Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • UFOs and Alien Encounters: Recent Developments in US Congress and MexicoRecent US Congress hearings have discussed UFO sightings and alleged alien recoveries, with a former intelligence officer claiming possession of nonhuman biologics. In Mexico, a journalist presented supposed alien remains, leading NASA to study UFOs further.

      UFOs, or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, have gained significant attention from both the US government and the public. This year, there have been multiple hearings in the US Congress regarding UFO sightings and alleged recoveries of alien bodies. A former intelligence officer testified about a secret program dealing with alien craft and even claimed to have nonhuman biologics. Additionally, a journalist presented supposed alien remains at a Mexican congressional hearing. These developments have fueled the belief that aliens have visited Earth and have led NASA to study these phenomena. Despite the skepticism, the increasing seriousness surrounding UFOs warrants further scientific investigation.

    • U.S. Navy Pilots Reported Seeing Unidentified ObjectsPilots' reports of Tic Tac-shaped UAP off San Diego coast, corroborated by radar data, intrigued skeptical podcast hosts to investigate further

      The hosts of the podcast had previously been skeptical about UFOs or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) due to past experiences where most reported sightings turned out to be mundane objects. However, they became intrigued by one particular case from 2004 involving US Navy pilots who reported seeing Tic Tac-shaped objects off the coast of San Diego. The pilots described the objects as moving erratically and disappearing suddenly, and their reports were corroborated by radar data and other pilots. Despite initial skepticism, the hosts plan to explore this case further, acknowledging that while most UAP sightings can be explained, the remaining unexplained cases deserve closer examination.

    • UFO Sightings with Unnatural Movements Baffle ScientistsReports of UFOs with unnatural movements on radar and video have intrigued scientists, who calculated implausible acceleration from descriptions. Military response is unclear.

      There have been numerous reports of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) that have been captured on radar and video, with some witnesses claiming they moved in ways that defy current scientific understanding. For instance, one witness reported seeing "rain" of UFOs on an aircraft carrier radar, while another pilot recorded a video of a Tic Tac-shaped object moving inexplicably using an infrared camera. The descriptions of these objects as moving in unnatural ways, such as moving slowly at high altitudes and then rapidly dropping to sea level, have piqued the interest of scientists like physics professor Kevin Knuth. Despite not having access to the original radar data, Knuth used the reports to calculate the objects' acceleration and found it to be implausibly high. The Navy and Pentagon have been contacted about this phenomenon but have yet to provide a response. The unexplained nature of these observations and the military's response raises questions about the potential significance of these events.

    • Tic Tac UFO sighting unlikely to be an alien spacecraftDespite intriguing claims, lack of solid evidence makes it unlikely that the Tic Tac UFO sighting was an alien spacecraft

      The Tic Tac UFO sighting, as intriguing and seemingly inexplicable as it may be, is likely not an alien spacecraft. The acceleration speeds mentioned in the discussion are beyond current technological capabilities and would have devastating effects on both aircraft and human bodies. Astrophysicist Sarah Webb, who specializes in red dwarf stars and communicates science to the public, was skeptical of the Tic Tac being an alien spacecraft. She believes that the lack of solid evidence, including eyewitness reports, videos, and radar data, makes it unlikely. While the mystery of unidentified flying objects remains intriguing, it's crucial to approach such claims with a healthy dose of skepticism and a strong foundation of evidence.

    • Assumptions about UFO sightings may be unreliableEyewitness testimony, radar data, and videos are not always reliable evidence for UFO sightings. Human perception can be misleading, and it's crucial to examine each piece of evidence independently to assess its credibility.

      The assumption that three pieces of evidence regarding a supposed UFO sighting describe the same event may not be valid. These pieces of evidence, which include eyewitness testimony, radar data, and a video, may not be as reliable as previously assumed. Eyewitness testimony, in particular, has been shown to be unreliable, especially when witnesses are far away from the object and have no reference points. For instance, pilots who reported seeing the Tic Tac UFO were estimating its size from a great distance, which is known to be difficult for humans. Additionally, a recent analysis of a different UFO video released by the Department of Defense revealed that the object was much farther away and moving much slower than initially thought, demonstrating how human perception can be misled. Therefore, it is essential to examine each piece of evidence independently to assess its credibility and merit.

    • Interpreting UFO evidence: A subjective and complex processApproaching UFO evidence with a critical and open-minded perspective is essential, acknowledging potential biases and limitations. A multidisciplinary approach combining various forms of evidence and collaborating across fields is necessary for accurate and reliable conclusions.

