Logo
    Home > Topics > 1995 golden raspberry awards

    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    Explore " 1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees" with insightful episodes like "Waterworld • The Next Reel", "Waterworld • The Next Reel", "Showgirls • The Next Reel", "Showgirls • The Next Reel" and "The Scarlet Letter • The Next Reel" from podcasts like ""The Next Reel Film Podcast", "The Next Reel Film Podcast", "The Next Reel Film Podcast", "The Next Reel Film Podcast" and "The Next Reel Film Podcast"" and more!

    Episodes (10)

    Waterworld • The Next Reel

    Waterworld • The Next Reel

    “He’s a wily one, that ichthy-demon.”
    Waterworld    : Sinking Budgets and Soaring Spectacle

    In the early 1990s, Kevin Costner was riding high after hits like Dances with Wolves and Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. He teamed up again with his Robin Hood director Kevin Reynolds for an ambitious post-apocalyptic aquatic adventure called Waterworld. With its massive scale and elaborate water-based sets, the production quickly sank into major budget overruns and production nightmares.

    Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Reynolds’ 1995 film Waterworld.

    Diving Into Our Waterworld Chat

    We dive deep into the troubled production and how it still managed to deliver an entertaining aquatic spectacle despite going way over budget. The world building stands out, creating an immersive post-apocalyptic seafaring society even if some plot points strain believability.

    More Topics From Our Wide-Ranging Water Chat

    • How the Hollywood sheen holds it back from grittier cult classics like Mad Max
    • Dennis Hopper's gleeful villainy as the Deacon
    • Appreciating the rich world building and visuals despite flaws
    • The differences between the theatrical cut and extended Ulysses version
    • How it stacks up to other Razzie nominees for Worst Director

    In the end, we found Waterworld to be a pleasant surprise given its reputation - an ambitious and imaginative, if imperfect, seafaring adventure. Despite its behind-the-scenes troubles, it delivers aquatic action and world building that entertained us.

    Tune in to hear our full thoughts! The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 22, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    kevin reynolds
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    Waterworld • The Next Reel

    Waterworld • The Next Reel

    “He’s a wily one, that ichthy-demon.”
    Waterworld    : Sinking Budgets and Soaring Spectacle

    In the early 1990s, Kevin Costner was riding high after hits like Dances with Wolves and Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. He teamed up again with his Robin Hood director Kevin Reynolds for an ambitious post-apocalyptic aquatic adventure called Waterworld. With its massive scale and elaborate water-based sets, the production quickly sank into major budget overruns and production nightmares.

    Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Reynolds’ 1995 film Waterworld.

    Diving Into Our Waterworld Chat

    We dive deep into the troubled production and how it still managed to deliver an entertaining aquatic spectacle despite going way over budget. The world building stands out, creating an immersive post-apocalyptic seafaring society even if some plot points strain believability.

    More Topics From Our Wide-Ranging Water Chat

    • How the Hollywood sheen holds it back from grittier cult classics like Mad Max
    • Dennis Hopper's gleeful villainy as the Deacon
    • Appreciating the rich world building and visuals despite flaws
    • The differences between the theatrical cut and extended Ulysses version
    • How it stacks up to other Razzie nominees for Worst Director

    In the end, we found Waterworld to be a pleasant surprise given its reputation - an ambitious and imaginative, if imperfect, seafaring adventure. Despite its behind-the-scenes troubles, it delivers aquatic action and world building that entertained us.

    Tune in to hear our full thoughts! The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 22, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    kevin reynolds
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    Showgirls • The Next Reel

    Showgirls • The Next Reel

    "Thrust it! Thrust it!”
    Before the sequins and controversy hit the screen, Showgirls was a script that sparked excitement for its bold take on the glitz and grunge of Las Vegas life. Helmed by Paul Verhoeven and penned by Joe Eszterhas, the duo behind the provocative hit Basic Instinct, expectations were high for this journey into the world of Vegas showgirls. Yet, the resulting film would divide audiences and critics, becoming a cult classic for some and a cautionary tale of excess for others. The backdrop was set for a film that would be discussed and dissected for years to come. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Showgirls.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about.

    In this deep dive, Pete and Andy explore the contentious legacy of Showgirls, a film that's danced its way into infamy. They discuss the film's place in the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards as a Worst Director Nominee, debating whether the film's over-the-top style was a misguided misstep or a misunderstood stroke of satirical genius. The hosts don't always see eye-to-eye, revealing a schism in their takes on the film's execution and its thematic intentions. They ponder whether Elizabeth Berkley's performance as Nomi was intentionally exaggerated to serve the film's satirical edge or if it was a misdirection that led to its critical panning. As part of their series on the Razzies, they delve into the broader conversation about what the nomination means for Showgirls and its place in cinematic history.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion.

