Podcast Summary
Maine disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, Trump faces defamation trial, Boebert leaves district for another run, Right-wing media focuses on odd topics: Maine bans Trump from 2024 ballot, Trump avoids defamation trial, Boebert runs in new district, Right-wing media discusses gas stoves and sexuality
Significant political developments continue to unfold, with Maine becoming the second state to disqualify Donald Trump from its 2024 ballot based on the 14th amendment. Trump also faces a defamation trial in January that he's desperate to avoid. Meanwhile, Lauren Boebert has left her Colorado district to run in another, and the right-wing media is focusing on odd topics like gas stoves and searches for why people are gay. Amidst this news cycle, the momentum seems to be shifting away from the doom and gloom narrative of a month ago, and towards a pro-democracy competition. The Midas Touch Network is committed to covering these developments and providing hot takes on the facts and data that are often overlooked by legacy media. Subscribe to the Midas Touch YouTube channel and add the Midas Touch podcast to your feed to stay informed.
Secretaries of State Taking Actions Against Candidates: Some Secretaries of State are disqualifying presidential candidates from the ballot based on the 14th Amendment, citing insurrection or actions against the rule of law, such as former President Trump's role in the Capitol riots.
Several secretaries of state are taking a stand against candidates who they believe have engaged in insurrection or actions against the rule of law, using the 14th Amendment as justification for disqualifying them from the ballot. For instance, the Secretary of State of Maine, Matt Dunlap, has made such a decision regarding former President Donald Trump based on the events of January 6, 2021. While this decision will go through the court system, it represents a growing trend of states taking action against candidates who they believe pose a threat to democracy. The Colorado Supreme Court has reached a similar conclusion, and the Republican Party in Colorado has petitioned the United States Supreme Court for expedited consideration of the case. This issue is being handled differently in various states, with some, like Michigan, refusing to get involved and leaving the determination of qualified candidates to political parties. The central question in these cases is whether January 6, 2021, was an insurrection and whether former President Trump can be considered an insurrectionist. The consensus so far is a resounding yes.
Discussions on Trump's potential disqualification from public office due to insurrection: Some officials are considering using the 14th Amendment to disqualify Trump from holding public office due to his role in the insurrection, while others believe it's necessary to protect democracy despite political controversy.
The discussion revolves around the ongoing legal debates regarding former President Donald Trump's potential disqualification from holding public office due to his involvement in the January 6th insurrection. While some officials have avoided addressing the issue directly, others have spoken out, asserting that Trump's actions constitute insurrection. The 14th Amendment Section 3 is being considered as a possible means of disqualification. Despite the controversy, some believe it is a necessary step to protect democracy, as the Republican Party continues to embrace the insurrectionists and undermine democratic values. The use of the 14th Amendment in this context is not politicizing the Constitution, but rather holding those who incite insurrection accountable. The conversation also touched upon the ongoing court proceedings, including the denial of Trump's request for a stay in the E. Jean Carroll case.
Donald Trump's Legal Battles: Delaying and Manipulating the System: Former President Trump is making conflicting arguments in court cases to delay legal proceedings, potentially manipulating the system and risking negative consequences.
Former President Donald Trump is attempting to delay legal proceedings in various cases, particularly those involving allegations of sexual misconduct and absolute presidential immunity. He has made conflicting arguments in different court cases, citing the importance of delay and considering his options for bringing cases to the Supreme Court. In one instance, he argues for the importance of the Supreme Court's review, while in another, he argues against it. Trump's behavior is seen as a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable and potentially gain an advantage, but it could also lead to negative consequences, such as potential removal from a case for violating legal procedures. Overall, Trump's actions highlight the complex and ongoing legal battles he faces and his continued efforts to manipulate the legal system.
MAGA legal team's perceived incompetence and overconfidence causing challenges: The MAGA legal team's perceived incompetence and overconfidence, along with their reliance on right-wing media, creates a dangerous situation for Trump's legal cases, particularly the DC case expected in 2024.
