Podcast Summary
Jeff Clark attempts to move Georgia case to federal court: Jeff Clark and other defendants aim to change jurisdiction to federal court for a slower process and potentially different judge
Jeff Clark, a former Department of Justice environmental lawyer and one of the 19 coconspirators in the Georgia case against Donald Trump, is trying to move the case to federal court by arguing that a federal officer may be involved and invoking federal defenses. This move could potentially result in a different judge presiding over the case. The motivation behind this move is to slow down the fast-paced Georgia criminal process and get on a faster track to the federal appellate system, as some defendants, including Jeff Clark, Mark Meadows, and possibly Donald Trump, prefer a slower federal court process.
Defense team seeking to move Fulton County election case to federal court: The defense team in the Fulton County election interference case is aiming to transfer the trial to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and potentially the US Supreme Court for a broader jury pool and federal precedent.
The defense team in the ongoing Fulton County, Georgia election interference case is actively seeking to move the trial to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta and ultimately to the US Supreme Court. This decision is based on the potential for a broader jury pool and federal precedent, despite having a seemingly favorable judge in the state court. The team's motivation may also be driven by the cooperation among the lawyers, as indicated by Jeff Clark's paperwork and recent developments. While the defendants may believe they can take the entire sprawling 19-person conspiracy case to federal court due to federal officer or defense involvement, the validity of this argument is uncertain. Nonetheless, this move suggests a shift in strategy and increased collaboration among the defense team. Trump and his legal team are reportedly monitoring the situation closely.
Moving a State Case to Federal Court Doesn't Change the Nature of the Crimes: Presidents can only pardon federal crimes, so state cases remain state cases with state prosecutors and judges, despite attempts to move them to federal court.
Even if some defendants in the ongoing criminal case in Fulton County, Georgia, try to move the case to federal court, it does not automatically convert the case into a federal crimes case. Presidents can only pardon federal crimes, so the case would still be a state crime with a state prosecutor and a state judge. The defendants have different preferences, with some wanting to go to federal court quickly and others preferring to stay in state court. The judge has called for a hearing to determine the estimated time and number of witnesses required for trying a 19-person RICO case. Meanwhile, the concept of senescent cells, also known as "zombie cells," is a relevant metaphor for the ongoing legal case. Just as these old cells waste energy and resources in the body, the complex legal case is consuming significant time, energy, and resources from all parties involved.
Noticeable anti-aging benefits from eliminating zombie cells: Qualia Senolytic's blend of seven senolytic ingredients targets and eliminates zombie cells, improving physical and mental well-being and offering noticeable anti-aging benefits for those in their late twenties or older. It's non-GMO, vegan, gluten-free, and comes with a 100-day money-back guarantee.
Neurohacker's Qualia Senolytic offers noticeable anti-aging benefits by targeting and eliminating "zombie cells" with a blend of seven science-backed senolytic ingredients. Users report feeling more confident, productive, and energized, with improvements in both physical and mental well-being. The formula is non-GMO, vegan, gluten-free, and comes with a 100-day money-back guarantee. For those in their late twenties or older, incorporating Qualia Senolytic into their diet could significantly help combat aging symptoms. Meanwhile, in the legal world, a case involving Jeff Clark's attempt to move it to federal court is ongoing, with Judge Steven Jones as the final decision-maker. Clark must decide whether to take the stand and potentially waive his 5th amendment rights to proceed with the transfer.
January 6th Capitol insurrection investigation: Key figure's testimony contradicted by evidence: Mark Meadows' denial of organizing fake electors contradicts emails and texts, potentially leading to perjury charges. Jeff Clark's case outcome could influence trial order and testimony.
Mark Meadows, a key figure in the January 6th Capitol insurrection investigation, testified under oath that he had no role in organizing fake electors, but emails and texts contradict his statement. This inconsistency could potentially lead to perjury charges against Meadows, adding another layer to the ongoing investigation. Jeff Clark, another individual involved in the case, is currently trying to move his case from state to federal court. The outcome of this motion, to be heard on September 18th, could determine whether Clark or Meadows testifies first, potentially giving one side valuable information before their trial. The inconsistencies and potential legal consequences highlight the complexity and ongoing nature of the January 6th Capitol insurrection investigation.
Hearing for Jeff Clark case to be broadcasted, Judge to issue custom order: This week, the hearing for the Jeff Clark case will be televised and discussed by commentators. The judge will also issue a custom order regarding the legal process. Stay informed by tuning into the Midas Touch YouTube channel or subscribing to their podcast, Legal AF.
This week, the hearing with Fawney Willis regarding the trial details of the Jeff Clark case will be broadcasted on television, YouTube, and various commentators will discuss it. Additionally, the judge will issue a custom order about the legal process considering the ongoing case in federal court. For those interested in the intersection of US law and politics, tune in to the Midas Touch YouTube channel for more insights. Every Wednesday and Saturday, Michael Popok, along with co-anchors Karen Friedman and Ben Mysales, host the podcast "Legal AF" to discuss current legal stories. Subscribe for free and join the conversation on Instagram @Midas_Touch. Stay informed about the latest news at the intersection of law and politics.
