Podcast Summary
Exploring current events, politics, and product recommendations: Dan Bongino discusses FBI interviews, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and introduces high-quality razors from Harry's
On The Dan Bongino Show, listeners can expect a wide range of topics from investigations into disturbing news stories like the death of Jeffrey Epstein, to political commentary on red flag laws and hypocrisy regarding the Second Amendment, all the way to product recommendations like the high-quality, affordable razors from Harry's. Dan Bongino, the show's host, promises to deliver the truth without holding back, and in this particular episode, he plans to share more information on Bruce Orr's interviews with the FBI and address recent actions of Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. So, whether you're interested in current events, politics, or a great shaving experience, tune in to The Dan Bongino Show.
Epstein's death raises serious questions: An investigation is underway into Epstein's death in custody, but it's crucial for transparency, fairness, and prompt handling to maintain public trust.
The circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody raise serious questions that demand transparency and a thorough investigation. Epstein, who was a subject of a criminal case and had connections to prominent Democratic donors, was not on suicide watch despite expressing concerns about his safety. The FBI and Inspector General are currently looking into the matter, but given the sensitive nature of the case and the potential implications for our justice system and public trust, it's crucial that they handle the investigation promptly, fairly, and transparently. The fact that Epstein was not on suicide watch despite reported threats to his life and a recent incident of self-harm is a significant open question that needs answering. The public deserves to know how this happened and what steps will be taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Unanswered questions about Epstein's death and relationships with powerful figures: Speaker clarified he had no firsthand knowledge of Epstein's wrongdoing or Clinton's involvement, questioned Epstein's ties to intelligence community, and urged caution against believing false information online.
There are many unanswered questions surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein and his past relationships, particularly with powerful figures like Bill Clinton. The speaker has been asked about his supposed knowledge of Epstein's activities and Clinton's involvement, but he clarified that he was not a witness to any wrongdoing and only received secondhand information. He also raised questions about Epstein's potential ties to the intelligence community and suggested that there may be more information coming to light about his behavior and associates. The speaker emphasized that he would share any new information on his show as soon as it becomes available. Additionally, he cautioned against believing clickbait headlines and false information spread online.
Democrats' questionable handling of sexual misconduct allegations: Despite debunked information, Democrats attempted to re-engage a man allegedly connected to powerful individuals amidst sexual misconduct allegations, raising concerns about his safety and motives.
The questionable actions surrounding the handling of a man allegedly connected to powerful individuals in the context of sexual misconduct allegations and the alleged attempt to re-engage him by Democrats despite the fact that the information he provided had been debunked. The speaker finds it deeply disturbing that this individual was not on suicide watch despite his alleged history and the gravity of the situation. Additionally, the speaker promotes Omax Health's sleep and stress remedy with CBD, emphasizing its effectiveness in helping people get a good night's sleep. The speaker also hints at a theory regarding the Democrats' motives for trying to re-engage the individual even after the dossier had been debunked.
Senator Warner tried to re-engage with discredited dossier producer Steele: Despite Steele's discreditation, Warner and the FBI continued to communicate with him, raising questions about their motives. The dossier may have been produced by Simpson, not Steele, to maintain a consistent story.
During May of 2017, despite Christopher Steele, the producer of the Trump dossier, being discredited and terminated as a source by the FBI, Democratic Senator Mark Warner on the Intel committee was trying to re-engage with him through his lawyer. This raises questions about why Warner and the FBI were still communicating with Steele and passing information to the FBI. It is now suspected that the dossier was not actually produced by Steele but by Glenn Simpson, who wrote about the same players in the Wall Street Journal in 2007. This theory is supported by the fact that Nelly Orr, Bruce Orr's wife who worked for Fusion GPS, was also producing the dossier. The motivation for the Democrats to keep Steele quiet and maintain a consistent story may explain why his name was used on the dossier instead of Simpson's.
FBI's Handling of Steele Dossier: The FBI relied on unverified information from Christopher Steele, who had previously worked with them, to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. Despite the lack of verification, they continued to use him as a source after he was fired, and the dossier's true origin was hidden by removing the Fusion GPS header.
The Steele dossier, which was used as evidence in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, was not thoroughly verified before it was presented to the FBI. Instead, the FBI relied on Christopher Steele, who had previously worked with them, as a verified source, even though the information was not his. The Democrats, including Senators Mark Warner and Dianne Feinstein, also met with Steele after he was fired by the FBI to keep him from speaking publicly about the dossier. The texts between Warner and another man, whose identity is redacted, reveal that Warner was desperate to keep the relationship going without a paper trail. The Ore 302s, which are FBI reports of interviews, show a continued relationship with Steele after he was fired, and the thumb drive containing the dossier's information was entered into evidence with the Fusion GPS header stripped. This strategy was used to launder the information and hide its true origin. The dossier, which was used to obtain FISA warrants to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page, was not authentic intelligence information but rather an attempt to get Steele to shut his mouth.
Bruce Orbin's statements contradict FISA warrant regarding Steele's media interactions: The FISA warrant application contained inconsistent information about Christopher Steele's media contacts, with Bruce Orbin acknowledging potential ongoing relationships, while the warrant stated only Fusion GPS and the FBI were recipients.