The legal team representing Donald Trump in various cases, often referred to as the MAGA team, is facing significant challenges due to their perceived incompetence and overconfidence. Trump's attempts to delay these cases, particularly the DC case which is expected to happen in 2024, are unlikely to succeed. The MAGA team's lack of qualifications, combined with their belief in their own superiority, creates a dangerous situation. This was evident in an interview between Alina Haba, a MAGA lawyer, and Sebastian Gorka on Newsmax, where Haba was praised for her supposed abilities despite being sanctioned for a large sum in a previous case. The MAGA team's reliance on right-wing media for validation further isolates them from the reality of the judicial system.
Politicians and Media: Softball Interviews and Conspiracy Theories: Politicians and media outlets face criticism for avoiding complex issues and labeling challenges as conspiracies. Softball interviews and evasive responses to tough questions undermine accountability and trust.
Some political figures and media outlets are criticized for receiving softball questions and avoiding complex issues, while also perceived as quick to label any challenge as a grand conspiracy. For instance, James Comer's move from Fox News to Newsmax was attributed to the latter's softer interview style. Similarly, Nikki Haley's response to a simple question about the cause of the Civil War was met with accusations of being set up, rather than addressing the issue directly. Furthermore, the perceived fear and reluctance to engage with the Supreme Court, as seen in the case of Jack Smith, was also criticized as an attempt to delay and evade accountability. These behaviors are contrasted with the higher standards and scrutiny faced by Democrats in the media. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of addressing complex issues directly and avoiding baseless conspiracy theories.
Jack Smith's Frustration with Motion in Limine and Alina Haba: Jack Smith criticized a court motion as a gag order, hindering his defense, and lamented the MAGA movement's whiny behavior. He endorsed Trade Coffee, a coffee subscription service.
During a court hearing, Jack Smith expressed frustration over a motion in limine filed by Alina Haba, which he perceived as a gag order preventing him from attacking the judge's law clerk. Smith believed this hindered his ability to defend himself effectively and criticized the MAGA movement for their whiny and weak behavior. The discussion also touched upon the contrast between the current political climate under President Biden and the unhinged rhetoric from right-wing media. Trade Coffee was introduced as a subscription service delivering high-quality coffee from local roasters to customers' doors. Smith expressed his genuine love for the product and endorsed it enthusiastically.
Nikki Haley's Ambiguous Response to the Cause of the Civil War: Nikki Haley's evasive answers during a town hall event regarding the cause of the Civil War raised concerns about her historical understanding and ability to lead.
During a town hall event, Nikki Haley was asked a seemingly simple question about the cause of the Civil War. Instead of providing a clear and concise answer, Haley refused to acknowledge the role of slavery and instead spoke about individual and economic freedom. Her response was met with criticism, including from President Biden, who simply stated that the Civil War was about slavery. Haley then attempted to clarify her statement, but her responses continued to avoid directly addressing the role of slavery. The incident highlights Haley's discomfort with acknowledging the historical truth of slavery and raises questions about her ability to lead and handle basic questions.
Nikki Haley's evasive stance on slavery and the Civil War: Nikki Haley, a potential GOP presidential candidate, avoids acknowledging slavery as a cause of the Civil War, instead framing it as a battle between tradition and change, to appease Neo Confederate voters. Her past actions, like removing the Confederate flag, contradict her evasive stance.
Nikki Haley, a potential Republican presidential candidate, has a history of avoiding directly acknowledging that slavery was a cause of the American Civil War. Instead, she often frames the issue as a battle between tradition and change. This strategy, which she has used for at least a decade, is likely an attempt to appease Neo Confederate voters in the South. However, her evasive answers on this topic have drawn criticism and confusion, particularly as she seeks higher office on the national stage. Despite her efforts to walk a delicate line on this issue, her past statements and actions, such as removing the Confederate flag from the South Carolina state house, speak to her complex relationship with the region's history and its implications for individual freedoms and government's role.
