Logo

    fourteenth amendment

    Explore " fourteenth amendment" with insightful episodes like "February 8, 2024: What’s at stake in today’s watershed Supreme Court case", "A History of Violence", "Honoring the Fourteenth", "Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Co. (Personal Jurisidction)" and "The FBI is the Democrat’s new KKK" from podcasts like ""POLITICO Playbook Daily Briefing", "Inside with Jen Psaki", "New Times Radio", "Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)" and "The Carl Jackson Podcast"" and more!

    Episodes (11)

    February 8, 2024: What’s at stake in today’s watershed Supreme Court case

    February 8, 2024: What’s at stake in today’s watershed Supreme Court case
    This morning, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a momentous case that could determine former President Donald Trump’s ballot eligibility — and, potentially, whether the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause bars him from a return to the White House. Playbook co-author Ryan Lizza and legal editor James Romoser break down what to expect inside the courtroom.

    A History of Violence

    A History of Violence

    Jen Psaki breaks down the trickle down effect of Donald Trump’s embrace of threats and violent language now playing in Congress during a week that saw multiple GOP lawmakers on the verge of physical violence. Rep. Dan Goldman joins to discuss the latest headlines surrounding the GOP and new developments in the Israel-Hamas war. Neal Katyal and Andrew Weissmann also join to break down the federal judge’s ruling that will keep Trump on the ballot in Colorado and other new legal headlines. Plus Jen also chats with Illinois Governor JB Pritzker about the 2024 race and the alarming rhetoric used by Donald Trump that mirrors language used in 1930s Germany. 

    Check out our social pages below:

    https://twitter.com/InsideWithPsaki

    https://www.instagram.com/InsideWithPsaki/

    https://www.tiktok.com/@insidewithpsaki

    https://www.msnbc.com/jen-psaki

    Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Co. (Personal Jurisidction)

    Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Co. (Personal Jurisidction)

    Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a State from requiring an out of state corporation to consent to personal jurisdiction in order to do business in the state. Mallory, a Virginia resident, brought suit against Norfolk Southern Railway Company under Pennsylvania Law -- claiming carcinogen exposure in Ohio and Virginia. Norfolk Southern rebutted the suit with a constitutional argument, arguing that the Pennsylvania court lacked personal jurisdiction against the Virginia company. Although Pennsylvania law requires a registered foreign corporation to answer any suit brought against it within the Commonwealth. The Pennsylvania court ruled that the claim was constitutionally precluded, disagreeing with precedent from supreme courts elsewhere. Held: The Due Process Clause allows states to require foreign corporations to consent to suit in exchange for the right to do business in the State. sThis case is controlled by well-established law (Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co. (1917)) -- the Pennsylvania court incorrectly stated that Pennsylvania Fire had been implicitly overruled. Vacated and remanded. Opinion delivered by Justice Gorsuch. 

    Read by: Jake Leahy

    The FBI is the Democrat’s new KKK

    The FBI is the Democrat’s new KKK

    Topics include: 1)Unsealed court documents revealed that the FBI abused digital surveillance powers nearly 300K times within two years by utilizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, designed to look for foreign intelligence or terrorist activity.
    2) The Marine Subway Hero Daniel Penny speaks out for the first time, after being wrongfully charged for the death of Jordan Neely.
    3)Biden is suggesting that he’s willing to unlawfully use the 14th Amendment to raise the debt ceiling.
    4)The NAACP board of directors issued a statement warning blacks that Florida is “openly hostile” to blacks. Meanwhile, the board’s chairman, Leon-Russell, lives in Florida.

    WATCH AND SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL https://www.youtube.com/@carljacksonshowandblog

    More: www.TheCarljacksonshow.com

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecarljacksonshow

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/carljacksonshow

    Parler: https://parler.com/carljacksonshow

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Abolition Constitutionalism

    Abolition Constitutionalism

    Dorothy Roberts is George A. Weiss University Professor of Law & Sociology; Raymond Pace & Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander Professor of Civil Rights; and Professor of Africana Studies Director, Program on Race, Science and Society.  She is an acclaimed scholar of race, gender and the law. Her pathbreaking work focuses on urgent contemporary issues in health, social justice, and bioethics, especially as they impact the lives of women, children and African-Americans.  In this episode, we discuss her 2022 book, Torn Apart: How the Child Welfare System Destroys Black Families--and How Abolition Can Build a Safer World and her 2019  Her major books include Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-first Century (New Press, 2011); Shattered Bonds: The Color of Child Welfare (Basic Books, 2002), and Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty (Pantheon, 1997). She is the author of more than 100 scholarly articles and book chapters, as well as a co-editor of six books on such topics as constitutional law and women and the law.

    Read Dorothy Roberts’ Harvard Law Review Foreword, Abolition Constitutionalism (2019), and her November 2022 intervention in the Harvard Law Review Forum, Racism, Abolition, and Historical Resembalnce.

    Episode 99 | The Supreme Court Abortion Decision Leaked!

    Sex, Gender, & the Constitution

    Sex, Gender, & the Constitution

    Join us for a deep dive into the Fourteenth Amendment's relationship to sex and gender. Even though Abigail Adams implored her husband John to "remember the ladies" when helping to draft the Constitution, the original text doesn't mention women, much less gender. When the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted in 1868, guaranteeing all American citizens equal protection under the law, it became a tool for women and minorities to fight discrimination.

    Incorporation Doctrine

    Incorporation Doctrine

    When first adopted, the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government -- not state governments. But in the early twentieth century, the Supreme Court began to rule that the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are part of the liberty that is protected by the due process clause in the Fourteenth Amendment. Here's a quick and dirty dive into the incorporation doctrine.

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io