Logo
    Search

    open science

    Explore "open science" with insightful episodes like "The digital ‘robots’ unlocking medical data", "Who Gets The First Peek At The Secrets Of The Universe?", "How ‘open science’ is changing psychological research, with Brian Nosek, PhD", "Is a ton of psychology just ... wrong?" and "Brian Nosek || Implicit Bias and Open Science" from podcasts like ""More or Less: Behind the Stats", "Short Wave", "Speaking of Psychology", "Unexplainable" and "The Psychology Podcast"" and more!

    Episodes (5)

    The digital ‘robots’ unlocking medical data

    The digital ‘robots’ unlocking medical data

    Big medical datasets pose a serious problem. Thousands of patients’ health records are an enormous risk to personal privacy. But they also contain an enormous opportunity – they could show us how to provide better treatments or more effective health policies.

    A system called OpenSAFELY has been designed to solve this problem, with the help of a computer code “robot”.

    Professor Ben Goldacre, director of the Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science at the University of Oxford, explains how it works. Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Janet Staples Sound mix: Hal Haines Editor: Charlotte McDonald

    Who Gets The First Peek At The Secrets Of The Universe?

    Who Gets The First Peek At The Secrets Of The Universe?
    The James Webb Space Telescope is by far the most powerful space-based telescope ever deployed by the United States. But it is only one instrument, and scientists all over the world have to share. The JWST's managers received more than 1,600 research proposals for what the telescope should look at.

    When an astronomer or a team does get some much-coveted telescope time, they currently get exclusive access to whatever data they collect for a full year. But there is a movement in astronomy to make most results open-access right away. That might speed up the pace of scientific discoveries and open up the data to a much wider set of researchers. On the other hand, some astronomers worry that instant open access would mostly benefit researchers who already have advantages.

    In this episode, NPR's Nell Greenfieldboyce talks with Short Wave scientist in residence Regina G. Barber, who has firsthand experience competing for telescope time, about who gets dibs on the data, and how that could affect equity in astronomy.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    How ‘open science’ is changing psychological research, with Brian Nosek, PhD

    How ‘open science’ is changing psychological research, with Brian Nosek, PhD

    Is psychology research in a crisis or a renaissance? Over the past decade, scientists have realized that many published research results, including some classic findings in psychology, don’t always hold up to repeat trials. Brian Nosek, PhD, of the Center for Open Science, discusses how psychologists are leading a movement to address that problem, in psychology and in other scientific fields, by changing the way that research studies get funded, conducted and published.

    Listener Survey - https://www.apa.org/podcastsurvey

    Is a ton of psychology just ... wrong?

    Is a ton of psychology just ... wrong?
    A decade ago, psychologists realized much of their science was fatally flawed, calling untold numbers of studies into question. Now, some young psychologists are trying to rebuild the foundations of their field. Can they succeed? For more, go to http://vox.com/unexplainable It’s a great place to sign up for our newsletter, view show transcripts, and read more about the topics on our show. Also, email us! unexplainable@vox.com We read every email. Support Unexplainable by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Brian Nosek || Implicit Bias and Open Science

    Brian Nosek || Implicit Bias and Open Science

    oday with have Brian Nosek on the podcast. Nosek is co-Founder and Executive Director of the Center for Open Science (http://cos.io/) that operates the Open Science Framework (http://osf.io/). The Center for Open Science is enabling open and reproducible research practices worldwide. Brian is also a Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Virginia. He received his Ph.D. from Yale University in 2002. He co-founded Project Implicit (http://projectimplicit.net/), a multi-university collaboration for research and education investigating implicit cognition–thoughts and feelings that occur outside of awareness or control. Brian investigates the gap between values and practices, such as when behavior is influenced by factors other than one’s intentions and goals. Research applications of this interest include implicit bias, decision-making, attitudes, ideology, morality, innovation, and barriers to change. Nosek applies this interest to improve the alignment between personal and organizational values and practices. In 2015, he was named one of Nature’s 10 and to the Chronicle for Higher Education Influence list.

    In this episode we discuss:

    • The genesis of Project Implicit
    • The current state of the field of implicit bias
    • Overuses of the Implicit Association Test (IAT)
    • The common desire people have for simple solutions
    • The potential for misuse of the IAT for real-world selection
    • How hard it is to study human behavior
    • What the IAT is really capturing
    • How the degree to which the IAT is trait or state-like varies by the topic you are investigating
    • Cultural influences on the IAT
    • Brian’s criticism of implicit bias training
    • The latest state of the science on implicit bias
    • How our ideologies creep in even when we are trying to be unbiased
    • The difference between implicit attitudes and conscious attitudes
    •  What would an equality of implicit associations look like?
    • Why bias is not necessarily bad
    • The genesis of The Reproducibility Project
    • What are some classic psychological studies that haven’t replicated?
    • The importance of having compassion for the scientist
    • The importance of having the intellectual humility of uncertainty
    • The importance of cultivating the desire to get it right (instead of the desire to be right)
    • What is open science?
    • What is #BroOpenScience?
    • How hostility on social media can cause us to lose the view of the majority
    • The importance of balancing getting it right with being kind to others

    Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/the-psychology-podcast/support

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.