The 2024 Republican Primary: Moral Clarity and Principled Leadership: Nikki Haley faces criticism for her perceived lack of moral clarity towards Trump, while Chris Christie stands out for his condemnation of Trump's divisive rhetoric. Biden's message of love, unity, and moral clarity resonates with voters, boosting his chances in the 2024 elections.
The 2024 Republican primary race continues to be a contentious one, with some candidates, like Nikki Haley, facing criticism for their perceived lack of moral clarity and principles when it comes to standing up to former President Donald Trump. Chris Christie, on the other hand, has made a name for himself by publicly condemning Trump's divisive rhetoric and actions. The contrast between the two approaches was highlighted in a recent exchange between Haley and a voter at one of her rallies, who pressed her on her stance towards Trump and a potential running mate role. Meanwhile, President Joe Biden has been gaining momentum heading into the 2024 elections, with his message of love, unity, and moral clarity resonating with many voters. The economic recovery under his presidency and successful handling of the COVID-19 pandemic have also boosted his chances. These developments underscore the importance of principled leadership and moral clarity in politics, and the potential consequences of embracing divisive rhetoric and actions.
US economic prosperity and political strength under Biden: Record-low uninsured rates, historically high wage growth, strong Democratic election performance - focusing on facts, not fear-mongering or media-driven narratives.
The United States is experiencing economic prosperity and political strength under President Biden, as evidenced by record-low uninsured rates, historically high wage growth, and strong Democratic Party performance in elections. However, it's important to be data-driven and not fall for media-driven narratives or fear-mongering, such as the false claim that Democrats are trying to take away gas stoves. These misleading stories can be harmful and serve only to divide and misinform the public. Instead, we should focus on the facts and the positive progress being made in the country.
Politicizing American issues and distorting facts: Fox and Newsmax distort issues, turning decency and rule of law into political divisions, misleading parents, and distracting from the facts. Focus on the voices of everyday people and the truth.
There's a disconnect between the information being presented on certain news networks and the reality of American values and concerns. The speaker expressed frustration with networks like Fox and Newsmax for distorting issues and turning basic decency and rule of law into political divisions. They highlighted the example of a conservative voter who spoke out against Donald Trump and the danger he poses to the country. Additionally, the speaker criticized a Fox segment discussing LGBTQ searches in Utah, labeling it as a misleading attempt to scare parents and distract from the actual motivations behind such searches. Overall, the message was that American issues, particularly those related to democracy and decency, should not be politicized, and it's essential to focus on the facts and the voices of everyday people.
Hypocritical behavior and attacks on personal matters by MAGA Republicans and conservative figures: MAGA Republicans and conservative figures attack non-issues, particularly personal matters of public figures, to incite hatred and rally their base, while showing contempt for their own people and engaging in extreme or strange behavior, not representative of normal conduct.
The MAGA Republicans and certain conservative figures are known for their hypocritical behavior and attacking non-issues, particularly when it comes to personal matters of public figures. They have been observed attacking the Vice President and her husband, as well as other politicians, based on manufactured issues, often to incite hatred and rally their base. This behavior is not representative of normal or acceptable conduct, and it is important to recognize that it is not a "both sides" issue at the leadership level. The leadership of the Republican Party, including members of Congress, school board leaders, and former President Trump, have shown contempt for their own people and engage in extreme, depraved, or strange behavior. The Fox News audience, which these figures often criticize, is treated with disdain by these individuals, who speak about them in derogatory terms. The recent actions of Lauren Boebert, such as leaving her previous congressional district and ditching her constituents, further highlight this pattern of behavior. It's crucial to hold these figures accountable for their actions and recognize that they do not have the best interests of the people at heart.
Politicians Debate Economic Impact of Inflation Reduction Act: The Inflation Reduction Act has generated economic growth and created jobs, despite criticism from some politicians. Critics' opposition may be driven by fear of being outshone or humiliated.
