Logo

    apasl

    Explore " apasl" with insightful episodes like "S5 - E3.5 - The New MASLD Nomenclature: What Lies Ahead For MASH Patients And Providers?", "S5 - E3.4 - Discussing MASLD With Patients: MASH Is Not "Just A Little Fat" Any More", "Hepatitis Delta in Focus: Episode 1 of Answering the Questions on Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment" and "44.3 2020 Year In Review: Revisiting the "MAFLD vs. NAFLD" debate" from podcasts like ""Surfing the NASH Tsunami", "Surfing the NASH Tsunami", "CCO Infectious Disease Podcast" and "Surfing the NASH Tsunami"" and more!

    Episodes (4)

    S5 - E3.5 - The New MASLD Nomenclature: What Lies Ahead For MASH Patients And Providers?

    S5 - E3.5 - The New MASLD Nomenclature: What Lies Ahead For MASH Patients And Providers?

    This conversation ties up several issues related to MASH and the new MASLD nomenclature that the panel did not touch on earlier in the episode. These range from the impact the nomenclature might have on other elements of treatment to the impact of this effort over time. Finally, the panelists grade the process to date (they admit, their views might be a bit biased) and signs of success. 

    Roger Green starts this conversation by asking what impact panelists believe the new MASLD nomenclature might have on NITs. From one perspective, Meena Bansal notes that it should have no impact given that NAFLD/NASH and MASLD/MASH map so similarly on top of one another. From a different perspective, Jeff Lazarus asks whether the nomenclature and accompanying guidelines from professional societies will result in more testing. The group aligns around the idea that patients living with Type 2 diabetes are an excellent target for increased testing with NITs given the high overlap of the two groups. Maru Rinella comments specifically that all efforts to tie T2DM to MASLD as frequently common metabolic diseases will be helpful and that discussing the proper use of NITs might be one way to make this connection. Louise Campbell agrees that increased focus on "Healthy Livers, Healthy Lives" will drive exactly these kinds of discussions. The rest of the episode consists of Roger asking panelists three questions, to which they respond: 

    1. What might change over the next year or two? Meena believese that approval of a drug will drive significant growth in the learning curve and, with that, enhanced disease awareness and understanding. Jeff suggests that this will not take the form of a transition from NAFLD to MASLD, but instead that people first learning about the disease will use the new nomenclature properly. Mike Betel notes that on the Fatty Liver Alliance website, ~98% of searches are simply for "fatty liver disease." Over time, he anticipates this will change and also that websites like FLA will address "fatty liver" queries in terms of new nomenclature. 
    2. Impact on ICD codes. Meena, who is doing significant work in this area, answers that the goal is to have no impact but simply a smooth cutover. 
    3. How the group would grade its work on this activity to date. As Jeff notes, answers from the people who led the process are likely to be quite biased, but all gave fairly high grades. 

    S5 - E3.4 - Discussing MASLD With Patients: MASH Is Not "Just A Little Fat" Any More

    S5 - E3.4 - Discussing MASLD With Patients: MASH Is Not "Just A Little Fat" Any More

    This conversation focuses on how the new MASLD nomenclature might improve providers' explanations of MASH to patients. Louise Campbell describes new opportunities, while Meena Bansal describes how focusing on metabolism provides a richer opportunity for providers to explain to MASH patients why fat on the liver matters.

    Louise Campbell starts this conversation by discussing a new NHS program providing primary care centers with VCTE units they can use to screen patients for MASLD and MASH. She points out that this will provide a unique opportunity to present the new MASLD nomenclature to primary care and allied health providers in a way that connects immediately to diagnosing patients and educating them properly about their disease. She notes that at the patient level, the discussion is still likely to focus on excess fat on the liver but presents the idea of "fat" in a less stigmatizing way.

    Meena Bansal focuses more specifically on exactly how provider-patient conversations might change. For years, she suggests, physicians have written "hepatic steatosis" on patient charts, but then told patients they "just have a little fat on the liver." In her view, the new nomenclature will take the word "just" out of the discussion and present the "little fat on the liver" as part of a metabolic syndrome that requires treatment. She goes on to mention another source of excitement: the ability to consider MetALD patients as part of the same MASLD community and add them to Mt. Sinai's longitudinal patient registry, which will likely become a rich source of MetALD data.
    Earlier in the episode, Jeff Lazarus had mentioned his excitement at the growing role and publicity for the "Healthy Livers, Healthy Lives" initiative. Louise notes that increasing focus on liver awareness and awareness of the importance of liver health, as discussed in Season 5 Episode 2, aligns neatly with Meena's disease description and the new communication opportunities for new physician and allied health specialties.

    Hepatitis Delta in Focus: Episode 1 of Answering the Questions on Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment

    Hepatitis Delta in Focus: Episode 1 of Answering the Questions on Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment

    In this episode, Maria Buti, MD, and Richard H. Davis, PA-C, address key considerations when screening, diagnosing, and treating patients with hepatitis delta virus (HDV), such as:

    • Barriers to screening 
    • HDV screening based on patient risk factors 
    • Universal screening for all patients with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
    • Reflex testing 
    • Availability of commercial testing
    • Monitoring suggestions in HBsAg positive and HDV antibody positive patients with negative HDV RNA
    • Limitations to evaluating advanced fibrosis in patients with HDV
    • Data on novel HDV therapies (eg, bulevirtide and lonafarnib)
    • Extending HDV therapy (eg, peginterferon) based on treatment response
    • Stopping rules (eg, HDV RNA negativity, HBsAg loss) for discontinuing HDV therapy

    Faculty:

    Maria Buti, MD
    Professor of Medicine
    Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron
    Barcelona, Spain

    Richard H. Davis, PA-C
    Senior PA
    Gastroenterology
    University of Florida
    UF Health
    Gainesville, Florida

    Link to full program: 
    http://bit.ly/3yp1Lxf

    44.3 2020 Year In Review: Revisiting the "MAFLD vs. NAFLD" debate

    44.3 2020 Year In Review: Revisiting the "MAFLD vs. NAFLD" debate

    Louise Campbell questions the implication of APASL and ALEH endorsing "MAFLD" as Fatty Liver Disease nomenclature and Stephen Harrison discusses behind-the-scenes activities to resolve this issue.

    Louise Campbell "wonders" where increased support for adopting the term "MAFLD" (Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease) instead of NAFLD (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) "is going to take us in the next 12 months and how we are going to come to a resolution." In response Stephen Harrison provides background on how the dispute started and discusses the current multi-regional efforts to create consensus around a nomenclature that describes the range of Fatty Liver Diseases accurately.

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io