Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Understanding and catering to unique needsEffective weight loss plans consider individual preferences, politics tackle women's issues while addressing societal concerns, and companies provide essentials while giving back

      Personalized weight loss plans from Noom, like the one that helped Evan lose weight despite his dislike for salads, can be effective for individuals with unique preferences. Meanwhile, in politics, the Conservative Party has made efforts to address women's issues, such as fighting crime against women and girls and introducing a women's health strategy. However, the effectiveness of these efforts is debatable, as shown by persistent issues like violence against women and girls. In the realm of comfort essentials, Bombas continues to make a difference by providing soft products for consumers while also donating an item for every purchase to those in need. Overall, it's crucial for individuals and organizations to understand and cater to unique needs and preferences, while also addressing larger societal issues.

    • Conservative Party's record on women's issuesThe Conservative Party's lack of action on the gender pay gap, increasing rape convictions, and under-representation of women in leadership roles raises concerns about their commitment to gender equality and negatively impacts their image among women voters.

      The Conservative Party's record on women's issues in the UK is concerning. The gender pay gap has widened, and the number of rapes resulting in convictions and the average wait time for rape cases to go to court have increased. Misogyny and violence against women are becoming more prevalent, and the party's lack of action in addressing these issues is apparent. Furthermore, the under-representation of women in the Conservative Party, both in terms of MPs and ministers, raises questions about their commitment to gender equality. These factors contribute to the party's unfavorable image among women voters, as evidenced by polling data. Overall, the Conservative Party's track record on women's issues is not promising, and there is a clear need for more substantive action and representation.

    • Women's voting decisions influenced by cost of living crisis and gender inequalityWomen, especially those in female-dominated professions, are prioritizing economic concerns over party loyalty due to the cost of living crisis and its disproportionate impact on them. Anger and politicization from pandemic's impact on work-life balance could create a new demographic of politically powerful women.

      The cost of living crisis and gender inequality are significant factors influencing how women vote in the current political climate. According to private polling from the Labor party, women have a more favorable perception of Rishi Sunak compared to Boris Johnson, but their voting decisions are primarily driven by economic concerns. The cost of living crisis is disproportionately affecting female professions, leading to widespread strikes. Furthermore, women, particularly those in certain generations, are feeling politicized and angry due to the pandemic's impact on their ability to balance work and family responsibilities. These "Prosecco moms" could emerge as a new demographic with significant political power.

    • Conservative Party's Policies Alienating WomenThe Conservative Party's policies on childcare, menopause care, and harassment are causing anger and concern among women, leading to potential social mobility issues and a loss of workers in the workforce.

      The Conservative Party may be alienating several generations of women through policies related to childcare, Vogue magazine, and menopause care. These issues are causing anger and concern among women of different age groups, leading to potential social mobility issues and a loss of workers in the workforce. The high cost of childcare keeps women at home, while the lack of support for menopausal women and the inability to address harassment and violence in schools and workplaces push women out. The government's rejection of menopause leave and protected characteristic status under the Equality Act further exacerbates the issue. These policies not only impact younger women but also older women, who are leaving the workforce at an alarming rate. This economic issue could have significant consequences for businesses, as they lose valuable workers. The Labour Party is addressing these concerns through policies such as affordable childcare and addressing workplace issues related to menopause and harassment.

    • Politicization of gender equality discussions risks alienating those involvedPolitical leaders should engage in gender equality discussions constructively to benefit all parties, including businesses and families, rather than dismissing ideas as 'left-wing' or divisive.

      The discussion around gender equality and related policies is becoming increasingly politicized and divisive, which may not serve the best interests of all parties involved. During a recent committee meeting, the government's minister for equalities, Kemi Badenoch, responded defensively to suggestions for implementing menopause leave, dismissing it as a "left-wing idea." This approach risks alienating those who see these issues as crucial for improving gender equality and affecting society as a whole, including businesses and families. The debate around trans rights has also become highly politicized, overshadowing the broader discussion on gender equality and its economic implications. It is essential for political leaders to engage in these discussions constructively and recognize their importance to a diverse range of people and issues.

