Logo

    whittaker chambers

    Explore " whittaker chambers" with insightful episodes like "Whittaker Chambers and the Freight Train of History", "EPISODE 17: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN 8.23.22", "Frank Meyer: Father of Fusionism", "Whittaker" and "Spies Within: Alger Hiss and Julius & Ethel Rosenberg" from podcasts like ""Know Your Enemy", "Countdown with Keith Olbermann", "Know Your Enemy", "Salvation and Stuff" and "Historically Speaking Podcast"" and more!

    Episodes (6)

    Whittaker Chambers and the Freight Train of History

    Whittaker Chambers and the Freight Train of History

    In this episode, Matt and Sam go deep into the life and times of Whittaker Chambers, most famous for his role in the "trial of the century"—the trial of Alger Hiss for perjury after Chambers accused Hiss of being a Communist spy during his years working in the federal government, especially the State Department. The two figures, once friends, came to symbolize a clash that was bigger than themselves, and prefigured the turn American politics would take at the onset of the Cold War. Chambers would become a hero of the nascent postwar conservative movement, with his status as an ex-Communist—one of many who would congregate around National Review in the mid-to-late 1950s—bringing his moral credibility to the right as one who had seen the other side and lived to tell his tale. Before all that, though, Chambers's life was like something out of a novel: a difficult family life, early brilliance at Columbia University, literary achievement in leftwing publications, and years "underground" engaging in espionage for the Soviet Union against the United States. "Out of my weakness and folly (but also out of my strength), I committed the characteristic crimes of my century," writes  Chambers in his 1952 memoir/jeremiad Witness.  Your hosts break it all down, assess his crimes and contributions, and explore one of the most consequential American lives of the twentieth century. 

     

    Sources:

    Sam Tanenhaus, Whittaker Chambers: A Biography (1997)

    Whittaker Chambers, Witness (1952)

    Whittaker Chambers, Cold Friday (1964)

    Whittaker Chambers, "Big Sister is Watching You," National Review, December 28, 1957

    The Whittaker Chambers Reader: His Complete National ReviewWritings, 1957-1959 (2014)

    William F. Buckley, Jr., editor, Odyssey of a Friend: Whittaker Chambers Letters to William F. Buckley, Jr. (1969)

    L. Brent Bozell, Jr. and William F. Buckley, Jr., McCarthy and His Enemies: The Record and Its Meaning (1954)

    Murray Kempton, Part of Our Time: Some Ruins and Monuments of the Thirties (1956)

    Landon R.Y. Storrs, The Second Red Scare and the Unmaking of the New Deal Left (2013)

    Richard H. Crossman, editor, The God that Failed: A Confession (1949)

    Lionel Trilling, The Middle of the Journey (1947)

    Matthew Richer, "The Cry Against Ninevah: A Centennial Tribute to Whittaker Chambers," Modern Age, Summer 2001

    Christopher Hitchens, "A Regular Bull," London Review of Books, July 1997

    Christopher Hitchens and Martin Amis, "No Laughing Matter" (YouTube, 2007)

    Jess Bravin, "Whittaker Chambers Award Draws Criticism—From His Family," Wall Street Journal, March 28, 2019

    Isaac Deutscher, "The Ex-Communist's Conscience,"  The Reporter, 1950. 

    John Patrick Diggins, Up From Communism: Conservative odysseys in American intellectual history, (1975)

    Daniel Aaron, Writers on the Left, (1961)

    Larry Ceplair, Anti-Communism in Twentieth-Century America: A Critical History, (2011)

     

    ...and don't forget to subscribe to Know Your Enemy on Patreon for access to all of our bonus episodes!

     