      The interpretation of evidence, especially in the context of unexplained phenomena like UFOs, can be subjective and influenced by various factors such as human perception, assumptions made during analysis, and the reliability of data sources. For instance, in the case of the Tic Tac UFO incident, the different interpretations of the same video by two researchers were due to their contrasting assumptions about the object's motion. Similarly, the radar data, which is often used as evidence for UFO sightings, can be unreliable due to false positives and other sources of error. Therefore, it's crucial to approach such evidence with a critical and open-minded perspective, acknowledging potential biases and limitations. As Kevin, one of the researchers involved in the discussion, pointed out, dismissing data that contradicts our expectations can be a pitfall. Ultimately, the investigation into UFOs requires a multidisciplinary approach, combining various forms of evidence and collaborating across different fields to arrive at more accurate and reliable conclusions.

    • Maintaining an open mind in the search for alien lifeWhile the search for alien life is complex and ongoing, it's important to keep an open mind and recognize that the bar for evidence should be higher for extraordinary claims. Scientists continue to make strides in this field, with the discovery of exoplanets opening up new possibilities.

      While we may have biases in evaluating claims of extraordinary evidence, such as the existence of UFOs or alien life, it's important to keep an open mind and recognize that the bar for evidence should be higher for such claims. The search for alien life is a complex and ongoing process, and scientists are making significant strides in this field despite the challenges. The discovery of exoplanets has opened up new possibilities and reduced the stigma surrounding this research. While we may not have definitive evidence for UFOs or aliens yet, the excitement and curiosity surrounding this topic remain high, and scientists continue to explore the possibilities. The quest for discovering alien life is a testament to human curiosity and our drive to explore the unknown.

    • The discovery of exoplanets has expanded our search for life beyond our solar systemWith billions of potentially habitable planets in the universe, the odds of finding another technological civilization are high

      The discovery of exoplanets has expanded our understanding of the universe, revealing that there are likely many planets with conditions suitable for life. The odds of humans being the only technological civilization in the history of the universe are extremely low, with estimates suggesting there have been 10 sextillion opportunities for life to develop. Scientists are using powerful telescopes and techniques like atmospheric characterization to search for signs of life on these planets, such as specific gases in their atmospheres that could indicate the presence of living organisms. The next generation of telescopes will allow us to search for biosignatures on planets much farther away, making this an exciting time for the search for extraterrestrial life.

    • Exploring technosignatures for detecting advanced civilizationsScientists are broadening their search for extraterrestrial life by looking for technosignatures, indicators of advanced civilizations and their technological presence, such as alien pollution like CFCs.

      Scientists are expanding their search for signs of extraterrestrial life beyond biosignatures, and are now looking for technosignatures, which are indicators of advanced civilizations and their technological presence. During a 2018 NASA conference, scientists discussed various ideas for detecting technosignatures, including alien pollution such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which are man-made and still present in Earth's atmosphere. While the discovery of a potential biosignature on an exoplanet is exciting, the search for technosignatures offers the potential for more definitive evidence of intelligent life beyond Earth.

    • Detecting signs of advanced alien civilizations using telescopesScientific advancements enable us to identify unusual atmospheric compositions and megastructures, potentially indicating advanced alien civilizations, which are now being taken seriously in the scientific community

      Our technological advancements have reached a point where we can now detect potential signs of advanced alien civilizations using telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope. This includes the ability to identify unusual atmospheric compositions that could indicate the presence of chlorofluorocarbons or even signs of megastructures, which are hypothetical large-scale engineering projects built by alien civilizations. A false alarm a few years ago demonstrated that such claims are now being taken seriously in the scientific community. This shift in perspective reflects the increasing sophistication of our scientific exploration and the need to consider the possibility of extraterrestrial life when interpreting data from space. Additionally, every claim made on the podcast is supported by scientific citations, allowing listeners to verify the information for themselves.

    • Discovering the International Space StationStaying alert and open-minded can lead to unexpected discoveries, even during seemingly ordinary activities.

      Even during a seemingly uneventful observation, important discoveries can be made. During a five-day expedition off the coasts of Laguna Beach and Catalina Island, the team was on the lookout for unusual objects in the sky. Their first discovery was none other than the International Space Station. This finding serves as a reminder that keeping an open mind and maintaining a diligent watch can lead to unexpected and exciting discoveries. So, whether you're listening to podcasts for entertainment or embarking on a skywatching adventure, always be prepared for the unexpected. And don't forget to follow us on Spotify for more intriguing stories!

