that the US may be making a mistake putting its chips down on an industrial revival. He talks us through some of the actual weaknesses of the Chinese model, as well as its global political reverberations.
Read more:
Two Veteran Chip Builders Have a Plan to Take On Nvidia
The US and China Are in an All Out Race for AI Domination
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
US Trade Rep Katherine Tai Describes the New Era of Globalization
One of the rare areas of bipartisan consensus in the US right now, is on the need to change our trading relationship with China. Former President Donald Trump started a process of putting tariffs on Chinese goods and limiting the export of certain key technologies. This has only expanded under the Biden administration, with expanded restrictions on things like electric vehicles, solar panels, and semiconductors. So what's the thinking behind this drive? What are the goals and what are the risks? On this episode we speak with the United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai. Ambassador Tai describes what she sees as a rethink, or a new version of, globalization. She explains the new worker-centric priorities, how trade fits into domestic investments, and what a healthy version of international economic relations actually looks like.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
The Booming Crypto Use Case That's Happening Right Now
Pretty much since the moment that cryptocurrencies came into existence, there's been a chorus of skeptics who argue that they solve no real world use cases, except for gambling and speculation. For a while, there was a lot of hype about things like Web3 or DeFi, but for the most part, these still remain in the realm of pure speculation and gambling. And so, the ultimate use case for crypto remains elusive. Our guest on this episode argues otherwise. He thinks that stablecoins, such as Circle or Paxos, which are backed by actual dollar instruments in regulated institutions running on public blockchains (like Ethereum or Solana) are solving a genuine problem in transmitting money, beyond just speculating on other cryptocurrencies. Austin Campbell is an adjunct professor at Columbia Business School and the founder of Zero Knowledge Consulting. He also comes with a long resume at both crypto and legacy financial institutions. He explains why stablecoins are having a moment and explains the problems they currently solve (particularly internationally) and why legacy payments infrastructure is unlikely to serve the same needs.
Read more:
The Case for Stablecoins Being the New Shadow Banks
How Stablecoins Became a Powerful Force in Crypto
Only Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
How Hedge Funds Discover the Next Superstar Trader
One of the problems in investing or trading is that — to use a common disclaimer — past results are no guarantee of future success. Someone can have a great track record in their stock picks, but maybe they just got lucky. Or maybe they were particularly well-dialed into one market regime that inevitably shifts. Or maybe they're actually just better than other traders. For multi-strategy hedge funds or "pod shops," there's an ongoing battle to hire or train the next great portfolio manager. But how can managers tell who is actually good and who isn't? On this episode of the podcast, we speak with Joe Peta, who was previously the head of performance analytics at Point72 Asset Management and has had a long career in the trading world. He's also an avid fan of sports gambling, and the author of the recent book, Moneyball for the Money Set, which attempts to take some of the talent analytical principles that originated in Major League Baseball and apply them to evaluating portfolio managers. He talks us through the traditional approach funds use to find or create superstars, and how these approaches can be improved upon using more rigorous, quantitative methods.
Mentioned in this episode:
Hedge Fund Talent Schools Are Looking for the Perfect Trader
How to Succeed at Multi-Strategy Hedge Funds
Only Bloomberg.com subscribers can get the Odd Lots newsletter in their inbox each week, plus unlimited access to the site and app. Subscribe at bloomberg.com/subscriptions/oddlots
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Related Episodes
CSV Economic Well-being