    EPISODE 17: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN 8.23.22

    EPISODE 17: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN 8.23.22

    NOW, TRUMP MUST BE PROSECUTED FOR ESPIONAGE

    A BLOCK (1:30) The New York Times' blockbuster and a stunning Trump leak of a letter from the National Archives makes it inevitable (2:15) There is no prosecutorial discretion here: if you've stolen MORE THAN 300 CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS THEY HAVE TO PROSECUTE YOU (2:43) And if some are the highest level of classification, you must be prosecuted FOR ESPIONAGE (3:00) The Times also implied there's video of people actually mishandling these documents (3:41) DOJ also isn't sure Trump isn't hiding MORE classified docs at Mar-a-Lago (5:08) None of the crimes mentioned on the search warrant are affected even if Trump somehow DID declassify the papers he stole (5:27) You also don't want to be Christina Bobb right now (6:47) Trump's motion to have a 'Special Master' review everything seized is described as 'Alice In Wonderland' (7:22) and incredibly it contains Trump boasting of how he got a threat relayed to Attorney General Garland (8:37) Judge Reinhart also seems to be leaning against unsealing the search warrant affidavit - in part for Trump's physical safety (9:55) Trump flunky Kash Patel is blaming the Government Services Administration because they haven't gotten around to blaming the moving company yet (10:05) Early Tuesday somebody connected to Trump LEAKED A NATIONAL ARCHIVES LETTER TO TRUMP'S LAWYER and ex-journalist John Solomon posted it (10:30) Archivist Debra Wall has detailed all of Trump's efforts to keep the stolen documents through the first five months of this year (11:07) Wall says Trump tried to claim executive privilege over them! The Biden White House finally agreed to waive any executive privilege (11:49) But Solomon (and presumably Trump) think the mere mention of Biden in the letter will let them paint this as Biden politically attacking Trump (12:09) without realizing that the letter confirms Trump DELIBERATELY held on to the documents and cannot claim some kind of mistake (12:39) And Wall even notes some documents were "Special Access Program materials" - bureaucratic speak of ultra-secret Black Ops programs. Trump is in twice as much trouble as he was before Solomon posted (15:20) They won't listen, but this would be a good time for his supporters to bail out on Trump because it's all indictments from here on in.

    B BLOCK (19:05) Every Dog Has Its Day: Roxy (20:33) Postscripts To The News: there's a Trump Electoral Fraud scandal too. The Your-Kraken-Is-Showing crowd seems to have illegally disseminated election data to people like friends of Sean Hannity (21:59) Why did The New York Times run a Trump Op-Ed by Rich Lowry when (23:13) it could've just reprinted his self-gratifying assessment of Sarah Palin's wink from 2008? (24:47) Sports: Tom Brady's back. The Masked Singer? Refilled his consecrated ground? (25:17) Bryce Harper's minor league rehab is...SPONSORED? (27:40) Trump, Tim Michels and Russia Ron Johnson compete for Worst Persons honors, with Ron insisting he was only involved in the coup for just "seconds."

    C BLOCK (32:00) My career stories - Things I Promised Not To Tell - focuses in this episode on the most talented (and most self-destructive) person I've ever worked with. He was a New York and Los Angeles radio news anchor and TV news reporter named Will Spens. He was a genius, but his ability to do what others would not try, eventually destroyed him.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Frank Meyer: Father of Fusionism

    Frank Meyer: Father of Fusionism

    Matt and Sam dedicate an entire episode to an under appreciated but indispensable figure in the founding of post-war conservatism: Frank Meyer, the father of "fusionism."

    Meyer was  a man of  contradictions: an ex-communist ideologue who longed for consensus; a cantankerous, unyielding debater who kept his friends and rivals close; a bohemian, individualist Jew who argued vociferously for freedom and against repressive orthodoxies, but who converted to Catholicism on his death bed. In this episode, we explore his life, work, and legacy — including a close reading of his most famous book, In Defense of Freedom: A Conservative Credo. Along the way, we ask some big questions: Why was it so important for Meyer to find a philosophical justification for fusing the traditional and libertarian strains of the conservative movement? How did he go about doing it? And did it work? 

    Today, many — especially younger — conservatives consider fusionism to be a dead consensus, a marriage of erstwhile convenience in which one partner, economic libertarians, got everything they wanted, while the other, Christian traditionalists, have seen unfettered capitalism and licentious liberalism destroy the precious permanent things they had hoped to conserve: Church, family, and community.  As the seams of the fusionist alliance fray, we look back to the man who conceived it in the first place. 

    This one is for the nerds. We hope you enjoy it! 

    Further Reading: 

    Frank S. Meyer, In Defense of Freedom: A Conservative Credo (Regnery, 1962)

    George H. Nash, The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945 (Basic Books, 1976)

    Jeffrey Hart, The Making of the American Conservative Mind: National Review and Its Times (ISI Books, 2006)

    Garry Wills, Confessions of a Conservative (Doubleday, 1979)

    Kevin J. Smant, Principles and Heresies: Frank S. Meyer and  the Shaping of the American Conservative Movement (ISI Books, 2002)

    Various, "Against the Dead Consensus," First Things, March 21, 2019

    Frank S Meyer, "The Twisted Tree of Liberty," National Review  Jan 16, 1962

    L. Brent Bozell Jr. "Freedom or Virtue," National Review, Sept 11, 1962

    ...and don't forget to subscribe on Patreon for access to all of our bonus episodes!