    • The Dickensian description of the film by some and the evolving public opinion over time
    • The comparison of Verhoeven's direction in Showgirls to his work in RoboCop and other films
    • The potential allegory of Hollywood and selling out as interpreted by Jonathan Rosenbaum
    • The contrasting performances, particularly Berkley's and Gina Gershon's, and their impact on the film's tone
    • The undercurrents of power and gender dynamics within the narrative
    • Our personal reactions to the comedic elements and whether they hit the mark or fell flat

    As we peel back the layers of this high-kicking, high-stakes drama, we find a film that's as polarizing as it is fascinating. Despite its Razzie nods and the debates it sparks, Showgirls remains an electrifying topic of discussion for cinephiles and critics alike. Whether you view it as a glittering satire or a cautionary tale of excess, there's no denying the film's unique place in the landscape of '90s cinema. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 14, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    paul verhoeven
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    Showgirls • The Next Reel

    Showgirls • The Next Reel

    "Thrust it! Thrust it!”
    Before the sequins and controversy hit the screen, Showgirls was a script that sparked excitement for its bold take on the glitz and grunge of Las Vegas life. Helmed by Paul Verhoeven and penned by Joe Eszterhas, the duo behind the provocative hit Basic Instinct, expectations were high for this journey into the world of Vegas showgirls. Yet, the resulting film would divide audiences and critics, becoming a cult classic for some and a cautionary tale of excess for others. The backdrop was set for a film that would be discussed and dissected for years to come. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Showgirls.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about.

    In this deep dive, Pete and Andy explore the contentious legacy of Showgirls, a film that's danced its way into infamy. They discuss the film's place in the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards as a Worst Director Nominee, debating whether the film's over-the-top style was a misguided misstep or a misunderstood stroke of satirical genius. The hosts don't always see eye-to-eye, revealing a schism in their takes on the film's execution and its thematic intentions. They ponder whether Elizabeth Berkley's performance as Nomi was intentionally exaggerated to serve the film's satirical edge or if it was a misdirection that led to its critical panning. As part of their series on the Razzies, they delve into the broader conversation about what the nomination means for Showgirls and its place in cinematic history.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion.

    • The Dickensian description of the film by some and the evolving public opinion over time
    • The comparison of Verhoeven's direction in Showgirls to his work in RoboCop and other films
    • The potential allegory of Hollywood and selling out as interpreted by Jonathan Rosenbaum
    • The contrasting performances, particularly Berkley's and Gina Gershon's, and their impact on the film's tone
    • The undercurrents of power and gender dynamics within the narrative
    • Our personal reactions to the comedic elements and whether they hit the mark or fell flat

    As we peel back the layers of this high-kicking, high-stakes drama, we find a film that's as polarizing as it is fascinating. Despite its Razzie nods and the debates it sparks, Showgirls remains an electrifying topic of discussion for cinephiles and critics alike. Whether you view it as a glittering satire or a cautionary tale of excess, there's no denying the film's unique place in the landscape of '90s cinema. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 14, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    paul verhoeven
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    The Scarlet Letter • The Next Reel

    The Scarlet Letter • The Next Reel

    “Why do you wait? Put it on for it is not a badge of my shame, but your own.”
    Roland Joffé took on the challenge of adapting Nathaniel Hawthorne’s classic 1850 novel The Scarlet Letter for the big screen in 1995. With a passion for the source material and a vision to expand the story in ways he felt Hawthorne was restricted from doing, Joffé assembled an impressive cast including Demi Moore, Gary Oldman and Robert Duvall. However, despite his noble intentions, many critics felt Joffé’s reach exceeded his grasp. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about The Scarlet Letter.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about:

    We discuss how Joffé's ambitions to elevate the material and expand the story ended up making the film feel overstuffed and unfocused. The heavy-handed symbolism, like the constantly reappearing "red bird of passion," also didn't work for us. And we both found the new "happy ending" Joffé devised to be a disappointment compared to the novel's more downbeat conclusion. However, we do appreciate his attempts to incorporate more of the indigenous American perspective.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion:

    • The overly sentimental score by John Barry... that’s still an amazing score
    • Whether the principle cast was well-suited for a period drama
    • The absurdity of Robert Duvall's unhinged performance that’s still undeniably entertaining
    • The unnecessary Pearl voiceover narration