    Recent Episodes from Science Vs

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?
    We’re hearing stories of people having amazing, cosmic orgasms. So what buttons are they pressing to do this?? Well, it's just one. The “male G spot,” also called the “P spot,” because that P stands for prostate. Word on the street is that if you touch your prostate in just the right way — BAM — one helluva orgasm. But is that really true? And if you don't have a prostate (ahem, me): are you stuck with your garden variety orgasms? To get to the bottom of this, Science Vs surveyed almost 16,000 people about anal sex and masturbation! We also speak with Dr Dan Dickstein, Dr Tom Gaither and Neuroscientist Dr Nan Wise. Have an idea for a Science Vs episode? Let us know! On Instagram we're Science_Vs, Wendy's Tiktok is @wendyzukerman and our email is sciencevs@gimletmedia.com Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMind-BlowingOrgasms In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Absolutely cosmic orgasms (04:47) Anal sex is big right now (08:52) What makes the prostate special (12:02) The hole story. The butthole story. (20:19) How to get a cosmic orgasm (29:19) Tips and tricks for great anal sex (34:54) The real G spot This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. A huge thank you to Sam Levang for her help analyzing our data. And Professor Caroline Pukall and Dan Dickstein for your help with our survey questions. Thanks to the researchers we spoke to including Dr Devon Hensel. Thanks to Jack Weinstein, Hunter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 20, 2024

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?
    Protein influencers are big right now, telling us that we're probably missing out on the protein we need — and giving us a bunch of hacks for getting it. Why? They say that eating extra protein helps us build muscle, feel full, and lose weight. So is that true? We talk to kinesiology professor Stuart Phillips and nutrition professor Faidon Magkos.  Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsPROTEIN In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Protein is all the rage right now (02:53) Why protein matters (05:32) How much protein is enough? (11:33) Do you need more protein if you’re working out? (15:06) Is it risky to eat a LOT of protein? (18:46) Should you pound protein right after a workout? (23:09) Protein and weight loss This episode was produced by Rose Rimler and Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Prof. Brad Schoenfeld and Dr. Nicholas Burd. And special thanks to the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 13, 2024

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot
    Today we’re presenting Trillion Dollar Shot, a new series that explores the business story behind the rise of Ozempic and other blockbuster drugs being used for weight loss. The first episode focuses on the Novo Nordisk scientist who invented the compound that paved the way for Ozempic. You can find every episode on The Journal’s show feed. Trillion Dollar Shot is part of The Journal, which is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. This episode was hosted by Jessica Mendoza, with Bradley Olson. It was produced by Matt Kwong, with help from Jeevika Verma. Additional production from Adrienne Murray Nielsen. The series is edited by Katherine Brewer. Sound design and mixing by Peter Leonard. Mixing for Science Vs by Bobby Lord. Music in this episode by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Theme music by So Wylie, remixed for this series by Peter Leonard. Special thanks to Maria Byrne, Stefanie Ilgenfritz, Kate Linebaugh, Peter Loftus, Sara O’Brien, Enrique Perez De La Rosa, Sarah Platt, Sune Rasumssen, Jonathan Sanders, Nathan Singhapok, Leying Tang, Rolfe Winkler, Liz Essley Whyte, and Tatiana Zamis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 11, 2024

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?
    Health care for trans kids has been in the spotlight, with battles over what the science says and tons of U.S. states restricting the care that children can get. And then there’s a new report out of the UK, called the Cass Review, saying that a bunch of the evidence that doctors have been relying on to treat trans kids is “remarkably weak.” So what’s going on here? What is the best health care for trans kids? We sort through the science with Professor Stephen Russell, Dr. Cal Horton, and Dr. Ada Cheung. UPDATE 6/6/24: In a previous version of this episode, we said a study was published this year, when it was actually published last year. The episode has been updated. Mental health resources, including suicide lifelines, for around the world: spotify.com/resources Trans Lifeline: A Trans peer support hotline: 1-877-565-8860 Trevor Project: crisis support services to LGBTQ young people: Call 1-866-488-7386 or Text ‘START’ to 678-678 Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsTransKidsCassReviewTranscript  Here are links to our previous episodes about the science of being transgender and misinformation about care for trans kids. In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over care for trans kids (02:45) What to do when a kid wants to change their name and pronouns (13:44) Do puberty blockers help trans kids’ mental health? (20:44) Does hormone therapy help trans people’s mental health? (25:25) How often are people "retransitioning"? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang and Rose Rimler. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Consulting by Rebecca Kling. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Blake Cavve, Dr. Doug VanderLaan, and Dr. Quinnehtukqut McLamore. And a very special thanks to the trans folks and their families we talked to, Christopher Suter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 06, 2024

