Podcast Summary
The 14th Amendment section 3 could disqualify Trump and others from future office: Legal scholars agree that the 14th Amendment section 3 could potentially bar Trump and others from future political campaigns due to their involvement in the Capitol insurrection.
The 14th Amendment section 3, a part of the US Constitution that has been largely overlooked, could potentially disqualify Donald Trump and others involved in the Capitol insurrection from running for office in the future. This interpretation is not a new idea, as it has been advocated by several legal scholars, including William Boud and Michael Stokes Paulson, who wrote a comprehensive law review article on the topic. Their findings have gained widespread agreement among scholars with diverse judicial philosophies, indicating a strong consensus on this issue. The 14th Amendment section 3, which deals with disqualifying individuals from public office who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the US, could provide a legal basis for barring Trump and others from future political campaigns. The practical application and enforcement of this provision, however, remain open questions.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is still in effect: The 14th Amendment's Section 3, which prohibits individuals from holding public office after engaging in insurrection or rebellion, remains a valid constitutional rule.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits individuals from holding public office if they have previously sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution but have engaged in insurrection or rebellion or given aid to the enemies of the United States, remains a fully operative rule of constitutional law. This provision, passed following the Civil War, is not a dead letter, and its legal force is not limited to the circumstances of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Despite some historical context suggesting otherwise, it has not been repealed by later statutes granting amnesty. Unlike some constitutional provisions that expire after a certain period or upon specific events, Section 3 does not operate in this way. It is a binding and authoritative part of the Constitution.
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment disqualifies insurrectionists from voting: The 14th Amendment's Section 3 automatically disqualifies individuals from voting who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the US, enabling efficient financial management for businesses through NetSuite
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment imposes a constitutionally automatic disqualification on individuals who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States. This disqualification is legally self-executing and does not require any prior judicial decisions or implementing legislation to be enforced. State and federal officials have the duty to exclude such individuals from the ballot, and they can do so without seeking judicial permission. Section 3 has been in effect for 25 years, and it has helped thousands of businesses streamline their financial management with NetSuite, the number one cloud financial system. By upgrading to NetSuite, businesses can manage their numbers, trends, and budgets more efficiently, close their books faster, and improve their margins. The unique needs of each business are catered to with customized solutions, allowing them to manage risk, get reliable forecasts, and make informed decisions with one source of truth.
Accessing comprehensive data leads to improved decision-making: The combination of having all relevant information in one place and using tools like NetSuite's KPI checklist can give businesses a significant competitive advantage, enabling informed decisions and quick adaptation to changing circumstances.
The combination of having all relevant information in one place and using tools like NetSuite's KPI checklist can lead to significantly improved decision-making for businesses. The constitutional discussion highlights the unprecedented power of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which supersedes any conflicting constitutional provisions and disqualifies individuals from future office holding for their involvement in insurrection or rebellion, or for giving aid or comfort to the enemy. This disqualification applies broadly to civilian, military, and legislative office holders, and its consequences could be far-reaching. In business terms, this means that having access to comprehensive data and insights can give companies a significant competitive advantage, allowing them to make informed decisions and adapt quickly to changing circumstances. To get started with NetSuite's KPI checklist, visit netsuite.com/midas.
14th Amendment disqualifies insurrectionists from presidency: The 14th Amendment's Section 3 disqualifies individuals who engage in insurrection or rebellion against the US from holding the presidency, without requiring judicial permission or new laws.
According to scholars Baud and Paulson, the 14th Amendment's Section 3 clearly states that anyone who has taken an oath to support and defend the US Constitution but then engages in insurrection or rebellion against the US and the Constitution, shall not be eligible to hold the office of the presidency. This interpretation, supported by originalist and federalist society members, does not require judicial permission or a new law. It's self-executing. The clarity of the language in the constitution means that states have the power to prevent insurrectionists from being placed on the presidential ballot. The agreement on this interpretation between scholars like Lawrence Tribe and retired judge Michael Luttig adds significant weight to this interpretation.
Discussions continue on removing Trump from office, but it's uncertain if it will happen: Despite legal grounds and bipartisan support, resistance from MAGA Republicans may prevent Trump's removal from office
There are ongoing discussions about the potential removal of former President Donald Trump from office, but it's uncertain if this will happen due to the resistance from MAGA-controlled legislatures and the declining support for Trump within the Republican Party. The legal grounds for removal exist, and there is significant bipartisan support for this action, except from MAGA Republicans in Congress, state legislatures, and the Senate. The conviction in the Jack Smith case against Trump could trigger this process, but it's not a requirement. The Midas Touch Network emphasizes the importance of democracy, justice, and accountability and encourages people to join the movement to convict 45 by visiting store.midastouch.com to purchase Convict 45 merchandise.