Logo

    orbital atk

    Explore " orbital atk" with insightful episodes like "Boeing Bows Out of $85B Military Bid", "T+45: 2018 Air Force Launch Vehicle Contracts, and the Dim Future of Antares", "T+39: Opportunities for Private Companies within Government Programs", "T+37: Government Subsidies, Private Capability, and the 2010 National Space Policy" and "T+32: Soyuz-U Failure and Satellite Servicing" from podcasts like ""IEN Radio", "Main Engine Cut Off", "Main Engine Cut Off", "Main Engine Cut Off" and "Main Engine Cut Off"" and more!

    Episodes (12)

    Boeing Bows Out of $85B Military Bid

    Boeing Bows Out of $85B Military Bid

    Boeing is having a hell of a week, and that’s not even usually news anymore. The aerospace supplier, who has been buried under the weight of its issues with the Max jet for months, saw its stock price tank when markets got wind of discussions to possible scale down or even discontinue Max production.

    But, alas, there is more money to lose for Boeing and this time it relates to a coveted military project that the aerospace company was in the running for. And it wasn’t just any contract. The winner-take-all award is set to be the largest contract awarded in 2020.

    But it won’t go to Boeing.

    Last week marked the deadline for bid submissions for a contract to replace the military’s Minuteman III missile system. Boeing has participated in the military’s program as a Minuteman supplier since 1962, and the company was expected to bid on the project along with competitor Northrop Grumman.

    But last week Boeing confirmed that it would bow out of the process, leaving Northrop Grumman as the lone bidder for the $85 billion project.

    Boeing said in July that it would have trouble competing on price since Northrop Grumman had purchased solid rocket motor maker Orbital ATK in 2018 – and Orbital ATK just happens to be the top producer of the solid fuel rocket motors generally used in the missiles.

    Boeing concluded it faced a tremendous disadvantage, and said in the statement that “the current acquisition approach does not provide a level playing field for fair competition.”

    Boeing had reportedly, and repeatedly, asked the Air Force to “mitigate Northrop’s anticompetitive and inherently unfair cost.” But, eventually saying the Air Force did not address its concerns, Boeing decided not to submit a proposal, leaving Northrop alone – a position that concerns some considering a one-bid deal could result in inflated costs. One analyst said he thinks this could case the Air Force to reconsider the acquisition strategy altogether.

    Modernizing the country’s nuclear arsenal is projected to cost $1.2 trillion over 30 years.

    Download and listen to the audio version below and click here to subscribe to the Today in Manufacturing podcast.

    T+45: 2018 Air Force Launch Vehicle Contracts, and the Dim Future of Antares

    T+45: 2018 Air Force Launch Vehicle Contracts, and the Dim Future of Antares

    As the award date approaches for the 2018 Air Force launch vehicle development contracts, we keep hearing from Congress about how they would like to see it go. And I discuss the future of Antares and the Next-Generation Launch Vehicle in light of the continuing flights of Cygnus on Atlas V.

    This episode of Main Engine Cut Off is brought to you by 9 executive producers—Pat, Matt, Jorge, Brad, Ryan, and four anonymous—and 42 other supporters on Patreon.

    T+39: Opportunities for Private Companies within Government Programs

    T+39: Opportunities for Private Companies within Government Programs

    This week, NASA officially announced that NanoRacks will be adding an airlock onto the International Space Station to add capabilities and capacity to their already-up-and-running business. That announcement, along with some early insight into NASA policy in 2017, got me thinking about commercial opportunities within government programs, beyond Commercial Cargo and Crew.

    This episode of Main Engine Cut Off is brought to you by 4 executive producers—Pat O, Matt Giraitis, Jorge Perez, and one anonymous—and 28 other supporters on Patreon.

    T+37: Government Subsidies, Private Capability, and the 2010 National Space Policy

    T+37: Government Subsidies, Private Capability, and the 2010 National Space Policy

    Four members of the House of Representatives sent letters to DARPA and the Pentagon this week to file a complaint about a program in conflict with the 2010 National Space Policy. It’s a situation reminiscent of the debate over commercial use of retired ICBMs as low-cost launch vehicles, except this time, Orbital ATK is on the other side. I discuss the current issues and how their resolution may affect future policy decisions.

    This episode of Main Engine Cut Off is brought to you by 4 executive producers—Pat O, Matt Giraitis, Jorge Perez, and one anonymous—and 28 other supporters on Patreon.

    T+32: Soyuz-U Failure and Satellite Servicing

    T+26: OA-5, Antares, and Orbital ATK’s Road Ahead

    T+19: SpaceX’s Manifest, Flight-Proven Hardware, Blue Origin Updates, and Antares’ Engines

    T+17: NextSTEP Habitat Prototypes, and the Zombie Centaur

    T+15: More SLS Roadmap Details, and Landed Falcon 9 Static Fires

    T+14: The Post-EM-1 Roadmap for SLS, and Potential Uses for SpaceX’s BFR

    T+6: Orbital ATK’s Next-Gen Vehicle, Falcon 9 Proving Its Reusability, and ULA’s Tough Future

    T+6: Orbital ATK’s Next-Gen Vehicle, Falcon 9 Proving Its Reusability, and ULA’s Tough Future

    Orbital ATK shared some more details about their next-generation launch vehicle, SpaceX is working out their certification process for reflown stages, and how these events affect the industry and other competitors in the near future.

    T+5: Space Stations Around the Moon and Mars, ExoMars 2016, and China’s Momentum in Space