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup
    More than 150 years ago, just before dino-mania struck, New York City was supposed to get a majestic dinosaur museum full of amazing models of dinos. There would have been nothing like it in the world. Until a bunch of thugs showed up with sledgehammers and smashed every bit of the models to smithereens — and buried it all in Central Park. Today we’re finding out what happened — and WHY. We speak with doctoral researcher Vicky Coules and paleontologist Carl Mehling. SURVEY!! HELP US SCIENCE!! WE NEED YOUR HELP TO UNCOVER THE LAST MYSTERIES OF SEX https://bit.ly/ScienceVsSurvey Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheGreatDinosaurSmashup In this episode, we cover: (00:00) ​​The amazing dino museum we didn’t get to have (03:15) What we knew about dinos in the 1800s (04:57) The famous Crystal Palace dinosaurs (06:48) The plan for the Paleozoic Museum is born (10:40) The Great Dinosaur Smashup of 1871 (12:52) Suspect No. 1: Boss Tweed (17:58) Vicky cracks the case! (26:17) One final mystery — where are the dino pieces?? This episode was produced by Blythe Terrell with help from Wendy Zukerman, R.E. Natowicz, Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler and Joel Werner. Editing by Wendy Zukerman. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to everyone we spoke to about this episode, including Gowan Dawson, Robert Peck, Wendy Anthony and Jessica M. Lydon. Also thanks to Jack Weinstein, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 30, 2024

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?
    The Abortion Pill is now the most common way to have an abortion in the US. Yet what exactly happens when you take these pills is shrouded in mystery. Even many doctors don't know how well they work! Today, we're letting the sun shine on the abortion pill. We'll walk you through what happens when you take these pills: what they do to your body, and how safe are they for your physical and mental health? To explore all this - and more - we speak to Dr Sara Whitburn, Professor Oskari Heikinheimo, and Professor Ushma Upadhyay. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheAbortionPiill The Abortion Project's Instagram @theabortionproject Science Vs's Instagram @science_vs If you want to talk to someone - there's some great resources in here: spotify.com/resources In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over the abortion pill  (04:28) How does the abortion pill work?  (09:05) How it feels to take the abortion pill (14:34) How often do people hemorrhage? (21:22) What's "normal" bleeding?  (24:11) Does taking the abortion pill affect your mental health?  (32:02) Why some people prefer the abortion pill This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr. Tiffany Green, Dr. Ned Calonge, Professor Jenny Higgins, Dr. Daniel Aaron, Dr. Beverly Winikoff, and Dr. Abigail Aiken. Also thanks to Lauren Silverman, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 23, 2024

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?
    With the powers of the James Webb Space Telescope, scientists discovered some super weird things in the early Universe, and it's making some nerds question our theory of everything.  This story comes to us from our friends at Unexplainable at Vox Media. Find Unexplainable’s transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsUnexplainable In this episode, we cover: (0:00) Liftoff (01:10) The James Webb Space Telescope  (04:57) Party of the early universe  (08:39) Mysteries of the early galaxies  (15:23) How do we figure it out? This episode was produced by Brian Resnick, with help from Noam Hassenfeld and Meradith Hoddinott, who also manages the Unexplainable team. Editing from Jorge Just, music from Noam, and mixing and sound design from Cristian Ayala. Fact checking from Kelsey Lannin. Mandy Nguyen is searching for new forms of life. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 16, 2024

