Logo

    207. How Clearly Do You See Yourself?

    en-usAugust 18, 2024
    What did Angela Duckworth discuss on the podcast?
    How do self-perception and others' perception of personality differ?
    What did Duckworth's first graduate study involve?
    What is significant about the Big Five personality traits analysis?
    Why is diverse feedback important for self-assessment?

    Podcast Summary

    • Self-perception vs Perception by OthersSelf-perception and perception by others can differ significantly, with family and close friends often being more observant but less accurate than individuals themselves in determining personality traits.

      Self-perception and perception by others can vary significantly when it comes to assessing personality traits. Angela Duckworth, a psychologist, shared her thoughts on this topic during an episode of the No Stupid Questions podcast. She mentioned that people often have different views of themselves compared to how they are perceived by their family, colleagues, or friends. Duckworth explained that while family and close friends might be more accurate in their perception due to their broader perspective, they could also be more critical, not in a negative way, but in an observant one. During the discussion, Duckworth said that she's been thinking about this topic since her graduate school days. She recalled her first study as a graduate student where she gave self-report questionnaires about personality traits, including self-control, to middle school students. She also gave the same questionnaires to their teachers and parents in the informant report version. The results showed that parents had the least correlation with the self-reported data, meaning they were the least able to accurately determine their children's personality traits based on the questionnaires. This highlights the importance of recognizing the difference between self-perception and perception by others and the significance of various sources of information when evaluating personality traits.

    • Self-assessment perspectivesSeeking feedback from diverse sources, like 360-degree surveys, can provide a more accurate understanding of strengths and weaknesses, overcoming the limitations of individual perspectives.

      When it comes to evaluating ourselves or our children's personalities, it's essential to recognize that individual perspectives can greatly vary. Parents, for instance, may have a limited frame of reference compared to teachers or professionals who have interacted with numerous individuals. This can make it challenging for parents to objectively assess their children or themselves. The use of standardized scales or surveys can help provide some structure, but even with added descriptions, individual interpretations may still differ. One solution to this issue is seeking feedback from diverse sources, such as 360-degree feedback surveys that gather input from managers, peers, and direct reports. By gathering a well-rounded view from multiple perspectives, individuals can gain a better understanding of their strengths and weaknesses, and how they are perceived by others. Ultimately, recognizing the importance of seeking out diverse feedback and striving for objectivity can lead to more accurate self-assessments and personal growth.

    • 360-degree assessmentsAggregating multiple imperfect assessments can result in a stronger collective signal, providing a more accurate representation of an individual's strengths and weaknesses.

      While individual assessments, such as those from parents, teachers, or references, may be subject to biases and imperfections, the principle of aggregation in 360-degree assessments can result in a stronger collective signal. By averaging multiple imperfect assessments, the noise cancels out, providing a more accurate representation of an individual's strengths and weaknesses. Employers should continue to use 360 assessments and consider multiple references when making hiring decisions. Additionally, individuals may benefit from recognizing potential self-perception biases and seeking feedback from diverse sources to gain a more well-rounded understanding of themselves.

    • Self vs Informant Report on Personality TraitsDespite common belief, there's little difference between self-report and informant report on the Big Five personality traits, except for openness to experience where people tend to rate themselves higher. Self-awareness is crucial for effective teamwork and decision-making.

      A meta-analysis of over 30,000 data points across 150 samples found that there is not much difference between the average scores of people's self-report and informant report on the Big Five personality traits. Contrary to popular belief, there is not a significant self-serving bias when it comes to rating one's personality. However, there is an exception for the trait of openness to experience, where people tend to rate themselves higher than others do. Self-awareness, which is the ability to recognize one's own strengths and weaknesses, is important for effective teamwork and decision-making. Self-awareness can be challenging to measure, as it is a slippery concept. At work, teams function better when individuals have a good understanding of their own abilities and limitations, and can contribute and coordinate effectively with others.

    • Self-awareness and communicationSelf-awareness is essential for effective communication and personal growth, enabling individuals to accurately assess their abilities, manage behaviors, and receive constructive feedback from others.

      Self-awareness is crucial for effective communication and personal growth. The speaker shared examples of people who lacked self-awareness, such as close talkers and loud speakers, and how they struggled to give feedback to them. She also recalled a conversation with Paul D. Podesta about the importance of grit, impulse control, and self-awareness in world-class performance. Self-awareness allows individuals to accurately assess their own abilities, manage their behaviors, and receive constructive feedback from others. Giving feedback, especially to those who lack self-awareness, can be challenging but ultimately beneficial for both parties.

