will davies

Will Davies (Goldsmiths) Anna Alexandrova (Cambridge) Abstract This seminar will bring together William Davies and Anna Alexandrova to triangulate between three themes they have both worked on: a) tensions between well-being and economic indicators in the rise of happiness economics, b) the particularity (and ambiguity) of emerging conceptions of ‘well-being’ and c) contemporary challenges to expertise. Within this, the speakers will focus on particular strands. Anna will discuss how well-being science takes many forms, but that promoted by Clark et al in their recent report and book ‘Origins of Happiness’ is striking for its simplistic definition of well-being and implausible mechanical vision of causality. Meanwhile, William will consider how emerging digital methods of happiness science seem to have a bias towards positivity. Feedback is increasingly in terms of whether or not someone expressed positive affect, and not about quantities of hedonia or negative affect. However, this is tied up with the problem of how to capture affect in real-time, and what kind of knowledge is being produced in these processes. Will Davies is a Reader in Political Economy at Goldsmiths. His work explores the way in which economics influences our understanding of politics, society and ourselves. He is author of three monographs: The Happiness Industry: How the government & big business sold us wellbeing (2015), The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty & the logic of competition (2014) and Nervous States: How feeling took over the world (2018). Anna Alexandrova is a Reader in Philosophy of Science in Cambridge and Principle Investigator of the Expertise Under Pressure project at CRASSH. She has written extensively on the philosophy of wellbeing and of economics, and is author of the monograph A Philosophy for the Science of Well-being (2017).

Will Davies (Goldsmiths) Anna Alexandrova (Cambridge) Abstract This seminar will bring together William Davies and Anna Alexandrova to triangulate between three themes they have both worked on: a) tensions between well-being and economic indicators in the rise of happiness economics, b) the particularity (and ambiguity) of emerging conceptions of ‘well-being’ and c) contemporary challenges to expertise. Within this, the speakers will focus on particular strands. Anna will discuss how well-being science takes many forms, but that promoted by Clark et al in their recent report and book ‘Origins of Happiness’ is striking for its simplistic definition of well-being and implausible mechanical vision of causality. Meanwhile, William will consider how emerging digital methods of happiness science seem to have a bias towards positivity. Feedback is increasingly in terms of whether or not someone expressed positive affect, and not about quantities of hedonia or negative affect. However, this is tied up with the problem of how to capture affect in real-time, and what kind of knowledge is being produced in these processes. Will Davies is a Reader in Political Economy at Goldsmiths. His work explores the way in which economics influences our understanding of politics, society and ourselves. He is author of three monographs: The Happiness Industry: How the government & big business sold us wellbeing (2015), The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty & the logic of competition (2014) and Nervous States: How feeling took over the world (2018). Anna Alexandrova is a Reader in Philosophy of Science in Cambridge and Principle Investigator of the Expertise Under Pressure project at CRASSH. She has written extensively on the philosophy of wellbeing and of economics, and is author of the monograph A Philosophy for the Science of Well-being (2017).

A workshop at CRASSH on the uses of number, in and against the public interest: past, present and future. Session One - Will Davies and Glen O'Hara This event is organised by the ‘Technology and Democracy’ project and will bring historical and contemporary perspectives to bear on the question of how the public interest is to be determined in a world increasingly under the rule of number, data and quantification. Speakers: Will Davies (Goldsmiths) Glen O'Hara (Oxford Brookes) Liz McFall (OU) Jonathan Gray (Bath) Frank Pasquale (Maryland) Collecting information about the public has often caused controversy, but it has usually been understood as a form of exchange. As this information takes increasingly numerical form, the nature of this quid pro quo – who gets what from the exchange – has become more and more opaque. Who has the right to collect and organise public information, to control access to it now and into the future? As a greater number of private entities accumulate statistical information, this workshop aims to investigate the shifting boundary of the public and the private spheres. We will ask how the processes of counting and enumerating people have helped to produce specific political forms of government and economic forms of business. And specifically, we will examine the ways in which claims of a public interest have been used to justify the collection of such information, from censuses to digital data trails. Panellists, speakers and respondents will approach the question using case studies from the history of insurance and medical surveillance, neoliberalism and official statistics, as well as electoral political strategies.