     

    Whittaker

    Whittaker

    It was no joke, on April 1st, 1901 Jay Vivian Chambers was born in Philadelphia on a cold early morning with snow blanketing the ground; a blizzard was soon to come. Weighing 12 pounds and measuring 12 inches across the shoulders, his birth nearly killed his mother Laha. An artery was torn and baby Jay had to be removed with instruments. It was sad but fitting that Jay was born in this fashion, difficult and dangerous; his birth would serve as a type of foreboding for the remainder of his life. He was an abnormally large  newborn, and he’d grow to live an abnormally large life.

    Young Jay was named after his father Jay Chambers. His middle name, Vivian was the last name of one of his mother’s lifelong friends. As a child and young adult, he despised his first and middle names and vowed to change them as soon as he was able. While he didn’t know it at the time, he would live to have multiple first and last names - most of them assigned to him. Eventually, Jay would take his mother’s maiden name for his first, and keep his father’s surname, going by who the world now knows him as, Whittaker Chambers.

    Young Whittaker grew up in Lynbrook, New York State. His family moved there in 1904 just after Whittaker’s little brother Richard was born.  As Whittaker became a child and began to understand and compare his world with that of others, he became keenly aware of the dysfunction that he was continually surrounded by. Both of his parents, Jay and Laha came from the world of art as they were both thespians in their young life. They loved the stage and continued to act even after having their two boys. More so Jay - He was truly an artist and viewed himself as much. He didn’t care for the comforts of a middle class family. This was made apparent by withholding any money for his wife to beautify or to just repair their humble home. Nor did he pay any attention to his son’s overall health - Both Richard and Whittaker often suffered tooth aches to no relief from a dentist. As Jay submerged himself in his work as an artist for the local paper, and took a liking for the opera, and all things “culture”, he became completely absent from the family. He would come home in the middle hours of the night, almost always drunk. For this, and many other reasons, young Whittaker regrettably, but honestly lacked any respect for his father (p. 142).

    Jay’s absence and lack of engagement made Laha become Whittaker’s favorite parent, even if it was by default. Their shared sentiments regarding Jay, drew them into a close relationship. But Laha struggled with her own demons. She became dependent upon her young boys and could be described as acting somewhat neurotic at times. For some reason she felt the need to frequently remind Whittaker of how much pain his delivery had caused her.  Understandably, he resented this. Yet, despite all of her faults and problems, Laha loved her two boys and they became her life and her world. The small family even tried attending an Episcopalian Church for a time. But without reason, the boys were suspected of passing the whooping cough to another attendant. That ended their three month trial - as such religion played no part in their home. Whittaker would later write, “What I knew as a child about religion, I did not know as the result of any instruction. I knew it as a result of something I heard by chance, or that happened to me, and that touched something that was already in me.” (p. 116).

    Whittaker might not have needed religious education, but he would need all the hope and grounding he could get because the tenuous marriage of his parents rapidly dissolved when Whittaker and Richard were still young. Jay had his own life outside his family and simply solidified this by moving out. He would send the family 8 dollars a week, which at the time, Laha and her two boys managed fairly well. But Whittaker knew they were poor and would understand later that Jay could have given more in alimony, seeing as he had a steady and relatively good paying job. The good part of Whittaker’s father being gone was that their home became a much happier place. His father’s absence at home lightened the usually oppressive atmosphere.

    But it wasn’t long before Jay had moved out, that Grandma Whittaker would move in. And she was anything but a calming presence in their house. With early dementia, Grandma Whittaker would lock herself into her room and light little fires “cooking” something. The family learned to disregard her insistent self ramblings as well as the smell of smoke coming from her room. There were several times when Whittaker, being the largest in the family, would have to intervene - whether it was breaking down a door to see what was aflame or wrestling scissors or knives from her clinched fists, Grandma being at the house, in addition to the old tensions, was like having a demoniac presence sitting in the heart of their home. (p. 169). Whittaker would later write, “I suppose nobody ever sleeps quite peacefully in a house where a woman sometimes wanders around with a knife.” (p. 170).

    While Whittaker seemed to take the brunt of all this abnormality, the weight was surely shared by both brothers. Living under the same roof caused Whittaker and Richard to become very close even though they were growing up to be quite different men. Richard was good with his hands, and worked with them often. He ended up building a guesthouse on their property which he would soon move into as a young adult. He was more outspoken, expressed more emotion, and soon became Laha’s favorite sons’ as it was natural for him to confide in her - something she desperately craved. Yet, as he neared his late teenage years, Richard began to find solace from his pitiful life in drinking  more prohibition whiskey than he clearly ought. By the time he was twenty, he could be found drunk in the early hours of the day. Whittaker, on the other hand was more cerebral, immersing himself into books and self reflection, guarding and keeping his thoughts almost entirely to himself.