    • Self-awareness and Self-confidenceSelf-awareness is essential for recognizing strengths and weaknesses, but also understanding how context and situations shape others' perceptions of us is crucial for growth. Balancing self-awareness and self-confidence is key to achieving success.

      Self-awareness is crucial for personal and professional growth, but a healthy dose of self-confidence, or "swagger," can also be beneficial. Angela Duckworth, a psychology professor, discussed the importance of self-awareness in recognizing strengths and weaknesses, but also emphasized the need for understanding how context and situations shape how others perceive us. She shared an example from her graduate class where students discovered discrepancies between their self-perception and how others saw them. This exercise highlighted the importance of recognizing different aspects of ourselves in various contexts and being open to feedback. In essence, a balanced combination of self-awareness and self-confidence is essential for achieving success and growth.

    • Multiple selvesUnderstanding our emotions and experiences by focusing on the situations that evoke them can help us gain insight into our root causes and improve self-perception.

      People perceive us differently based on various contexts, and we all have multiple selves. As Michel de Montaigne, a philosopher, once said, "There is as much difference between us and ourselves as there is between us and other people." This idea of multiple selves means that we are complex beings, and we may exhibit different versions of ourselves in different situations. To better understand ourselves, it can be helpful to ask "what" instead of "why" when reflecting on our emotions and experiences. By focusing on the situations that evoke certain feelings, we can gain insight into the root causes and improve our self-perception.

    • Selves in different situationsEmbrace the diverse selves within us to bring out our best in various life chapters, rather than focusing solely on self-perception versus others' perceptions

      Our lives are composed of various selves that emerge in different situations. This idea was beautifully expressed by Barbara Tversky during a celebration of Daniel Kahneman's life, as she reminisced about the different "Dannies" she had known throughout their long collaboration. These selves ranged from the mercurial and excitable to the pessimistic and selfless. By recognizing and embracing the diverse selves within us, we can strive to bring out our best in different chapters of our lives. Rather than fixating on self-perception versus others' perceptions, it's essential to understand that there are multiple versions of ourselves, and we have the power to cultivate the ones we want to showcase. Angela's mention of the better-than-average effect and the fact check about Paul D. Podesta's name in "Moneyball" serve as reminders of the complexities of self-perception and the importance of being open to feedback and growth.

    • Volunteer opportunities for retireesRetirees and older adults can find rewarding experiences by volunteering in their community through programs like Read to Succeed and tax preparation assistance offered by organizations such as the Community Foundation and the United Way.

      There are numerous volunteer opportunities available for retirees and older adults in the community, providing a meaningful way to help others and stay engaged. Programs like Read to Succeed and tax preparation assistance through organizations such as the Community Foundation and the United Way offer rewarding experiences for those looking to give back. This was emphasized by listeners Millie Hubbard and David Lasseter. Remember, your thoughts on self-perception are welcome - send a voice memo to NSQ at freecanomics.com. Next week on No Stupid Questions, we'll discuss the rise of AI companionship. Stay tuned! No Stupid Questions is part of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which includes Freakonomics Radio, People I (Mostly) Admire, and the economics of everyday things. Our shows are produced by Stitcher and Renbud Radio. This episode was produced by Julie Kanfer, senior produced by me, Rebecca Lee Douglas, and mixed by Greg Rippen. Research assistance was provided by Daniel Moritz-Rabson. Our theme song was composed by Luis Guerra. Follow us on Twitter at MSQ_show, and send your questions to NSQ at freconomics.com. Visit freconomics.com/NSQ for more information and episode transcripts. Thanks for listening!

    Recent Episodes from No Stupid Questions

    211. Why Do We Listen to Sad Songs?

    211. Why Do We Listen to Sad Songs?

    What are Mike and Angela’s favorite songs to cry to? Can upbeat music lift you out of a bad mood? And what is Angela going to sing the next time she does karaoke?

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 15, 2024

    210. What Makes a Good Sense of Humor?

    210. What Makes a Good Sense of Humor?

    What is the evolutionary purpose of laughter? What’s the difference between Swedish depression and American depression? And why aren’t aliens interested in abducting Mike? 