    • Labour Party's struggle with electing a female leaderThe Labour Party, despite advocating for gender equality, has yet to elect a female leader, reflecting a larger societal issue of underrepresentation of women in leadership roles. Efforts are being made to address this issue, but progress is slow.

      The Labour Party, despite positioning itself as the party of equality, has yet to elect a female leader. This is a source of frustration for many, both within and outside the party. The lack of female representation in leadership roles is a persistent problem that the Labour movement shares with society at large. The historical perception that female MPs have been elected through positive discrimination may have influenced some members' attitudes towards them. However, recent appointments like that of Sue Gray to Boris Johnson's office indicate an awareness of the issue and an effort to address it. The Labour Party, like many other institutions, has work to do in promoting gender equality and ensuring that women are treated fairly and given equal opportunities.

    • Lack of Female Labour Party Leader: Reasons and Potential SuccessorsThe Labour Party's lack of a female leader could be due to sexism, factionalism, and media performance. Potential successors include Rachel Reeves, Bridget Phillipson, Lisa Nandy, and Wes Streeting. Margaret Hodge emphasizes the importance of addressing sexism within the party to prevent losing ground to the Conservatives.

      Despite the talent and potential of women in the Labour Party, the lack of a female leader could be due to a combination of factors including sexism, factionalism, and media performance. MPs like Wes Streeting are often mentioned as potential successors, but there are also talented women like Rachel Reeves, Bridget Phillipson, and Lisa Nandy who could potentially lead. Margaret Hodge, a Labour politician with 60 years of experience, has expressed her disappointment over the lack of a female leader and believes that Labour cannot afford to take its foot off the accelerator in addressing sexism within the party. The adversarial nature of the political environment in Westminster further exacerbates the issue, making it a challenging environment for women to thrive in. The Conservative Party's success with female prime ministers highlights the importance of addressing this issue in Labour as well.

    • Historical perceptions of female leaders in the Labour partyHistorical biases and incorrect perceptions of Labour's membership demographics can impact the electability of female Labour candidates, but the success of Conservative women leaders suggests a more nuanced picture.

      The historical perception of what party members look like and the type of leader they prefer can impact the electability of female candidates, particularly in the Labour party. The speaker notes that the British public may have been less ready for a certain type of female leader in the past, leading to a barrier for Labour women. Additionally, the perception of Labour's membership being primarily students and left-wing culture warriors is also incorrect, and many are actually older and male. The speaker suggests that when a male Labour leader steps down or is ousted, it is likely that a female candidate will be the default choice, but it remains to be seen whether this will ultimately benefit her or not. The conversation also touched upon the fact that Conservative women, such as Thatcher, Truss, and May, have historically been more successful in rising to leadership positions. Overall, the discussion highlights the complex interplay of historical and current societal perceptions, party membership demographics, and individual candidate qualities in shaping the electability of female political leaders.

    • Pressure on Labour Party to Increase Women's Representation in LeadershipThe Labour Party in the UK is under pressure to increase the number and opportunities for women in leadership roles, with initiatives and campaigns focusing on gender equality and maternity rights.

      The Labour Party in the UK is under pressure to increase the representation of women in leadership roles, both due to legal requirements and societal expectations. This push for gender equality extends beyond just having a large number of female MPs, but also includes ensuring that women have the opportunity to become party leaders. Stella Creasy, Jess Phillips, and others are seen as potential new standard bearers for women in the Labour Party, and they will hold the party accountable for its choices. Additionally, there are campaigns and initiatives focused on women's rights and maternity rights within the party. Quincy, a company offering high-end goods at discounted prices, is an example of a brand that can help people get the nice things they deserve without breaking the bank. And 1-800-Flowers is offering discounts on Mother's Day gifts to help people celebrate their moms in style.

    Recent Episodes from The New Statesman Podcast

    The race to cervical cancer elimination | Sponsored

    The race to cervical cancer elimination | Sponsored

    Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women globally. It causes more than 800 deaths in the UK each year.

     

    Yet 99.8% of cervical cancer cases are entirely preventable. Regular screening and the introduction of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination are helping to reduce the number of deaths. With smart policy and public health interventions NHS England have set 2040 as the target date for total elimination of cervical cancer.