    In the fall of 1920, Whittaker enrolled at Columbia College (p.164). Upon attending, he took the opportunity to finally rid himself of the name Vivian to officially take his mother’s maiden name, Whittaker. And although he was already abreast of the Communist movement, it was here that he began reading more  of its happenings and was encouraged by others to delve deeper into the social, economic, and political world of Marxism. Here, Whittaker’s skills and talent with writing, reading, and translating the languages was noticed among his peers and professors. Many thought he’d become a novelist or major poet. Indeed, Whittaker did  write - among his works was a short play entitled: A Play for Puppets. It was featured in Columbia's literary magazine. But the atheistic nature of the playlet caused controversy among the school and even spread to the New York City newspaper. Whittaker was disheartened and came to dislike Columbia - Although it wasn’t his first choice of colleges, it allowed him to live at home and save the family from paying boarding fees. Choosing to live at home rather than live at a dorm not only saved the family money, but in a sense, saved the family, or what was left of it  - if only for a short time.

    In the two years Whittaker attended college, Richard found himself further down the road of self destruction - continual drinking with self absorbed unhappiness.  One night at a bar with his friends and brother, Richard became so belligerent, he began cursing for all to hear, himself and his parents for ruining not only their own lives, but his life as well. The sober Whittaker took offense at the remarks and with the bar tender’s approval, threw a tumbler of whiskey at Richard’s face. The two brothers fought in the bar and throughout the night. Whittaker, although larger but not as scrappy, finally went to bed bleeding from the bridge of his nose. The scar Richard left him would remain with Whittaker for the remainder of his life. It was a sort of going away gift as Richard was soon to leave.

    Within a years time - Richard would take his life. He was found in his kitchen one morning with his head resting on a pillow inside the gas oven - his feet propped up on a pile of books with a bottle of whiskey just below his rigid fingers. Whittaker, although in shock from seeing his brother and best friend cold and lifeless, was not surprised. Richard had tried this multiple times before without success only because of his older brother’s intervention. It was only a matter of time. Not long after Whittaker removed his brother from his house and had him buried, did he receive a call from Laha informing him that his father Jay had passed away. His mother said that Jay “had simply dropped dead in the bathroom as he prepared to shave.”

    Whittaker was 22 years old and his small world, as broken and fragile as it was, had mostly died - and what was left, was dying. His mother was withering away from grief and His grandmother was clinically insane. Whittaker was convinced that the death surrounding him and the many pains that preceded it was a just microcosm of the world at large. World War One had just ended three years before claiming twenty-two million lives. The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was nearing its end, having murdered tens of millions and served as Communism’s catalyst to spread across the globe. Revolutions were happening, as were epidemics. The Spanish flu was in full swing and would kill fifty million people before it ended, not to mention smallpox that would end up taking many more than that.

    Much of what Whittaker intimately knew was poverty, neglect, alcoholism, and dysfunction. And at the time, the world seemed to reflect that stark reality. Yes, “The world was dying of its own vulgarity, stupidity, complacency, inhumanity, power and materialism - a death of the spirit… That this world was dying both brothers knew.” (p.185). “But they differed on how to face the fact. Richard had simply removed himself from what he found unsolvable or unworthy to be solved. He had made his choice, (186-187) and so would Whittaker. But whereas Richard succumbed to the world’s cancer of wars, economic crises’ and moral enervation, finding nothing to live for, Whittaker committed to become the cure, having found something to die for. By the time his brother and father expired, Whittaker was already a member in the Communist Party. But now he became an un-reconcilable Communist - in both body and spirit. Not because he was simply attracted to it, but was driven to it from despair by the crisis of history through which the world [was] passing.” (p.191).

    Whittaker was at a loss. And he felt helpless - God was not in control - not in control of his circumstances, nor his brother’s. God wasn’t in control of the wars and revolutions, nor the epidemics of diseases spreading across the globe. If God could not, or would not solve the problems plaguing mankind - then mankind had no choice but to assume the throne. Whittaker would write that “Communism restores to man his sovereignty by the simple method of denying God.” (p. 10). But although Whittaker was about to plunge deep and long into a world view that not only denies God, but seeks to eradicate any trace of him, God would not deny Whittaker. Rather, God would pursue him!