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 08, 2024

    Why Are Stories Stickier Than Statistics? (Replay)

    Why Are Stories Stickier Than Statistics? (Replay)

    Also: are the most memorable stories less likely to be true? Stephen Dubner chats with Angela Duckworth in this classic episode from July 2020.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Pearl S. Buck, 20th-century American novelist.
      • Jack Gallant, professor of neuroscience and psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.
      • Steve Levitt, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Chicago, host of People I (Mostly) Admire, and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • George Loewenstein, professor of economics and psychology at Carnegie Mellon University.
      • Deborah Small, professor of marketing at Yale University.
      • Adin Steinsaltz, rabbi, philosopher, and author.
      • Diana Tamir, professor of neuroscience and psychology at Princeton University.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 06, 2024

    209. Why Do We Settle?

    209. Why Do We Settle?

    Why does the U.S. use Fahrenheit when Celsius is better? Would you quit your job if a coin flip told you to? And how do you get an entire country to drive on the other side of the road?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Christian Crandall, professor of psychology at the University of Kansas.
      • Stephen Dubner, host of Freakonomics Radio and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • Scott Eidelman, professor of psychology at the University of Arkansas.
      • David Hume, 18th century Scottish philosopher.
      • Ellen Langer, professor of psychology at Harvard University.
      • Steve Levitt, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Chicago, host of People I (Mostly) Admire, and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • John McWhorter, professor of linguistics, English, and comparative literature at Columbia University.
      • Mark Twain, 19-20th century American writer.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 01, 2024

    208. Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?

    208. Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?

    What happens when machines become funnier, kinder, and more empathetic than humans? Do robot therapists save lives? And should Angela credit her virtual assistant as a co-author of her book?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Robert Cialdini, professor emeritus of psychology at Arizona State University.
      • Reid Hoffman, co-founder and executive chairman of LinkedIn; co-founder and board member of Inflection AI.
      • Kazuo Ishiguro, novelist and screenwriter.
      • Ethan Mollick, professor of management and co-director of the Generative A.I. Lab at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Ann Patchett, author.
      • Kevin Roose, technology columnist for The New York Times and co-host of the podcast Hard Fork.
      • Niko Tinbergen, 20th-century Dutch biologist and ornithologist.
      • Lyle Ungar, professor of computer and information science at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • E. B. White, 20th-century American author.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 25, 2024

    207. How Clearly Do You See Yourself?

    207. How Clearly Do You See Yourself?

    Do you see yourself the same way others see you? What’s the difference between self-perception and self-awareness? And why do Mike and Angela both hate fishing?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Luis von Ahn, co-founder and C.E.O. of Duolingo; former chair of the board at Character Lab.
      • Paul DePodesta, chief strategy officer of the Cleveland Browns; former baseball executive.
      • Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.
      • Michel de Montaigne, 16th-century French philosopher.
      • Barbara Tversky, professor emerita of psychology at Stanford University and professor of psychology and education at Teachers College, Columbia University.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 18, 2024

    Why Do People Get Scammed? (Replay)

    Why Do People Get Scammed? (Replay)

    What makes a con succeed? Does snake oil actually work? And just how gullible is Angela?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Robert Cialdini, professor emeritus of psychology and marketing at Arizona State University.
      • Yaniv Hanoch, professor of decision sciences at University of Southampton.
      • Hugo Mercier, research scientist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research.
      • George Parker, 19-20th century American con artist.
      • Clark Stanley, 19th century American herbalist and quack doctor.
      • William Thompson, 19th century American criminal and con artist.
      • Danny Wallace, British filmmaker, comedian, writer, and actor.
      • Stacey Wood, professor of psychology at Scripps College.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 11, 2024

    206. When Is It Time to Step Aside?

    206. When Is It Time to Step Aside?

    Should government jobs have mandatory retirement ages? Is it foolish to care about your legacy? And why did Jason always call Angela’s father “Dr. Lee”?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • William Bridges, professor emeritus of American literature at Mills College, consultant, and author.
      • Arthur Brooks, professor of leadership at Harvard University.
      • Jimmy Carter, former President of the United States and founder of the Carter Center.
      • Erik Erikson, 20th-century psychoanalyst.
      • Craig Fox, professor of management at the University of California, Los Angeles.
      • Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.
      • Mitt Romney, U.S. Senator from Utah.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 04, 2024

    205. Where Do Values Come From?

    205. Where Do Values Come From?

    Do you get your principles from your parents — or in spite of them? Is there anything wrong with valuing conformity? And why doesn’t McDonald’s sell salads? 

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Erika James, dean of the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Olivia Rodrigo, singer-songwriter.
      • Shalom Schwartz, professor emeritus of psychology at the Hebrew ‎‎University of Jerusalem.
      • Thomas Talhelm, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 28, 2024

    204. What Happens When You’re Cut Off From All Human Contact?

    204. What Happens When You’re Cut Off From All Human Contact?

    How is the brain affected by solitary confinement? How would you deal with being stranded on a deserted island? And do baby monkeys make the best therapists? 

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 21, 2024