There are inconsistencies between statements made by Bruce Orbin and information in the FISA warrant regarding Christopher Steele's interactions with the media. Bruce Orbin acknowledged to the FBI that Steele may have had an ongoing relationship with the press, which contradicts a footnote in the FISA warrant stating that Steele only shared the dossier with Fusion GPS and the FBI. This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy of the information used to obtain the warrant to surveil Carter Page in the Russia investigation. Additionally, Steele provided a copy of the dossier to a John McCain associate, David Kramer, who in turn shared it with Buzzfeed and CNN, further complicating the issue. The implications of these findings could be significant for the ongoing investigation and those involved in the initial application for the FISA warrant.
The Second Amendment safeguards an individual's right to bear arms: The Second Amendment ensures an individual's liberty to own firearms, as confirmed by historical and legal interpretations
The Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms, as confirmed by historical and legal interpretations. This right, like the First and Fourth Amendments, codifies a preexisting individual liberty. The misconception that it's a collective right stems from a misunderstanding of its text and historical context. For example, Judge Antonin Scalia's interpretation in District of Columbia v. Heller supports this individual right perspective. Additionally, Vincero Watches, with their high-quality products, excellent customer focus, and ongoing sales, offer an exciting shopping opportunity for watch enthusiasts. Their commitment to customer satisfaction and wide range of collections make them a go-to brand for both gifting and personal use.
The Second Amendment protects individual rights: The Second Amendment guarantees individual rights to bear arms, similar to the First and Fourth Amendments
The Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms, protects individual rights, just like the First and Fourth Amendments do with freedom of speech and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, respectively. The use of the term "the right of the people" in the Second Amendment refers to individual rights, not collective rights of a militia, as evidenced by the consistent use of this terminology throughout the Bill of Rights. This was clarified by Judge Scalia in his rulings and interpretations of the Constitution. It's a simple concept, but it's important to remember that the Second Amendment protects individual rights, just like the other amendments do.
Red flag laws and due process concerns: Red flag laws, while intended to prevent harm, raise due process concerns and potential for misuse, as seen in the VA's disruptive behavior committees, which can result in firearms being taken away without a criminal charge or conviction.
Red flag laws, or gun violence restraining orders, while intended to protect individuals and prevent potential harm, raise significant due process concerns. These temporary orders allow for the removal of firearms from individuals deemed a danger to themselves or others, but without a criminal charge or conviction. Matt Palumbo's piece, "The Problem with Red Flag Laws," highlights the potential misuse and malfunction of such lists, as seen in the VA's disruptive behavior committees. Once placed on these lists, individuals can have their firearms taken away, and the process for removal is not always accessible. With temporary solutions, the focus should be on addressing potential dangers within families and communities, rather than allowing the government to encroach on liberties and freedoms without due process.
Liberal politicians' inconsistent views on taxes: Elizabeth Warren's call for gun manufacturer taxes contradicts liberal belief that taxes don't impact business, illustrating their inconsistent messaging on taxes.
The inconsistency between liberal politicians' messages regarding taxes was highlighted in a tweet by Elizabeth Warren, which proposed increasing taxes on gun manufacturers to reduce sales. However, as critics pointed out, this contradicts their long-held belief that taxes have no impact on business or commerce. The speaker warned listeners to keep this in mind when engaging in debates with liberals about the economic implications of taxes. Additionally, the speaker shared his amusement at the hypocrisy of the situation and the inconsistency of liberal messages.
Bernie Sanders' Climate Stance and Criticisms: While Sanders and Trump clash on climate change, Sanders faces criticism for his proposed $30 trillion healthcare system and wealth. Socialist ideas, while appealing, could lead to mismanagement and negative consequences. Help the poor become wealthy through means other than socialism.
During a recent discussion, it was pointed out that both Bernie Sanders and the speaker have criticized Donald Trump's stance on climate change, with Sanders labeling Trump an "idiot." However, Sanders himself has been criticized for his proposed $30 trillion government-run healthcare system and his hypocrisy regarding his wealth. The speaker expressed concern that Sanders' socialist ideas, while appealing, could lead to negative consequences and mismanagement of resources. The discussion also touched upon the unequal distribution of wealth and the importance of adding value in business. A Wall Street Journal article on Venezuela's growing inequality was cited as an example of the potential pitfalls of socialist policies. Ultimately, the speaker emphasized the importance of helping the poor become wealthy through means other than socialism.
Socialist Policies Widen Income Inequality: Socialist policies can lead to mismanagement, shortages, and disproportionately affect the less fortunate, widening income inequality. Focus on promoting equality within a free market system instead.
Socialist policies, as exemplified by the situation in Venezuela, can result in wider income inequality rather than bridging the gap between the rich and the poor. The speaker argues that socialism, which involves government control of production and resources, often leads to mismanagement and shortages, disproportionately affecting the less fortunate. Instead, the focus should be on promoting equality within the framework of a free market system. The speaker also criticizes those advocating for such policies, like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, for their hypocrisy and inconsistent approaches to taxation and regulation.