    Whittaker was now in his early 50’s - and was now a counter-revolutionist testifying against Communism. What had at once given him a reason to live had now become evil; and now risked taking his life. Whittaker, in the midst of deadly consequences from without and emotional turmoil from within, was presently shinning an unwanted light on not only his past affairs working for the Soviet’s secret military intelligence, but many others who were still working within the United States Government. After twenty five years, Whittaker would look back on his time as a Communist.

    In those beginning years, soon after Richard’s suicide, Whittaker’s ability with writing and editing were quickly put to use for the Communist Party - specifically “Class-angling”. This was the art of rewriting news stories with a Communist interpretation. That was just the beginning though. Whittaker’s proficiency and devotion to Communism exceeded simply working for the Party and being shuffled around to  and from various Socialist presses, producing pamphlets, magazines, and any other forms of literary propaganda. He had more services to offer, and others laying in wait had taken notice. And within a short time, Chambers was recruited to join the "Communist underground”.

    Accepting it as his solemn duty, Whittaker was now a spy working to overthrow the U.S. government on behalf of Stalin’s Soviet Union in the military intelligence agency - the GRU. After serving under various controllers, taking assorted identities, holding numerous job titles, and only living in places for short periods, Whittaker finally came under the direction of Harold Ware, a member of the Washington spy apparatus. Ware was an agricultural engineer and was employed by the federal New Deal while covertly leading a group of about 75 operatives within the U.S. government. It was in this place and time that Chambers became close to Alger Hiss. Hiss was a fellow communist spy and like Ware, served within the higher echelons of the Washington establishment. He was a government attorney, served in the New Deal, the Justice Department, and would later even serve in the U.S. delegation to attend the famous Yalta Conference where Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill met to negotiate the terms for the end of the War. Circumstances had Whittaker and Alger in close contact. Living together for a time, their families shared a rare type of intimacy; that kind that could only be relegated to secrecy and truly understood by the life of a spy. From the plenty of people that came in and out of Whittaker’s life within his service as a Russian asset, Chambers would later confess that “Mr. Hiss had become his closest friend.” (p. 694).

    By now, Whittaker was in the thick of his espionage activity, but his concerns with  taking orders from the Soviet Union were growing. At first he was specifically disillusioned with Stalin’s personal perversion by turning to Fascism. But shortly after, that, Whittaker came to see that is wasn’t Stalin he was concerned with, but Communism itself. He would later write, “The point was not that Stalin is evil, but that Communism is more evil, and that, acting through his person, it found its supremely logical manifestation. The important point was not the character of Stalin, but the character of Communism,…”( p. 249).

    Through Whittaker’s marriage to his wife Esther, in the early 30’s and the births of their two children afterwards, (both events which were unofficially frowned upon by the Party), God was slowly but steadily convicting Whittaker not only of the evils of Communism, but the joy and grace that can only be had in a life surrendered to Himself. God was calling Whittaker to come forth.  And it wasn’t until 1937, until he  first began to feel like Lazarus - a man making “the impossible return”; climbing from the deep underground into the realm of the living. And within a year’s time, in April of 1938, Whittaker and his wife, made that final decision - the only possible choice; that they’d rather die, than live under Communism. It would be all sorts of hell that they would have to endure. Whittaker faced the threat of physical death for defecting  from anybody at anytime, but it was the emotional turmoil he suffered that was just as troubling. In times of weakness and unbearable stress, it was as if Whittaker’s brother was calling from the ground to join him. But through all the pain, and all the trials, nothing made the couple regret their decision. (p.25). Chambers finally and officially broke with communism and took his wife and two children into hiding. But Whittaker did not break from Communism just to remain quiet, but to eventually fight against it.

    In April of 1939, almost one year exactly from leaving the Soviet underground did Whittaker come out of hiding to go work for Time. His actions against Communism were going to be slow and methodical and his new job allowed those two maneuvers. He began at Time as a no-body; a third-string book reviewer making an annual 5 thousand dollars and quickly rose to senior editor making 30 thousand. Never once did he ask for a raise. As a well trained former Communist, Whittaker never really knew or cared how much he made. Nearly 10 years later, he resigned as one of the best known writer-editors from Time because the court case he was in “had reached a crisis.” (p. 86). Looking back, Whittaker would write, “My debt and my gratitude to Time cannot be measured. At a critical moment, Time gave me back my life. It gave me my voice. It gave me sanctuary, professional respect, peace and time in which to mature my changed view of the world and man’s destiny, and mine, it it. I went to Time a fugitive; I left a citizen. In my years with it, I became a Quaker and took my wife and children with me into the spiritual peace of the meeting.” (p. 87-88). And Whittaker would need a reservoir of peace for the long battle ahead.