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky
    Getting your heart broken sucks — and for some of us, it even feels physically painful. So why does it hurt so bad? And what can science tell us about how to get over it? We dive into all of this with neuroscientist Prof. Lucy Brown.  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsHeartbreak In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Heartbreak sucks (07:17) What heartbreak does in the brain (12:14) What heartbreak does in the body (15:07) How to get over heartbreak  The episode does mention abuse. Here are some resources if you’re struggling to move on from abuse:  https://resources.byspotify.com/ https://www.loveisrespect.org/resources/why-am-i-struggling-to-move-on-after-abuse/ This episode was produced by Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler, Meryl Horn, Kaitlyn Sawrey and Lexi Krupp. Editing by Caitlin Kenney and Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly and Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, and Bobby Lord. A huge thanks to all the scientists we got in touch with for this episode, including Professor Larry Young, Professor Tiffany Field, Professor Ethan Kross, Professor Sandra Langeslag, and Professor Naomi Eisenberger. Thanks to Lori Segal. A special thanks to the Zukerman family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes
    Comedian Tig Notaro, who just released her fifth comedy special, "Hello Again," joins us for a chat about the science of her comedy: telling us how she builds jokes, and of course sharing a bunch of dumb and fabulous jokes. Enjoy!  Here's our Funniest Joke in the World Episode!!  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTigNotaro In this episode, we cover: (00:00) We're interviewing Tig!  (01:22) I could be a comedian?  (02:47) How Tig creates a joke  (08:59) The element of surprise (12:27) The world's funniest joke? (13:55) Tig's favorite jokes This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Funniest Joke in the World

    The Funniest Joke in the World
    If you Google "The Funniest Joke in the World," you'll be very disappointed. The internet might serve you something like, "What has many keys but can't open a single lock??” (Answer: A piano). Screw that. That's not funny. Enter Science Vs. We’re going on a romp to find out once and for all: What is the funniest joke in the world. According to science. And for this quest we've interviewed a bunch of amazing comics including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Dr Jason Leong, Loni Love, as well as special guest Latif Nasser of Radiolab and, of course, some scientists: Neuroscientist Professor Sophie Scott and Psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman. Which Joke Will Win???    Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsFunniestJoke In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The Quest Begins (08:40) Why laughing matters (13:13) The scientific search for the world's funniest joke (17:40) Woof, quack or moo? (21:33) The comedy K (26:30) Do different cultures have different senses of humour? (28:27) The winner! (32:15) Scientific theories of humour (lol) (38:28) Why the winning joke isn't funny (40:26) How do you stop a dog from humping your leg?  (44:43) Meet the comedy gods This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Joel Werner, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Sarah Baum. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr Andrew Farkas, Professor Penny MacDonald, Dr Maggie Prenger and a huge thank you to Professor Chris Westbury for sharing your amazing spreadsheet!! Thanks to all the comedians we interviewed in this episode including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Loni Love, Takashi Wakasugi, Urooj Ashfaq, Dr Jason Leong, Penny Greenhalgh and Mohammed Magdi. Another big thanks to Lindsay Farber, Roland Campos, Lauren LoGiudice, Andrea Jones-Rooy and the other comics at The Joke Lab; and all the comics that we spoke to and couldn't fit into the episode, we really really appreciate you and your time! Thanks to Ben Milam, the Melbourne International Comedy Festival, Stupid Old Studios, Paige Ransbury, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Running the Dish on Finding Alien Life Full Episode

    Running the Dish on Finding Alien Life Full Episode

    Full Episode

    WITH THE PENTAGON RELEASING A REPORT...

    ON THE U F O QUESTION AND, WITH RECENT REVEALS FROM U-S MILITARY

    ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS

    IT'S TIME TO EXPLORE THIS TOPIC ON RUN THE DISH...

    SINCE WE ARE FOOD, LIFESTYLE, AND OTHER KITCHEN...

    WITCHERY... WE TACKLE ALL TOPICS INCLUDING THIS ONE...

    WHAT ABOUT ALIEN LIFE? ARE THEY OUT THERE? AND SINCE WE ARE FOOD PODCAST...

    WHAT DO ALIENS EAT?JOINING US FOR A GRIPPING INTERVIEW IS PROFESSOR LEE CRONIN

    REGIUS CHAIR OF CHEMISTRY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW

    WHO HAS BEEN ON TED-TALKS...

    HE WILL RUN THE DISH ON LIFE, HOW IT DEVELOPED HERE ON THIS PLANET,

    AND, HOW WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO DETECT SIGNS OF LIFE,

    "ELSEWHERE..." AND DOES IT NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE ORGANIC?

    PLUS, WHAT DO ALIENS EAT?

    IN OUR TEASPOON OF TRIVIA... OUR HOST, MARIO BOSQUEZ...

    SHARES, HIS POSSIBLE ALIEN LIFE, ENCOUNTER... WHICH TURNED HIS LIPS BLUE... IN SHOCK... AND SURPRISE...