     

    If that goal is to be met the issue of health inequality needs to be addressed; currently screening and vaccination rates vary between different regions, communities and socio-economic groups.

     

    So what needs to be done to share best practice and narrow these inequalities?

     

    In this episode of Spotlight on Policy, host Zoe Grunwald is joined by Emma Cerrone, Business Unit Director for Public Health & Vaccines at MSD; Dr Adeola Olaitan, Honorary Associate Professor at University College London and Honorary Consultant Gynaecological Oncologist at UCLH; and Gayathri Kumar, Senior Economist at OHE, the Office for Health Economics.

     

    This episode has been fully funded by MSD who, as sponsors, have reviewed and inputted to the final content. The report referenced by Office for Health Economics throughout this episode was fully funded by MSD. Ultimate editorial control for this episode and the OHE report rests solely with the New Statesman and the Office for Health Economics, respectively. MSD is one of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies active in several key areas of global health, including immunisation and oncology.



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    What's happening in Northern Ireland? and should polling be banned?

    What's happening in Northern Ireland? and should polling be banned?

    It's listener question time! Freddie Hayward, political correspondent, is joined by Finn McRedmond, junior commissioning editor and writer, to answer questions on Northern Ireland, personal approval ratings, presidential debates, and polling influence.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    On the road with Corbyn, Farage, and Lammy

    On the road with Corbyn, Farage, and Lammy

    Today New Statesman is publishing an election special issue of the magazine which includes our election endorsement as well as in-depth political interviews with Jeremy Corbyn, Nigel Farage, and David Lammy.


    Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor, is joined in the studio by George Eaton, senior editor, and editor-in-chief Jason Cowley.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Up all night to Bet Lucky

    Up all night to Bet Lucky

    Another day, another flurry of betting allegations. More and more parties are now being dragged into the gambling scandal, but should we discern some distinction between the nature of these bets and their repercussions?


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by Freddie Hayward, political correspondent, and Ben Walker, senior data journalist.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Andrew Marr: "If I were Sunak, I'd be wailing under the table"

    Andrew Marr: "If I were Sunak, I'd be wailing under the table"

    Everything's been going so badly for the prime minister, one can't help but admire the fact that he's carrying on.


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by Andrew Marr, political editor, to discuss the developments in the betting scandal, how Nigel Reform lost the right, and why Labour failed to win over the Murdoch empire.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Is GamblingGate the new PartyGate?

    Is GamblingGate the new PartyGate?

    We’re in the penultimate week of campaigning, which may come as a relief to those suffering from election fatigue - maybe no one more so than Rishi Sunak. The prime minister has not had a particularly smooth weekend as the Tory betting scandal continues to rumble on …


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by George Eaton, senior editor, to discuss the latest developments in the gambling scandal, Labour's positions gender recognition and their plans for the House of Lords.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Rishi Sunak is campaigning through gritted teeth

    Rishi Sunak is campaigning through gritted teeth

    We were bestowed yet another leadership TV special last night, Ed Davey said sorry for tuition fees, Rishi Sunak said sorry for Liz Truss, and Keir Starmer said sorry for Jeremy Corbyn. But one unmissable feature of the night was the grimace on the prime ministers face as the impassioned audience put their questions to him.


    Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor, is joined by Freddie Hayward, political correspondent to discuss the TV special and to answer listener questions.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us




    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Stop The Bets!

    Stop The Bets!

    The Tory gambling scandal respawned last night when it was revealed that a met officer working in Rishi Sunak's protection team had been arrested over alleged bets, and also being looked into by the Gambling Commission is Laura Saunders - a Conservative candidate who happens to be married to the director of campaigns in CCHQ.


    The team also discuss the three polls published last night; while the predictions may differ, all roads lead to disaster for the Conservatives.


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor, and Freddie Hayward, political correspondent.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us




    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Is there still momentum for Scottish independence?

    Is there still momentum for Scottish independence?

    "Vote SNP for Scotland to become an independent country" - bold letters shout from the first page of the SNP manifesto. But is there still momentum for independence in Scotland? And what else is John Swinney pledging in his fight to retain seats from the hands of Scottish Labour.