    Soon after leaving Time, on August 3, 1948, Chambers was called to testify before the House on the Un-American Activities Committee. It was here where he  gave witness to the names to all those he knew inside the underground Ware group. This undoubtedly, included his once good friend, Alger Hiss. It caused Whittaker, the disheveled and portly witness, much anguish to have to testify against him. His statements didn’t accuse Alger of espionage activity, but straightly claimed that he was or at least had been a member of the Communist Party. But the buttoned-up and good looking Hiss flatly rejected any allegations that he had ever been a Communist and claimed no knowledge as to who Chambers was. The long trials that pursued would be called the “Hiss Trials”. These were some of Whittaker’s worst years of defection. By now, he was thankful to not really worry about being snuffed out by an unknown assassin, and he remained grateful for his work at Time where he gained respect and a bit of editorial notoriety. But coming before the United States Government to confess his past, and having to charge others, specifically his friend Alger, of secret allegiance to Soviet Russia, bore down on his body and his soul.

    In the beginning, the majority of people just couldn’t believe that the U.S. government had been infiltrated to such an extent. And on the surface, Hiss was likable, believable,  and had a mirror-finish education and career. Whittaker on the other hand looked tired and depressed and his accusations - too far fetched. President Truman straightforwardly dismissed  Whittaker’s testimony as a “Red Herring”. He surely didn’t like the allegation that the man responsible for the United Nations Charter Conference was a Communist. But Whittaker simply knew too many intimate details about Alger that couldn’t be easily ignored. Yet, without evidence, the first trial ended in 1949 with the jury deadlocked.

    Meanwhile, Hiss’s attorneys referred to Whittaker as an “enemy of the Republic, a blasphemer of Christ, and a disbeliever in God,”. This was ironic, since it was due to Whittaker’s hope to save the Republic and trust in God that he was testifying. Regardless, the defense also put on a psychiatrist who pointed out Chamber’s childhood, characterizing him as a sort of psychopath who’s only nature was to lie. But the evidence finally produced by Chambers in the second trial was undeniable. Under subpoena, Whittaker presented four handwritten notes composed by Hiss,  65 State Department documents, and 4 strips of microfilm that had once been hidden inside a hollowed out pumpkin. These papers and microfilm became known as the “pumpkin papers.” The reason for the delay in producing the evidence was by Whittaker’s account, “to spare an old friend from more trouble than necessary.” But even though Whittaker tried to guard his old friend, the evidence was not as gracious. And eventually, in 1950, when the second trial had reached its conclusion, Hiss was found guilty on two counts of perjury being sentenced to five years in prison. He couldn’t be charged with espionage because the statute of limitations for such a crime was only five years.

    The whole ordeal was unpleasant to say the least. The international attention, the constant personal attacks, and the character assassination left Whittaker troubled, saddened, and took a brutal toll on his overall health. He had been suffering from heart problems for over 10 years now. But although the court case was conclusively over,  and the smoke had settled, Whittaker had much more to say, un-encumbered by interruptions from attorneys and groans from the crowds. He would do what he knew best - Write his account - his life story; why and how he became a Communist and why he defected. He would explain everything in vivid detail, in his 800 page autobiography, aptly entitled: Witness. In 1952, Chambers published his work to widespread acclaim. The book was a bestseller for nearly a year which helped to pay some of the legal debts that had been growing. But, as an Ex-Communist and now a Quaker, money meant little to Whittaker whereas honesty and honor meant everything.

    His autobiography served to make the record straight. It laid to rest the suggestion  that he fabricated anything in his testimony. But Witness wasn’t just written as a counter revolutionist’s hope to win over his enemies, but as a father gently explaining his complex life to his two children, who were too young to understand all the drama swirling around them and their father. As such, Whittaker bore his soul for all to see that  Communism and Freedom were the two irreconcilable faiths of his time. To Whittaker, a Witness against Communism was a Witness for God. And that calling to witness in every sense of it, became Whittaker’s cross to bear. He would explain this to his son and daughter in the introduction of autobiography:

    “My children, when you were little, we [to] used sometimes to go for walks in our pine woods.  In the open fields, you would run along by yourselves.  But you used [to] instinctively … give me your hands as we entered those woods, where it was darker, lonelier, and in the stillness our voices sounded loud and frightening.  In this book I am again giving you my hands.  I am leading you, not through cool pinewoods, but up and up a narrow defile between bare and steep rocks from which, in shadow, things uncoil and slither away.  It will be dark.  But, in the end, if I have led you aright, you will make out three crosses, from two of which hang thieves.  I will have brought you to Golgotha— the place of skulls.  This is the meaning of the journey.  Before you understand, I may not be there; my hands maybe have slipped from yours.  It will not matter.  For when you understand what you see, you will no longer be children.  You will know that life is pain, that each of us hangs always upon the cross of himself.  And when you know that this is true of every man, woman, and child on earth, you will be wise.” (p. 21).

    Nine years after, on July 9, 1961, Whittaker died of a heart attack at his 300-acre farm in Westminster, Maryland. Having said his peace - he left his wife and children the life he had always wanted and a Witness the world could never ignore.

     

    Spies Within: Alger Hiss and Julius & Ethel Rosenberg

    Spies Within: Alger Hiss and Julius & Ethel Rosenberg

    Since its very inception, America has always had to be on the lookout for spies not just from foreign adversaries, but also from its own citizens. Alger Hiss, along with Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, all American citizens, were former members of the Communist Party (a party that still exists in America today.) They were all accused of passing American secrets to the U.S.S.R. in the 1940’s and were brought to trial in the early 1950’s. In this episode, we take a deep dive into what those three were accused of, what they were found guilty of, and what their ultimate sentence was. 

    Episode Edits:

    1. While most federal crimes have a five-year statute of limitations, acts of espionage generally carry a 10-year statute of limitations.
    2. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were married in 1939, the same year Julius graduated from City College of New York.
    3. Julius Rosenberg was fired from the Army Signal Corps in 1945 because they found out he was a Communist.

     Episode Resources: Alger Hiss (1904-1996)

    Episode Resources: Julius Rosenberg (1918-1953) and Ethel Rosenberg (1915-1953)

    Whittaker

    Whittaker

    Whittaker

     

    "I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made;     your works are wonderful, I know that full well." Psalm 139:14 NIV

     

    “When we dead awaken.” - Henrik Ibsen

     

    One morning in 1938 in his small apartment on St. Paul Street in Baltimore, Whittaker was casually feeding his young daughter Ellen breakfast. He contemplatively absorbed this everyday and seemingly ordinary experience as it appeared to stand in direct contrast to everything about him. Just the fact that Whittaker and his wife, Esther had a daughter was an unforeseen and unplanned blessing. Even sex itself was “was held to be merely functional and of little importance except that it might help or harm the party.” p. 214  Active Communists generally saw children as a burden which only slowed their participation in the party. Even more so for an underground agent in the Soviet Military Intelligence.

    Irregardless from his own desires, no matter how suppressed they might have been, the 37 year old Russian spy had many reasons to not have children. From nearly all viewpoints, Whittaker had not lived a desirable life. From his clinically insane grandmother, absent and drunk father, to his emotionally dependent mother and suicidal brother, Whittaker came to the conclusion that having his own children would be to repeat his misery - a crime against life. p. 184 He had no selfish right to perpetuate such hardship. Besides, he questioned, what right had any man and woman to bring children into the 20th century world only to suffer its inevitable revolutions or die in its inevitable wars? ” p. 325

    The answer in his mind was, “none”. That’s why abortion was commonplace for Communists. There were Communist doctors who rendered that service for a small fee. Communists who were more choosy knew liberal doctors who would render the same service for a larger fee. Abortion, which now filled Whittaker with physical horror, was once regarded by him, like all Communists, as a mere physical manipulation. “p.325 But even though Whittaker’s mind was resentfully determined to remain childless, his soul was not. When he heard those words for the first time two years before Esther had conceived, he was first filled with a shock of wild joy and fatherly pride. By this time, his father Jay had died and his brother Richard had long ago taken his own life. If Whittaker was  to remain without a child, the bloodline would stop with him. This only increased his inward desire to have children. Yet, because it was assumed, that he and his wife would dutifully adhere to the party rule, (even though unspoken) it was a passing joy, only to be succeeded by a momentary sadness.

    But the paternal instincts were too strong to deny in both Whittaker and Esther. They both simply wanted to have the child - and nothing would stop them. Not reason, the agony of his own upbringing, the Communist Party and its theories, nor wars and revolutions of their current time. All these stout walls of materialism and Communist ideology crumbled with the gentle touch of a child. p. 325.