    DID IT REALLY HAPPEN?

    In our "Fruit, Vegetable, and Nut in the Spotlight,"

    An exclusive interview with THE FRIENDLY, THE APPROACHABLE,

    THE DELICIOUS, CHINESE, WATER CHESTNUT...

    "Fruit, Vegetable, and Nut in the Spotlight,"

    Where we learn little or nothing, and it rarely goes well.

    HOW WILL IT GO, THIS TIME?

     

    Episode 83 Beyond The Stars The Berkshire UFO Sighting with Tom Warner

    Episode 83  Beyond The Stars The Berkshire UFO Sighting with Tom Warner
    It was September 1, 1969, and ten-year-old Tom Warner, was living in the Berkshires town of Great Barrington, Massachusetts, with his six siblings in his family's 1835 homestead. That evening, he was next door, coloring with his neighbor when mental telepathy called him to leave his neighbors house and go home. A historic event was about to occur. All noises disappeared and in an instant, a UFO dropped out of the sky and he was abducted.
    https://tomwarnerbeyondthestars.com/​

    Today, on Conflict Radio we will here from Tom Warner. He will tell us the story of what happened to him on the fateful day. Was it a UFO, UAP or Flying Saucer? You decide.

    Unsolved Mysteries on Netflix also did an episode on this story. Go look for it.

    Conflict Radio - Episode 83 Beyond The Stars: The Berkshire UFO Sighting with Tom Warner
    https://conflictradio.net/

    Running the Dish on Alien Food & Life Part 1

    Running the Dish on Alien Food & Life Part 1

    WITH THE PENTAGON RELEASING A REPORT...

    ON THE U F O QUESTION AND, WITH RECENT REVEALS FROM U-S MILITARY

    ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS

    IT'S TIME TO EXPLORE THIS TOPIC ON RUN THE DISH...

    SINCE WE ARE FOOD, LIFESTYLE, AND OTHER KITCHEN...

    WITCHERY... WE TACKLE ALL TOPICS INCLUDING THIS ONE...

    WHAT ABOUT ALIEN LIFE? ARE THEY OUT THERE? AND SINCE WE ARE FOOD PODCAST...

    WHAT DO ALIENS EAT?JOINING US FOR A GRIPPING INTERVIEW IS PROFESSOR LEE CRONIN

    REGIUS CHAIR OF CHEMISTRY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW

    WHO HAS BEEN ON TED-TALKS...

    HE WILL RUN THE DISH ON LIFE, HOW IT DEVELOPED HERE ON THIS PLANET,

    AND, HOW WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO DETECT SIGNS OF LIFE,

    "ELSEWHERE..." AND DOES IT NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE ORGANIC?

    PLUS, WHAT DO ALIENS EAT?

    IN OUR TEASPOON OF TRIVIA... OUR HOST, MARIO BOSQUEZ...

    SHARES, HIS POSSIBLE ALIEN LIFE, ENCOUNTER... WHICH TURNED HIS LIPS BLUE... IN SHOCK... AND SURPRISE...

    DID IT REALLY HAPPEN?

    In our "Fruit, Vegetable, and Nut in the Spotlight,"

    An exclusive interview with THE FRIENDLY, THE APPROACHABLE,

    THE DELICIOUS, CHINESE, WATER CHESTNUT...

    "Fruit, Vegetable, and Nut in the Spotlight,"

    Where we learn little or nothing, and it rarely goes well.

    HOW WILL IT GO, THIS TIME?

     

    Episode 32 Starseeds, Where Are They From & Why Are They Here

    Episode 32 Starseeds, Where Are They From & Why Are They Here
    Star people or StarSeeds (New Age belief), individuals who believe they originated from another world or planet. Who are they? Why are they here?

    Today we will talk to Aurena Agathe Fohler, a Starseed. Hopefully she can answer our questions and help us decide if we are in fact, Starseeds
    https://www.aurenafohler.com/
    https://www.facebook.com/Aurena-International-1912324932157687/?ref=br_rs

    Arcturians are Master beings and amazing healers! They also have highly telepathic skills.
    We are incarnated to teach, heal and to educate. We are one of the most advanced races in the galaxy.
    Arcturus is the 4th brightest star in the sky and resides in the Bootes constellation.

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/347407199060299

    Conflict Radio - Episode 32 STARSEEDS Where Are They From & Why Are They Here? Aurena Agathe Fohler
    https://conflictradio.net/