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by Chris Deerin, Scotland editor, and Ben Walker, senior data journalist.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Andrew Marr: Labour must prepare for the turning tide

    Andrew Marr: Labour must prepare for the turning tide

    Labour are set to win a majority, if not a supermajority, but in these politically fragmented times will people who vote for the party necessarily stay loyal in their support after July the fifth?

     

    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by political editor Andrew Marr to discuss the changing political tides, Starmer's continued struggle with tax and Corbyn, and the potential return of Boris Johnson.

     

    Register to vote: https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote

     

    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Related Episodes

    “Transparent Leader” Author Dwight Johnson 1 of 3, Biographer of Famous Evangelicals

    “Transparent Leader” Author Dwight Johnson 1 of 3, Biographer of Famous Evangelicals
    1. Author Dwight Johnson, Biographer of Famous Evangelical Leaders, Wrote “Transparent Leader” 2. Wrote two books with Tim LaHaye, Tom Landry, Chuck Colson, Bill Armstrong, Ken Blanchard, Adolph Coors IV, Bill McCartney, Hank Brown, Will Perkins, George W. Bush, Tom Osborne, Rosie Grier, Jim Groen, Bill Kennedy, Josh McDowell (c) 2016, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD. Airs 12/16 on NRB TV, AndroidTV, Amazon FireTV, Roku, GoogleTV, Smart TV, iTunes and www.PrayInJesusName.org

    TRUMP vs JOHNSON: Leadership Challenge (# 1-20)

    TRUMP vs JOHNSON: Leadership Challenge (# 1-20)

    Who doesn't have a view on Donald Trump and/or Boris Johnson? Who is the better leader ?
    In episode 20 of the Leadership Detectives we thought we would chose 5 key areas of leadership out of 15+ we have discussed over our first 20 weeks, and then award each one of them a rating.
    Do you agree with our assessments?
    Would you rate each/both of them differently?
    Please join us and tell us and others what you think.

    Career Q&A: Resumes: should you make a unique one for each job you apply for?

    Career Q&A: Resumes: should you make a unique one for each job you apply for?

    This episode's question
    I'm looking for a new job. And I'm considering a couple of different kinds of jobs. So do I need a separate resume for each type of job that I'm applying for?

     

    What you'll learn
    - How to stop wasting your time submitting resumes to recruiters and hiring managers who throw it in the trash or overlook your awesomeness.

    - How to get noticed by talent management "bots" - the automated tools that are screening you as a candidate before a human ever sees your resume.

    - The big secret to getting hiring managers and recruiters to give your resume more than the 10 second skim. Hint: make it all about them.

     

    Resource of the episode
    Pinterest inspiration boards for Killer Visual Resumes to differentiate yourself and catch the eye of a recruiter. There's also a board on resume writing tips and interviewing tips.

     

    Tweetable of the episode
    In the world of resumes, if you make recruiters do work to see how your skills are relevant, they will move along to someone who doesn't. via @careerpodcast

    Ep307 - Anand Giridharadas | Winners Take All

    Ep307 - Anand Giridharadas | Winners Take All

    Anand Giridharadas visits Google to discuss his book "Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World."

    Anand Giridharadas takes us into the inner sanctums of a new gilded age, where the rich and powerful fight for equality and justice any way they can—except ways that threaten the social order and their position atop it. The book argues that elites rebrand themselves as saviors of the poor; that they lavishly reward so-called thought leaders who redefine “change” in ways that preserve the status quo; and that they constantly seek to do more good, but never less harm.

    Giridharadas asks hard questions: for example, why should our gravest problems be solved by the unelected upper crust instead of the public institutions eroded by lobbying and tax dodging? His groundbreaking investigation has already forced a great, sorely needed reckoning among the world’s wealthiest and those they hover above, and it points toward an answer: Rather than rely on scraps from the winners, we must take on the grueling democratic work of building more robust, egalitarian institutions.

    Originally published in October of 2018.

    Visit YouTube.com/TalksatGoogle to watch the video.