    And so, two years later, Whittaker found himself caught between two opposing worlds. He was a spy for the Russian Communist Party working to overthrow Capitalism and the Christian worldview through espionage activities among high-ranking United States government officeholders, while also being a man who really only wanted to live on a farm and work the land - be a husband to a wife he loved and a father mundanely feeding his beautiful daughter on unremarkable mornings.

    Despite the danger and adventure in the former, the latter brought Whittaker more peace and joy. He felt like an average man and a normal father as he watched his daughter drop porridge on the floor and rub it on her face as she tried to find her mouth. So bad was her aim that bits of breakfast were even found on her ear. And it was then that her father’s eyes stopped. He gazed at her ear - more specifically, on the small convolutions of her ear - those intricate, perfect ears. Those ears were not made by chance or by atoms naturally coming together (The Communistic view). They could have only been created by immense design. All Whittaker could think was - God. He tried for a second to crowd the unwanted thought out of his mind. For if he had completed it, he would have to admit that “Design presupposes God.” And for a Communist where the denial of God and exaltation of man is the aim, such thoughts were secular anathema. While he might not have known it at the time, “the finger of God was first laid upon his forehead.” p. 16

    In this surreal moment, certain thoughts from Whittaker’s childhood resurrected in his mind. Anything he knew of God or religion wasn’t a result of Christian upbringing nor of education. “He knew it as a result of something he had heard by chance, or something that happened to him, and that touched something that was already in him.” p. 116 There were a few moments in his childhood that he believed declared the invisible attributes of God - even as a child, he knew there was something divine in these rare experiences.

    One occurred early in his childhood. Whittaker had wandered off into the roaming fields from where he lived as a boy. After sometime time he found himself facing a nearly impenetrable 4 foot tall wall of thistles in full bloom. Wanting to keep moving, he pushed his way through with his back on the ground weaving like a worm between the thick stems. After sometime of pushing, he stood up in the midst of the field. It was painted purple for as far as his eye could see from the endless flowering thistles. “Clinging to the flowers, hovering over them, or twittering and dipping in flight, were dozens of goldfinches - little golden-yellow birds with black, contrasting wings and caps. They didn’t pay the slightest attention to the young boy — it was if they had never before seen one before.  The sight was so unexpected, and the beauty so absolute that young Whittaker thought he could not stand without grabbing a stem for support. Out loud, he said: “God”. It was a simple statement, not an exclamation. And at that moment, which he remembered through all the years of his life as one of its highest moments, he was closer than he would be again in nearly 40 years to the intuition that alone could give meaning to his life - the intuition that God and beauty are one.

    The dropping of his daughter’s utensil on the ground awoke Whittaker from his meditation - he squinted his eyes to break the vacant look still fixed on little Ellen’s ear. The sunlight had begun to fall softly upon the table at which they sat as Esther came in to relieve her husband. Whittaker stood up and began to get ready for another day’s work in the Fourth Section of the Russian Intelligence apparatus. Yet, as he shaved and got dressed, he couldn’t shake the notion that it was God whispering in his ear as he stared in awe at his daughter’s.

    He collected his documents and placed them up top of the revolver that he kept inside his briefcase. As he gathered everything he needed for the day, he kissed his wife and daughter goodbye and closed the door behind him. He walked into the rising sun but away from the world he held dear. Whittaker knew that what had transpired while gazing at his daughter’s ear was something to behold. He wanted to leave the party, but knew there would be serious repercussions if he did. As one colleague told him that if one ever decided to break from the underground, they’d either be terminated “by them or by us.” This wasn’t surprising to Whittaker. He had assumed this from the beginning of his service to the party. And yet, as he walked down the sidewalk, he felt like Lazarus, that he had begun the impossible return from the underground where he had been buried deep for six years, back into the world of freeman p. 25 As Whittaker would later observe, "A Communist breaks because he must choose at last between irreconcilable opposites - God or Man, Soul or Mind, Freedom or Communism.” p. 16 God was drawing Whittaker’s Soul towards Himself, towards Beauty, and towards Freedom. As these thoughts became more alive and began to take root within his soul  he reached the predetermined park bench. Starting to feel more alive than ever, Whittaker sat down and waited for the drop-off. Under his breath, he continued to repeat four words taken from an Ibsen play,  “When we dead awaken, When we dead awaken, When we dead awaken.”p. 25

    All footnotes taken from: Chambers, Whittaker. Witness, Regnery Publishing, Inc. Washington, D.C. Copyright 1952.

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io