While some politicians, like MAGA Republican Lauren Boebert of Colorado, criticize the Inflation Reduction Act as a massive failure, others, like the speaker in this discussion, argue that it has generated economic growth and created good paying jobs. Boebert's criticism of the act comes despite the deficit being cut by $7 billion and the creation of the largest wind turbine factory in the world in her district. The speaker also points out that Boeber herself fled her district to run in another, and suggests that her criticism of the act may be motivated by her fear of being humiliated or outshone by President Biden. The speaker also notes that Trump, who Boebert is a strong supporter of, dislikes being humiliated and cannot stand satire or being treated in the same way he treats others.
Allegations of Trump's foul odor surface, causing a stir: Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger brought up Trump's foul odor, faced backlash from his team, and more people have come forward with similar experiences. Trump's team denied the allegations but accused Kinzinger of being an unemployed fraud. The issue highlights Trump's sensitivity to criticism and his team's defensive response.
The discussion revolves around former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger bringing attention to allegations of Donald Trump having a foul odor. Kinzinger expressed surprise that those close to Trump haven't spoken about it and faced backlash from Trump's team, who accused Kinzinger of farting on live TV and being an unemployed fraud. Trump's team did not deny the odor claims. Kathy Griffin also made similar claims a few weeks ago. The allegations have gained traction with more people coming forward about their experiences around Trump, causing a visceral reaction from those near him. The issue highlights Trump's sensitivity to criticism and his team's defensive response. The discussion also touches upon Trump's past behavior and his relationships with foreign leaders.
Congressman Accuses Trump of Body Odor Issue: Congressman Adam Kinzinger accused Donald Trump of having a body odor problem based on personal observations and Michael Cohen's testimony. The allegations gained credibility with a resurfaced TikTok video and divided opinions among listeners.
Adam Kinzinger, a Congressman, accused former President Donald Trump of having a problem with body odor, based on his observations and the testimony of Michael Cohen. Kinzinger made these comments during an interview on a podcast called "Political Beatdown." Cohen, who was once a close associate of Trump, provided insight into Trump's behavior, comparing it to that of a constipated baby. Kinzinger argued that Trump's embarrassing behavior is a national disgrace and a reason for concern. The allegations gained credibility when a TikTok video resurfaced, detailing an incident from the 1980s where Trump was reportedly asked to leave a steakhouse due to his smell. The discussion on the podcast received mixed reactions, with some listeners expressing skepticism and others sharing similar experiences. Overall, the conversation highlighted the divisive nature of political discourse and the importance of fact-checking information.
Personal experiences and observations of Trump's body odor: Despite reports of Trump's body odor and passing gas in the presence of political figures, his MAGA supporters continue to show unwavering loyalty.
During various discussions, multiple individuals have shared their personal experiences and observations regarding former President Donald Trump's body odor. These accounts include witnessing him wearing diapers and exhibiting strong body odor during events in the past. The smell was so noticeable that some people believe it was a deliberate display of wealth and disregard for others. Additionally, there are recorded instances of Trump passing gas in the presence of prominent political figures, including Senator Dianne Feinstein and Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan. These incidents, along with the MAGA cult's continued support for Trump despite these revelations, highlight the strange and divisive nature of the movement.
Allegations of obstruction of justice against President Biden: The MAGA Republicans are accusing President Biden of obstruction of justice for preventing Hunter Biden's secret deposition. The Midas Touch team aims to reach 2 million YouTube subscribers by January 7th, expanding their network through collective efforts.
The MAGA Republicans are accusing President Biden of obstruction of justice for allegedly preventing Hunter Biden from giving a secret deposition, as they believe President Biden was aware of Hunter's presence in Washington, D.C. at the time. This is a developing story, and its validity remains uncertain. As we approach the new year, the Midas Touch team is looking to expand their network by encouraging viewers and listeners to subscribe, share, and support their content. They aim to reach 2,000,000 YouTube subscribers by January 7th through collective efforts. The Midas Touch network is a community-driven platform, built without outside investors, and their goal is to continue growing and fueling their editorial content in an intelligent, pro-democracy manner.