    Overall, while we can appreciate some of what Joffé was trying to accomplish, we feel his reach exceeded his grasp in many ways, resulting in a film that feels messy and unsatisfying. But we have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 08, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    roland joffé
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    The Scarlet Letter • The Next Reel

    The Scarlet Letter • The Next Reel

    “Why do you wait? Put it on for it is not a badge of my shame, but your own.”
    Roland Joffé took on the challenge of adapting Nathaniel Hawthorne’s classic 1850 novel The Scarlet Letter for the big screen in 1995. With a passion for the source material and a vision to expand the story in ways he felt Hawthorne was restricted from doing, Joffé assembled an impressive cast including Demi Moore, Gary Oldman and Robert Duvall. However, despite his noble intentions, many critics felt Joffé’s reach exceeded his grasp. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about The Scarlet Letter.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about:

    We discuss how Joffé's ambitions to elevate the material and expand the story ended up making the film feel overstuffed and unfocused. The heavy-handed symbolism, like the constantly reappearing "red bird of passion," also didn't work for us. And we both found the new "happy ending" Joffé devised to be a disappointment compared to the novel's more downbeat conclusion. However, we do appreciate his attempts to incorporate more of the indigenous American perspective.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion:

    • The overly sentimental score by John Barry... that’s still an amazing score
    • Whether the principle cast was well-suited for a period drama
    • The absurdity of Robert Duvall's unhinged performance that’s still undeniably entertaining
    • The unnecessary Pearl voiceover narration

    Overall, while we can appreciate some of what Joffé was trying to accomplish, we feel his reach exceeded his grasp in many ways, resulting in a film that feels messy and unsatisfying. But we have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 08, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    roland joffé
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    CutThroat Island • The Next Reel

    CutThroat Island • The Next Reel

    “Congratulations, Morgan. There’s another town you’ve destroyed.”
    After the success of Die Hard 2 and Cliffhanger, director Renny Harlin wanted to establish his wife Geena Davis as an action star. He sought out a swashbuckling pirate adventure script for her to lead. Screenwriters Michael Frost Beckner and James Gorman had written an initial draft, but extensive rewrites resulted in multiple additional credited writers. With Geena Davis attached to the lead role of pirate captain Morgan Adams, finding the right co-lead proved challenging. Michael Douglas was originally set to play opposite Davis but dropped out due to issues over equal screen time. Numerous major stars were offered the role including Tom Cruise, Keanu Reeves, Russell Crowe, Liam Neeson and Daniel Day-Lewis before Harlin settled on Matthew Modine. With the stars finally set, cameras rolled on location in Malta and Thailand. But behind the scenes, the production was plagued with problems that led to massive cost overruns. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Harlin’s 1995 film CutThroat Island.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about:

    We discuss the issues with the constantly evolving script and poor dialogue, along with miscasting of the leads and lack of chemistry between Davis and Modine. We also get into the impressive practical effects and action set pieces, despite flaws elsewhere. And we talk about the legendary reputation of this box office bomb that sunk Carolco Pictures.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion:

    • Renny Harlin's strengths and weaknesses as a director
    • The great production design and cinematography
    • How the film hasn't aged particularly well
    • Our armchair casting for who could have been better in the lead roles

    In the end, we found CutThroat Island to be a mixed bag with plenty of problems holding it back yet still quite entertaining and delivering a romping pirate adventure. It makes for an interesting case study in a big budget production gone awry. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 01, 2024
    renny harlin
    1995
    1990s
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    CutThroat Island • The Next Reel

    CutThroat Island • The Next Reel

    “Congratulations, Morgan. There’s another town you’ve destroyed.”
    After the success of Die Hard 2 and Cliffhanger, director Renny Harlin wanted to establish his wife Geena Davis as an action star. He sought out a swashbuckling pirate adventure script for her to lead. Screenwriters Michael Frost Beckner and James Gorman had written an initial draft, but extensive rewrites resulted in multiple additional credited writers. With Geena Davis attached to the lead role of pirate captain Morgan Adams, finding the right co-lead proved challenging. Michael Douglas was originally set to play opposite Davis but dropped out due to issues over equal screen time. Numerous major stars were offered the role including Tom Cruise, Keanu Reeves, Russell Crowe, Liam Neeson and Daniel Day-Lewis before Harlin settled on Matthew Modine. With the stars finally set, cameras rolled on location in Malta and Thailand. But behind the scenes, the production was plagued with problems that led to massive cost overruns. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Harlin’s 1995 film CutThroat Island.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about:

    We discuss the issues with the constantly evolving script and poor dialogue, along with miscasting of the leads and lack of chemistry between Davis and Modine. We also get into the impressive practical effects and action set pieces, despite flaws elsewhere. And we talk about the legendary reputation of this box office bomb that sunk Carolco Pictures.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion:

    • Renny Harlin's strengths and weaknesses as a director
    • The great production design and cinematography
    • How the film hasn't aged particularly well
    • Our armchair casting for who could have been better in the lead roles

    In the end, we found CutThroat Island to be a mixed bag with plenty of problems holding it back yet still quite entertaining and delivering a romping pirate adventure. It makes for an interesting case study in a big budget production gone awry. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enFebruary 01, 2024
    renny harlin
    1995
    1990s
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    Congo • The Next Reel

    Congo • The Next Reel

    “Are you serving that ape a martini?”
    In the early 1990s, following the massive success of Jurassic Park, studios were eager to adapt more of Michael Crichton’s popular novels to film. Congo had been published back in 1980 but no one had figured out how to bring the complicated story to the big screen. After the rights bounced around for years, Paramount finally secured them in 1994 and began fast-tracking production. Director Frank Marshall was fresh off hits like Alive and Arachnophobia when he signed on, along with an all-star cast including Laura Linney, Dylan Walsh, Ernie Hudson, and Tim Curry. But the difficult shoot on location in Africa plagued the production. Despite high hopes, the film flopped critically when it was released in 1995, earning Marshall a Razzie nomination for Worst Director. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Marshall’s 1995 film Congo.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about.

    In this lively discussion, we dig into the pre-production and challenges behind adapting Michael Crichton’s 1980 novel to the big screen in 1995. We discuss the all-star cast and debate whether the directing, acting, or weak script led to poor character development and lack of chemistry. We also analyze the cultural portrayal and exploitation of Africa in cinema at the time.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion:

    • Weak CGI and special effects that don’t hold up today
    • The silly conceit of the genetically engineered “bad gorillas”
    • Confusion over who the true protagonist is
    • Enjoyable moments from Ernie Hudson and Tim Curry

    Though we have some fun unpacking this Razzie-nominated film, we ultimately agree Congo fails to come together as an entertaining adventure. The story loses Crichton’s scientific edge and thought-provoking commentary on technology in the adaptation. We still have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enJanuary 25, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    frank marshall
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees

    Congo • The Next Reel

    Congo • The Next Reel

    “Are you serving that ape a martini?”
    In the early 1990s, following the massive success of Jurassic Park, studios were eager to adapt more of Michael Crichton’s popular novels to film. Congo had been published back in 1980 but no one had figured out how to bring the complicated story to the big screen. After the rights bounced around for years, Paramount finally secured them in 1994 and began fast-tracking production. Director Frank Marshall was fresh off hits like Alive and Arachnophobia when he signed on, along with an all-star cast including Laura Linney, Dylan Walsh, Ernie Hudson, and Tim Curry. But the difficult shoot on location in Africa plagued the production. Despite high hopes, the film flopped critically when it was released in 1995, earning Marshall a Razzie nomination for Worst Director. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off the 1995 Golden Raspberry Awards Worst Director Nominees series with a conversation about Marshall’s 1995 film Congo.

    Here's a hint at what we talk about.

    In this lively discussion, we dig into the pre-production and challenges behind adapting Michael Crichton’s 1980 novel to the big screen in 1995. We discuss the all-star cast and debate whether the directing, acting, or weak script led to poor character development and lack of chemistry. We also analyze the cultural portrayal and exploitation of Africa in cinema at the time.

    Here are a few other points in our discussion:

    • Weak CGI and special effects that don’t hold up today
    • The silly conceit of the genetically engineered “bad gorillas”
    • Confusion over who the true protagonist is
    • Enjoyable moments from Ernie Hudson and Tim Curry

    Though we have some fun unpacking this Razzie-nominated film, we ultimately agree Congo fails to come together as an entertaining adventure. The story loses Crichton’s scientific edge and thought-provoking commentary on technology in the adaptation. We still have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

    Film Sundries


    The Next Reel Film Podcast
    enJanuary 25, 2024
    1995
    1990s
    frank marshall
    1995 golden raspberry awards worst director nominees
    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    TwitterYouTubeInstagramPinterestFacebookLinkedIn

    Pages

    PodcastsEpisodesTopics

    Support

    Refund PolicyTerms of ServiceContact usPrivacy Policy

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io