Logo

    aptt

    Explore "aptt" with insightful episodes like "🇫🇷 S1E7- Suivi des HNF : TCA ou Anti-Xa ?", "S2E7 - APTT, not a one-for-all-purposes reagent" and "#11 – Monitoring of UFH: APTT or Anti-Xa?" from podcasts like ""🇫🇷 Ask Stago (version française)", "Ask Stago (english version)" and "Ask Stago (english version)"" and more!

    Episodes (3)

    🇫🇷 S1E7- Suivi des HNF : TCA ou Anti-Xa ?

    🇫🇷 S1E7-  Suivi des HNF : TCA ou Anti-Xa ?

    Bienvenue chez « Ask Stago», le Podcast fournissant des réponses d'experts à vos questions d'experts en hémostase.  

    Dans l'épisode d'aujourd'hui, avec François Depasse, notre directeur du développement clinique, nous discuterons du suivi des héparines non-fractionnées (HNF) et de l'outil approprié pour le faire : TCA ou activité anti-Xa ?  

    Pour en savoir plus :  

    • Johnson EA, Mullboy B. The molecular weight range of commercial heparin preparations. Carbohydr Res 1976; 51: 119-127 
    • Hirsh J, Raschke R, Heparin and Low-molecular-weight heparin : the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. CHEST 2004; 126 (suppl 3): 188S-203S. 
    • Basu D, Gallus A, Hirsh J, Cade J. A prospective study of the value of monitoring heparin treatment with the activated partial thromboplastin time. N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 17;287(7):324-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197208172870703. PMID: 5041701. 
    • Eikelboom JW, Hirsh J. Monitoring unfractionated heparin with the aPTT: time for a fresh look. Thromb Haemost. 2006 Nov;96(5):547-52. 
    • Frugé KS, Lee YR. Comparison of unfractionated heparin protocols using antifactor Xa monitoring or activated partial thrombin time monitoring. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Sep 1;72(17 Suppl 2):S90-7. 
    • Vandiver JW, Vondracek TG. Antifactor Xa levels versus activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jun;32(6):546-58. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01049.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24 

    Le contenu est de nature scientifique et technique. Il se veut un outil pédagogique pour les professionnels de laboratoire et les sujets abordés ne sont pas destinés à être des recommandations ou des commentaires sur la pratique clinique appropriée.  

    S2E7 - APTT, not a one-for-all-purposes reagent

    S2E7 - APTT, not a one-for-all-purposes reagent

    Welcome to Ask Stago, the Podcast dedicated to provide expert answers to your expert questions in coagulation. In today episode, our expert Thomas, is covering with us the usages of APTT testing.  

     

    Literature sources: 

    • Toulon, P., Eloit, Y., Smahi, M., Sigaud, C., Jambou, D., Fischer, F. and Appert‐Flory, A. (2016), In vitro sensitivity of different activated partial thromboplastin time reagents to mild clotting factor deficiencies. Int. Jnl. Lab. Hem., 38: 389-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12499
    • CLSI One-stage Prothrombin Time (PT) test and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) test; Approved guideline - second edition. CLSI document H47-A2 Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, 2008 
    • Levy JH, Szlam F, Wolberg AS, Winkler A. Clinical use of the activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time for screening: a review of the literature and current guidelines for testing. Clin Lab Med. 2014 Sep;34(3):453-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.06.005 
    • Kitchen S, Jennings I, Woods TA, Preston FE. Wide variability in the sensitivity of APTT reagents for monitoring of heparin dosage. J Clin Pathol. 1996 Jan;49(1):10-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.1.10. 
    • Gosselin RC, King JH, Janatpour KA, Dager WE, Larkin EC, Owings JT. Comparing direct thrombin inhibitors using aPTT, ecarin clotting times, and thrombin inhibitor management testing. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;38(9):1383-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D565. 
    • Gouin-Thibaut I, Martin-Toutain I, Peynaud-Debayle E, et al. Monitoring unfractionated heparin with APTT: a French collaborative study comparing sensitivity to heparin of 15 APTT reagents. Thrombosis Research. 2012 May;129(5):666-667. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.11.016. 
    • Triplett DA. Screening for the lupus anticoagulant. Ricerca in Clinica E in Laboratorio. 1989; 19-379-89 
    • Denis-Magdelaine A et al; Sensitivity of sixteen APTT reagents for the presence of anticoagulant. Haemostasis 1995; 25:98-105/ 
    • Rozen L, Copette F, Noubouossie DF, Demulder A. Evaluation of three APTT reagents in a routine laboratory: toward a compromise. Clin Lab. 2013;59(7-8):921-4. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2012.120909 
    • van Rossum, A.P., Vlasveld, L.T., van den Hoven, L.J.M., de Wit, C.W.M. and Castel, A. (2012), False prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in inflammatory patients: interference of C‐reactive protein. Br J Haematol, 157: 394-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08990.x 
    • Gu, J.‐M., Ramsey, P., Evans, V., Tang, L., Apeler, H., Leong, L., Murphy, J.E., Laux, V. and Myles, T. (2014), Evaluation of the activated partial thromboplastin time assay for clinical monitoring of PEGylated recombinant factor VIII (BAY 94‐9027) for haemophilia A. Haemophilia, 20: 593-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.12374
    • Hillarp A, Bowyer A, Ezban M, Persson P, Kitchen S. Measuring FVIII activity of glycopegylated recombinant factor VIII, N8-GP, with commercially available one-stage clotting and chromogenic assay kits: a two-centre study. Haemophilia. 2017 May;23(3):458-465. doi: 10.1111/hae.13168. 
    • Ezban M, Hansen M, Kjalke M. An overview of turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP; ESPEROCT® ) assay performance: Implications for postadministration monitoring. Haemophilia. 2020;26(1):156-163. doi:10.1111/hae.13897 

    Related podcasts: 

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Content is scientific and technical in nature. It is intended as an educational tool for laboratory professionals and topics discussed are not intended as recommendations or as commentary on appropriate clinical practice. 

    #11 – Monitoring of UFH: APTT or Anti-Xa?

    #11 – Monitoring of UFH: APTT or Anti-Xa?

    Welcome to Ask Stago, The Podcast dedicated to provide expert answers to your expert questions in coagulation. 

    In our episode this week, we will discuss with François Depasse, our Clinical Development Director, about the monitoring of UFH and the appropriate tool to do it: APTT or anti-Xa activity? 

    Sources:  

    • Johnson EA, Mullboy B. The molecular weight range of commercial heparin preparations. Carbohydr Res 1976; 51: 119-127 
    • Hirsh J, Raschke R, Heparin and Low-molecular-weight heparin : the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. CHEST 2004; 126 (suppl 3): 188S-203S. 
    • Basu D, Gallus A, Hirsh J, Cade J. A prospective study of the value of monitoring heparin treatment with the activated partial thromboplastin time. N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 17;287(7):324-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197208172870703. PMID: 5041701. 
    • Eikelboom JW, Hirsh J. Monitoring unfractionated heparin with the aPTT: time for a fresh look. Thromb Haemost. 2006 Nov;96(5):547-52. 
    • Frugé KS, Lee YR. Comparison of unfractionated heparin protocols using antifactor Xa monitoring or activated partial thrombin time monitoring. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Sep 1;72(17 Suppl 2):S90-7. 
    • Vandiver JW, Vondracek TG. Antifactor Xa levels versus activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jun;32(6):546-58. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01049.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24. 

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Content is scientific and technical in nature. It is intended as an educational tool for laboratory professionals and topics discussed are not intended as recommendations or as commentary on appropriate clinical practice.