Logo

    Justice for All - The Wyatt Wright Show

    Attorney Wyatt Wright Discusses Your Constitutional Rights
    en-us30 Episodes

    People also ask

    What is the main theme of the podcast?
    Who are some of the popular guests the podcast?
    Were there any controversial topics discussed in the podcast?
    Were any current trending topics addressed in the podcast?
    What popular books were mentioned in the podcast?

    Episodes (30)

    Decade of Disaster at the Texas Supreme Court: 2000-2010

    Decade of Disaster at the Texas Supreme Court: 2000-2010
    Wyatt reviews a recent report from non-partisan watchdog group Court Watch, entitled “Thumbs on the Scale—A Retrospective of the Texas Supreme Court 2000-2010.” The report details statistics showing that consumers lose against big business almost 80% of the time at the Texas Supreme Court, and that the high court reverses 74% of all jury verdicts in consumer cases.

    Texas' Broken Workers' Compensation System

    Texas' Broken Workers' Compensation System
    Wyatt discusses the devastating ruling of the Texas Supreme Court in Tex Mutual Ins. Co. v. Ruttiger which erased a cause of action and immunized workers’ compensation insurance companies from any threat of being sued by policyholders—even when the insurers blatantly and deliberately deny claims to injured Texas workers.

    Generic Drug Pre-Emption – The Danger Worsens

    Generic Drug Pre-Emption – The Danger Worsens
    Wyatt discusses the dangerous ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Pliva v. Mensing which overturned the 8th and 5th circuits’ decisions and held that federal drug regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers directly conflict with and preempt plaintiffs’ state law claims. This absurdity means that people injured by dangerous “name brand drugs” can sue for relief while those injured by “generic drugs” have absolutely no remedy in the law at all.

    End of corporate campaign limits

    End of corporate campaign limits
    Wyatt discusses the dangerous ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Pliva v. Mensing which overturned the 8th and 5th circuits’ decisions and held that federal drug regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers directly conflict with and preempt plaintiffs’ state law claims. This absurdity means that people injured by dangerous “name brand drugs” can sue for relief while those injured by “generic drugs” have absolutely no remedy in the law at all.
    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io