Logo

    leverhulme

    Explore "leverhulme" with insightful episodes like "How has life expectancy changed after the pandemic?", "Con il Covid il più grande calo dell’aspettativa di vita dal ‘45", "Khaled El-Rouayheb - The Rise of “Deep Reading” in Ottoman Scholarly Culture", "Khaled El-Rouayheb - A Discourse on Method: Dialectics (‘ilm al-munazara) in the Ottoman Empire in the 17th century" and "Professor Clifford Siskin - 5 March 2013 - When System Met History: The Tectonics of the Modern Disciplines" from podcasts like ""Oxford Sparks Big Questions", "ANSA Daily", "CRASSH", "CRASSH" and "CRASSH"" and more!

    Episodes (8)

    How has life expectancy changed after the pandemic?

    How has life expectancy changed after the pandemic?

    Demographers (researchers who study the statistics of human populations) look at factors such as birth rates, death rates, migration and life expectancy. But what exactly is meant by the term 'life expectancy'? How is it calculated, and how has it changed after the pandemic? We speak to Prof Jennifer Dowd from the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science to find out.

    You can find out more about Prof Dowd's work in our micro-documentary Demography: Understanding Our World: https://www.oxfordsparks.ox.ac.uk/videos/demography-understanding-our-world/

    Khaled El-Rouayheb - The Rise of “Deep Reading” in Ottoman Scholarly Culture

    Khaled El-Rouayheb - The Rise of “Deep Reading” in Ottoman Scholarly Culture
    Professor Khaled El-Rouayheb, Leverhulme Visiting Fellow at CRASSH for 2015-2016, delivers the second of his Leverhulme lectures. This lecture will trace the emergence of a novel ideal of “deep reading” among Ottoman scholars of the seventeenth century. Medieval Arabic-Islamic educational manuals tended to focus on student-teacher relations and the acquisition of knowledge through listening. In the seventeenth century, Ottoman scholars articulate a new ideal of the acquisition of knowledge through “deep reading”. This development would seem to be related both to the increasing importance of the rational and instrumental sciences, and to the Ottoman examination system of the seventeenth century.

    Khaled El-Rouayheb - A Discourse on Method: Dialectics (‘ilm al-munazara) in the Ottoman Empire in the 17th century

    Khaled El-Rouayheb - A Discourse on Method: Dialectics (‘ilm al-munazara) in the Ottoman Empire in the 17th century
    Professor Khaled El-Rouayheb, Leverhulme Visiting Fellow at CRASSH for 2015-2016, delivers the first of his Leverhulme lectures. The second lecture, The Rise of "Deep Reading" in Ottoman Scholarly Culture, will take place on Wednesday 4 May. The science of ādāb al-baḥth or munāẓarah emerged relatively late in Islamic history. Its roots lay in the earlier science of eristic (jadal or khilāf) that had developed among early Islamic theologians and jurists (with some influence from Aristotelian topics and late-antique rhetoric). In this lecture, I will argue that there was an explosion of interest in the science in the Ottoman Empire in the seventeenth century. I will discuss the wider intellectual context of this development, as well as some of its consequences for the Ottoman tradition of logic.

    Professor Clifford Siskin - 5 March 2013 - When System Met History: The Tectonics of the Modern Disciplines

    Professor Clifford Siskin - 5 March 2013 - When System Met History: The Tectonics of the Modern Disciplines
    This is the first of two Leverhulme Re:Enlightenment Lectures by Clifford Siskin (Henry W and Alfred A Berg Professor of English and American Literature, New York University; Director, The Re:Enlightenment Project) who is currently a Leverhulme Visiting Professor at CRASSH. The second lecture, Guesswork: System, Science, and the Advancement of Knowledge, will be held on Monday 29 April 2013. These lectures examine how knowledge gets stuck and the strategies for restarting it. Ranging from past to present--and back--they link Galileo's and Bacon’s efforts to advance knowledge to efforts to scale up to new possibilities today. The first lecture highlights the “good fortune” (Bacon) of new tools, by debuting one. Like Galileo's spyglass, "Tectonics" zooms in--in this case, to clarify how our modern disciplines emerged from Enlightenment. The second lecture zooms out to reconsider the history of science in terms of Newton choosing "system" as his tool for guesswork. Together, these lectures explore the conditions of possibility for a centre such as CRASSH--a collaborative effort to reconnect the arts, social sciences and humanities. The first condition is the division of knowledge into those categories, with their second-order divisions into the narrow but deep disciplines of modernity. The second condition is that we think that there’s something to gain by this reconnect—that knowledge needs new forms of guesswork now. That thought—that we have a historically-specific opportunity for reorganizing and advancing knowledge—is also central to the The Re:Enlightenment Project's effort to explain and transform our Enlightenment inheritance. These lectures are not an effort to study Re:Enlightenment but to enact it.
    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io